Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.

Advertisements

Overview of Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System Hector Glynn Executive Director.

R ACIAL D ISPARITIES IN THE C RIMINAL J USTICE S YSTEM.

Pretrial Procedures Transfer hearings Detention Intake Diversion

SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross.

Juvenile Sentencing Options in Texas

Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Ten and Eleven.

Juvenile Justice system

PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.

Chapter 16.  A. It is most important that juveniles be rehabilitated.  B. It is most important that juveniles be held accountable and.

The 3-Strikes Law California, U.S.A. March 7, 1994.

NORTH CAROLINA SENTENCING AND POLICY ADVISORY COMMISSION Report on Study of Youthful Offenders Pursuant to Session Law , Sections 34.1 and 34.2.

Delinquency Dispositions: Legal Overview Janet Mason Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill March, 2006.

Presentation by: Andrew Clark Director of the Institute for the Study of Crime & Justice and the Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at CCSU Institute.

Re-Entry and Recidivism

Strengthening Probation as the Sanction of Choice In order for Probation to be a meaningful sanction, it must be adequately funded. Probation is the sanction.

BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES

A few facts and figures…. US population composition.

CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.

DRAFT PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS Mark Rubin – Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine.

Sections V & VI. The Juvenile Court Process  1. Based on your reading, what factors do you believe might explain the disproportionate representation.

Virginia’s Geriatric Release Provision. 2 Geriatric Release Provision & Truth-in-Sentencing  The Geriatric Release Provision was adopted as part of the.

November 3 1.What is an action committed by a juvenile called that would be considered a crime if committed by an adult? a. intake b. truancy c. status.

Reported Property Crime and Arrests Reported Property Crime 152, ,677159,814156,833147,684142,384138,899139,438.

© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER EIGHTEIGHT.

Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.

Hennepin County School/Shared Social Work Project Social Work Project May 16, 2013 Mark Griffin Senior Assistant County Attorney.

Juvenile Justice.

November 5, 2014 New Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instruments – Status Update VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.

Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process

NC Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission RECIDIVISM OF 16 AND 17 YEAR OLD AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS: FINDINGS FROM TWO STUDIES Presented to Youth Accountability.

Juvenile Delinquency Mrs. Lauterhahn. What is Juvenile Delinquency? An act by a juvenile under the age of 18 that if committed by an adult would constitute.

Chapter 6 Postimprisonment Community Supervision.

Harvey J. Reed, Director Linda S. Janes, Assistant Director Presentation and Update to the Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission.

Paul J. Powers Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney.

Juvenile Justice. juvenile Persons under the age of 17.

North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.

Ursula Hill February 2012 Notre Dame-AmeriCorps Mid-Year Conference.

Criminal Justice System. Police Have immediate control over who is arrested “Police discretion” Size of U.S. population and number of police officers.

JUVENILE COURT WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO. DELINQUENCY CASES THE JUVENILE COURT HANDLES CRIMINAL CASES ABOVE CLASS B MISDEMEANORS TO CAPITAL MURDER FOR.

Juvenile Justice Ch. 16.

Juveniles Convicted in Circuit Court FY2001 – FY2008.

Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.

Mike Fitzgerald and Desiree Maldonado California’s Juvenile Justice System.

ARIZONA’S FISCHER REPORT DATA DRIVEN DECISIONS ELIZABETH ORTIZ ARIZONA PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS’ ADVISORY COUNCIL MARCH 5, 2014.

Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.

2013 MONITORING DATA: SENTENCING PRACTICES DATA SUMMARY Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission September 18, 2014.

Sentencing and the Correctional Process

Realignment in San Francisco: Profile and Impact on Women Wendy Still, MAS Chief Adult Probation Officer October 30, 2013.

Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?

JUVENILE JUSTICE In Minnesota. History of Juvenile Law  Originally, juvenile offenders were treated the same as adult criminals  Beginning in 1899,

National Center for State Courts DETENTION ASSESSMENT.

Race and the Relationship to Juvenile Adjudication

Criminal Justice Poll Diamond State Consulting

Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective

Dependency Court Flowchart

TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1

Criminal Justice Poll Diamond State Consulting

1 Panel 2, Position 5 Jack D. Ripper.

Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016

Illinois Recidivism Studies

Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.

Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends

By Austin O'Neill and Rebecca Tibbs

Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.

Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.

The Court System Juveniles.

Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.

Western Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Allegany, Frederick, Garrett and Washington DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.

Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends

Presentation transcript:

Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05

Discretionary Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class B1 through I felony offenses 26 juveniles in adult system in FY 2004/05 1,543 juveniles in juvenile system in FY 2004/05

Juveniles in Adult System Gender: Male – 23 (88%) Female – 3 (12%) Race: Black – 14 (54%) White – 9 (35%) Other – 3 (12%)

Juveniles in Adult System Age: 15 years old – 19 (73%) 14 years old – 7 (27%) 13 years old – 0

Juveniles in Adult System Charged Offenses: Classes A through E – 18 (69%) Classes F through I – 8 (31%)

Juveniles in Adult System Convicted Offenses: Classes B1 through E – 14 (54%) Classes F through I – 12 (46%)

Juveniles in Adult System Prior Record Level: Level I – 22 (85%) Level II – 3 (11%) Level IV – 1 (4%)

Juveniles in Adult System Sentences: Active – 17 (65%) Intermediate – 8 (31%) Community – 1 (4%)

Juveniles in Adult System Recidivism: 37 juveniles placed on probation or released from prison in FY 2001/ placed on probation % were rearrested within three years. 15 released from prison – 60% were rearrested within three years.

Juveniles in Juvenile System Gender: Male – 1,408 (91%) Female – 135 (9%) Race: Black – 878 (57%) White – 549 (36%) Other – 116 (7%)

Juveniles in Juvenile System Age: 15 years old – 804 (52%) 14 years old – 507 (33%) 13 years old – 232 (15%)

Juveniles in Juvenile System Adjudicated Offenses: Violent – 170 (11%) Serious – 1,373 (89%)

Juveniles in Juvenile System Delinquency History Level: Low – 975 (63%) Medium – 250 (16%) High – 318 (21%)

Juveniles in Juvenile System Dispositions: Level 1 – 641 (41%) Level 2 – 720 (47%) Level 3 – 182 (12%)

Juveniles in Juvenile System Recidivism: Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission report due May 1, 2007.