WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Based in part on … Some Scale Considerations for Predicting/Projecting Extreme Precipitation William.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Advertisements

GCM Scenarios for Regional Studies over West Africa Gregory S. Jenkins Department of Meteorology Penn State University.
North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) Linda O. Mearns National Center for Atmospheric Research 5 th Spring Runoff Conference.
Scaling Laws, Scale Invariance, and Climate Prediction
NARCCAP Fourth Users’ Meeting Welcome! Linda O. Mearns National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO April , 2012.
Regional Climate Models And Linkages to Agricultural Models Linda O. Mearns National Center for Atmospheric Research Agriculture and Forestry GHG Modeling.
Task: (ECSK06) Regional downscaling Regional modelling with HadGEM3-RA driven by HadGEM2-AO projections National Institute of Meteorological Research (NIMR)/KMA.
Earth Science & Climate Change
Mechanistic crop modelling and climate reanalysis Tom Osborne Crops and Climate Group Depts. of Meteorology & Agriculture University of Reading.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Alan F. Hamlet Eric P. Salathé Matt Stumbaugh Se-Yeun Lee Seshu Vaddey U.S. Army Corps of Engineers JISAO Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental.
Precipitation Extremes in Western U.S. Urban Areas: How Reliable are Regional Climate Model Projections Vimal Mishra 1, Francina Dominguez 2, and Dennis.
Topic 6: Climate change and climate models in Colombia.
Pacific Northwest Climate Model Scenarios 2008 Climate Impacts Group & Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Eric Salathé Philip.
WFM 6311: Climate Risk Management © Dr. Akm Saiful Islam WFM 6311: Climate Change Risk Management Akm Saiful Islam Lecture-4: Module- 3 Regional Climate.
1 An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting NCAR, Boulder, CO April ,
1 Regional Climate Change Summary of TAR Findings How well do the Models Work at Regional Scales? Some Preliminary Simulation Results Understanding Climate.
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Simulations of Floods and Droughts in the Western U.S. Under Climate Change L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory US CLIVAR/NCAR ASP Researcher.
NARCCAP Fourth Users’ Meeting Overview of Climate Change Results Linda O. Mearns National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO April , 2012.
Regional Climate Modeling in the Source Region of Yellow River with complex topography using the RegCM3: Model validation Pinhong Hui, Jianping Tang School.
NARCCAP Users Meeting April 2011 Results from NCEP-driven RCMs Overview Based on Mearns et al. (BAMS, 2011) Results from NCEP-driven RCMs Overview Based.
Status of regional climate modeling: Recommendations for WRF W. J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa WRF Workshop (March 2005) with thanks.
Uncertainty in climate scenarios when downscaling with an RCM M. Tadross, B. Hewitson, W Gutowski & AF07 collaborators Water Research Commission of South.
Extreme Weather Trends over the Pacific Northwest Cliff Mass Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
2012 NARCCAP Meeting, NCAR, Boulder Ana Nunes 1 and John Roads 2* 1 IGEO, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2 ECPC,SIO, UCSD, California, USA (*) Deceased (*)
Downscaling and its limitation on climate change impact assessments Sepo Hachigonta University of Cape Town South Africa “Building Food Security in the.
Precipitation Intensity Climate Impacts Group & Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington Eric Salathé.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS J28 Earth Science for National Action on Climate Change Canada Water Accounts AET estimates for.
Use of Regional Climate Models in Impacts Assessments L. O. Mearns Institute for the Study of Society and the Environment National Center for Atmospheric.
Understanding hydrologic changes: application of the VIC model Vimal Mishra Assistant Professor Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Gandhinagar
NARCCAP Users Meeting February 2008 NARCCAP Multi-Model Simulations: Initial NCEP-Driven Results Bill Gutowski, Ray Arritt, Gene Takle, Dave Flory,
First Users’ Workshop Welcome!. Workshop Goals Introduce initial group of users to NCARCCAP Provide opportunity of interaction between modelers and users.
Simulated and Observed Atmospheric Circulation Patterns Associated with Extreme Temperature Days over North America Paul C. Loikith California Institute.
Southern California February 9, 2002 MISR mesoscale climate dynamics in Southern California Sebastien Conil Alex Hall IRI, April 4, 2006.
NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting February , 2008 Boulder, CO.
Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.
NARCCAP Meeting September 2009 Results from NCEP-driven RCMs ~ Overview ~ Results from NCEP-driven RCMs ~ Overview ~ William J. Gutowski, Jr. & Raymond.
Climate Science Research in Support of the Wind Power Industry Wind resource availability Seasonal prediction Impacts of climate change Environmental impacts.
Ten-Year Simulations of U.S. Regional Climate Z. Pan, W. J. Gutowski, Jr., R. W. Arritt, E. S. Takle, F. Otieno, C. Anderson, M. Segal Iowa State University.
Results: Model Skill Cool season RegCM2 precipitation exhibits negative (positive) bias in the south central U. S. (northwestern U.S.). Warm season precipitation.
John Mejia and K.C. King, Darko Koracin Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 4th NARCCAP Workshop, Boulder, CO, April,
Climate Change and Water Supply: Potential Hydrologic Consequences Guido Franco Technical Lead for Climate Change Research Public Interest Energy Research.
Hydrologic Forecasting Alan F. Hamlet Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of.
ASM - III July 2009 Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) William J. Gutowski Iowa State University Ames, Iowa, USA (with thanks to F. Giorgi.
NARCCAP Second Users’ Meeting Welcome! Linda O. Mearns National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, CO September 10-11, 2009.
Module 17 MM5: Climate Simulation BREAK. Regional Climate Simulation for the Pan-Arctic using MM5 William J. Gutowski, Jr., Helin Wei, Charles Vörösmarty,
Eric Salathé JISAO Climate Impacts Group University of Washington Rick Steed UW Yongxin Zhang CIG, NCAR Cliff Mass UW Regional Climate Modeling and Projected.
3 rd EULAG Workshop CAM-EULAG June 2012 West African Extreme Daily Precipitation in Observations and Stretched-Grid Simulations by CAM-EULAG William J.
Influences of Regional Climate Change on Air Quality across the Continental U.S. Projected from Downscaling IPCC AR5 Simulations Christopher G. Nolte1.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program L. O. Mearns and the NARCCAP Team March 20, 2006.
ESSL Holland, CCSM Workshop 0606 Predicting the Earth System Across Scales: Both Ways Summary:Rationale Approach and Current Focus Improved Simulation.
R.W. Arritt for the NARCCAP Team December 2006
Tanya L. Spero1, Megan S. Mallard1, Stephany M
Overview of Downscaling
MM5I simulations for NARCCAP
Climate Change Results National Center for Atmospheric Research
North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program
Climate Science Research
Validation of GCM, and the need of High resolution atmospheric and hydrological model Vicente Barros and Mariano Re San José de Costa Rica 28 May 2003.
The Experimental Climate Prediction Center Regional Spectral Model (ECPC-RSM) Contribution to the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program.
North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP)
An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations and Analysis
On HRM3 (a.k.a. HadRM3P, a.k.a. PRECIS) North American simulations
North American Regional Climate Change
Hydrologic response of Pacific Northwest Rivers to climate change
University of Washington Center for Science in the Earth System
RegCM3 Lisa C. Sloan, Mark A. Snyder, Travis O’Brien, and Kathleen Hutchison Climate Change and Impacts Laboratory Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences.
Assessing the Water Cycle in Regional Climate Simulation
Presentation transcript:

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Based in part on … Some Scale Considerations for Predicting/Projecting Extreme Precipitation William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University U.S.A.

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Methodologies for Estimating Extremes  Simulated time & space scales  Process behavior under climate change

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Cold Half of Year 95% Precipitation: Frequency vs. Intensity ~ Averaging Time (Gutowski et al. 2003) 6-hourly daily 10-day Simulation: Continental U.S km grid NCEP Reanalysis 1 Analysis: Central U.S. 8 years of October - March April - May 95% Warm Half of Year

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Precipitation: Frequency vs. Intensity ~ Spatial Scale Simulation: Continental U.S km grid Analysis: Central U.S. 8 years of October - March (Gutowski et al. 2003) [km]

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 NARCCAP Simulations Domain Domain - Most of North America Resolution Resolution ~ 50 km Simulation Period Simulation Period Boundary Conditions Boundary Conditions - NCEP/DOE reanalysis MM5 Iowa State/ PNNL RegCM3 UC Santa Cruz ICTP CRCMQuebec,Ouranos HADRM3 Hadley Centre RSMScrippsWRFNCAR/PNNL PLUS: GFDL Atmosphere GCM - 0.5˚ resolution - specified SST/ice for same period NCAR CCSM Atmosphere-Ocean GCM - 1.4˚ (T85) resolution - analysis for same period

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Comparison with observations Observation-based Fields Observation-based Fields  Precip: University of Washington VIC retrospective analysis  Other fields: North American Regional Reanalysis Comparison period: Comparison period:  omitted - spinup  UW data end in mid-2000 Analysis Analysis  “Precipitation event” = Daily precip ≥ 2.5 mm at a grid point  Focus on precip intensity ≥ 99.5%

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Regions Analyzed Boreal forest Pacific coast California coast Great Lakes Maritimes Upper Mississippi River Deep South

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Precipitation Frequency vs. Intensity 99.5%

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Days with Simultaneous Extremes on “N” Grid Points “widespread extremes”

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Composite Structure of Extreme Events - DJF

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Composite Structure of Extreme Events - DJF

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Composite Structure of Extreme Events - DJF

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Present & Future Climate – Earlier Results Control-driven NCEP-driven Scenario-driven 500 hPa Heights (Gutowski et al. 2008)

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Precipitation Changes? Future – Current 0.05% Threshold+ 17% Extreme Precip. + 26% Extreme precipitation  as max humidity  Max atmospheric humidity  ~ 7% per degree Projected temperature increase: ~ 2.5˚C

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Africa: Water Balance Changes (IPCC AR4 WG1) Minus # models with  > 0

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Africa:  Precipitation via Statistical Downscaling Vs 30-yr pres vs. Range: [-80,+80] mm/month (Hewitson & Crane, 2006)

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010  Higher resolution is necessary, but not sufficient, for simulating short-term (e.g., daily) precipitation extremes.  Coarser models (and nudged regional models) tend to have daily extremes covering a wider area than observed extremes.  Focusing on environments conducive to extremes yields relevant climatic behavior, even in relatively coarse models.  This conclusion rests on the assumption that important small-scale features are not missing (e.g., low-level jets).

WCRP Metrics/Methodologies for Extremes September 2010 Thank You!