1 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Not only size matters: Regularized partial similarity of shapes Alexander Bronstein, Michael.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differential geometry I
Advertisements

1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Introduction Introduction Alexander Bronstein, Michael Bronstein © 2008 All rights reserved. Web: tosca.cs.technion.ac.il.
Multiple Shape Correspondence by Dynamic Programming Yusuf Sahillioğlu 1 and Yücel Yemez 2 Pacific Graphics 2014 Computer Eng. Depts, 1, 2, Turkey.
Proportion Priors for Image Sequence Segmentation Claudia Nieuwenhuis, etc. ICCV 2013 Oral.
Topology-Invariant Similarity and Diffusion Geometry
Xianfeng Gu, Yaling Wang, Tony Chan, Paul Thompson, Shing-Tung Yau
Isometry-Invariant Similarity
Data Clustering Methods
Corp. Research Princeton, NJ Cut Metrics and Geometry of Grid Graphs Yuri Boykov, Siemens Research, Princeton, NJ joint work with Vladimir Kolmogorov,
Discrete geometry Lecture 2 1 © Alexander & Michael Bronstein
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Geometry Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Shortest path problems Alexander Bronstein, Michael Bronstein,
Shape reconstruction and inverse problems
Invariant correspondence
1 Processing & Analysis of Geometric Shapes Shortest path problems Shortest path problems The discrete way © Alexander & Michael Bronstein, ©
1 Michael Bronstein Computational metric geometry Computational metric geometry Michael Bronstein Department of Computer Science Technion – Israel Institute.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Partial similarity Partial similarity © Alexander & Michael Bronstein, © Michael Bronstein, 2010 tosca.cs.technion.ac.il/book.
1 Processing & Analysis of Geometric Shapes Introduction Processing and Analysis of Geometric Shapes Department of Electrical Engineering – Technion Spring.
Multidimensional scaling
Numerical Optimization
Isometry invariant similarity
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Lecture I – Introduction Numerical geometry of shapes Lecture I – Introduction non-rigid Michael Bronstein.
Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes
Numerical geometry of objects
1 Bronstein 2 and Kimmel Extrinsic and intrinsic similarity of nonrigid shapes Michael M. Bronstein Department of Computer Science Technion – Israel Institute.
Lecture IV – Invariant Correspondence
Correspondence & Symmetry
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Partial similarity Partial Similarity Alexander Bronstein, Michael Bronstein © 2008 All rights reserved. Web:
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Spectral Methods Tutorial. Spectral Methods Tutorial 6 © Maks Ovsjanikov tosca.cs.technion.ac.il/book Numerical.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Lecture II – Numerical Tools Numerical geometry of shapes Lecture II – Numerical Tools non-rigid Alex Bronstein.
Spectral Embedding Alexander Bronstein, Michael Bronstein
Differential geometry II
Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes In the Rigid Kingdom In the Rigid Kingdom Lecture 4 © Alexander & Michael Bronstein tosca.cs.technion.ac.il/book.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes A journey to non-rigid world objects Invariant correspondence and shape synthesis non-rigid Alexander Bronstein.
1 Bronstein, Bronstein, and Kimmel Joint extrinsic and intrinsic similarity of non-rigid shapes Rock, paper, and scissors Joint extrinsic and intrinsic.
Invariant Correspondence
Recovering Articulated Object Models from 3D Range Data Dragomir Anguelov Daphne Koller Hoi-Cheung Pang Praveen Srinivasan Sebastian Thrun Computer Science.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Spectral embedding Conclusions I hope that posterity will judge me kindly, not only as to the things which I have.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes A journey to non-rigid world objects Numerical methods non-rigid Alexander Bronstein Michael Bronstein Numerical.
Non-Euclidean Embedding
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Introduction Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Introduction Alexander Bronstein, Michael Bronstein, Ron Kimmel.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Numerical Geometry Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Numerical geometry Alexander Bronstein, Michael Bronstein,
Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes
Paretian similarity for partial comparison of non-rigid objects
1 Bronstein 2 & Kimmel An isometric model for facial animation and beyond AMDO, Puerto de Andratx, 2006 An isometric model for facial animation and beyond.
1 Numerical Geometry of Non-Rigid Shapes Invariant shape similarity Invariant shape similarity © Alexander & Michael Bronstein, © Michael Bronstein,
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Non-Euclidean Embedding Non-Euclidean Embedding Lecture 6 © Alexander & Michael Bronstein tosca.cs.technion.ac.il/book.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Expression-invariant face recognition Expression-invariant face recognition Lecture 8 © Alexander & Michael Bronstein.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Three-Dimensional Face Recognition Three Dimensional Face Recognition “And in stature he is small, chest broad,
1 Michael M. Bronstein Partial similarity of objects 17 December 2006 Partial similarity of objects, or how to compare a centaur to a horse Michael M.
1 Bronstein 2 & Kimmel Matching 2D articulated shapes using GMDS AMDO, Puerto de Andratx, 2006 Matching 2D articulated shapes using Generalized Multidimensional.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes A journey to non-rigid world objects Introduction non-rigid Alexander Bronstein Michael Bronstein Numerical geometry.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Non-rigid correspondence Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Non-rigid correspondence Alexander Bronstein,
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Nonrigid Correspondence & Calculus of Shapes Non-Rigid Correspondence and Calculus of Shapes Of bodies changed.
CSE554Laplacian DeformationSlide 1 CSE 554 Lecture 8: Laplacian Deformation Fall 2012.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Shortest path problems Shortest path problems Lecture 2 © Alexander & Michael Bronstein tosca.cs.technion.ac.il/book.
Coarse-to-Fine Combinatorial Matching for Dense Isometric Shape Correspondence Yusuf Sahillioğlu and Yücel Yemez Computer Eng. Dept., Koç University, Istanbul,
Expression-invariant Face Recognition using Geodesic Distance Isometries Kerry Widder A Review of ‘Robust expression-invariant face recognition from partially.
Scalable and Fully Distributed Localization With Mere Connectivity.
Roee Litman, Alexander Bronstein, Michael Bronstein
CENG 789 – Digital Geometry Processing 04- Distances, Descriptors and Sampling on Meshes Asst. Prof. Yusuf Sahillioğlu Computer Eng. Dept,, Turkey.
1Ellen L. Walker 3D Vision Why? The world is 3D Not all useful information is readily available in 2D Why so hard? “Inverse problem”: one image = many.
1 Numerical geometry of non-rigid shapes Projects Quasi-isometries Project 1 © Alexander & Michael Bronstein tosca.cs.technion.ac.il/book Numerical geometry.
Implicit Active Shape Models for 3D Segmentation in MR Imaging M. Rousson 1, N. Paragio s 2, R. Deriche 1 1 Odyssée Lab., INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France.
Assoc. Prof. Yusuf Sahillioğlu
Morphing and Shape Processing
Graph matching algorithms
SHREC’17 Track: Deformable Shape Retrieval with Missing Parts
10-6 Similar Figures (page )
Invariance Under Transformations
Presentation transcript:

1 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Not only size matters: Regularized partial similarity of shapes Alexander Bronstein, Michael Bronstein © 2008 All rights reserved. Web: tosca.cs.technion.ac.il

2 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 I am a centaur.Am I human ?Am I equine ? Yes, I’m partially human. Yes, I’m partially equine. Identity crisis Partial similarity

3 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Partial similarity Shapes are partially similar if they have significantsimilar parts Illustration: Herluf Bidstrup

4 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Shape Shape: metric-measure space Set of points Metric Measure Part: -measurable subset Represented as indicator function Part of a shape is a shape

5 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Significance = significance of part Alternatively: Many ways to define measure Area of the part Normalized area Statistical weighting a là tf-idf

6 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Metric Many ways to define metric Restricted metric : as the bird flies Intrinsic metric : shortest path length

7 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Metric Extrinsic geometry Intrinsic geometry Invariant to rigid deformation Invariant to inelastic nonrigid deformation

8 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Similarity Extrinsic similarity How congruent are and ? Best rigid alignment Intrinsic similarity How similar are and ? Min. distortion embedding Minimum-distortion correspondence

9 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Correspondence and ( dis ) similarity Correspondence: binary relation Belongs to some class of correspondences Rigid correspondences Non-rigid correspondences Given correspondence, quantify mismatch it creates between part of and part of Dissimilarity between two parts

10 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Rigid shape similarity Closest pointEuclidean isometry ICP

11 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Non-rigid shape similarity GMDS

12 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Multicriterion optimization Shapes are partially similar if they have significant similar parts Simultaneously minimize dissimilarity and maximize significance over all possible pairs of parts Criteria are competing: find a trade-off

13 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 What is better? Many small parts… …or one large part? Not only size matters!

14 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Regularization Shapes are partially similar if they have significant, regular, and similar parts Add regularization term is the degree of regularity of part

15 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Boundary length regularization IrregularRegular Part regularity inversely proportional to boundary length Isoperimetric inequality (planar case): for fixed area (significance), the most regular shape is a circle.

16 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Numerical framework Minimization over all parts (binary indicator functions) is NP-hard !  Relax: replace crisp part by fuzzy part Continuous optimization

17 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Problem “fuzzification” Substitute binary with a continuous one Mumford-Shah regularization on curved surfaces Similarity: no change Significance: no change Regularity: fuzzy part has no boundary!

18 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Minimization algorithm Freeze parts and solve for correspondence Freeze correspondence and solve for parts 12 Step 1: weighted ICP (rigid) or weighted GMDS (nonrigid) Step 2: Newton descent Discretization & numerical details in the paper

19 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Rigid partial similarity SIGNIFICANCE REGULARITY

20 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Without regularization With regularization

21 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Conclusions Framework for regularized partial similarity Control over part significance and regularity Optimal geometry-driven weighting scheme for ICP and GMDS

22 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Published by Springer To appear in August 2008 ~350 pages Over 50 illustrations Color figures tosca.cs.technion.ac.il Shameless advertisement Additional information

23 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Backup slides

24 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Pareto optimality INSIGNIFICANCE DISSIMILARITY UTOPIA Attainable set Pareto frontier Solution is Pareto optimal if there exist no with and simultaneously.

25 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Set-valued dissimilarity INSIGNIFICANCE DISSIMILARITY Pareto frontier = set-valued dissimilarity Analogy: rate-distortion curve in communication

26 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Order relations BLUE < RED GREEN ? RED INSIGNIFICANCE DISSIMILARITY Is this crocodile greener than ? Not total ordering of set-valued dissimilarities Some dissimilarities are not commensurable

27 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Scalar-valued dissimilarity INSIGNIFICANCE DISSIMILARITY Convert Pareto frontier into scalar Fixed significance : Fixed dissimilarity : Area under the curve Distance from utopia:

28 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Topology regularization Euler characteristic as regularity Gauss-Bonnet identity No isoperimetric inequality for general curved surfaces Same boundary length, different number of connected components Small boundary length does not necessarily mean regularity

29 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 DaveVictoriaHorseCentaurSeahorse Data: tosca.cs.technion.ac.il

30 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Nonrigid partial similarity Partial similarity Full similarity Scalar partial similarity Human Human- like Horse-like Human- like

31 Regularized partial similarity of shapes NORDIA – CVPR 2008 Regularized partial similarity INSIGNIFICANCE DISSIMILARITY IRREGULARITY