Summary Ted Liu, FNAL Feb. 9 th, 2005 L2 Pulsar 2rd IRR Review, ICB-2E, video: 82Pulsar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMS Week March presented by John Coughlan RAL FED Hardware Status Pre-Series Manufacture Final Production Plans.
Advertisements

 Project Overview & System Integration Ted Liu June 11th, 2004 Fermilab, High Rise, Hornet Nest Pulsar Meeting.
Final Commissioning Plan and Schedule Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Installation Readiness Review 09/27/2004 Outline: - Work to be done during shutdown - Work.
Slink TX Slink merger Teststand setup Slink merger firmware and testing Firmware features - DAQ RAMs for saving out input and output data - Possible to.
June 19, 2002 A Software Skeleton for the Full Front-End Crate Test at BNL Goal: to provide a working data acquisition (DAQ) system for the coming full.
B. Hirosky Jan 5 ‘01 L2ßeta: Current Focus Last Friday’s meeting at UMD: Bob Hirosky, Drew Baden, Rob Bard, John Giganti Discussed details of various SBC.
The LAr ROD Project and Online Activities Arno Straessner and Alain, Daniel, Annie, Manuel, Imma, Eric, Jean-Pierre,... Journée de réflexion du DPNC Centre.
Introduction Ted Liu, FNAL Feb. 9 th, 2005 L2 Pulsar 2rd IRR Review, ICB-2E, video: 82Pulsar
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
A presentation by Angela Little SULI Program 8/4/04 Pulsar Boards and the Level II Trigger Upgrade at CDF.
1 Pulsar firmware status March 12th, 2004 Overall firmware status Pulsar Slink formatter Slink merger Muon Reces SVT L2toTS Transmitters How to keep firmware.
1 Pulsar firmware status June 11th, 2004 Slink format Transmitter firmware Transmitter firmware status Receiver firmware overview Receiver firmware status.
HCAL FIT 2002 HCAL Data Concentrator Status Report Gueorgui Antchev, Eric Hazen, Jim Rohlf, Shouxiang Wu Boston University.
Using the Trigger Test Stand at CDF for Benchmarking CPU (and eventually GPU) Performance Wesley Ketchum (University of Chicago)
13 January All Experimenters’ MeetingAlan L. Stone - Louisiana Tech University1 Data Taking Statistics Week of 2003 January 6-12 We had to sacrifice.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
MICE CM26 March '10Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM25 o DAQ System Upgrade o Luminosity Monitors o Sequels of.
Pulsar System Overview and Commissioning Plan Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Installation Readiness Review 02/08/2005 Outline: - Items from last review - Pulsar.
Burkard Reisert June 11 th, 2004 Fermilab, High Rise, Hornet Nest Pulsar Meeting Ted’s overview talk: Pulsar production/testing success !  all hardware.
14 Sep 2005DAQ - Paul Dauncey1 Tech Board: DAQ/Online Status Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Cluster Finder Report Laura Sartori (INFN Pisa) For the L2Cal Team Chicago, Fermilab, Madrid, Padova, Penn, Pisa, Purdue.
Design and Performance of a PCI Interface with four 2 Gbit/s Serial Optical Links Stefan Haas, Markus Joos CERN Wieslaw Iwanski Henryk Niewodnicznski Institute.
Technical Part Laura Sartori. - System Overview - Hardware Configuration : description of the main tasks - L2 Decision CPU: algorithm timing analysis.
Commissioning Experience and Status Burkard Reisert (FNAL) L2 installation readiness review:
Muon Electronics Upgrade Present architecture Remarks Present scenario Alternative scenario 1 The Muon Group.
Svtsim status Bill Ashmanskas, CDF simulation meeting, Main authors: Ashmanskas, Belforte, Cerri, Nakaya, Punzi Design goals/features: –main.
For more information on Pulsar board: Burkard Reisert (FNAL) Nov. 7 th, 2003 PULSAR Production Readiness.
17 February All Experimenters’ MeetingAlan L. Stone - Louisiana Tech University1 Data Taking Statistics Week of 2003 February Dedicated some.
L2 Upgrade review 19th June 2007Alison Lister, UC Davis1 XFT Monitoring + Error Rates Alison Lister Robin Erbacher, Rob Forrest, Andrew Ivanov, Aron Soha.
5/7/2004Tomi Mansikkala User guide for SVT/XTRP TX firmware v1.0 XTRP out Control FPGA Tomi: - Introduction - Control bit descriptions - Test Pattern format.
Simple ideas on how to integrate L2CAL and L2XFT ---> food for thoughts Ted May 25th, 2007.
Status of NA62 straw electronics Webs Covers Services Readout.
John Coughlan Tracker Week October FED Status Production Status Acceptance Testing.
LHCb front-end electronics and its interface to the DAQ.
Tracker Week October CCLRC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxon, UK Imperial College, London, UK Brunel University,
Project Overview Ted Liu Fermilab Sept. 27 th, 2004 L2 Pulsar upgrade IRR Review
NTOF DAQ status D. Macina (EN-STI-EET) Acknowledgements: EN-STI-ECE section: A. Masi, A. Almeida Paiva, M. Donze, M. Fantuzzi, A. Giraud, F. Marazita,
L2 Status and Plan Matt Worcester, Heather Ray, Monica Tecchio, Myron Campbell, Jane Nachtman, David Saltzberg, Tom Wright, Steve Kuhlmann, Karen Byrum,
Trigger Commissioning Workshop, Fermilab Monica Tecchio Aug. 17, 2000 Level 2 Calorimeter and Level 2 Isolation Trigger Status Report Monica Tecchio University.
Online monitor for L2 CAL upgrade Giorgio Cortiana Outline: Hardware Monitoring New Clusters Monitoring
New L2cal hardware and CPU timing Laura Sartori. - System overview - Hardware Configuration: a set of Pulsar boards receives, preprocess and merges the.
Pulsar Status For Peter. L2 decision crate L1L1 TRACKTRACK SVTSVT CLUSTERCLUSTER PHOTONPHOTON MUONMUON Magic Bus α CPU Technical requirement: need a FAST.
ATLAS TDAQ RoI Builder and the Level 2 Supervisor system R. E. Blair, J. Dawson, G. Drake, W. Haberichter, J. Schlereth, M. Abolins, Y. Ermoline, B. G.
Pulsar Status Report Ted Liu Friday Trigger Meeting, May 10th. 02 PULSAR: PULSer And Recorder Pulsar design overview:  from L2 teststand tool to a general.
1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.
J. Linnemann, MSU 2/12/ L2 Status James T. Linnemann MSU PMG September 20, 2001.
Can we tag on SVT at L2? Bill Ashmanskas, CDF TDSWG meeting, SVT has been producing fitted tracks since April Resolution has improved, fake.
TEL62 AND TDCB UPDATE JACOPO PINZINO ROBERTO PIANDANI CERN ON BEHALF OF PISA GROUP 14/10/2015.
L2TS and Plan for Integration Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab Pulsar Meeting 06/11/2004.
L2toTS Status and Phase-1 Plan and Pulsar S-LINK Data Format Cheng-Ju Lin Fermilab L2 Trigger Upgrade Meeting 03/12/2004.
L2 CAL Status Vadim Rusu For the magnificent L2CAL team.
1 Programming of FPGA in LiCAS ADC for Continuous Data Readout Week 6 Report Wednesday 6 th August 2008 Jack Hickish.
Pulsar Hardware Status Burkard Reisert (FNAL) March, 14 th 2003.
ATLAS RoI Builder + CDF ● Brief reminder of ATLAS Level 2 ● Opportunities for CDF (what fits - what doesn't) ● Timescales (more of what fits and what doesn't)
1 Status of Validation Board, Selection Board and L0DU Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, 19 Dec 2006.
News and Related Issues Ted & Kirsten May 27, 2005 TDWG News since last meeting (April 29th) Organization Issues: how to improve communication Future Plans:
E. Hazen1 New DCC Status and Plans Jim Rohlf, Eric Hazen, Arno Heister, Phil Lawson, Jason St John, Shouxiang Wu Boston University.
Initial check-out of Pulsar prototypes
CLAS12 DAQ & Trigger Status
ATLAS calorimeter and topological trigger upgrades for Phase 1
Enrico Gamberini for the GTK WG TDAQ WG Meeting June 01, 2016
CMS Tracker Electronics
Update on CSC Endcap Muon Port Card
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
Pulsar WG Meeting (C-J Lin)
Evolution of S-LINK to PCI interfaces
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
L2 CPUs and DAQ Interface: Progress and Timeline
The Road Warrior: first use of the Pulsar for SVT
Presentation transcript:

Summary Ted Liu, FNAL Feb. 9 th, 2005 L2 Pulsar 2rd IRR Review, ICB-2E, video: 82Pulsar Materials for the review will be available at:

Summary Preparation work in (the rest of ) Feb Readiness for Operation in March Back up slides: future system performance optimization

Q&A Are we ready for operation?  We are getting very close  Pulsar system is already robust  Pulsar crate running for half year and has been reliable  Better performance (than legacy) at high luminosity  has been running in auto-reject mode with system since Feb.2 (2005)  Already in “Operation Mode”! We do have (limited) experience on Pulsar hardware/firmware reliability: RunIIa Muon Pulsar has been in the system since Sept, We have never had to touched it and no single error so far. No single Pulsar board failure in the past few years (~40 extensively used)

There are still work to do Most important action items (the rest of the month):  Fully test the new readout code in coming week  Have PulsarMon TL2D checking code fully ready ASAP  PulsarMon has been a wonderful success!  Request a few long beam runs, at different luminosities with Pulsar driving alpha auto-reject. Compare TL2D bit by bit and study timing performance  ACE web page and online monitoring with CO instructions performance can be further improved of course: see backup slides on near/long term improvements It takes time to optimize a new system…and this is a flexible system

Operation readiness in March Most important:  Run for one week with Alpha driving, Pulsar auto-reject  PulsarMon TL2D checking bit by bit, if ok  Request run for two weeks with Pulsar driving & alpha auto-reject, with PulsarMon checking TL2D bit by bit, event by event To make a system more or less working is not hard, to have zero error is hard, to keep it that way could be harder…

Summary Pulsar L2 running with system since Feb 02, 2005 Decision/Control node software working in beam Initial study indicates that performance better than Alpha at high luminosity (~ 1 x 10**32), but a few us behind Alpha at lower luminosity due to long ShowerMax latency (alpha does not wait for SMX data). At high luminosity, Muon/XTRP latency is longer than SMX. System needs more testing in beam in the next few weeks Many ways to improve the performance in near future… (all can be done in parasitic mode once in operation) Goal is still March, 2005

Backup slides Just in case people are interested, the rest of slides are for future performance improvements of the Pulsar system

Possible system performance optimization, near term (summer) Deliver SMX data on a 3rd S32PCI64  send SMX merger data into another S32PCI64  CPU no longer waits for SMX data (similar to alpha case) Have done a quick test with beam (parasitically) last week, for events do not require SMX, the decision time is ~ few us faster Issue to be solved: due to simple PCI handling, introduce extra latency for events that do need SMX (1-2 us)  due to: PCI read/write for another S32PCI64… Possible solution: modify the firmware to change “request FIFO” to “request RAM”, only configure it once for 4 events Contacted CERN experts, to see if there are simpler/quicker ways to improve the interface performance

RAM Change request FIFO  RAM Same family FPGA used as on Pulsar

Plan for system performance optimization long term Use FILAR cards instead of S32PCI64  Remove the final merger, data directly goes into FILAR  Replace Reces merger with another FILAR  Also allow us to run SLINK faster: 40 MHz  60 MHz  Should reduce the latency by more than ~ 4 us  Run in multi-events request mode, expect better performance at higher luminosity/L1A rate  Already have one FILAR in hand  Need PCI software work, Kristian already started  Plan to have Sakari full time on the case soon

FILAR can improve the system latency  Higher bandwidth, less latency overhead 64-bit/66MHz PCI bus, four 2 Gbit/s S-LINK channels Reduced PCI protocol overhead (compare to S32PCI64)

L1 muon L1 XTRP L1 trigger L2 CAL (CLIST/Iso) PreFred ShowMax (RECES) PC SLINK TS SVT Muon Cluster Electron Merger SVT L2toTS System with FILARs Pulsar pre-processors Pulsar has two SLINK outputs, one will be used to develop system with FILARs parasitically…

L1 muon L1 XTRP L1 trigger L2 CAL (CLIST/Iso) PreFred ShowMax (RECES) PC SLINK TS SVT Muon Cluster Electron Merger SVT L2toTS To keep things simple: (1)Waiting for Reces data (2)Very simple PCI handling  Different from alpha case  Not optimal timing performance Baseline for operation Pulsar pre-processors