Open assessments : 1 Department of Computer Science Masters level Open assessments Susan Stepney.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment I. Outline Select a paper of interest Not a thought piece or a review Empirical research Get paper approved Produce 2,000 word report.
Advertisements

Assessment II. 2 The Research Cycle Formulation Generate Hypothesis/Questions Model Design Research Collect Data Sell Solution Assess Reliability/Validity.
AS Sociology Exam Technique.
Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Guideline for discussion/presentation/critique #1: Really understand the paper …
Research Supervisor Training Programme Obligations of the Supervisor.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Workshop: Translating graduate attributes into classroom learning A/Prof Simon Barrie Institute for Teaching and Learning Hong Kong Institute of Education.
What is Science anyway.
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
Making Sense of Assessments in HE Modules (Demystifying Module Specification) Jan Anderson University Teaching Fellow L&T Coordinator SSSL
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
CSCD 555 Research Methods for Computer Science
All About the Master’s Thesis Michael I. Schwartzbach University of Aarhus Department of Computer Science.
All About the Master’s Thesis Michael I. Schwartzbach Gudmund S. Frandsen University of Aarhus Department of Computer Science.
Understanding Standards: Biology An Overview of the Standards for Unit and Course Assessment.
Left click or use the forward arrows to advance through the PowerPoint Upon clicking, each section of the article will be highlighted one by one Read.
The Modernisation of Higher Education Introduction to LOLA methodology Anthony Vickers 27 th June 2012.
As soon as you are given an essay question, begin your thinking. If you don't, you might miss useful information whilst doing other research. The television.
Advanced Research Methodology
Developing Higher Level Study Skills
‘Positively defined learning outcomes’ Harriet Barnes Standards, Quality and Enhancement 19 June 2015.
How to Write a Literature Review
Research Writing and Scientific Literature
MODELS OF REFLECTION.
Programme Specification, Benchmarks etc. Warren Houghton School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Exeter.
“Knowing Revisited” And that’s how we can move toward really knowing something: Richard Feynman on the Scientific Method.
Promoting and Communicating Learning Quality at NKU Mapping Student Learning Outcomes and Assessing Student Learning D. Kent Johnson, PhD.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
Literature Review Evaluating Existing Research
1 The proposed UK computing masters benchmark 5th TEMPUS JEP Meeting Belgrade April 26/27.
CompSci 725 Handout 7: Oral Presentations, Projects and Term Reports Version July 2009 Clark Thomborson University of Auckland.
CM602: Effective Systems Development Exam Preparation Slide 1 Exam Preparation Preparing for the CM602 Examination D.Miller J. Horton.
Writing research proposal/synopsis
Methodologies. The Method section is very important because it tells your Research Committee how you plan to tackle your research problem. Chapter 3 Methodologies.
PROF. DR. MOHD ADAM BAKAR HF :
442421: Dissertation Interim Report Ian Perry Room: C49 Extension: 7287
Fundamentals of Scientific Research Dr. Samer Odeh Hanna (Ph.D.)
TIPS FOR ANSWERING LONGER ANSWER QUESTIONS Which command word is used? These tell you what to do. Explain, Describe, Discuss, Compare Check you know what.
Basic Writing Skills Science Workshop 1pm Tuesday March 6 th Department of Biological Sciences.
AF1.1 L1-2 Using models for and in explanations Compare features or parts of objects, living things or events.
One Form of Argument… “Argument” in NGSS In science, the production of knowledge is dependent on a process of reasoning from evidence that requires a.
PSY 219 – Academic Writing in Psychology Fall Çağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Department of Psychology Inst. Nilay Avcı Week 3.
PSY 219 – Academic Writing in Psychology Fall Çağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Department of Psychology Inst. Nilay Avcı Week 9.
Welcome to UCC Dr Liam Marnane Dean of Graduate Studies (Dept. Electrical & Electronic Engineering)
CAS Managebac update CAS opportunity for someone with a scanner. Cambodia?
“the presentation of the thesis falls short,,,substantial proof reading,,,” “the literature,,raises a number of issues,,,many of them are also left open,
Academic Writing Skills: Paraphrasing and Summarising Activities and strategies to help students.
How to avoid plagiarism. Format of this session A. What is plagiarism?: Can you recognise it? (Activity 1, 2 and 3) B. What is paraphrasing?: How do you.
Writing your project Mr Harbron Year 12 Enhancement Coordinator and EPQ Centre Coordinator.
CMSC 601: Paper Summary Presentations Adapted from slides by Prof. Marie desJardins February 2011.
Welcome to the University of Wolverhampton
Proposal development and research design. What is a research proposal? A research proposal is a document written by a researcher that provides a detailed.
B1 Exam Tips Feedback from the examiners The examiner says…
Foundation Year Routes to Success Part III - Sustaining Success Su White Semester 2 Before you hand in Resource set in Edshare
Dr Hidayathulla Shaikh. Objectives At the end of the lecture student should be able to – Define journal club Mention types Discuss critical evaluation.
Scientific Literature and Communication Unit 3- Investigative Biology b) Scientific literature and communication.
Phase C.
Nancy Swisher Lecturer in ESL FLE 402 Fall 2016
HN BUSINESS HND GRADED UNIT 3
Masters and Doctorate – what are these?
Research Methods for Computer Science
How to avoid plagiarism
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
your entry into academia
Investigating science
Quality assurance and curriculum development
Technical Writing (AEEE299)
Validation Programme Developers
Managing People: Essay Guidance 2018/19
Presentation transcript:

Open assessments : 1 Department of Computer Science Masters level Open assessments Susan Stepney

Open assessments : 2 Department of Computer Science Masters level work Masters level teaching provides: –an enhanced capability for independent learning and work Masters level students must demonstrate: [“The framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland”; ] –a systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, much of which is at, or informed by, the forefront of their academic discipline, field of study, or area of professional practice –originality in the application of knowledge demonstrated by: –closed examination or open assessment of each module –Masters level project work CSW module covers how to do project work

Open assessments : 3 Department of Computer Science workload (open assessment module) 10 credit module = 100 hours, typically split something like: Lectures: 16 x 1 hrs Practicals: 4 x 2 hrs Private study: 40 hrs –general “reading around the subject”, following up on lectures and practical material the lectures merely provide the context for this study –some lecturers provide detailed reading lists – others don’t! an enhanced capability for independent learning and work Assessment: 36 hrs –typically one or a few questions, to be answered in a page “report”

Open assessments : 4 Department of Computer Science open assessment report the required Masters level “systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness … informed by the forefront of their academic discipline” … … cannot be demonstrated by regurgitation of lecture notes the lectures merely provide the context for your own study if your assessment report merely regurgitates lecture notes – you will fail –this is where Masters level open assessments and Batchelors level (undergraduate) closed examinations fundamentally differ!

Open assessments : 5 Department of Computer Science open assessment report the required Masters level “systematic understanding of knowledge, and a critical awareness … informed by the forefront of their academic discipline” … … can be demonstrated by including (as part of your answer) a systematic discussion and critical evaluation of the state of the art scientific literature (read during the hours allocated for your private study, and for your open assessment) your report should typically include a list of 5-20 relevant key papers, which you appropriately reference and critique as part of your written answer

Open assessments : 6 Department of Computer Science example “Discuss the issues in validating nanite correctness, and nanite safety.”  The issues of nanite correctness and safety are [a few sentences taken from three slides of the lecture notes]. The issues of nanite correctness and safety are described by [Smith99] to be [a summary of Smith’s position]. But [Bloggs02] claims [another summary]. More recent work by [Jones06] explains [yet another summary], but appears to neglect [then your critique of Jones’s paper]. … and so on, and so on, for as many pages as suggested by the number of marks allocated for this question

Open assessments : 7 Department of Computer Science critique : reasoned evaluation  I don’t like this idea.  This idea won’t work. This idea doesn’t work in this application because [a justified reason]. Moreover, [Brown77] shows that [some other idea is better]. However, [it might actually work somewhere else], and [Black00] says that … etc, etc  I think this approach is excellent, and should always be used. This approach should be used in [certain specified cases] because [a justified reason]. Also, [Green04] shows that [it worked on their application, some of the time]. On the other hand, [Pink59] claims [it has fundamental problems], … etc, etc

Open assessments : 8 Department of Computer Science moral an open assessment is like a (mini) project, and needs its own (mini) literature review and critique –referencing and evaluating other people’s work is an important part of your own analysis when answering the question do this, and become a Masters level student!