Andrey Alexeyenko M edical E pidemiology and B iostatistics Gene network approach in epidemiology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Systems Biology 3; Article number 140; doi: /msb
Advertisements

1 Harvard Medical School Mapping Transcription Mechanisms from Multimodal Genomic Data Hsun-Hsien Chang, Michael McGeachie, and Marco F. Ramoni Children.
Data Integration for Cancer Genomics. Personalized Medicine Tumor Board Question: given all we know about a patient, what is the “optimal” treatment?
Reported by R5 李霖昆 Supervised by 楊慕華 大夫 Genomics-Driven Oncology: Framework for an Emerging Paradigm Review article Journal of Clinical Oncology 31, 15,
TCGA(The cancer genome atlas) catalogue genetic mutations responsible for cancer, using genome sequencing and bioinformatics The TCGA is sequencing the.
MiRNA-drug resistance mechanisms Summary Hypothesis: The interplay between miRNAs, signaling pathways and epigenetic and genetic alterations are responsible.
Andrey Alexeyenko M edical E pidemiology and B iostatistics Network biology and cancer data integration.
FunCoup: reconstructing protein networks in the worm and other animals Andrey Alexeyenko, Erik Sonnhammer Stockholm Bioinformatics Center.
Expression signatures as biomarkers: solving combinatorial problems with gene networks Andrey Alexeyenko Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
Network-based stratification of tumor mutations Matan Hofree.
27803::Systems Biology1CBS, Department of Systems Biology Schedule for the Afternoon 13:00 – 13:30ChIP-chip lecture 13:30 – 14:30Exercise 14:30 – 14:45Break.
T Monday, June 15, 2015Monday, June 15, 2015Monday, June 15, 2015Monday, June 15, 2015.
Gene Co-expression Network Analysis BMI 730 Kun Huang Department of Biomedical Informatics Ohio State University.
Schedule for the Afternoon 13:00 – 13:30ChIP-chip lecture 13:30 – 14:30Exercise 14:30 – 14:45Break 14:45 – 15:15Regulatory pathways lecture 15:15 – 15:45Exercise.
Microarrays and Cancer Segal et al. CS 466 Saurabh Sinha.
ONCOMINE: A Bioinformatics Infrastructure for Cancer Genomics
Systems biology in cancer research. What is systems biology? = Molecular physiology? “… physiology is the science of the mechanical, physical, and biochemical.
27803::Systems Biology1CBS, Department of Systems Biology Schedule for the Afternoon 13:00 – 13:30ChIP-chip lecture 13:30 – 14:30Exercise 14:30 – 14:45Break.
Biological networks Construction and Analysis. Recap Gene regulatory networks –Transcription Factors: special proteins that function as “keys” to the.
Introduction to molecular networks Sushmita Roy BMI/CS 576 Nov 6 th, 2014.
3 rd Summer School in Computational Biology September 10, 2014 Frank Emmert-Streib & Salissou Moutari Computational Biology and Machine Learning Laboratory.
Comprehensive Gene Expression Analysis of Prostate Cancer Reveals Distinct Transcriptional Programs Associated With Metastatic Disease Kevin Paiz-Ramirez.
Presented by Karen Xu. Introduction Cancer is commonly referred to as the “disease of the genes” Cancer may be favored by genetic predisposition, but.
Experimental Design and Biospecimens David F. Ransohoff, MD Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Dept. of Medicine.
Knowledgebase Creation & Systems Biology: A new prospect in discovery informatics S.Shriram, Siri Technologies (Cytogenomics), Bangalore S.Shriram, Siri.
Gene Regulatory Network Inference. Progress in Disease Treatment  Personalized medicine is becoming more prevalent for several kinds of cancer treatment.
Gene Expression Data Qifang Xu. Outline cDNA Microarray Technology cDNA Microarray Technology Data Representation Data Representation Statistical Analysis.
Networks and Interactions Boo Virk v1.0.
Precision Medicine A New Initiative. The Concept of Precision Medicine (PM) The prevention and treatment strategies that take individual variability into.
Data Analysis Summary. Elephant in the room General Comments General understanding that informatics is integral in medical sequencing and other –omics.
Prognose mittels Genexpression Prof. Martin H. Brutsche Kantonsspital St. Gallen-CH.
BIOMARKERS Diagnostics and Prognostics. OMICS Molecular Diagnostics: Promises and Possibilities, p. 12 and 26.
Andrey Alexeyenko Functional analysis with pathways and networks.
Michael Birrer Ian McNeish New Developments in Biology and Targets of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
Computational biology of cancer cell pathways Modelling of cancer cell function and response to therapy.
Abstract Background: In this work, a candidate gene prioritization method is described, and based on protein-protein interaction network (PPIN) analysis.
Sample to Insight Alexander Kaplun, PhD Sep PGMD: a comprehensive pharmacogenomic database for personalized medicine and drug discovery.
COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF MULTILEVEL OMICS DATA FOR THE ELUCIDATION OF MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF CANCER Presented by Azeez Ayomide Fatai Supervisor: Junaid.
Using Predictive Classifiers in the Design of Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute.
By: Amira Djebbari and John Quackenbush BMC Systems Biology 2008, 2: 57 Presented by: Garron Wright April 20, 2009 CSCE 582.
ICNCT-16, June 2014, Helsinki Glioma heterogeneity and the L-Amino acid transporter-1 (LAT1): A first step to stratified BPA-based BNCT? D. Ngoga 1 ; C.
Lecture 11. Topics in Omic Studies (Cancer Genomics, Transcriptomics and Epignomics) The Chinese University of Hong Kong CSCI5050 Bioinformatics and Computational.
Introduction to biological molecular networks
Anthony Gitter Cancer Bioinformatics (BMI 826/CS 838) May 5, 2015
Cancers of the Digestive System November 19, 2007 NCDD Meeting Chair: John M. Carethers, MD Vice Chair: Robert Sandler, MD, MPH.
CBioPortal Web resource for exploring, visualizing, and analyzing multidimentional cancer genomics data.
Case Study: Characterizing Diseased States from Expression/Regulation Data Tuck et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 2006.
Network applications Sushmita Roy BMI/CS 576 Dec 9 th, 2014.
(1) Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Largest systematic study of genetic regulation in multiple tissues to date 53 tissues, 500+ donors, 9K samples, 180M.
Triple negative (TN) vs. positive (TP) breast cancer (BC) analysis with public genomic data yields AGR3 as a biomarker Anita Umesh, Jenny Park, James Shima,
Animal models of breast and prostate cancer “Advances in targeting cancer pathways” by Cinbo delegates MEDITERRANEAN SCHOOL OF ONCOLOGY 08 April 2016,
Annals of Oncology 23: 298–304, 2012 종양혈액내과 R4 김태영 / prof. 김시영.
Different microarray applications Rita Holdhus Introduction to microarrays September 2010 microarray.no Aim of lecture: To get some basic knowledge about.
 We investigated for biomarkers that distinguish metastatic or recurring disease with non-metastatic disease, with a particular focus on breast cancer.
Advances and challenges in computational modeling and statistical learning of biological systems Qi Liu Department of Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt.
Multi-scale network biology model & the model library 多尺度网络生物学模型 -- 兼论模型库的建立与应用 Jianghui Xiong 熊江辉
David Amar, Tom Hait, and Ron Shamir
EQTLs.
GENETIC BIOMARKERS.
A graph-based integration of multiple layers of cancer genomics data (Progress Report) Do Kyoon Kim 1.
Drivers, Passengers, and Biomarkers via Network Enrichment Analysis of Tumor Molecular Profiles Andrey Alexeyenko.
Gene expression.
Global Transcriptional Dysregulation in Breast Cancer
Microarray Technology and Applications
Dept of Biomedical Informatics University of Pittsburgh
The Genomics of Cancer and Molecular Testing:
Schedule for the Afternoon
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Diagnostics and Prognostics
Interactome Networks and Human Disease
Presentation transcript:

Andrey Alexeyenko M edical E pidemiology and B iostatistics Gene network approach in epidemiology

Network is just a graph! The fact that we can draw a network does not yet make it a biological reality!..

Why the network approach is an advancement compared to differential expression analysis? Functional context “Anchoring”, i.e. interdependence Biological interpretability Accounts for more statistical properties Data integration More data = flexibility!

Gene network discovery: high-throughput experiments

Bayesian inference: rps14 and rps8 functionally coupled rps14 and rps8 co- expressed P(C|E) = (P(C) * P(E|C)) / P(E) rps14 rps8 Gene network discovery: probabilistic data integration

FunCoup is a data integration framework to discover functional coupling A Human B Human ? Find orthologs* Mouse Worm Fly Yeast High-throughput evidence

Conversion “data pieces  confidence” in a Bayesian framework

Data components in FunCoup A

FunCoup: on-line interactome resource Andrey Alexeyenko and Erik L.L. Sonnhammer (2009) Global networks of functional coupling in eukaryotes from comprehensive data integration. Genome Research.

Gene network discovery: getting rid of spurious links Data processing inequality: “Direct links convey more information than indirect ones”

Mutations: distinguishing drivers from passengers Functional coupling transcription  transcription transcription  methylation methylation  methylation mutation  methylation mutation  transcription mutation  mutation + mutated gene

Network curation: cancer viewed by KEGG database curators

Prostate cancer: recapitulated by FunCoup

Network reconstruction: combination of methods

Combination of methods: edges with different features A Alexeyenko, DM Wassenberg, EK Lobenhofer, J Yen, ELL Sonnhammer, E Linney, JN Meyer (2010) Transcriptional response to dioxin in the interactome of developing zebrafish. PLoS One.

Verification of single gene lists Yellow diamonds : somatic mutations in prostate cancer Pink crosses: also mutated in glioblastome (TCGA)

Subtyping cancer. Personalized medicine. Power of clinical trials AZD 2281 Salt Lake City, UT, June 19, 2007— Myriad Genetics, Inc. today announced the start of two Phase II trials for a new compound being tested to treat patients with BRCA1 & BRCA2 positive breast and ovarian cancer.

Single molecular markers are often far from perfect. Combinations (signatures) should perform better. How to select optimal combinations? × Severity, Optimal treatment, Prognosis etc. Biomarker signatures in the network

Candidate signature in the network Biomarker candidates

Ready network-based signature RELAPSE = γ 1 EIF3S9 + γ 2 CRHR1 + γ 3 LYN + … + γ N KCNA5

Identical genotypes can go different ontogenetic ways Disease Gene a Protein A

Current gene expression results from inherited genotype, ontogenesis, and disease etiology Disease Physiological condition Birth Development Adult Gene a Gene Protein A

Pathway cross-talk

Analysis of cancer-specific wiring Pathway network of normal vs. tumor tissues Edges connect pathways given a higher ( N>9; p ) between them (seen as edge labels). Known pathways (circles) are classified as: signaling, metabolic, cancer, other disease. Blue lines: evidence from mRNA co- expression under normal conditions + ALL human & mouse data. Red lines: evidence from mRNA co- expression in expO tumor samples + ALL human data + mouse PPI. Node s i z e : number of pathway members in the network. Edge opacity : p 0. Edge t hi ck ne ss : number of gene- gene links.

Arrow of time: network prospective A Alexeyenko, DM Wassenberg, EK Lobenhofer, J Yen, ELL Sonnhammer, E Linney, JN Meyer (2010) Transcriptional response to dioxin in the interactome of developing zebrafish. PLoS One.

Thanks to: Erik Sonnhammer Martin Klammer Sanjit Roopra Joel Meyer Thank you for listening!

Summary: Predicting gene networks is realistic. Proposed applications: – Genetic heterogeneity of cancer – Communication between different cells, tissues, processes etc. – Evaluation of candidate biomarkers – Expression signatures Ask concrete practical questions, not global ones!

Prostate cancer a cancer regulatory network + proteomics (HPA) data Cyan: up-regulated in normal glandular cells Red/green: up/down-regulated in malignant cells Yellow&magenta: (potential) regulators of prostate cancer