Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities Thermal, Settlement, and Vibration Issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electron Beam Control and Alignment LCLS FEL Undulator Commissioning Workshop UCLA Jan , 2004 P. Emma, SLAC Undulator collimation and protection.
Advertisements

SCU Measurements at LBNL
XFEL Undulator Efforts at DESY and Thoughts on LCLS-II H.-D. Nuhn June 30, 2010.
FAC review, 10/27 D. Schultz 1 e-Beams System Update Injector System Installation has started. Linac System Preparing for ’06 installation. Controls System.
J. Welch 4/7/05 Facility Advisory Committee Meeting Physics Issues for Conventional Facilities Review and Update 4/7/05 J. Welch.
Jo Beth Folger MMF Site and October 14, Conventional Facilities – MMF Presentation Outline Facility Design.
Undulator Alignment Strategy – April 20, 2006 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS FAC 1 Undulator Alignment Strategy Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
Zachary Wolf Undulator Tuning June 17, 2008 Undulator Tuning Status Z. Wolf, S. Anderson, R. Colon, S. Jansson, S.Kaplunenko,
LCLS Undulators October 14, 2004 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL MMF Review Introduction to the LCLS Undulators Heinz-Dieter Nuhn,
Isaac Vasserman Magnetic Measurements and Tuning 10/14/ I. Vasserman LCLS Magnetic Measurements and Tuning.
X-Ray Diagnostics for the LCLS Jan , 2004 UCLA.
J. Welch 10/12/04 Facility Advisory Committee Meeting Physics Issues for Conventional Facilities Review and Update 10/12/04 J.
Physics Requirements – October 20, 2005 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review 1 Physics.
Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Undulator Alignment.
Robert Ruland Installation Alignment -Magnetic Measurements – Fiducialization April 7-8, 2005 FAC Meeting 1 Installation Alignment,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
BBA Related Issues Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Undulator.
Robert Ruland MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget October 14, 2004 MMF Review 1 MMF Introduction, Schedule, Budget Robert Ruland.
Overview of Proposed Parameter Changes Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Stability of Mechanical Systems S. Sharma and V. Ravindranath.
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
J. Welch Talk MMF 10/14/04 LCLS Magnetic Measurement Facility Requirements Functional Temperature Vibration Earth's.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
19 Nov 08,ILC08Cherrill Spencer Rotating Coil System Description 1 Short description of the SLAC rotating coil system used to measure the CIEMAT-made prototype.
LCLS-II Transverse Tolerances Tor Raubenheimer May 29, 2013.
Alignment and Beam Stability
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Conventional Facilities & Beam Stability Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities NSLS-II Beam Stability Workshop.
ANATAC Meeting Line Length Correction Status 2004-Apr-23.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II ASAC Review Conventional Facilities Briefing Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities National Synchrotron.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
Main Linac Integration Work Packages Chris Adolphsen Dec 11, 2007 High Priority Items in Red.
Technical Challenges and Concerns S. Sharma and R. Alforque, R. Beuman, C. Foerster, E. Haas, E. Hu, P. Montanez, P. Mortazavi, S. Pjerov, J. Skaritka,
Orbit Control For Diamond Light Source Ian Martin Joint Accelerator Workshop Rutherford Appleton Laboratory28 th -29 th April 2004.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
Undulator parameters choice/wish based on a simplified XFEL cost model Jürgen Pfingstner 29 st of July 2015.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Issues on Closed Orbit Feedback for NSLSII NSLS-II Stability Workshop April 18-20, 2007 Li-Hua Yu.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Stability Issues NSLS-II PAC Meeting May 24, 2007 S. Krinsky.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
LCLS-II Physics Meeting, May 08, 2013 LCLS-II Undulator Tolerances Heinz-Dieter Nuhn LCLS-II Undulator Physics Manager May 8, 2013.
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
Magnetic Field Stability Measurements Joe DiMarco 23Oct07.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Vibrations studies for the nominal optics and the ultra-low beta optics Benoît BOLZON 1 B. Bolzon, A. Jeremie (LAPP) P. Bambade, Y. Renier (LAL) A. Seryi.
Catherine LeCocq, SLAC Alignment Plan for the LCLS Undulator IWAA 2006,1 Alignment Plan for the LCLS Undulator Catherine.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Beam Stability Overview NSLS-II CFAC Meeting May 8, 2007 S. Krinsky.
Accuracy of the orbit measurement by KEKB BPM system for the study of ILC damping ring H. Fukuma (KEK) Requirement for the accuracy of BPM data.
Summary of Presentation 1. Tolerances i. Vertical tolerances on BPMs (rf-BPM: ± 0.2μm, user BPMs: ±0.1μm, and X-BPMs: ± 0.1μm) ii. Tolerances on magnets’
8 th February 2006 Freddy Poirier ILC-LET workshop 1 Freddy Poirier DESY ILC-LET Workshop Dispersion Free Steering in the ILC using MERLIN.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
Magnetic Measurements At SLAC
Overview Preparatory work at the MML BBA to define the reference orbit
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
Sven Reiche UCLA ICFA-Workshop - Sardinia 07/02
Phase Adjustments: K vs
Beam-Based Alignment Results
Thermal Environment & Mechanical Support
Undulator Tuning Status Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS for Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko, Scott Jansson, Ralph Colon, Dave.
Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities
Motivation Technique Simulations LCLS LCLS DOE Review, April 24, 2002
Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities
BEAM REALISTIC ERROR ORBIT IMPACT ON SASE PERFORMANCE
Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities
Presentation transcript:

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Physics Requirements for Conventional Facilities Thermal, Settlement, and Vibration Issues J. Welch

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 General Background What are Physics Requirements for CF? Needed to accommodate technical systems Distinguished from programming and site requirements Used by system managers as input for further design Where do they come from? GRD, System physicists, system managers Types of Requirements Environmental, Layout, Space, Utility and Radiation Critical Issues are Thermal, Settlement, and Vibration

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Sensitive CF Areas VibrationThermalSettlement Undulator Hall XXX MMFXX Sector 20XX Near HallX … Start with Undulator Hall (UH)

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Physics Sensitivities for UH FEL saturation length (86 m) increases by one gain length (4.7 m), for the 1.5 Angstrom case if there is: 18 degree rms beam/radiation phase error 1 rms beam size ( ~ 30  m) beam/radiation overlap error. Xray beam will move 1/10 sigma if ~ 1/10  rad change in angular alignment of various Xray deflecting crystals electron trajectory angular change of ~ 1/10  rad

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 FEL Mechanism Exponential Gain Micro-bunching Narrow Radiation Cone ~1  r, (1/  ~ 35  rad) 2  radiation phase advance per undulator period

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Phase Sensitivity to Orbit Errors from H-D Nuhn LCLS: A < 3.2  m LEUTL: A < 100  m VISA: A < 50  m Path Length Error Phase Error

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 LCLS Phase Tolerance Trajectory Straightness 2  m rms tolerance for the electron trajectory deviation from an absolutely straight line, averaged over 4.7 m Maintaining an ultra-straight trajectory puts demanding differential settlement and thermal requirements on the Undulator Hall Undulator magnet uniformity ∆K/K <= 1.5 x for 10 degrees error per undulator segment Undulator alignment error limited to 50/300 micron vertical/horz. Temperature coefficient of remanence of NdFeB is 0.1%/C, which, because of partial compensation via Ti/Al assembly, leads to a magnet temperature tolerance of ± 0.2 C.

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Obtaining an Ultra-Straight Beam BBA is the fundamental tool to obtain and recover an ultra-straight trajectory over the long term. Corrects for BPM mechanical and electrical offsets Field errors, (built-in) and stray fields Field errors due to alignment error Input trajectory error Does not correct undulator placement errors Procedure Take orbits with three or more different beam energies, calculate corrections, move quadrupoles to get dispersion free orbit Disruptive to operation

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Maintaining Alignment Ultra-straight trajectory will be lost if BPM’s move and feedback incorrectly corrects the beam Quads move Stray fields change Launch trajectory drifts Phase accuracy will also be lost if undulator segments move ~ 10  m, (50  m assuming zero fiducialization and initial alignment error) note that unless the actual motion is known, there is no effective way to re-establish the undulator position except through magnetic measurements. BBA once a month OK, once a day intolerable

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Motion Due to Temperature Change Dilitation 1.4 m Granite6-8 Anocast12 Steel11 Aluminum23 CTE ppm/deg C  T ~ 2  m / 1.4 m x 10 x = 0.1 deg C (for a nominal 10 ppm/deg C)

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Motion Due to Heat Flux or temperature gradients L = 3 m, titanium strongback Note that 3 W/m2 can be generated by ~1 degree C temperature difference between the ceiling and floor via radiative heat transfer 3 W/m 2 -> 2 micron warp for an undulator segment ∆T ≈ 0.05 deg C across strongback 

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Motion of the Foundation 1 mm/year = 3  m/day

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Implications for Undulator Hall Expect differential settlement of  m / day, in some locations. Make foundation as stable as possible geotechnical, foundation design, uniformity of tunnel construction and surrounding geologic formation, avoid fill areas Thermally stabilize the Undulator Hall reduce heat fluxes to a minimum HVAC designed to precisely regulate temperature to within a ± 0.2 deg C band everywhere in the Undulator Hall

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Title I Undulator Hall Foundation High Moment of Inertia, T shaped foundation Pea Gravel supportSlip planes Completely underground Imprevious membrane blocks groundwater Located above water table (at this time anyway) Low shrink concrete, isolated foundation “Monolithic”

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Title I Undulator Hall HVAC Cross flow to ducts AHU in alcoves 9X

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Magnetic Measurement Facility Air Temperature ± 0.1 deg C band everywhere in the measurement area deg C year round temperature Vibration Hall probe motion is translated into field error in an undulator field such 0.5  m motion causes 1 x10 -4 error. Measurements show vibrations below 100 nm.

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Sector 20 RF electronics Timing signals sensitive to temperature Special enclosure for RF hut Laser optics Sensitive to temperature, humidity and dust, vibration Class 100,000 equivalent, humidity control, vibration isolated foundation (separated from klystron gallery), fix bumps in road nearby.

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Near Hall Hutches with a variety of experiments to house Thermal, humidity, and dust control Class 10,000 equivalent Adjacent to Near Hall are Xray beam deflector which have significant vibration sensitivities.

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Xray Beam Pointing Sensitivity 250 m ~ 320 m Near Hall Far Hall Undulator ~ 400 m  FEL ~ 400  m  ’ FEL ~ 1  rad

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Pointing Stability Tolerance 0.1  spot stability in Far Hall (conservative) implies 0.1  rad pointing stability for deflecting crystals and electron beam Feedback on beam orbit or splitter crystal can stabilize spot on slow time scale. Typical SLAC beam is stable to better than 1/10  with feedback. Still have to face significant vibration tolerances on deflecting crystals Corrector magnets in BTH must be stable to better than 1/10 sigma deflection net. Electron beam stability is not expected to be not quite as good as 1/10 sigma

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Vibration and Pointing Stability Angular tolerance can be converted to a vibration amplitude for a specific frequency, for CF spec. y=A coskx-  t where y is the height of the ground, dy/dx is the slope. We want average rms(dy/dx) ≤ 0.1  rad  A ≤ 0.1  rad/2 . is the wavelength of the ground wave Typical worst case is around 10 Hz and speed of ground wave is around 1000 m/s.  A ≤ / 2  ~ m, which is quite reasonable since typical A~100 nm or less High Q support structures could cause a problem

Pine, Bldg 48, Room 232 J. 4/29/04 Conclusion Reliable production of ultrahigh brightness, FEL x-rays requires Exceptional control of the thermal environment in the Undulator Hall and MMF Excellent long term mechanical stability of the Undulator Hall foundation Care in preventing undesirable vibration near sensitive equipment at several locations Requirements are understood, what remains is to obtain and implement cost effective solutions.