QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/20061 Projet QSHA –WP3 Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées 58, bd Lefebvre, 75732 Paris Cedex 15 Réunion.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A data assimilation system to improve streamflow predictions G. Thirel (1), E. Martin (1), J.-F. Mahfouf (1), B. Bouriquet (2), S. Massart (2), J. Noilhan.

Advertisements

1 MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE PROJECT AND THEIR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN EUROPEAN STANDARD -Major findings -Major findings suitable for inclusion in European Standard.

Semantic Formalisms 2: Software Components Eric Madelaine INRIA Sophia-Antipolis Oasis team UNICE – EdStic Mastère Réseaux.

QSHA, Réunion du 01/06/20071 Projet QSHA – WP3 Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées 58, bd Lefebvre, Paris Cedex 15 Réunion.

CHAPTER 1: COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING

AAAI of 20 Deconstructing Planning as Satisfiability A Revised Report Henry Kautz UW University of Rochester in collaboration with Bart Selman and.

November 20GEOINFO 20061/25 A Robust Strategy for Handling Linear Features in Topologically Consistent Polyline Simplification Department of Computer Engineering.

Signal/Background Discrimination Harrison B. Prosper SAMSI, March Signal/Background Discrimination in Particle Physics Harrison B. Prosper Florida.

MUSHI-Life Presenter Richard Joiner Designer : Chris Quintana.

Nonlinear Site Effects: laboratory and field data observations and numerical modeling Luis Fabián Bonilla Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire,

A Pseudo-Dynamic Rupture Model Generator for Earthquakes on Geometrically Complex Faults Daniel Trugman, July 2013.

1 23 maart 2006 Surface construction techniques for volumetric objects How to maintain convex and concave features? Eddy Loke and Erik Jansen.

Stable discontinuous staggered grid in the 4 th -order finite-difference modeling of seismic ground motion Kristek 1,2, J., Moczo 1,2, P., Galis 1,2, M.

Experiments with RAINS-NL Jan Aben. Jan Aben, Experiments with RAINS-NL, Rome, May Contents Features and objectives of RAINS-NL Illustration.

Vermelding onderdeel organisatie 20/11/ DCA theme 3: Airport Systems Prof.dr.ir. Gabriel Lodewijks DCA - Delft Centre for Aviation Symposium Delft.

EAR-BASED AMENDMENT FORUM. September PROCESS AND PROCEDURES From Preparation of an Amendment to a Finding of “In Compliance”

EAR-BASED AMENDMENT FORUM. September Sponsored by the Pinellas Planning Council September 12 & 13, 2006 Harborview Center Clearwater.

THHGCS07B Coordinate Marketing Activities Lecture 2.

1 Modal methods for 3D heterogeneous neutronics core calculations using the mixed dual solver MINOS. Application to complex geometries and parallel processing.

FAA AAR-410 December 5, FAA Airport Pavement Roughness R&D u Gordon Hayhoe, AAR-410, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic City, New Jersey,

Data accreditation standard for the IM&T DES12 Sept The IM&T DES Using the tools that support e- audit John Williams & James Barrett.

CMPE 511, Fall Hybrid (Software-Hardware) Dynamic Memory Allocator Prepared by Mustafa Özgür Akduran İstanbul, 2006 Boğaziçi Üniversitesi.

Design of Experiments Lecture I

More on Canonical Huffman coding. Gabriele Monfardini - Corso di Basi di Dati Multimediali a.a As we have seen canonical Huffman coding allows.

Mid-Term Review Meeting, February 13-14, Tutzing Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European network IVO OPRSAL.

Journée Castem, 25/11/09 Simulation de l’injection de carbone dans un site géologique de séquestration du CO 2 Mohamed HAYEK, Emmanuel MOUCHE and Claude.

5/4/2015rew Accuracy increase in FDTD using two sets of staggered grids E. Shcherbakov May 9, 2006.

Numerical methods in the Earth Sciences: seismic wave propagation Heiner Igel, LMU Munich III The latest developments, outlook Grenoble Valley Benchmark.

High performance flow simulation in discrete fracture networks and heterogeneous porous media Jocelyne Erhel INRIA Rennes Jean-Raynald de Dreuzy Geosciences.

Session: Computational Wave Propagation: Basic Theory Igel H., Fichtner A., Käser M., Virieux J., Seriani G., Capdeville Y., Moczo P.  The finite-difference.

Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.

Theoretical aspects of seismic waves and sources Massimo Cocco INGV Earthquakes produce effects to the environment & the society Damages are produced by.

Sismovalp final meeting, Martigny, 02/10/2006 SISMOVALP WP6 Alpine ground motion Numerical benchmark of ground motion simulation in the Grenoble valley.

NORM BASED APPROACHES FOR AUTOMATIC TUNING OF MODEL BASED PREDICTIVE CONTROL Pastora Vega, Mario Francisco, Eladio Sanz University of Salamanca – Spain.

16/12/ Texture alignment in simple shear Hans Mühlhaus,Frederic Dufour and Louis Moresi.

The surface profiles in Grenoble area determined by the MASW measurements Seiji Tsuno, Cecile Cornou, Pierre-Yves Bard (LGIT) QSHA meeting, 1/Juin/2007,

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Nick Simos NSLS2 Ground Motion and Vibration Studies.

Participants of Nurmerical Benchmark Test and Misfit Criteria for Summarizing the Results Seiji Tsuno (LGIT)

11/02/2007PEER-SCEC Simulation Workshop1 NUMERICAL GROUND MOTION SIMULATIONS: ASSUMPTIONS, VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION Earthquake Source Velocity Structure.

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Nick Simos NSLS2 Ground Motion and Vibration Studies.

Jeroen Tromp Computational Seismology. Governing Equations Equation of motion: Boundary condition: Initial conditions: Earthquake source: Constitutive.

Tutorial 5: Numerical methods - buildings Q1. Identify three principal differences between a response function method and a numerical method when both.

Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European network Suggestions for synthetic data storage The SPICE project Expected seismic simulation.

Finite Differences Finite Difference Approximations  Simple geophysical partial differential equations  Finite differences - definitions  Finite-difference.

SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European.

FFCUL, PORTUGALBologna Oct 2006 NEAREST Coordinator: Maria Ana V Baptista NEAREST PARTNER - FFCUL PORTUGAL.

35 1 Introduction Since 2004, the EU funded Marie Curie Training Network "Seismic wave propagation and imaging in complex media: a European network" joins.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review January 14-15, 2003, FNAL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Center for Data Intensive.

Mid-Term Review Meeting, February 13-14, Tutzing Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European network MARTIN GÁLIS.

Blue – comp red - ext. blue – comp red - ext blue – comp red - ext.

SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Ivan Lokmer Early Stage Researcher Host Institution: UCD Dublin.

1 The reactive transport benchmark J. Carrayrou Institut de Mécanique des Fluides et des Solides, Laboratoire d’Hydrologie et de Géochimie de Strasbourg,

SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European.

Mathematical Background

Jayne Bormann and Bill Hammond sent two velocity fields on a uniform grid constructed from their test exercise using CMM4. Hammond ’ s code.

Validation of physics-based ground motion earthquake simulations using a velocity model improved by tomographic inversion results 1 Ricardo Taborda, 1.

Present / introduce / motivate After Introduction to the topic

Program 2 Internal structure and deformation of volcanic edifices.

SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Overlapping Multidomain Chebyshev Method: Verification.

A Fully Conservative 2D Model over Evolving Geometries Ricardo Canelas Master degree student IST Teton Dam 1976.

Deutscher Wetterdienst 1FE 13 – Working group 2: Dynamics and Numerics report ‘Oct – Sept. 2008’ COSMO General Meeting, Krakau

Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.

Unstructured Meshing Tools for Fusion Plasma Simulations

1 DICA, Università di Trento; 2 Institut f. Geophysik, ETH Zürich

Hamiltonian formalism, seismic waves, and seismic barriers

High-F Project Southern California Earthquake Center

Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015

17-Nov-18 Parallel 2D and 3D Acoustic Modeling Application for hybrid computing platform of PARAM Yuva II Abhishek Srivastava, Ashutosh Londhe*, Richa.

Presentation transcript:

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/20061 Projet QSHA –WP3 Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées 58, bd Lefebvre, Paris Cedex 15 Réunion du 23/11/2006

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/20062 Réunion WP3 : ordre du jour 10h-12h : Méthodes et évolutions envisageables –Différences finies, Jean Virieux –Éléments finis, Evelyne Foerster –Éléments spectraux, Emmanuel Chaljub –Volumes finis, Nathalie Glinsky –Éléments de frontière (FMM), Stephanie Chaillat –Éléments discrets, Christian Mariotti –Fonctions de Green empiriques, Carine Kohrs-Sansorny –Modèles de comportement non linéaires, Fabian Bonilla 12h15-13h : Benchmark ESG + Sismovalp + Spice (+SCEC?) Emmanuel Chaljub, Seiji Tsuno et Jean-François Semblat 14h-17h : Discussion pour QSHA-WP3 : –modèles géologiques et liens avec WP1, Cécile Cornou –modèles numériques canoniques et réalistes –sensibilité aux paramètres, comparaisons repas

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/20063 Projet européen SPICE Seismic Wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex Media: a European Network (SPICE) one of the primary goals : Development of the earthquake motion numerical simulation methods code validation effort in Europe through a long-term web-interactive basis for possible tests/comparisons/validation of numerical methods and codes for the seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion simulation The basis will serve even after the SPICE project is completed and to anybody interested

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/20064 Two model sets Based on the evaluation of the SCEC code validation project and capabilities of recent numerical-modeling methods, two model sets were elaborated: Wave Propagation (WP) model set and Source Dynamics (SD) model set Both model sets are divided into three subsets Obviously, new models can/will be added in correspondence with progress in the numerical modeling methods

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/20065 SPICE Subset WP I Simplest canonical models designed to test accuracy of the methods/codes with respect to individual factors/features of the models: (includes SCEC_UHS1 and SCEC_UHS2) homogeneous elastic space : dispersion, local error homogeneous viscoelastic space :incorporation of attenuation 2 homogeneous halfspaces :planar interface - elastic interface - viscoelastic/pure_Q interface homogeneous halfspace : planar free surface homogeneous anisotropic el. space :anisotropy

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/20066 SPICE Subset WP II Canonical models combining two or more basic individual factors/features: (includes SCEC_LOH1 and SCEC_LOH3) layer over halfspace :planar interface + free surface - elastic and viscoelastic - source inside layer / halfspace gradient in velocity / Q random velocity distribution soft inclusion in a halfspace : lateral heterogeneity vertical layer in a halfspace :interface at the free surface 2 homogeneous halfspaces :non-planar interface free-surface topography :traction-free condition - Gaussian hill - cliff - slope

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/20067 SPICE Subset WP III Realistic models possibly with real recordings: (includes SC_2.1 and SC_2.2 ) Colfiorito, Central Italy :laterally bounded sedimentary basin (in cooperation with the INGV Rome, Italy) Grenoble, France :deep Alpine valley (in cooperation with the ESG 2006 Grenoble benchmark organizers) other site(s)

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/20068 Quantitative Misfit Criteria Each submitted solution can be compared with a reference solution for a given problem, and with other submitted solutions, using the quantitative misfit criteria TFEM & TFPM, TEM & TPM, FEM & FPM, and single-valued EM & PM misfit criteria were developed by Kristekova, Kristek, Moczo and Day ( Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 2006, #5 ) The criteria are based on the time-frequency representation of seismograms The time-frequency representation is obtained using the continuous wavelet transform

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/20069 Interactive web interface The interactive web interface has been developed by the SPICE team at the Comenius University in Bratislava

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/200610

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/200611

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/200612

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/200613

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/200614

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/200615

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/200616

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/200617

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ The SPICE Code Validation provides an unprecedented opportunity in Europe (and possibly not only in Europe) to test and compare methods and computer codes for modeling of seismic wave propagation, earthquake ground motion, and seismic exploration Participants au projet SPICE favorables à échanges avec autres projets et contributions supplémentaires à leffort de validation (cas tests, solutions de référence…)

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ WP3 - Ground motion simulation

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ WP3-1 Methological improvements Main goals : main features of the various methods (table) current or potential improvements range of application (frequency, heterogeneity, non linearity…) comparisons (misfit criteria) : –efficiency –accuracy –stability… very simple canonical models with well constrained features Developments of numerical tools for wave propagation

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ Fiche descriptive / méthode Type/name of method: FVTD - Finite-Volume Method in the Time Domain Contributors (labs): N. Glinsky-Olivier (Cermics/INRIA), S. Lanteri (INRIA), M. Benjemaa (INRIA), S. Piperno (Cermics/INRIA), J. Virieux (GeoSciences Azur), Basic principle & improvements: –Principles : Finite Volumes, Unstructured grids, Centered numerical fluxes, Leap- frog time-scheme, Energy conservation, Weak treatment of boundary conditions (free surface, ABC, dynamic rupture) –Improvements : extension using Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Elements, parallel solver in development Features: –Source/propagation (S, P, S+P): S+P –Coupled methods: coupling with PML, poss. coupling with FETD & FDTD meth –1D/2D/2.5D/3D : 2D (3D parallel solver under development) –Time/frequency: time-domain –Direct/iterative: direct (explicit in time) –Elements size (fraction of ): 1/12 in FVTD (less in DGTD) –Model size (nb of ): –Free-surface topography: Yes –Heterogeneity: Yes –Anisotropy: Yes (future) –Material behav. (lin., NL, eq.lin): linear –Damping (NCQ, rheol.): none (possible) –Main references 6/7 methods !!

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ Tableau récapitulatif méthodes GroupsFDMFEMSEMFVMBEMDEMEGF GEOAZUR LLNL LGIT L/ (NL) NL BRGM LL/EQ/ NL NL CEA ?L/NL? LCPC L/EQ/ NL L/NLLNL L=linear, EQ=equivalent linear, NL="non-linear"

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ Simple canonical models 2D/3D, Stratification, Amortissement, Discrétisation, extension géométrique... Comportement… … finally simple structures : canyons, basins (for purpose of validation), cf Sismovalp

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ WP3-2 Sensitivity studies (P-Y Bard) Key parameters in modelling : –intermediate canonical models (for sensitivity analyses) –influence of topography description –sensitivity to source location, source dynamics, source extension… –influence of soil non linearities in 2D and 3D –influence of the physical model (variability) on response spectra (input uncertainties vs output uncertainties) identification of the key parameters to be measured finally, empirical description of the physical effects from theoretical results (e.g. 2D/3D aggravation factor...)

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ WP3-2 Sensitivity studies (P-Y Bard) (Nearly) realistic models : Nice (WP1 : test de rugosité dinterface…) Grenoble Algiers Naples… …cf WP3-3 & WP3-4

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ WP3-3-WP3-4 Benchmarking (E.Chajlub/E.Foerster) Validation of developed codes based on international benchmark but not tied to ESG2006 with two geometries (Basins and margins) Fully realistic models...

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ WP3-5 Statistical comparison (Hideo Aochi) Variability of simulations using intensive simulations...

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ WP 3-6 Lessons (J.Virieux) ????

QSHA-WP3, Réunion du 23/11/ WP 3-X Who What Deli. Who What Deli. Who What Deli. Who What Deli. Who What Deli. Who What Deli. Planning et échéancier ! Prochaine réunion ?