Early Reading First Project 2004-2007 Professional Development Model Mary Abbott Juniper Gardens Children’s Project-University of Kansas Amy Herring Project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KSC Cooperating Teacher Training Fall 2010 Module 1 Introduction to Expectations and Danielson Framework Mia Manning-Osborn and Amy LaPierre 1/6/11.
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
A DAY IN PRE-K CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT. Clarke County School District’s Vision Our vision is for all students to graduate as life-long learners.
PORTFOLIO.
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Small Group Time
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Language, Learning And Literacy (L3)
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
SEED MAT Mentor Training MAT Overview Roles and Responsibilities Internship Realities Internship Rotation Cycles Danielson Frameworks.
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Elementary Literacy Audit Kindergarten – 5th Grade
The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework A Focus on School Readiness for Infant and Toddler Children August 19, 2014 RGV Pre-Service.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
INTERVENTION: CLOSING THE ACADEMIC GAP BEFORE KINDERGARTEN Kathy Petersen Bonnie VanAusdal Brittney Nelson.
Enhancing Positive Behavior Skills January 9 th, 2009 ERF Professional Development Younwoo Lee Information in this presentation is available for noncommercial.
Hank Fien, Carrie Thomas Beck, Nicole Sherman-Brewer Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Leadership Session: Fidelity of Implementation Observation.
Preschool Writing Stages of Development and Activities that Encourage Preschoolers to Write Dr. Mary Abbott April 3, 2009 Information in this presentation.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Early Reading First Jeopardy This activity is available for professional, noncommercial use only. You may use this activity provided that: –(a) you do.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Research-Based Facts about Young English Language Learners Dr. Mary Abbott and Liesl Edwards Parent Meeting Presentation Friday September 12, 2008 Information.
Tier-2 Intervention Professional Development May 21, 2009 Information in this presentation is available for noncommercial use only. You may use the information.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Literacy Collaborative Achievement for Every Student.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Wyandotte County Early Reading First Wy-ERF Team Drs. Mary Abbott & Jane Atwater Jeanie Schiefelbusch, Deb Montagna, Younwoo Lee & Liesl Edwards Juniper.
1 A Behavior and Reading Improvement Center Presentation Integrating Academic and Behavior Support Richard White and Bob Algozzine Integrated Systems for.
TEAM MADRAS: Are YOU on the team? Madras Middle School Professional Development Plan Proposal by Donna Eskut - July 2013 Presented to Madras.
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
IES e-PATT Grant e-PATT: Parents and Teachers Together.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
What is Title I? Prepared by the Fairfax County Public Schools Title I office and Lorton Station ES.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
A major shift in Alabama’s curriculum to better prepare our students for post-secondary life (i.e. life after school). 1.Beginning this school year ( )
Human Capital Management Office of Human Resources Office of Professional Development & Evaluation.
A Professional Development Model for Teachers in Child- Care Centers CEC National Conference April 2, 2009 Seattle, WA Madelyn James UIC PhD student in.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Monday, May 23, 2005 Family Literacy 101 Presented by Jon Lee – Assistant Professor of Education, Bellarmine University.
June 081 Competent Learner Model Overview. June 082 Today you will learn… What is the CLM What is the goal of the CLM What are the foundations of the.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
The Iowa Distance Mentoring Model (DMM) for Early ACCESS promotes the systematic implementation of family guided routines based intervention (FGRBI) for.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
July 31, 2014 Dr. Ann-Marie Trammell.  BISD Learning Platform.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Staff Development in a Pre-K Literacy Project Belinda Biscoe and Priscilla Griffith (Debra Corey, Susan Kimmel) University of Oklahoma
OKLAHOMA EARLY READING FIRST What We Are Learning Priscilla Griffith University of Oklahoma Go Sooners!
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Empowering Teachers: Evidence- based practices to tackle Problem Behavior and Manage the Learning Environment BY MARY BUCCI AND CINDY ELAYOUBI.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
PRESCHOOL WRITING STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT AND ACTIVITIES THAT ENCOURAGE PRESCHOOLERS TO WRITE Dr. Mary Abbott April 3, 2009 Information in this presentation.
SIOP Implementation in Manatee County A Title I and Title III Partnership Presented by: Debra Estes, ESOL Coordinator.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Presentation transcript:

Early Reading First Project Professional Development Model Mary Abbott Juniper Gardens Children’s Project-University of Kansas Amy Herring Project EAGLE-University of Kansas Medical Center Information in this presentation is available for noncommercial use only. You may use the information provided that: (a) you do not modify or delete any content; (b) you do not redistribute content without identifying the website and author as the source of content; (c) the use of content does not suggest that our ERF project promotes or endorses any third party causes, ideas, Web sites, products or services. For additional permission requests, please contact Dr. Mary Abbott,

Juniper Gardens Children’s Project – KU Project EAGLE Project Administration Mentor Coaches Professional Development Evaluation Nine 3-5 Year-Old Classrooms BA, AA, and CDA teacher per classroom 1 to 3 mentor coach/teacher ratio Ongoing professional development Emphasis on literacy, social-emotional growth, and the arts Rich physical environment Parental involvement Project Structure

Instructional Implementation  Instructionally-sound delivery model  Focus on critical literacy and oral language components  Evidence-based  Appropriate for pre-school population  Maintains student interest and relevance Conceptual Framework Professional Development  High-quality teacher training  Weekly in-class mentor coaching  System for continuous monitoring of implementation fidelity  System for continuous evaluation of outcomes to identify areas in need of teacher improvement Student + Environmental Outcomes Student growth in literacy skills Phonological awareness Alphabet knowledge Concepts of print Student writing Student oral language development Expressive Receptive Instructional environment Literacy materials Literacy usage

Two Components of Professional Development Data Training

Goals Based on Data Each data source was reviewed by project staff. Then ERF project and classroom goals were created and updated as new data was compiled. –ERF goals included the creation of effective training and modification training based on data (i.e., topics and issues). –Individual classroom goals included creation of a teacher work plan to improve specific aspects of the instructional day (e.g., shortening transitions or specific strategies for improving content delivery or additional ways to differentiate instruction).

Data Sources for Data-Driven Instructional Decision Making Teacher fidelity of implementation results –Conducted 2-3 times per year – criteria goal 80% Classroom environment and child outcomes –Classroom environment – fall and spring –Child outcome measures – fall and spring –Child progress monitoring – fall, winter, and spring Mentor coach reports about implementation –Completed weekly

Yearly Professional Development Dosage

Initial Teacher Workshops During the summer, three full days of training were provided for the entire staff. Management from each center were also encouraged to attend. Training focused on: –Skill content (literacy and language) –Instructional strategies for teaching skills –Environmental content (e.g., room arrangement, praise/reprimand, schedules)

Mentor Coach Objectives Students look at the language experience field trip book they have created. Coaches built capacity and promoted sustainability by working with teachers and the center director. 50% of the coach’s time was spent embedded in classrooms –One morning during literacy instructional time –One 2-hour weekly lesson planning session

Mentor Coach Duties In the classroom, the mentor coach –Modeled appropriate strategies –Provided teacher feedback on instruction Mentor coaches prepared weekly reports detailing implementation Each month, mentor coaches hosted an evening and morning parent meeting. During these meetings, parents learned instructional strategies to use at home and viewed their child’s academic data.

Weekly Mentor Coaching Areas of teacher improvement for classroom coaching were based on the following data sources: –Topics covered during teacher workshops –Teacher fidelity of implementation results –Classroom environment and child outcomes –Mentor coach reports of implementation

Monthly Teacher Workshops All teaching staff attended monthly half day workshops related to language/literacy skills content, instructional strategies, and classroom management. Workshop topics were based on: –Teacher fidelity of implementation results –Classroom environment and child outcomes –Mentor coach reports of implementation

Mini-Trainings Targeted trainings were provided in individual classrooms at nap time and were based on these data sources: –Weekly mentor coach reports of implementation –Student outcomes Training topics included: –Classroom management –ELL strategies –Literacy activities during center time –Beginning reading instruction

Teacher Fidelity of Implementation The first year, fidelity checklists were created for circle, center, storybook instructional segments. A small group instruction fidelity was created in year two. Checklists included columns for individual teacher ratings. 3-hour classroom observations were used to complete the teacher fidelities.

Fidelity Content Fidelity of Implementation Checklists addressed the following areas of implementation: –Has the activity been planned as evidenced by the lesson plan? –Is the lesson plan being followed? –Do teachers use appropriate procedures taught during professional development (e.g., circle or center times)? –Do the teachers provide appropriate behavior management techniques? –Are transition times and methodology appropriate?

Percent fidelity of implementation across all teachers and classrooms. 80% criteria for each content area. After 3 months of training in 2005, 4 of 6 classrooms met criteria on Circle and Storybook. In spring of of 9 met criteria in Circle and Storybook. Good improvement was made in Centers.

For more information contact: Mary Abbott, PhD University of Kansas Juniper Gardens Children’s Project 650 Minnesota 2nd fl. Kansas City, KS 6610 Amy Herring, MA University of Kansas Medical Center Project EAGLE Community Programs 400 State Ave. Tower II Kansas City, KS