Learning Community Projects: IT as a Hub for Collaborative Knowledge Building Dr. Nancy Law, Dr. Allan Yuen Ms. Elaine Wong & Mr. Johnny Yuen Acknowledgment:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Creativity and Innovation 2. Communication and Collaboration
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
PORTFOLIO.
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
NET Section, CDI. Grammar and e-learning for Communication (GEL.com) This project: was launched initially with a view to encouraging participating schools.
Consistency of Assessment
The impact of IT supported collaborative knowledge building activities on local secondary school classrooms Dr. Nancy Law, Dr. Allan Yuen Ms. Elaine Wong.
HOW TO DESIGN CLASSROOM PRACTICES FOR COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY? Minna Lakkala Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki
The mind beyond time and space: Online collaborative knowledge building using Knowledge Forum Learning Community Project, CITE, HKU.
The 2 nd Factor: Group leader structure In our previous experience in conducting KB activities, we found that group leaders play a substantial role in.
Peer Tutoring Project (PTP) (July 2002 – October 2002) [1][1] Knowledge building discourse in the Peer Tutoring Project: Knowledge Forum database (
Introduction to Workshop 10 Choosing Learning and Teaching Approaches and Strategies.
Geography Subject leaders Training Exploring the content of the new National Curriculum.
New Senior Secondary History Curriculum (Secondary 4-6) Understanding and Interpreting the Curriculum.
Graduate Attributes Jackie Campbell, Laura Dean, Mark de Groot, David Killick, Jill Taylor.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
{ Senate Hearing Project Kathryn Gustafson Farmington High School.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Elements of eTwinning – Pupils participation in projects – Teacher recognition Dr. Riina Vuorikari & Anne Gilleran eTwinning Central Support Service European.
Connected Learning with Web 2.0 For Educators Presenter: Faith Bishop Principal Consultant Illinois State Board of Education
Created By: Ms. Leah Wendt.  1. Teachers know the subjects they are teaching. The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures.
FLIBS June 2015 Biology Category 1 Session 2: Learning Biology within the IB Philosophy.
Innovative Schools toolkit Strategic Workshop 3 - Exploring good practice case studies.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
NET Section, CDI 2 March, Grammar and e-learning for Communication (GEL.com) This project: is to encourage schools to go in tandem with one of the.
The Design of a Collaborative Learning Environment in a Mobile Technology Supported Classroom, Concept of Fraction Equivalence Sui Cheung KONG Department.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Cultural Competency and the Inclusive Classroom Professional Development Session Kalyn Estep.
The ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS  S) and Performance Indicators for Students.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
The Evolution of ICT-Based Learning Environments: Which Perspectives for School of the Future? Reporter: Lee Chun-Yi Advisor: Chen Ming-Puu Bottino, R.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Knowledge Building in Classrooms: Ideas at the Center Mary Lamon Institute for Knowledge Innovation and Technology (IKIT) OISE/University of Toronto Knowledge.
The PYP Exhibition Mentor Information. What is it?  The Exhibition is:  An individual, group or whole class inquiry  An inquiry that starts from personal.
School in Front of Challenges of Knowledge Society, Again and Again Liisa Ilomäki Department of Psychology University of Helsinki EDEN conference.
Marlene Scardamalia, Candace Thille, John Rinderle, Maria Chuy, Michaele Brown Presented by John Rinderle OLI and Knowledge Forum: Integrating pedagogies.
State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.
National Educational Technology Standards for Students: The Next Generation.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Welcome Alabama Course of Study Technology Education Workshop.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
A Portfolio by: Mary S. Weinaug Enter.  As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of teacher standards  ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Google Earth INTEGRATING GLOBAL THINKING. Why Use Virtual Tours? Flexible Tool: History, Science, Math, English, etc. An Interactive Way to Explore Supports.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
Innovative Schools toolkit STRATEGIC WORKSHOP 2 Exploring good practice case studies.
Elaine Wilson Faculty of Education Teacher Professional Development for the 21 st Century.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
MY TIME, OUR PLACE Framework for School Age Care In Australia Prepared by: Children’s Services Central April 2012 Team Meeting Package.
Pedagogical aspects in assuring quality in virtual education environments University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
D RAFT OF F RAMEWORK OF C OLLABORATION A CTIVITIES “SEAEDUNET 2.0: D IGITAL -A GE T EACHING AND L EARNING M ODEL ”
National Educational Technology Standards For Students.
Psychology 9698.
DPI 10 Teaching Standards
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Creating an Active Learning environment
Choi Wai Kit (Gavin) St. Margaret’s Girls’ College, Hong Kong
Project Category Grade Level
Presentation transcript:

Learning Community Projects: IT as a Hub for Collaborative Knowledge Building Dr. Nancy Law, Dr. Allan Yuen Ms. Elaine Wong & Mr. Johnny Yuen Acknowledgment: RGC and UGC

Aims of the project (1) To support and investigate the development of life-long learning abilities in group collaborative learning contexts using technology, focusing on finding the relationships between the development of enquiry and knowledge-building abilities and the changing group dynamics and interaction patterns of the learners (2) To explore possible cultural differences in the formation of knowledge building communities between Hong Kong and schools of other places. (3) To help schools to build up a capacity and culture of learning as knowledge building through the establishment of hub schools.

Online collaborative knowledge building platform Virtual Knowledge Domain Interface In other words, it mediates processing among human mind.

Knowledge Forum  Virtual Knowledge Domain Interface

Knowledge Forum (KF) KF is a problem-centered collaborative knowledge medium that operates over a computer network. KF includes knowledge building and management tools for:  Collaborative learning  Providing scaffolding supports for building idea networks  Providing graphic functionalities for developing concept maps  Identifying knowledge gaps and advances  Viewing database from multiple perspectives The functional design of KF is an embodiment of the knowledge building principles.

We hope that KF can help students in developing their: Thinking skills Meta-cognitive skills in learning Abilities to collaborate with others Life long learning skills

Activities Organized & Preliminary Research Findings

Knowledge Building Symposium and Workshops 18 th –25 th May 2002 The activity served as a means to conduct interim review and disseminate good practice and the use of KF. The focus of the Symposium rested on the conceptual introduction and operational sharing of experience on knowledge building. The Workshops were mainly catered for a smaller audience who were interested in integrating knowledge building supported by Knowledge Forum in the next year.

Peer Tutoring Project June 2002 – October 2002 The partakers in this scheme were the secondary school students from approximately ten schools, ranged from Form 3 to Form 6. The students worked on the topics set by their teachers with their own schoolmates in groups during the summer. They were required to report on their progress in the form of peer tutoring to their schoolmates at the beginning of new semester. This was followed by a cognitive achievement test on the respective subjects to find out the depth of understanding attained by students. Students were also invited to do presentation and sharing in the award presentation ceremony in mid- October.

Research findings drawn the Peer Tutoring Project “ Developmental Trajectory in Knowledge Building: An Investigation” (conference paper) To investigate students’ developmental trajectory in knowledge building through evaluating their discourse on KF when working collaboratively on various study topics, using the 12 knowledge building principles as the evaluation framework  Hierarchy of accessibility to knowledge building principles  Clustering of knowledge building principles  Developmental pattern in knowledge building

12 Knowledge Building Principles Real ideas, authentic problems Improvable ideas Idea diversity Rise above Epistemic agency Community knowledge, collective responsibility Democratizing knowledge Constructive use of authoritative sources Knowledge building discourse Embedded and transformative assessment Pervasive knowledge building Symmetric knowledge advancement

What is the implication of these findings? Students cherished not only their participation and contribution to the community, but also valued their group membership and wanted to share responsibility for advancing the group’s knowledge. Strong ‘copy-and-paste’ culture, take sources as it is, without further interpretation, critical evaluation or extension. Lack experience & confidence to espouse their ideas and contend with authorities. Students lacked of enthusiasm for self-reflection may relate to their lack of experience and/or ability to evaluate and monitor their own learning A critical factor in the success of students’ inquiry and discourse rests on the teacher’s skills in setting the inquiry tasks and their support to the knowledge building process.

What next?

HK/Toronto Collaborations March 2003 – present To promote project-based learning in different cultural settings in Knowledge Forum. At the beginning of the collaboration, teachers agreed on the discussion topic rested on looking at children's relationships with parents in the two countries, and other cultural similarities and differences for teenagers. Later on, due to the outbreak of SARS in the two cities, the issue of SARS became the major focus of the collaboration.

Assessment for Better Learning June 2003 – present students are required to design a structured assessment item on their own subject area. This assessment item should adequately cover a topic in the curriculum of their subject and the time allocation for an individual student to finish the assessment item should be around 20 minutes. Along with the design of this item, students need to design a model/ guided answer and a marking scheme which is able to differentiate different levels of understanding to the assessment item Except from designing their own question and marking scheme, they also need to assess other groups’ proposed question.

Assessment for Better Learning This, in turn, induces every student in the class to work on not only one topic, but also the whole syllabus in order to assess other groups’ work. In order to encourage students to design a good assessment item, some of the items designed by students will be selected and adopted by teachers for the questions of the real examinations.

For More Information… If you want to use KF in your classes… Or simply contact us!