ESPON 2013 Programme Internal Seminar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Open Method of Coordination as an example of policy learning at the European Level Six Countries Programme Stockholm May 2006 Peder Christensen.
Advertisements

Regions 2020 structure The policy context: from challenges to priorities Regions 2020 revisited Policy Lessons.
1 7 th Progress Report: The regional and urban dimension of Europe 2020 Lewis Dijkstra Deputy Head of the Analysis Unit DG for Regional Policy European.
The political framework
Governance and the European Commissions 2020 strategy Caius Tudor Luminosu juris doctor, Politehnica University, Transport and Management Faculty, Chair.
Roma education: the role of the Structural Funds Policy Framework.
Second Tier Cities in Age of Austerity: Why Invest Beyond the Capitals? Professor Michael Parkinson CBE ESPON Seminar Aalborg, June 2012.
European Conference Measuring well being and fostering the progress of Societies OECD-eFrame-European Commission 28 June 2012 Around the EU Agnès HUBERT.
Europe 2020: Resource-efficient Europe flagship initiative
1 / 21 6 th Progress Report on Social and Economic Cohesion The debate on Territorial Cohesion & Regional Creativity and Innovation.
OECD World Forum “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy”, Palermo, November Territorial Indicators for Regional Policies Vincenzo Spiezia Head,
Adam Tyson, European Commission DG HE, Dublin, 22 April 2013
May 16th, 2012 RSA 2012 European Conference, Delft Dr. Karl Peter Schön Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR) Federal Institute for Research.
How is the budget raised The own resource system – The overall amount of own resources needed to finance the budget is determined by total expenditure.
How the European Social Fund can contribute to social enterprises? Workshop 7: Structural funds (ESF, ERDF) for social enterprises Strasbourg, 16 January.
Policy for Cities in the Age of Austerity: Why Invest Beyond the Capitals? SGPTDE Project Professor Michael Parkinson CBE ESPON Seminar, Krakow 2011.
Workshop 3 RIGA 12-13th June 2014 NOASS Floating Galleries, Riga.
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
European Commission DG REGIO 1 Europe 2020 Strategy Europaforum Northern Sweden Arvidsjaur, 25 March 2010 David Sweet.
Ministry of local Government and Regional Development Polycentric settlement structures (Odd Godal, Adviser, Vilnius, )
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Commission proposals for Cohesion Policy Addressing challenges of.
Union of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications (CEEC) Technical University of Sofia Third International Seminar - UPB University-
November 2010SGAMG 1 Political priorities for EDUCATION & CULTURE
EU Cohesion Policy in support of Innovative Energy Solutions in the Baltic Sea Region Charlina Vitcheva Director - Inclusive Growth, Urban and Territorial.
Regional Development Conference EU Context Finola Moylette Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government 17 July 2015.
Ecdc.europa.eu Richard Deiss, DG EAC, unit for studies, analysis, indicators EU 2020 education benchmarks Visit of Estonian delegation in Brussels, 1 June.
Marcello Bonitatibus – Zvolen, Slovakia – June 2007 Transnational cooperation summary Common goals Viera Petrášová – Zvolen, Slovakia, 11. – 12.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
EU Climate Action EU – Central Asia Working Group on
ESPON Open Seminar June 2012 – Aalborg, Denmark Research, Innovation and Competitiveness SIESTA – Spatial Indicators for a ‘Europe 2020’ Territorial.
1 9 November 2007 – Torino Silke Brocks Project Officer INTERREG IIIC/IVC JTS Lille, France European Interregional Cooperation as part of the Cohesion.
Antonis Constantinou Director, Rural Development Programmes II DG Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission DEVELOPING A VISION ON THE FUTURE.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
Structural Funds Kat Feldinger European Structural Funds Division.
What next for European funding post 2013? John Bachtler ‘Regeneration in Hard Times’ seminar – Wednesday, 10 November 2010 Committee Room 2, Scottish Parliament.
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days October 2012 – Brussels Lead Partner of ESPON SIESTA: Rubén Lois Use of European territorial evidence to the EU.
Budapest, June 2014 Hermina Golob Head od Development Policies Division SLOVENIA Partnership agreement and Operational programme
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
1 Cohesion Policy and demography By Ronald Hall Director Directorate-General for Regional Policy 28 April 2010.
The importance of innovation in the European Union’s 2020 strategy Lambert van Nistelrooij Member of the European Parliament, EPP- Group/CDA 8 September.
The European Union Climate Policy and Related Data Needs Velina Pendolovska European Commission, DG Climate Action Meeting on Climate Change Related Statistics.
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
Political Issues and Social Policy in the E.U. Professor John Wilton Lecture 10 Regions and the E.U. policy process.
European Environment Agency ‘Trends and projections in Europe’ – Tracking progress towards Europe’s climate and energy targets for 2020 François Dejean.
Ms. Podpeskar International Politics THE EUROPEAN UNION.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Third progress report on cohesion 17 May 2005 Towards a new partnership for growth, jobs and cohesion.
How does cohesion policy support rural development Ex-post evaluation of ERDF support to rural development: Key findings (Objective 1 and 2)
Interregional Conference Pécs 19 th of October 2010.
The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies ISMERI EUROPA Ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes Work Package 1: Coordination,
The importance of innovation in the European Union’s 2020 strategy Lambert van Nistelrooij Member of the European Parliament, EPP- Group/CDA 4 October.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
European Union Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 11 Regions and the E.U. public policy process.
Assessing the capacity of the Agenda 2020 to to carry ‘social investment’ ideals Joakim Palme Institute for Futures Studies
A snapshot of the main challenges and opportunities of rural areas
EUROPE 2020 Seven Flagships
Investment climate and Innovation in europe
European Union’s Regional Development Policy
Third progress report on cohesion 17 May 2005
Eurostat Management Plan for Regional and Urban statistics
7th Progress Report: The regional and urban dimension of Europe 2020
South East Europe 2020 indicators
URBAN - Mission “economic and social regeneration of cities and neighbourhoods in crisis” Lewis Dijkstra, Ph.D. DG Regional Policy.
Cohesion Policy, using geospatial information and statistics
REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS: COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES AND UNUSED RESOURCES by Vincenzo Spiezia OECD – Territorial Statistics and Indicators Regional and Urban.
Monitoring progress in the field of education and training
By Prof. Danuta Hübner Brussels, 30 May 2007
5.1. The EUROPE 2020 strategy and Social Statistics
‘Regional Policy contributing to Sustainable Growth in EU 2020’
Presentation transcript:

ESPON 2013 Programme Internal Seminar Evidence-based Cohesion Policy: Territorial Dimensions The regional and urban dimension of Europe 2020 Source : Philippe Monfort, Directorate General for Regional Policy, European Commission 29 November 2011, Kraków ESPON 2013 Programme Internal Seminar

Introduction June 2010 – European Council approves the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Cohesion Policy is mentioned as a key delivery mechanism for Europe 2020. Regional and local authorities can indeed make a key contribution to this strategy through the actions that fall within their responsibility. Involving regional authorities in European policies can indeed increase the efficiency of these policies, making the best of territories potential.

Introduction Debate and reflection are now launched on how to translate the objectives and targets of Europe 2020… … into their counterpart at regional level. Regions cannot or should not reach all their national or the EU targets: For some regions, distance to the target is simply be too great. For some issues, it is not realistic or desirable that all regions reach the same target. There are many ways in which a region can contribute to a given objective.

Introduction Accordingly Cohesion Policy programmes should: Select their investment priorities taking into account the starting position of a region or city in relation to the national 2020 targets; Identify the manner it can best respond to regional/local development needs... … while at the same time contributing to 2020 targets. 7 PR focuses on the first point: Assesses how regions and cities can contribute to three types of growth of the Europe 2020 strategy; and Measures the distance of cities and regions to the national 2020 targets proposed in NRPs.

Europe 2020 pillars Smart Growth Sustainable Growth Inclusive growth Education Innovation Digital Society Sustainable Growth Competitiveness Resource efficiency Climate change Biodiversity Inclusive growth Employment Poverty and exclusion

Smart Growth Improve education, promote R&D and innovation and move towards a digital society.

Education Human capital is one of the key determinants of regional growth. It favours: innovation and rapid diffusion and absorption of knowledge and techniques; Productivity, employment and social inclusion; Environmental awareness. Europe 2020 target: increase the share of people aged 30-34 with a tertiary degree to 40 % by 2020. Currently, only one in five EU regions is at this level. Member States have set themselves targets ranging from 26 % to 60 %.

Education Education attainment follows GDP per head: High in regions eligible under RCE objective (one in three); Around the EU average in transition regions (one in four); Lower in convergence regions (one in twenty). The distance to the national target is significant for many regions, like for instance in Portugal, Slovakia or Germany.

Tertiary education

Education Education attainment tends to be higher in capitals and adjoining regions.

Cities and tertiary educated

Education The variation in human capital between regions within a Member State is often larger than between Member States. Therefore, national strategies need to be complemented by regional policies.

R&D Technological progress is another important factor of growth and job creation. Europe 2020 target: 3 % of GDP invested in R&D. Member States have defined national targets for investments in R&D. In 2009, R&D expenditure represented 2 % of GDP in the EU-27.

R&D R&D is typically concentrated in core areas such as capital and metropolitan regions. Highest R&D expenditure in northern countries (Germany, UK, Sweden and Finland), Austria and capital regions such as Hovedstaden (Copenhagen) and Île de France (Paris). In 2008, only 16 regions across Europe have reached the national targets set under Europe 2020. On average R&D expenditure of the convergence regions is only 0.9 % of their GDP.

R&D

R&D The EU 2020 headline target should obviously not be reached by all regions. Too narrowly focused on science and technology, which need a certain scale or critical mass of activities not present everywhere. Regional innovation strategies should involve a rigorous assessment of regions’ strengths and weaknesses and… … cover all dimensions of innovation, involve key regional actors, and identify appropriate policy mix: R&D, support to SMEs; Organisational and process innovation; human capital; Infrastructure (e.g. incubators, ICT, transport).

Sustainable Growth Enhancing resource efficiency Foster low-carbon world Preventing environmental degradation and biodiversity loss Promote green and competitive economy

Resource efficiency Europe 2020 targets: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 20 % (and 30 %, if the conditions are right) compared to 1990; Increase energy efficiency by 20%; Increase consumption of renewable energy by 20 %. The overall emission reduction goal will be accomplished through (i) the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and (ii) the ‘Effort Sharing Decision’. ‘Effort Sharing Decision’ sets the target of reducing greenhouse gas emission targets from sectors not included in the ETS – such as transport, buildings, agriculture and waste – by 10%.

Resource efficiency Cohesion Policy actions can better support emission reduction within the ‘Effort Sharing Decision’ rather than the ETS. Under the ‘Effort Sharing Decision’, MS have adopted a mix of emission reduction targets and limits on emission increases. Some have already reached their target and only need to maintain this lower level of emissions (e.g. Greece or Slovakia).

Effort sharing decision

Resource efficiency The share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption varies from 44 % in Sweden to 0.2 % in Malta. All Member States, except Latvia and Slovenia, have increased renewable energy consumption, with especially high increases in Austria, Estonia and Romania. Some Member States are close to their target (Sweden: + 4.6 pp). For others , the distance to the target is greater and additional efforts will be required. (e.g UK: +13 pp and Ireland: +12 pp).

Renewable Energy

Regional dimension Sustainable growth has an important regional dimension: Regional characteristics directly determine the extent to which EU regions can produce renewable energy (e.g. solar vs wind energy). Regions and cities can promote cleaner modes of public transport, adapted to the local context (e.g. focusing on infrastructure in regions where it is still lacking while targeting demand management in other regions). Regions can play a prominent role in fostering energy efficiency, in particular where actions must adapt to the local climate or context (e.g. urban vs rural areas, old vs new buildings). Regional and local authorities are key actors for investments in green infrastructure (requires deep knowledge of local context). Data not available at regional NUTS 2 or 1 level!

Urban eco-efficiency

Inclusive growth Increase employment rates and the quality of jobs Help people anticipate and manage change by investing in skills and training Reduce poverty and exclusion

Employment Europe 2020 tagetr: increase the employment rate to 75 % for the population aged 20-64 by 2020. Member States have set national targets varying from 62.9 % in Malta to 80 % in Denmark and Sweden. Not all Regions are expected to reach the EU or national employment targets, as they face very different starting positions. If the goal was to reach the 2020 target in all convergence regions, 11 million people would have to find a job; 3 million in transition regions; 9.4 million in RCE regions.

Employment Employment rates below 60 % can be found in southern Spain and southern Italy and some regions in Romania and Hungary. Many regions in Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and Austria are above 75 %.

Employment: Northwest vs. the rest

Unemployment Economic crisis led to rapid increases in unemployment rates. In the three Baltic States and seven Spanish regions unemployment rates increased by between 10 and 18 pp. Despite the overall increases, unemployment decreased in 52 regions, mostly in Germany but also in some regions in Poland, France, Finland and Austria.

Unemployment: impact of the crisis

Poverty and social exclusion Europe 2020 target: reduce the number of people at risk of poverty or exclusion by 20 million by 2020 (i.e. from 23 % of the EU population to 19 %). The share of population at risk of poverty or exclusion is over 50 % in three Bulgarian regions and is 49 % in Sicily. The lowest rates can be found in Åland, Trento, Navarra and Praha, where is it 10 % or lower.

At risk of poverty and exclusion: South/East divide

Poverty and social exclusion The at-risk-of-poverty rate has a strong regional dimension. Besides personal characteristics (education, employment status, household type and age), the at-risk-of-poverty rate also depends on where people live (‘location effect’). Example - the urban paradox: urban poverty is inversely related to the level of economic development: the more developed Member States tend to have less inclusive cities. At-risk-of-poverty-or-exclusion data not available at regional NUTS 2 or 1 level in several large Member States.

East West divide on urban poverty

Conclusion Europe 2020 is an ambitious strategy. Requires a different policy mix in countries (National Reform Programmes). Also requires a different policy mix in regions (Partnership Contract). This implies flexibility. If actions are appropriately tailored to the local context, regions can developed and at the same time contribute to achieve Europe 2020 objectives. Challenging but it is the fundamental idea behind place-based integrated policy!

Thank you for your attention