Finding ST Sensors that cause CMN: A Follow up to TSC Meeting N. 215 Prof. J. Incandela UC Santa Barbara US CMS Tracker Project Leader Tracker Steering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clean Room Plans Monday, August 23, Hybrids--- Frames--- SensorsModules.
Advertisements

US CMS Silicon Tracker Project – Breakout session Overview - DOE/NSF Review Brookhaven - May 20, Incandela 1 CMS Si Tracker: Breakout Session Dept.
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 Faulty Channel Sources (TOB) Fault Sources (excluding cable breaks and CMN)  Hybrid-0.004%
Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – April 20, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara Dean White.
US Tracker Production Meeting, March 8, 2005 J. Incandela 1 Slides for the US Si Tracker Weekly Production Meeting J. Incandela March 8, 2005.
Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – July 20, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara UCSB Gantry Team: Andrea Allen Dave.
US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 1 Slides for the US Si Tracker Institutional Group Leaders Meeting J. Incandela March.
TOB Status Joe Incandela University of California, Santa Barbara For the TOB Group Tracker General Meeting Sep. 21, 2001 at CERN Slides courtesy of: A.
CMS Tracker Week – Gantry Meeting – 21 st October 2003 – Dean White 1 Status of the UCSB Gantry Dean White University of California Santa Barbara October.
US Production Report - September 4, Incandela 1 US Production Report CMS Tracker Steering Committee 4 September 2003 J. Incandela University of.
Slide 1X-Calibration Common Testing Issues-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, June 3, 2003 X-Calibration Common Testing Issues: Grounding, Environmental.
Recent TOB Developments First LT failure and Stereo Module Status J. Incandela With slides provided by E. Chabalina, A. Affolder, Dean White.
Status of the Tracker Outer Barrel J. Incandela University of California Santa Barbara for the TOB Group Tracker General Meeting December 7, 2005 Slides.
US CMS Silicon Tracker : Schedule J. Incandela University of California Santa Barbara US CMS Silicon Tracker Project Manager Fermilab PMG April 9, 2004.
Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – Febuary 10, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Status University of California Santa Barbara UCSB Gantry Team: Andrea Allen.
1 Module produced with low R int sensors-Anthony AffolderSensor Meeting, Feb 11, 2004 Modules Produced With Low R int Sensors Anthony Affolder UCSB.
Slide 1US silicon group meeting 5/6/2003 Hybrid Testing Status 10 new hybrids brought by Lenny all tested à 9 tested with no flaws à 1 had 1 chip + 1 wirebond.
4/25/2006 Puneeth Kalavase, UC, Santa Barbara On behalf of US Tracker Outer Barrel group Construction and Testing of CMS “Rods”
US Module and Rod Production Overview and Plan For the US CMS Tracker Group.
Slide 1Electrical Testing at UCSB -Anthony AffolderDOE review, January 20, 2004 Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids, Modules, & Rods Anthony Affolder On.
Schedule & Plans Prof. J. Incandela US CMS Tracker Project Leader DOE Visit January 20, 2004.
US Module Production Prof. J. Incandela US CMS Tracker Project Leader For the US CMS Tracker Group Tracker Meetings - CERN Feb. 13, 2004.
US Tracker Group Status Sep. 1, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.
1 US Testing Status-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, Dec. 11, 2003 Update of US Testing Status Anthony Affolder On behalf of the US testing group.
UCSB Encapsulation Studies UC Santa Barbara Based upon a 6 week study by F. Garberson in collaboration with A. Affolder, J. Incandela, S. Kyre and many.
CMS Week – UCSB Gantry Status – June 8, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara UCSB Gantry Team: Andrea Allen Dave Staszak.
1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 US Module Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group) Update.
Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April DS ROD Prototype: “final” optohybrids “final” CCUM integrated in the rod with new FEC_to_CCUM adapter (Guido.
Identifying anomalous strips David Stuart, Noah Rubinstein University of California, Santa Barbara June 18,
Slide 1Susanne KyreDOE review, January 20, 2004 Wirebonding for TOB and TEC Susanne Kyre University of California, Santa Barbara.
Status Brussels GANTRY Ê Assembly of R3 modules (36 modules) 4 precision of the modules 4 problems with DataBase (not adapted for single sensor modules)
Humidity effects in SSD Mino for SSD 1 WRC meeting - 1/3/2011.
CMS Week, CERN, September Sep 2003CMS Week - Module ProductionSalvatore Costa - Catania Executive summary from Bonding WG Meeting 16 Sep.
Tracker Week, CERN, Oct Oct 2003Tracker Week - Module ProductionSalvatore Costa - Catania Executive summary from Bonding WG Meeting 21 Oct.
Guido_Tonelli / CMS_TSC / 5 February Time stability of ST sensors The problem The sensors re-measuring campaign Failure analysis Conclusions.
Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)
July, 2002CMS Tracker Electronics1 APV25 wafer testing Outline Mark Raymond, Imperial College Wafer test procedure speed improvements.
FNAL Production Experience
APV Lectures APV FE Basic Building Blocks How Our Testing Works
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
Update of US Testing Status
APV Lectures APV FE Basic Building Blocks How Our Testing Works
UCSB Testing 3 Stereo Modules Tested 1 SS6 Module Tested
Results from module testing
Vienna Module Production
Module Failures on RODs
FNAL Module Testing Status
On behalf of the US TOB testing group
US Testing Mailing List
US Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group)
The measurement set-up
Noise in TOB modules and sensor quality
Hybrid Testing Status 10 new hybrids brought by Lenny all tested
UCSB Qualification Module Grading
Hybrid Status/Deliveries
Sensor probing (Summary)
First UCSB TEC Module (Pictures)
CORRELATION BETWEEN LEAKAGE CURRENT AND NOISE
Modules Produced With Low Rint Sensors
Anthony Affolder UC Santa Barbara
Noise in TOB modules and sensor quality
Electrical Testing at UCSB: Hybrids, Modules, & Rods
Is Increased Bias Current and CMN Correlated?
Current Necessary for CMN Problem
Recent TOB Developments
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
Recent TOB Developments
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
FNAL Hybrid Testing Status
Presentation transcript:

Finding ST Sensors that cause CMN: A Follow up to TSC Meeting N. 215 Prof. J. Incandela UC Santa Barbara US CMS Tracker Project Leader Tracker Steering Committee Meeting Number 216 March 4, 2004 These slides were prepared with the help of Tony Affolder and are based upon work done this past week by the dedicated efforts of the UCSB production group

TSC No.216 March 4, J. Incandela 2 Is Increased Bias Current and CMN Correlated? As of TSC #215 held on Feb , UCSB had in stock 22 sensors which upon reprobing showed a current change of  I > 1.5  A These sensors were probed both at UCSB and U Rochester with uniform results (like many of those reported on this last tracker week) We ordered these sensors by increasing  I We built 8 modules with 9 of these sensors We picked every other sensor in the ordered list starting with the one with the lowest  I The sensor with large  I was always placed in position furthest from hybrid in module construction 1 module was built with 2 “bad” sensors 6 of 8 modules have common mode noise Of the two modules without common mode noise: The “bad” sensor had < 2  A of increased current Increased noise is seen around a known, and hence unbonded, pinhole The other module now has current consistent with QTC measurement after construction We expect ~11 of the 13 sensors remaining from the original 22 will cause CMN in modules

TSC No.216 March 4, J. Incandela Sensors Channels 442 at 80V Increased bias current seen at 60V in sensor reprobing

TSC No.216 March 4, J. Incandela Sensors Channels 203 at 70V Increased bias current seen at 30V in sensor reprobing 251 at 130V Increased bias current seen at 130V in sensor reprobing

TSC No.216 March 4, J. Incandela Sensors Channels at 150V Increased bias current seen at 250V in sensor reprobing

TSC No.216 March 4, J. Incandela Sensors Channels at 200V Increased bias current seen at 220V in sensor reprobing

TSC No.216 March 4, J. Incandela Sensors Channels 505,506 at 350V Increased bias current seen at 400V in sensor reprobing

TSC No.216 March 4, J. Incandela Sensors Channels 280, 281 at 250V Increased bias current seen at 250V in sensor reprobing

TSC No.216 March 4, J. Incandela 9 Updated Correlation Plot All CMN modules built at UCSB to date: 12 of 13 sensors with  I >3  A caused common mode noise 2 of 9 modules with  I between 2-3  A caused common mode noise

TSC No.216 March 4, J. Incandela 10 Conclusions The correlation is strong and it is at the same level first seen last summer. It is no fluke. It is therefore not at all difficult to identify affected sensors.