UCA International Users Group The Quality Assurance Program prepared by the UCA ® International Users Group Testing Subcommittee UPDATED: 28 July 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing a New Accreditation Program in the U.S.
Advertisements

GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
PRINCIPLES OF A CALIBRATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Quality Label and Certification Processes Vienna Summit 11 April 2014 Karima Bourquard Director of Interoperability IHE-Europe.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
FIPS 201 Personal Identity Verification For Federal Employees and Contractors National Institute of Standards and Technology Information Technology Laboratory.
DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) Phase III – Validation Thomas Howard Chris Pierce.
For OpenSG Discussion: Preliminary SG-Enterprise Charter Greg Robinson, Co-Chair, SG-Enterprise Wayne Longcore, Chair, SG-Enterprise.
Secure System Administration & Certification DITSCAP Manual (Chapter 6) Phase 4 Post Accreditation Stephen I. Khan Ted Chapman University of Tulsa Department.
Quality Manual for Interoperability Testing Morten Bruun-Rasmussen Presented by Jos Devlies, Eurorec.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
5.2 Personnel Use competent staff Supervise as necessary
Advocating BACnet Advocating BACnet Jim Lee. BACnet Advocacy and Testing b BACnet Manufacturers Association b BACnet Testing Laboratories b BACnet Interest.
CIM Users Group Intro and Benefits Ralph Mackiewicz Chair, Marketing Subcommittee UCA International Users Group October 2007 Austin, TX
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
NVLAP Overview and Accreditation Process March 2006.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
April 11, 2007 Prepared by the North American Energy Standards Board 1 North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development Process.
US NITRD LSN-MAGIC Coordinating Team – Organization and Goals Richard Carlson NGNS Program Manager, Research Division, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing.
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
1 Proposed PLCS TC Organization and Functional Responsibilities Revision
November 9-10, 2009 UCA IUG Testing Subcommittee Report Testing Subcommittee Report UCAI Users Group Meeting Charlotte, Nc, USA November 9-10, 2009 Bruce.
Interoperability Tests for IEC Scott Neumann November 12, 2009.
“Integrating Standards in Practice” 10th Open Forum on Metadata Registries July 9-11, 2007 New York City, NY USA An international conference to share and.
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
Roles and Responsibilities
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
OpenSG and Conformity Bruce Muschlitz EnerNex Corporation Knoxville October 2009.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
1 Synchronize work on DEXs and reference data between PLCS pilots and OASIS/PLCS - Proposed PLCS TC Organization and Functional Responsibilities.
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
OpenSG Conformity IPRM Overview July 20, ITCA goals under the IPRM at a high level and in outline form these include: Organize the Test and Certification.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All SMART GRID ICT: SECURITY, INTEROPERABILITY & NEXT STEPS John O’Neill, Senior Project Manager CSA.
UCAIug Annual Meeting 2009 November 9 th – 10 th, 2009 EPRI Office Charlotte, NC.
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
普 华 永 道 Phase 1: Project Preparation Phase 1: Project Preparation Phase Overview Phase Overview.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE REMJA WORKING GROUP ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND EXTRADITION.
25 August UCA International Users Group Testing Quality Assurance Program Funding Issues 25 August 2010/ Updated 12 October 2010 Jack Robinson,
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Status Briefing Americas Aerospace Quality Group (AAQG) Registration Management Committee (RMC) Tim Lee – Chair The.
© 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved For Internal MITRE Use Addressing ISO-RTO e-MARC Concerns: Clarifications and Ramifications Response.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
ARIP Technical Committee Convener Call 07 April
CTI Technical Committee Convener Call 11 May
WG Summaries Austin, TX October 24, Process WG Co-chairs: Terry Saxton & Ed Dobrowolski Scope: Overall management of the CIMug Development and tuning.
1 The GCC Metrology Group GULFMET Mohammad Al Mulla GSO - Building for Integration
It was found in 1946 in Geneva, Switzerland. its main purpose is to promote the development of international standards to facilitate the exchange of goods.
1 May 30, 2007 U.S. – China Symposium on Active Industry Participation in Standardization Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC.
Open Smart Grid (OpenSG) Technical Committee Plenary October 20, 2009.
ELECTRONIC SERVICES & TOOLS Strategic Plan
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Dr. Trevor Smith Chair ISO/TC 176 Quality Management & Quality Assurance Worldwide Quality Director Global Manufacturing & Logistics Eastman Kodak Company.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
LECTURE 5 Nangwonvuma M/ Byansi D. Components, interfaces and integration Infrastructure, Middleware and Platforms Techniques – Data warehouses, extending.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
Security Methods and Practice Principles of Information Security, Fourth Edition CET4884 Planning for Security Ch5 Part I.
International Planetary Data Alliance Registry Project Update September 16, 2011.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
Financial System Upgrade Agency Change Champion Deployment Session March 16 th, 2006.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Testing Technical Committee Paris, France August 24, 2010
Global Solar Certification Network
Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC
Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal
PSS verification and validation
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

UCA International Users Group The Quality Assurance Program prepared by the UCA ® International Users Group Testing Subcommittee UPDATED: 28 July 2008 Jack Robinson: UCA International Users Group Secretary Bruce Muschlitz: Chair Testing Subcommittee Marco C. Janssen: editor of the QAP

International Users Group Mission Advancing interoperability for the utility enterprise by providing a global forum in which stakeholders can work cooperatively as members of a common organization to support international standards: Educational Activities Improvement Process for International Standards Testing and Certification Promotional Activities

International Users Group Charter Not-for-Profit International Consortium Utilities and Vendors working together in support of international standards Over 109 Members From 26 Countries: IEC TC 57 Members (Editors and Conveners of IEC 61850, CIM and OpenAMI/DR) Vendors of Control and Substation Automation Products Utility Buyers of 61850, CIM and OpenAMI/DR Products Testers and Certification Providers Consultants, Universities, Research Facilities

Broad Technical Focus Utility enterprises are complex and cross many functional boundaries Promoting interoperability in the utility enterprise requires a similarly broad focus UCA IUG uniquely offers members an organization to promote standardization across several functional areas

UCA IUG – Technical Focus Communications –IEC – Substation Automation –IEC based extensions for wind, hydro, distributed generation, etc. Application Integration –Common Information Model (CIM) IEC and IEC –Generic Interface Definition (GID) IEC Metering and Demand Response –OpenAMI – Information/data models, reference designs and interoperability guidelines based on IntelliGrid and IEC standards. ONE MEMBERSHIP

The Users Group and Testing The Users Group strongly supports testing Focus for testing is now on devices and systems developed in conformance with IEC Standards Users Group works closely with the IEC for problem resolution and tracking (e.g. WG 10 members are all in the IEC Technical Issues Users Group Subcommittee) Testing procedures, requirements and guidelines: –Quality Assurance of performed activities –Traceability of results

Testing Subcommittee IEC Test Procedures WG OpenDR Test Procedures WG Testing TSC Org Chart CIM Test Procedures WG

AEP A. Clark EPRI J.Hughes Co-Chair EnerNex B.Muschlitz Co-Chair KCA J.Robinson Secretary Triangle/ MicroWorks G.Schimmel SISCO H.Falk CIM Member DR Member Testing Subcommittee Testing SC

Committee / Working Group Editors/ Representatives Testing Quality Assurance Program Editor: Marco Janssen (UTInnovation) CIM Document Editors Tester Accreditation Task Force (unique to each area) IEC Document Editors: –Tester System Accreditation: Willem Strabbing (KEMA) –Server Product Test Procedures: Richard Schimmel (KEMA) –Client Product Test Procedures: Richard Schimmel (KEMA)

Testing Web Site Support Testing Subcommittee / WG Areas (Meeting Agenda’s / Minutes, Draft Documents, Issues Discussion, Action Items, Tasks, Events) Member Only Testing Documents (Corporate Access) –Quality Assurance Program and Addendums –Product Test Procedures –Tester Accreditation Procedures Public Documents –QAP Overview/ Testing White Papers –Tester Certification (IEC 61850) –Testing Completed (IEC 61850) (Posted Certificates)

The Users Group and Quality Assurance for Testing A Quality Assurance Program (QAP) for IEC Product Testing and Test System Accreditation and Recognition is a major benefit to the members and is expected to save time and money for participants The QAP allows for the continuous improvement of test centers, test systems and the international standards The Users Group QAP identifies the means to quickly resolve IEC specification problems and, through IEC coordination, provides the vehicle for later update of IEC standards following IEC charter rules

Concepts of the QAP Feedback is essential –To keep all informed –To make sure standards are correct and well understood –To quickly resolve problems uncovered during testing Process is decentralized –All activities relating to testing are performed individually by parties that may be other than the UCA ® International Users Group –UCA ® International Users Group plays a major role in coordinating and managing information dissemination The process provides value for all who participate, and a strategy to bring all stakeholders together (users, vendors, testers, consultants).

QAP - The Development Process IEC TC57 Working Groups Product Development Test System Development Test Labs Projects Test SystemsTested Products Success Specifications Test Cases Products

QAP - The Quality Assurance Process IEC TC57 Working Groups Vendor Manufacturer System Integrator Test System Developers Test Labs Projects (Users) All Parties Need Feedback Difficult to Coordinate QAP Realistic Coordination

Standards Improvement Technical Issues (TISSUES) TISSUES Initiator s 1st Proposal “green” TISSUES “yellow” TISSUES Final Proposal 100% approval Resp. GoE member will create 1st proposal & distribute to GoE After discussion a final proposal is distributed to TISSUES group for vote. Selected and distributed to the responsible member of Group of Experts (GoE) Could be a short term fix IEC TC57 WG10

The Contents of the QAP Roles of: –Standards organization –Product development –Test cases, test system development, test systems and test laboratories –Projects Rules, requirements and procedures for exchange of information between them –Input from and to: Vendors, manufacturers and system integrators for product development Test laboratories Vendors, manufacturers and system integrators for projects Users for projects

The contents of the QAP (cont'd) QAP Maintenance Problem reporting and handling –Standard problem report –Formal procedure for initial evaluation, proposals for resolution and resolution and formal reporting of solutions and determine which developers are involved –Short term recommendation to user(s) and vendor(s) on how to proceed –Process to upgrade the documents and/or test systems associated with the problem Mechanism for identification, registration and publication of interoperability problems and the resolutions within various revisions/errata of IEC standards as well as specific revisions of the test systems and lab certified devices

The contents of the QAP (cont'd) Organization and infrastructure –Users Group Executive and Technical Committees –Audits Authority to organize and/or perform audits at testing organizations participating in the UCA ® International Users Group QAP To verify the set up, implementation and use of the required quality system. Periodically or upon request from a UCA ® International Users Group member with notice and mutually agreeable time schedule and agenda. –Confidentiality of documents and information In general testing results owned and controlled by testers and vendors Results reported back to UCA ® International Users Group and are considered public information for dissemination to Members Field problems carry the level of confidentiality as designated by the reporting company

The contents of the QAP (cont'd) Organization and infrastructure –Information sharing Amongst UCA ® International Users Group Members in accordance with the confidentiality guidelines Primary sharing vehicle is the Users Group web site under access and password control Public areas available to any one who visits the web site * Confidential areas open to Users Group Members Private Forum open to committee or working group members * =

The contents of the QAP (cont'd) Procedures, requirements and guidelines for the realization of tests including definitions for:  test configurations  conformance test procedures / steps / results  the conformance test process  standard test procedure groups  IEC conformance blocks  test case list  test report  test procedures  control of testing organizations and systems  planning of tests  test definitions and set up  formal and informal testing  the use of test tools  re-testing  self testing  procurement steps  test architecture / system configuration  test architecture for conformance  what is to be conformance tested?

The contents of the QAP (cont'd) Test Procedures –Detailed test procedures for IEC Device Testing Used by testing organizations Maintained by the UCA ® International Users Group Contains Abstract Test Cases, based on IEC Part 10 –Certification done by test centers, users and test vendors (No direct certification of devices by Users Group) –Any qualified facility may issue a “Product Certificate” –Users Group maintains certified devices list on the web site –Users / vendors that submitted the device for test own the detailed test report / results

The contents of the QAP (cont'd) Control of Conformance and Interoperability –Starts with accreditation and recognition of testing organizations –No minimum conditions IEC protocol functionality to be supported in order to get a certificate –Certificate remains valid as long as the owner follows the Users Group guidelines specified in the QAP –Users Group maintains record of all tested and all tested and certified products and systems including the references to the documents and their respective versions that the tests performed were based upon –Arbitrator role for the Testing Committee

The contents of the QAP (cont'd) Resolution of Problems resulting from Testing –Testing must be documented, repeatable, and results comparable across tested equipment / applications –QAP provides process for problem tracking, analysis, and resolution of tests, standards, and implementation agreements –Users Group assists testing organizations in Maintaining problem reports Resolving specification conflicts Modifying the standards as problems are uncovered Maintaining lists of certified products Ensuring the testing facilities keep up their qualifications per approved test procedures

The contents of the QAP (cont'd) Resolution of Problems resulting from Testing –Access to QAP and problem information, along with key technical detail for users, product developers and integrators –Status evaluation of own devices against a ‘non-aligned’ technical resource that presents an unbiased interpretation of the problems and possible resolutions –Participation in the problem feedback process by Approved Testers –Information on problems uncovered in the field by vendors who receive device certificates from approved testers –Vendors and testers shall include in their users and quality assurance manuals, a problem identification, resolution and reporting process that includes the UCA ® International Users Group feedback step

The contents of the QAP (cont'd) Improvement Process –In accordance with the ISO 9000 series of standards, the UCA ® International Users Group strives for continuous process improvement –The community including members and non-members of the UCA ® International Users Group are invited to use the mechanisms for providing feedback –In accordance with the procedures laid down in the QAP the UCA ® International Users Group will facilitate improvements.

Other Available Testing Documents Test Center Accreditation and Recognition Procedure for IEC Device Testing (Test System Accreditation) Conformance test for IEC Servers (Device Test Procedures) Testing of CIM Products (Draft by the CIM group) CIM Compliance Document/ Conformance Testing Requirements Conformance test for IEC Clients

Test System Accreditation Describes the procedure to qualify test centers Conditions that test centers should comply to in order to certify IEC based products and attach an Users Group label to the tested product To Date: There are 3 Users Group approved Test Centers for IEC Products: KEMA, Nari-Relays and ABB Tested device vendors (receiving certificates) participate in the Users Group Quality Assurance Program

Device Test Procedures Conformance test procedures and results in general and in detail (IEC Example)

Testing Milestones AEP/UG Testing Workshop (May 05: Demo of Testing Capability, Tools, and Rollout of the QAP) QAP Version 2.6 (March 2007) –Update for General Quality Assurance Program –Addendum for IEC (June 2008) –Addendum for CIM and OpenAMI/DR (in preparation) Tester Certification IEC –KEMA –ABB (Recognized) –Nari-Relays (Recognized) Device Testing IEC Server Procedures Rev 2.2 (October 2007) Testing Completed (IEC 61850) for 12 Vendors and 79 Products (posted on Web Site)

Testing Current Plans QAP Version 2.X –Addendum for CIM –Addendum for OpenAMI/DR Tester Certification IEC 6185 Device Testing IEC Server Procedures Use Rev 2.2 (after October 2008) Device Testing IEC Client Rev 1.0 (by early 2008) Future Documents: Product Mark, Implementation Agreements, Testing Specifications, Test Procedures for CIM and OpenAMI/DR

Bottom-Line Benefits Test and certification activities that lower costs for users Provide input to international standards activities at no additional cost and no travel Members only access to: –Resolution of technical issues related to standards –Industry experts via a global help desk –Technical documents and best practices from existing users –On-line discussion forums Discounts on paid seminars and exhibitions

Conclusions The available documents provide comprehensive means to assure the quality of the testing process Testing will be well documented, repeatable, and results shall be comparable across tested equipment/applications. The QAP provides an appropriate process through which to perform problem tracking, analysis, and resolution of tests, standards, and implementation agreements The UCA ® International Users Group provides a vehicle for deployment and testing of high-quality products based on open standards for the Electric Utility Industry

To Join The UCA International Users Group Go To: or or call (919) www.ucaiug.mobi For Public Documents and Information: or or