Main Questions How do human activities influence the spatial and temporal structures of agrarian landscapes? How does this vary over time and across biogeographic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Investing in the Carbon Sink Potential of Agriculture and Wetland Sustainability Agriculture and Wetlands Greenhouse Gas Initiative of Ducks Unlimited.
Advertisements

Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Systematic Conservation Planning, Land Use Planning and SEA in South Africa Sustainable development embodied in Constitution Secure ecologically sustainable.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
Ecological and Recreational Flows Workgroup Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Next Steps Urban Water Institute August 14, 2014 San Diego,
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Page 1 Supported by Namibia‘s Experience with Ecosystem Services Valuation for Conservation Dr. Konrad Uebelhör MET/GIZ Biodiversity Management and Climate.
Towards an integrated South African Green Economy Model (SAGEM)
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
David Kaufman Associate Administrator for Policy, Program Analysis, and International Affairs Toward More Resilient Futures: Putting Strategic Foresight.
Data: How to Read It How to Use It 8 Printed with permission from the following National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research sites involved.
Data: How to Read It How to Use It 4 Printed with permission from the following National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research sites involved.
Community-Led Biodiversity Monitoring in Kalahari Rangelands Example Proposal in Review Reading time / Query time on your topic ideas! Environmental Context.
Data: How to Read It How to Use It 1 Printed with permission from the following National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research sites involved.
Data: How to Read It How to Use It 5 Printed with permission from the following National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research sites involved.
Data: How to Read It How to Use It 2 Printed with permission from the following National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research sites involved.
Agricultural Landscapes in Transition LTER SITES.
Effects of Climatic Variability and Change on Forest Resources Dave Peterson Forest Service – PNW Research Station Pacific Wildland Fire Sciences Lab UW.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
Harnessing the Power of Environmental Data for Decision-Making IABIN Phase II.
Dr. David Cleaves Senior Climate Change Advisor U.S. Department of Agriculture – Forest Service 1 st European Evaluators Network Forum Leuven, Belgium.
New Trends in Scientific Integration John Parker Arizona State University National Science Foundation, Arizona State University Division of Graduate Studies,
C OLLECTIVE A CTION AND THE TRANSITION TO A SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY : A RESEARCH AND ACTION PROPOSAL Sander van der Leeuw Arizona State University Santa Fe.
Demographic and Socioeconomic Research in the Baltimore Ecosystem Study BACKGROUND The inclusion of social scientists in any of the LTER projects is relatively.
Convening Partners to Define the Landscape of the Future: Steps toward multi-partner Landscape Conservation Design June 2015 Steering Committee Workshop.
Yaqui Valley Land-Water System WaterAgriculture Industry Wetlands Aquaculture Urban Fisheries + Marine Estuaries + Fisheries Climate  (sea level, precip)
Thinking in Terms of Social- Ecological Systems: Connecting climate change impacts to human communities Miranda H. Mockrin Rocky Mountain Research Station.
Science themes: 1.Improved understanding of the carbon cycle. 2.Constraints and feedbacks imposed by water. 3.Nutrient cycling and coupling with carbon.
What has the SSCZO team focused on? 1.Regolith: How do topographic variability, moisture, weathering, and soil formation control the thickness and development.
The Implementation of Land and Ecosystem Accounts in Europe Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting Roy Haines-Young, University of Nottingham.
Patch Dynamics of Urban Ecosystems: A case study of the Baltimore Ecosystem Study Morgan Grove and Bill Burch with significant.
Research programmes in ecology Jacques Baudry 1, Françoise Burel 2, and Agnès Ricroch 3 1 INRA of Rennes, 2 University of Rennes/CNRS, 3 University of.
Dr Richard Johnson, Mountain Environments, UK.  Lead Partner: Germany: Research Institute of Forest Ecology and Forestry  Partner countries: Germany,
“POLICY AND CHALLENGES ON ENVIRONMENT IN MONGOLIA – GEF COOPERATION” By J. Enkhsaikhan GEF Political Focal Point for Mongolia GEF Constituency Meeting.
SIM Evaluation Approach Presentation to the SIM Steering Committee September 25, 2013.
Conservation Growth Poles A landscape level development pathway.
DATA-MODEL ASSIMILATION CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE LTER PROGRAM Debra Peters Lead Research Scientist, USDA ARS, Jornada Experimental Range, Las.
EcoTrends: a multi-agency synthesis project Project Leader: Debra Peters, USDA ARS, Jornada Experimental Range, Jornada Basin LTER & Sevilleta LTER, Las.
Chapter 6: Integrating Knowledge and Action Scott Kaminski ME / 9 / 2005.
Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.
WLE: Science Focal Point Meeting 2014 Uniting Agriculture and Nature for Poverty Reduction.
The Long Term Ecological Research Network The Long Term Ecological Research Network The Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network is a collaborative.
Global Environmental Change and Food Systems Scenarios Research up to date Monika Zurek FAO April 2005.
EGU General Assembly , April 2011 Vienna Marek Giełczewski, Mateusz Stelmaszczyk, Mikołaj Piniewski, Tomasz Okruszko Warsaw University.
Accelerating irrigation services and preserving ecosystem service values.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Aberdeenshire Land Use Strategy Pilot James Davidson, Aberdeenshire Council NESAAG, Woodhill House, 05/11/14.
AgroBIODIVERSITY Cross Cutting Network Photo: F. Wäckers Co-chairs: Louise Jackson (UC Davis) & Lijbert Brussaard, IPO at Wageningen University.
Project SLUCE: Spatial Land Use Change and Ecological Effects Daniel G. Brown With funding from Biocomplexity Land Cover and Land Use Change CSISS ABM-LUCC.
The Experience of Long Term Ecological Research Network in Taiwan Yue-joe Hsia [1] Hen-biau King [2] Ming-shiung Lin [3 ] [1] [2] [3 ] [1] [1] Institute.
Landscape ecology methods
Introduction to Models Lecture 8 February 22, 2005.
Social Analysis Workshop on Country Analytical Work June 19, 2001 Anis Ahmad Dani World Bank, Social Development Department.
Climate Change Response Framework projects Presentation to the Forest Community Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity in the Context of Climate Change Workshop.
Science Enabled by New Hyperspectral Observations Related to Physiology and Functional Types (HyspIRI) Dar Roberts, Frank Muller-Karger Reiterate Break.
An introduction to the ecosystem approach and ecosystem services.
Session 4 The human-environment system: A conceptual framework Presenter: B.L. Turner; Moderator: Elizabeth King Cambridge Discussants: Matthew Aruch,
1 REDD+, biodiversity and people: Opportunities and risks John A. Parrotta, Chair, Global Forest Expert Panel (GFEP) on Biodiversity, Forest Management.
‘Landscape of Fear’: How non- consumptive effects are detected across multiple ecological scales Rehage, Kominoski, Swan, Reuss, Schmitt, Keilland, Deegan.
ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar
Regional analyses of aboveground net primary production (ANPP):
Robin Chazdon University of Connecticut
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
Landscape Approach to Resource Management
The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process
Integrating the Innovation Ecosystem
Forest Planning Under the 2012 Planning Rule
A Conference on Ecosystem Services (ACES)
First draft of ALiSEA charter: clarification and approbation
What is the place for biodiversity in the Catalan 2030 Agenda?
Presentation transcript:

Main Questions How do human activities influence the spatial and temporal structures of agrarian landscapes? How does this vary over time and across biogeographic regions? What are the ecological and environmental consequences of the resulting structural changes? What are the human responses to both these structural and ecological changes, and how do these responses drive further changes in agrarian landscapes?

Innovations Multi-scalar and cross scalar; spanning temporal, spatial, and organizational scales Attention to long time spans; especially lags and legacies Nature of influences and feedbacks; relationship to shifts in stability regimes and resilience Framework is comparative: cross-site, cross-cultural, and cross-biogeographical Strategy is to integrate qualitative with quantitative approaches

Approaches Data and maps –Demographic, agricultural, ecological, land use –Over time and at different scales Case studies –Different ‘triggering events’ and stories in each region –Integrate insights from a qualitative approach Analytical approaches –Statistical, modeling approaches Application –Scenario building –Approaches to conservation

Questions for this Workshop 1.What kinds of agrarian landscape transformations should we focus upon? (introduction, growth, stability, transformation, decline, abandonment) 2.Will these be the same for each study site? 3.How will we define the temporal and spatial boundaries of each study site? 4.What ecological features do we want to monitor?

Questions to pose going forward 1.What has driven agrarian transformations at your site? 2.What can we know about agrarian landscapes in the past? 3.What have been the triggering events of the past? 4.What have been the impacts of those transformations?

Agricultural Landscapes in Transition CAP KNZ HFR CWT Yaqui Valley LTER Partners HFR- Harvard Forest CAP- Central Arizona- Phoenix SGS- Shortgrass Steppe KBS- Kellogg Biological Station CWT- Coweeta KNZ- Konza Prairie Non-LTER Partners TNC- The Nature Conservancy Yaqui Valley Study, Mexico Archaeomedes Project, France SGS KBS

CAP LTER *Charles Redman (PI/PD) *Ann Kinzig (Co ‑ PI) Numerous CAP LTER folk Harvard Forest LTER *David Foster (Co ‑ PI) David Kittredge University of Michigan/SGS)LTER *Myron Gutmann (Co ‑ PI) Ken Sylvester The Nature Conservancy *Peter Kareiva (Co ‑ PI) Rebecca Shaw Coweeta LTER *Ted Gragson Paul Bolstad AG TRANS Participants, by Site KBS LTER *Alan Rudy (Executive Committee) Craig Harris Konza LTER *Gerad Middendorf Baltimore Ecosystem Study Morgan Grove International Partners Sander van der Leeuw (Archaeomedes Project, France) Pamela Matson, Stanford (Yaqui Valley, Mexico Regional Sustainability Study) * = Executive Committee