Beam current4 A Beam pulse length1.5 ms Power input/structure 35 MW Ohmic losses (beam on)1.6 MW RF power to load (beam on) 0.4 MW RF-to-beam efficiency.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Lyon 2005 DIPAC Lyon th DIPAC Lyon June 2005Ulrich Raich CERN AB/BDI Instrumentation in small, low energy machines Ulrich Raich CERN AB-BDI.

Advertisements

Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.

Commissioning August & September. 2 Agenda 11:20 Coffee 11:30 Introduction Sue S 11:35 Controls (an overview) Brian M 10:55 Controls & Data Acquisition.

Design and Performance Expectation of ALPHA accelerator S.Y. Lee, IU 2/26/ Introduction 2. Possible CIS re-build and parameters 3. Issues in the.

Cryomodule Quad Doublet Solutions – M Church 9/12/07 1 NML Cryomodule Quad Doublet Lattice Solutions  Question  Are quadrupoles required as part of the.

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory MERIT Experiment Status NFMCC Collaboration Meeting FNAL March 17-20, 2008.

P. Emma, SLACLCLS FAC Meeting - April 29, 2004 Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P. Emma LCLS FAC Meeting April 29, 2004 LCLS.

Controls Review  Want to record a full configuration of the experiment at every possible “event”, including controls data.  Event trigger = accelerator.

ILC Polarized Electron Source Annual DOE HEP Program Review June 5 – 8 International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center A. Brachmann,

Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,

Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector Commissioning September Injector Commissioning Plans C.Limborg-Deprey Gun exit measurements.

Cecile Limborg-Deprey Injector October Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Diagnostics and Commissioning GTL measurements.

Ultra-sensitive HALO monitor N. Vinogradov, A. Dychkant, P. Piot.

F Specifications for the dark current kicker for the NML test facility at Fermilab S. Nagaitsev, M. Church, P. Piot, C.Y. Tan, J. Steimel Fermilab May.

Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.

(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,

ESS DTL beam commissioning

Injector Accelerator Readiness Review, 10/31/06 Henrik Loos 1 Beam Losses During LCLS Injector Phase-1 Operation Scope of phase 1 operation Operating modes.

Laser Stripping and H 0 monitor systems 10/18/2011B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI1.

Status of Beam loss Monitoring on CTF3 Results of Tests on LINAC and PETS as R&D for TBL Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Thibaut Lefevre CERN CTF3.

Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.

FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.

The Stripping Foil Test Stand in the Linac4 Transfer Line

Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.

DEVELOPMENT OF A BEAM LOSS DETECTION SYSTEM FOR THE CLIC TEST FACILITY 3 T. Lefevre Beam loss monitors for the CLIC Test Facility 3 Preliminary study done.

IEEE NSS 2007 D.Kramer 1 Very High Radiation Detector for the LHC BLM System based on Secondary Electron Emission Daniel Kramer, Eva Barbara.

PROBLEM 1 Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.

‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.

P. Urschütz - CTF3 Collaboration Meeting 2007 CTF3 commissioning & operation in 2006 P. Urschütz for the CTF3 operations team  Commissioning of the Delay.

The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.

PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,

CERN, 29.January 2009Uli Raich AB/BI 3 MeV instrumentation commissioning U. Raich Linac-4 Beam Coordination Committee

FCC-ee booster: preliminary design study Dmitry Shwartz BINP

LINAC4 emittance measurements BI Day Divonne, 24 th November 11/24/2011 B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, D. Gerard, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI 1.

Estimates of required MPS reaction time In the merger (at the centers of respective 20deg dipoles and in between 2 lenses) rms R=250 um In the

PXIE Beam Instrumentation Status Update – Preparing for MEBT 1.1 Beam Vic Scarpine Feb. 9, 2016.

E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.

Wir schaffen Wissen – heute für morgen PSI, March 2013 Paul Scherrer Institut PSI / DESY / KIT Mini-Workshop on Longitudinal Diagnostics for FELs.

CLIC DB injector facility, photo-injector option studies LCWS, Granada, September 26 th -30 th,2011Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  CLIC DB injector  Thermionic.

Radiation studies for the MI collimation system and ILC vertical cryostat test area December 13, 2006 Igor Rakhno Accelerator Physics Department.

ESS Front End diagnostic

High intensity electron beam and infrastructure Paolo Valente * INFN Roma * On behalf of the BTF and LINAC staff.

Phil Oxford , june 18 Photoinjector at.

Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN

Cesium Telluride Photocathode Preparation at Argonne

LINAC 4 source & LEBT measurement results

Measurements, ideas, curiosities

MIT Compact X-ray Source

The Cornell High Brightness Injector

Performance Degradation cERL Injector Cryomodule

Electron Source Configuration

Status of the CLIC Injector studies

Sensitivity tests of BLM_S chamber in PSB dump

CEPC Injector Damping Ring

Why do BLMs need to know the Quench Levels?

Considerations on Beam Diagnostics Physics

Linac/BC1 Commissioning P

commissioning and measurements

Compact linear accelerator FLUTE: status update

Dark current in TESLA linac

Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P

LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002

High Charge Low Emittance RF Gun for SuperKEKB

DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.

Diagnostics overview Beam profile monitors Cherenkov radiators Summary

小型X線源の性能確認実験計画高輝度・RF電子銃研究会広島大学高エネルギー加速器研究機構浦川順治

Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016

Experience with photoinjector at ATF

Isotope Readiness Review Run Plans

Presentation transcript:

Beam current4 A Beam pulse length1.5 ms Power input/structure 35 MW Ohmic losses (beam on)1.6 MW RF power to load (beam on) 0.4 MW RF-to-beam efficiency ~ 94% Phase variation along pulse±4º RF phase Power to load (beam off) phase Power to load (beam on) ± 4º 1.5  s RF power

Beam position monitor Accelerating structures Quadrupoles e-e- Beam loss detectors Y z x Design beam optics

Simulations based on a beam loss corresponding to the ‰ of the nominal beam current e-e- Beam loss at + Y

(a)(b) (c)(d)

+ Y +/- X - Y Positions of the beam loss e-e- ACEM’s

Collimator BPM 502 BPM 690 Accelerating structures BPM 402 Quadrupoles e - Dipoles Injector Cleaning chicane Steerers First Linac Section

- An Aluminum Cathode Electron Multiplier (ACEM) (Ø38mm) e - /e + x &  rays Aluminum cathode 100nm thick e - / e + : [1, 20]MeV  1 – 5 % SEM e -  & x rays : [10keV,20MeV]  SEM e - e - current amplification < e-e- HV Signal 50mV/50Ω  100mA-100nA

Calibration using a very intense Cesium source (  - emitter: 53pA) High Voltage (V) ACEM current (pA) Efficiency (%) Output voltage on 50Ω (nV) Calibration : 1mV  xx  A ACEM

The slit is opened so that the full beam enters the next accelerating structure. The beam transient is then re-accelerated up to 80MeV and is lost somewhere because the beam optics are not adapted to its energy The slit is closed so that the beam transient is stopped in the collimator. The rest of the beam enters the next accelerating structure and is accelerated to 35MeV

(a)(b) (c) (d)

e - shower efficiency for different beam loss positions and energies Beam loss position1 st Quad2 nd Quad3 rd QuadPipe 0.9mPipe 0.3m Shower efficiency (%) MeV, 3mrad, 0mm beam size 80MeV, 3mrad, 0mm beam size Beam loss position1 st Quad2 nd Quad3 rd QuadPipe 0.9mPipe 0.3m Shower efficiency (%)

Damage on a Vacuum valve Spectrometer line

BLM’s

Shower versus beam angle Positions of the beam loss

~ e - / e + shower of 0.3nA, not seen by the ACEM with a 400volts bias

‘BLM signals depend on beam energy, position and current’ Possibility to estimate where the beam transient is lost The different energies are not lost at the same position Beam loss distributed between the detector and the 3 rd quadrupole