Magnetic Topology and the Corona- Heliosphere Connection Background: –Frozen-in flux (τ D ~ L 2 / η >> τ L ) implies that magnetic topology constrains.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The magnetic nature of solar flares Paper by E.R. Priest & T.G. Forbes Review presented by Hui Song.
Advertisements

The Relationship Between CMEs and Post-eruption Arcades Peter T. Gallagher, Chia-Hsien Lin, Claire Raftery, Ryan O. Milligan.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
CME/Flare Mechanisms Solar “minimum” event this January For use to VSE must be able to predict CME/flare Spiro K. Antiochos Naval Research Laboratory.
Magnetic Reconnection Across the HCS Mark Moldwin UM and Megan Cartwright UC-Berkeley Isradynamics April 2010 With thanks to Mark Linton at NRL Linton.
1 Hinode Coordinated Observations: Plasma Composition Photospheric composition ~ 1 in coronal hole (CH) -> fast wind Coronal composition ~1.5-3 in active.
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Global Distribution of Slow Solar Wind N. U. Crooker, S. W. Antiochos, X. Zhao, Yi-M. Wang, and M. Neugebauer.
Non-Equilibrium Ionization Modeling of the Current Sheet in a Simulated Solar Eruption Chengcai Shen Co-authors: K. K. Reeves, J. C. Raymond, N. A. Murphy,
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Current sheets formation along magnetic separators in 3d Dana Longcope Montana State University Thanks: I Klapper, A.A. Van Ballegooijen NSF-ATM.
STEREO AND SPACE WEATHER Variable conditions in space that can have adverse effects on human life and society Space Weather: Variable conditions in space.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Chip Manchester 1, Fang Fang 1, Bart van der Holst 1, Bill Abbett 2 (1)University of Michigan (2)University of California Berkeley Study of Flux Emergence:
Magnetic fields in the photosphere and heliosphere: structure, statistical parameters, turbulent state Valentyna I. Abramenko Big Bear Solar Observatory.
Sept. 12, 2006 Relationship Between Particle Acceleration and Magnetic Reconnection.
High-latitude activity and its relationship to the mid-latitude solar activity. Elena E. Benevolenskaya & J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University Abstract.
M3 Session AIA/HMI Science Meeting D-1 : M3-Magnetic Field Data Products Data Product Development Session Chairs: R. Larsen/Y. Liu Status: [draft]
MSU Team: R. C. Canfield, D. W. Longcope, P. C. H. Martens, S. Régnier Evolution on the photosphere: magnetic and velocity fields 3D coronal magnetic fields.
1 SDO/HMI Products From Vector Magnetograms Yang Liu – Stanford University
Discussion Group B: Progress on Initiation Mechanisms 1. Determine topology of initiating field –Initiate broad observational investigation on filament.
Solar-B XRT XRT-1 The Science and Capability of the Solar-B / X-Ray Telescope Solar-B XRT Presenter: Ed DeLuca Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.
Discussion Summary: Group B –Solar Active Regions And Their Production of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections Discussion Leaders: George Fisher Hugh Hudson.
Center for Space Environment Modeling Ward Manchester University of Michigan Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory SHINE July.
Coronal Mass Ejections: Models and Their Observational Basis (P.F. Chen Living Rev. Solar Phys.) 张英智 中国科学院空间科学与应用研究中心空间天气学国家重点实验室.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan Coupling of the Coronal and Subphotospheric Magnetic Field in Active Regions by Shear Flows Driven by The Lorentz.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Flows in NOAA AR 8210: An overview of MURI progress to thru Feb.’04 Modelers prescribe fields and flows (B, v) to drive eruptions in MHD simulations MURI.
Flows and the Photospheric Magnetic Field Dynamics at Interior – Corona Interface Brian Welsch, George Fisher, Yan Li, & the UCB/SSL MURI & CISM Teams.
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
2007 PROM WORKSHOP Space Sciences Lab / UC-Berkeley Sheared-Field Prominences and the Eruptive Implications of Magnetic Topology B. J. Lynch, Y. Li, J.
SDO/AIA science plan: prioritization and implementation: Five Objectives in 10 steps [C1]1 I: C1/M8/C10 Transients: Drivers & Destabilization Chair(s):
The Effect of Sub-surface Fields on the Dynamic Evolution of a Model Corona Goals :  To predict the onset of a CME based upon reliable measurements of.
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
Coronal holes as seen in soft X-rays H. S. Hudson (UCB and SPRC) SOHO-11, Davos, March 13, 2002.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Data-Driven MHD Modeling of CME Events
Sept. 13, 2007 CORONAL HEATING (Space Climate School, Saariselka, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
What coronal parameters determine solar wind speed? M. Kojima, M. Tokumaru, K. Fujiki, H. Itoh and T. Murakami Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,
A topological view of 3D global magnetic field reversal in the solar corona Rhona Maclean Armagh Observatory 5 th December 2006.
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
Footpoint behavior Hugh Hudson UCB Galileo science meeting Nobeyama, July 12, 2002.
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
18-April-2006XRT Team1 Initial Science Observations Solar-B XRT Ed DeLuca for the XRT Team.
SLIDE SHOW 3 B changes due to transport + diffusion III -- * * magnetic Reynold number INDUCTION EQUATION B moves with plasma / diffuses through it.
Helicity Condensation: The Origin of Coronal/Heliospheric Structure S. K. Antiochos, C. R. DeVore, et al NASA/GSFC Key features of the corona and wind.
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
Analysis Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares: the Importance of Spines and Separators Angela Des Jardins 1, Richard Canfield 1, Dana Longcope 1, Emily.
II. MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS (Space Climate School, Lapland, March, 2009) Eric Priest (St Andrews)
New England Space Science Meeting 3 Feb 1, 2006 Implications of Reconnection Nathan Schwadron Feb 1, 2006.
SHINE 2006 David Alexander Rice University Exploring the dynamics of flux-emergence in magnetically-complex solar active regions David Alexander and Lirong.
III. APPLICATIONS of RECONNECTION Yohkoh Bright Pts Loops Holes A magnetic world T=few MK 1. Coronal Heating.
SHINE Formation and Eruption of Filament Flux Ropes A. A. van Ballegooijen 1 & D. H. Mackay 2 1 Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
Solar Magnetic Field Reversal V J Pizzo SHINE Workshop August 18, 2002.
What is the Evidence for Open Field Lines from Active Regions? J. Harvey National Solar Observatory.
Shock heating by Fast/Slow MHD waves along plasma loops
A Topological Analysis of the Magnetic Breakout Model by Rhona Maclean University of St Andrews 10 th August 2004 Collaborators: Colin Beveridge, Dana.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetic Structure Feb. 16, 2012.
What we can learn from active region flux emergence David Alexander Rice University Collaborators: Lirong Tian (Rice) Yuhong Fan (HAO)
Initiation of Coronal Mass Ejections: Implications for Forecasting Solar Energetic Particle Storms Ron Moore, Alphonse Sterling, David Falconer, John Davis.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
Session: Connecting Slow Wind Theories to Current and Future Observations by Justin Edmondson, Ben Lynch, Aleida Higginson, Xudong Sun and Liang Zhao.
Ward Manchester University of Michigan
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
From the Convection Zone to the Heliosphere
How does the solar atmosphere connect to the inner heliosphere?
Introduction to Space Weather
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic Topology and the Corona- Heliosphere Connection Background: –Frozen-in flux (τ D ~ L 2 / η >> τ L ) implies that magnetic topology constrains plasma structure and dynamics –Determines how photo/corona connects to heliosphere Importance: –Restricts possible topology of coronal holes (CH) –Insight into 3D CME models – breakout –Predictions for LWS and especially SDO Spiro K. Antiochos Code 7675, Naval Research Lab, Washington DC

Basic Assumptions Continuous polarity distribution at ‘photosphere’ –Structure given by neutral line geometry –Neglect small-scale dipoles/structure No current singularities in closed field region –Basically assuming quasi-static equilibrium –Extension of source-surface model –Field-line mapping smooth except at separatrices

Canonical coronal magnetic topology –Two large-scale neutral lines on photosphere –Three separatix curves and two points on photosphere –Field defines smooth volume mapping, except at separatrix lines/points, even if J = 0. Field line equations: dx/ds = B x /B dy/ds = B y /B dz/ds = B z /B Singularity e.g., splitting, only if, B x, B y, or B z discontinuous or B vanishes

Conjecture: One CH per Polarity Region Consider simple polarity region with one CH Consider annulus of closed flux surrounding CH Cannot map to adjacent area, –Requires line splitting, current singularity in closed field region

Must map to surrounding annulus But then, second CH would split closed lines

Consider embedded polarity region –If region closed, annulus maps over the top –If region contains coronal hole? –Problem with both CH and spine

If polarity regions embedded, CHs are embedded –Opening of CH in embedded region drives external CH Creates coronal hole corridor –CH in embedded region must extend to spine – CMEs?

Interaction of AR with CH – Begin with AR fully in closed region –Apply photo motion that moves AR into CH –Interchange reconnection opens spine –Creates open field corridor surrounding spot (movie)

3D interaction of active region and coronal hole Reconnection opens field surrounding AR

Topology of 3D Breakout Eruption Any long-lived opening must extend to separatrix

Topology of Fully 3D Breakout Minimize required energy by rearranging separatrices (reconnection)

Global Plus Low-Latitude AR θ = 20 o AR field embedded in closed field region Topology of coronal hole essentially unchanged

Topology of Low-Latitude AR θ = 20 o Negative polarity AR flux encased by Σ-surface (fan) and γ-lines (spine) 3D null point in corona Σ-surface greatly distorted due to flux distribution at photosphere

CONCLUSIONS Topology provides strong constraints on corona- heliosphere connection –One CH per polarity region – CH corridors –Embedded polarities imply embedded CHs Topology plays critical role in 3D eruptions –Mechanism underlying breakout –Predicts spine movement, dimming areas, … Fascinating field for Theory/SDO studies