FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Tony Donné Introduction to fusion control.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department
Advertisements

Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.
Extension of IEA Implementing Agreement on Large Tokamak Facilities Presented to Committee on Energy Research Technologies October 18-19, 2005 Paris, France.
Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants Related Advanced Technologies with participants from China and Korea ( Kyoto University, Uji, Japan, Feb.
The Swiss Association vision for the period Presented by M. Q. Tran on behalf of the CRPP.
Stability, Transport, and Conrol for the discussion Y. Miura IEA/LT Workshop (W59) combined with DOE/JAERI Technical Planning of Tokamak Experiments (FP1-2)
George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
ELECTRON CYCLOTRON SYSTEM FOR KSTAR US-Korea Workshop Opportunities for Expanded Fusion Science and Technology Collaborations with the KSTAR Project Presented.
FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM, Trilateral Euregio Cluster Feedback controlled ECRH power deposition for control of.
Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.
Lecture 6.1 Lecture 6.1 ADVANCED PLASMA DIAGNOSTICTECHNIQUES Fri 23 May 2008, 1 pm LT5 Presented by Dr Ian Falconer Room.
Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster 1 M.R. de Baar, Workshop Control for Nuclear Fusion, the Netherlands, In the control room:
Analysis of instrumental effects in HIBP equilibrium potential profile measurements on the MST-RFP Xiaolin Zhang Plasma Dynamics Lab, Rensselaer Polytechnic.
IAEA - FEC2004 // Vilamoura // // EX/4-5 // A. Staebler – 1 – A. Staebler, A.C.C Sips, M. Brambilla, R. Bilato, R. Dux, O. Gruber, J. Hobirk,
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
EXPERIMENTS OF ACTIVE QSH CONTROL IN EXTRAP-T2R L. Frassinetti, P.R. Brunsell, E.K.J Olofsson and J.R. Drake.
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Introduction Tony Donné Information taken.
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
Predictive Integrated Modeling Simulations Using a Combination of H-mode Pedestal and Core Models Glenn Bateman, Arnold H. Kritz, Thawatchai Onjun, Alexei.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
Recent JET Experiments and Science Issues Jim Strachan PPPL Students seminar Feb. 14, 2005 JET is presently world’s largest tokamak, being ½ linear dimension.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
Measurement Requirements and Assessment of Measurement Capability David Johnson, Réjean Boivin, Ken Young.
XP NSTX Results Review Beam Modulation Effects on Ion Power Balance XP 737 P.W.Ross.
Database structure for the European Integrated Tokamak Modelling Task Force F. Imbeaux On behalf of the Data Coordination Project.
Particle Distribution Modification by TAE mode and Resonant Particle Orbits POSTECH 1, NFRI 1,2 M.H.Woo 1, C.M.Ryu 1, T.N.Rhee 1,,2.
Status and Plans Transport Model Validation in ITER-similar Current-Ramp Plasmas D. R. Mikkelsen, PPPL ITPA Transport & Confinement Workshop San Diego.
O. Sauter Effects of plasma shaping on MHD and electron heat conductivity; impact on alpha electron heating O. Sauter for the TCV team Ecole Polytechnique.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
Self-consistency of pressure profiles in tokamaks Yu.N. Dnestrovskij 1, K.A. Razumova 1, A.J.H. Donne 2, G.M.D. Hogeweij 2, V.F. Andreev 1, I.S. Bel’bas.
現代制御理論を用いた核融合プ ラズマ制御シミュレーション 三善 悠矢 東京大学大学院新領域創成科学研究科.
1 Plasma Rotation and Momentum Confinement – DB ITPA - 1 October 2007 by Peter de Vries Plasma Rotation and Momentum Confinement Studies at JET P.C. de.
ITPA Meeting, PPPL, April, y1999: two core and two SOL transport codes with about 15 users, who worked locally at JET; y2000: Secondees from.
Global Stability Issues for a Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment UFA Burning Plasma Workshop Austin, Texas December 11, 2000 S. C. Jardin with input from.
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
D. Moreau, ITPA-IOS Meeting, Kyoto, October 18-21, 2011 LEHIGH U N I V E R S I T Y First Integrated Magnetic and Kinetic Control for AT Scenarios on DIII-D.
APS DPP 2006 October Adaptive Extremum Seeking Control of ECCD for NTM Stabilization L. Luo 1, J. Woodby 1, E. Schuster 1 F. D. Halpern 2, G.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
(National Institute for Fusion Science, Japan)
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
S. Coda, MHD workshop, PPPL, 22 Nov Advances in sawtooth control for NTM prevention in JET S. Coda 1, L.-G. Eriksson 2, J. Graves 1, R. Koslowski.
Effect of low aspect ratio data on H-mode confinement.
RFX workshop / /Valentin Igochine Page 1 Control of MHD instabilities. Similarities and differences between tokamak and RFP V. Igochine, T. Bolzonella,
7th Workshop on Fusion Data Processing Validation and Analysis Frascati 2012 Brief Tutorial on Real-time Analysis D. Mazon CEA Cadarache.
TRANSP for core particle transport studies M. Maslov.
Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.
1 Feature of Energy Transport in NSTX plasma Siye Ding under instruction of Stanley Kaye 05/04/09.
Approach for a High Performance Fusion Power Source Pathway Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy ARIES Team Meeting March 3-4, 2008 UCSD, San.
Confinement & Transport Plan Classical theory of confinement and transport. o Diffusion equation Particle diffusion in a magnetic field.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
1 SIMULATION OF ANOMALOUS PINCH EFFECT ON IMPURITY ACCUMULATION IN ITER.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
Fuel Cycle Research Thrust Using A Full Fusion Nuclear Environment
1 Peter de Vries – ITPA T meeting Culham – March 2010 P.C. de Vries 1,2, T.W. Versloot 1, A. Salmi 3, M-D. Hua 4, D.H. Howell 2, C. Giroud 2, V. Parail.
Nonlinear Simulations of Energetic Particle-driven Modes in Tokamaks Guoyong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ, USA In collaboration.
NSTX Meeting name – abbreviated presentation title, abbreviated author name (??/??/20??) Goals of NSTX Advanced Scenario and Control TSG Study, implement,
Software Architecture for Multimodal Interactive Systems : Voice-enabled Graphical Notebook.
6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Summary Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement chaired.
SMK – RR ‘041 Stanley M. Kaye PPPL, Princeton University NSTX Results Review 20 September 2004 FY04 Run Coordination Wrap-Up.
Electron Ion Collider New aspects of EIC experiment instrumentation and computing, as well as their possible impact on and context in society (B) COMPUTING.
Active Beam Spectroscopy in Hot Fusion Plasmas
CPHT-Ecole polytechnique
EX/2-5: Plasma shape and fueling dependence on the small ELMs regime in TCV and AUG B. Labit et al. A transition from Type-I to Type-II/grassy ELMs is.
Automatic Analysis of Edge Pedestal Gradient Degradation during ELMs
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas
Modelling of pulsed and steady-state DEMO scenarios G. Giruzzi et al
Presentation transcript:

FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Tony Donné Introduction to fusion control

Association Euratom-FOM A.J.H. Donné, Control for Nuclear Fusion, 7/8 May /9 Control is a central issue in fusion Research in present devices points strongly towards need for advanced control –Simultaneous control of multiple (profiles of) plasma parameters –Real-time control of a large number of parameters with a limited set of actuators –Profile control in the presence of dominant alpha heating –Control signals for feedback on one parameter derived from multiple diagnostics –Intelligent control taking account of the instrumental response functions

Association Euratom-FOM A.J.H. Donné, Control for Nuclear Fusion, 7/8 May /9 Let’s look at ITER measurements to illustrate this Control is a central issue in fusion

Association Euratom-FOM A.J.H. Donné, Control for Nuclear Fusion, 7/8 May /9 Conclusion The more advanced the operating scenarios, the more parameters need to be controlled

FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM P. Politzer et al., ITPA meeting Lisbon 2004

Association Euratom-FOM A.J.H. Donné, Control for Nuclear Fusion, 7/8 May /9 The (hopefully not too) far future: DEMO Only 1-2 operating scenarios –Smaller number of measurements/diagnostics –Advanced predictive/analysis codes to combine data from various diagnostics in an intelligent way are needed to reduce the number of required diagnostics. Experience with this should be gained on ITER Experience on ITER may guide the selection of techniques that can best cope with the harsh environment During ITER life time experience should be gained with real-time data handling and validation to process large quantities of data, in-pulse calibration, etc.

Association Euratom-FOM A.J.H. Donné, Control for Nuclear Fusion, 7/8 May /9 DEMO: no Diagnostic Neutral Beam? In case the data obtained in ITER with the DNB (He-ash, T i, v rot, B p, etc.) are important for DEMO, techniques and hardware should be developed to obtain the same info without beam –E.g., is it possible to use measurements of He near the edge to control the He ash?

Association Euratom-FOM A.J.H. Donné, Control for Nuclear Fusion, 7/8 May /9 This workshop Position and shape control –Equilibrium, stability Profile control –Performance boosting, plasma tailoring MHD control –Stability, ‘controlability’ (i.e. tolerable ELMs) Integrated scenarios

Association Euratom-FOM A.J.H. Donné, Control for Nuclear Fusion, 7/8 May /9 I wish you all a very interesting workshop