GIS modelling for marine management Poland habitat mapping Oslo Workshop 2007-05-29 Martin Isæus 08-16 10 11

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Maritime Eionet workshop

Advertisements

Environmental data collection and information systems in the Baltic Sea Juha-Markku Leppänen Marine Research Centre of SYKE EEA/EIONET Workshop Maritime.

Geoscience and Ocean Management: Queen Charlotte Basin western Canada GeoHab 2003 May 2, 2003 J. Vaughn Barrie 1, Kim Conway 1, Manfred Krautter 2 and.

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, INCORPORATED Oregon Coastal Atlas Coastal web atlases are among the best sources of GIS data for marine spatial planning Primary.

Tasks and selected results of the project „Ecosystem approach to marine spatial planning – Polish marine areas and the Natura 2000 network” Department.

Integrated Management of Marine Ecosystems and the Role of Marine Protected Areas Han Lindeboom.

Gianna Casazza European Commission DG Environment, Marine Unit La Direttiva Quadro sulla Strategia per l’Ambiente Marino (Direttiva 2008/56/CE) Marine.

BALANCE Towards an ecosystem-based approach to management of the marine ecosystem - linking the WFD, HD and pMSD 1st Mtg. MARCOS, Copenhagen 16th of February.

18-19 June 2007MARCOS 2, Ulriksdal Slott, Stockholm 1 European Marine Directives: Concepts, Overlap and Synergy Jesper H. Andersen DHI Water Environment.

SixcurrentMPAProjects: Offshore MPAs National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment BCLME KwaZulu-Natal Prince Edward Islands Agulhas Bioregion.

BLUE GROWTH CALL AREA 3 : Ocean observation systems and technologies Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge 2 Info Day 17/01/2014 Dr Efthimios ZAGORIANAKOS.

MESH webGIS Habitat maps online at

UKSeaMap The mapping of seabed and water column features of UK seas

Research priorities for HELCOM monitoring and assessment purposes Juha-Markku Leppänen, HELCOM (presented by Timo Vihma, FIMR)

Managing and distributing marine biodiversity data to meet the needs of marine conservation Steve Wilkinson, Jon Davies & David Connor Joint Nature Conservation.

Swedish Board of Fisheries

Joint Research Centre FERNANDO TEMPERA, EC-JRC HARMONIZED ECOSYSTEM SERVICE MAPS FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC HARMONIZED ECOSYSTEM SERVICE.

1 OSPAR Commission for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic.

Work package 3 Analysis of international MSP Instruments Sophie Jacques 3E Support by: WP 2: National MSP - France SEANERGY 2020 project Sophie Jacques.

Baltic Operational Oceanographic System (BOOS) Erik Buch Centre for Ocean and Ice.

Integrating Seafloor Mapping & Benthic Ecology into Fisheries Management in the Gulf of Maine April 15 th Breakout Group Summary Group 2—Conference Rm.

Multibeam Bathymetric and Backscatter Products for Benthic Habitat Mapping There’s No Silver Bullet Joyce Miller Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center.

1 BI 3063 J. Mork H08 Genetic and biologic stock management I C E S The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea

Wet DEMs – Lessons Learned Working with Bathymetric Data in the Hawaiian Islands Emily Lundblad NOAA Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center Coral Reef.

Eurosion and Conscience projects - brief overview Tom Bucx (Deltares) 9 June 2011 EEA Expert meeting Methods and tools for assessing.

Planning the infrastructure for marine monitoring and operational oceanography Lennart Funkquist Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Figures.

Launching the core indicators! Samuli Korpinen HELCOM CORESET May 2013, Riga.

Pål Buhl-Mortensen Institute of Marine Research Atlantic Seabed Mapping – Status & Direction Towards a CAN-EU-US Atlantic strategic seabed mapping pilot.

Spatial Fisheries Values in the Gulf of Alaska Matthew Berman Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage Ed Gregr Ryan Coatta.

Monitoring marine litter, a part of the joint Norwegian/Russian ecosystem survey in the Barents Sea Bjørn Einar Grøsvik 1, Elena Eriksen 1, Tatiana Prokhorova.

MESH UK Workshop 19 October 2006 Introduction Dr Paul Gilliland Marine Policy Adviser and MESH Partner Lead Natural England.

Methodology workshop focused on technology for identifying marine habitats Trine Bekkby Workshop at NIVA, Oslo, May

Section for Coastal Ecology Technical University of Denmark National Institute of Aquatic Resources Habitat modeling: linking biology to abiotic predictors.

Bioregionalisation of the Southern Ocean – conservation applications & data needs Susie Grant British Antarctic Survey

The Swedish fisheries administration – an overview Maria Hellsten, head of executive staff unit.

Spatial distribution of fish stocks in a climate perspective Nordic Climate Fish Conference 2011, Solstrand Geir Odd Johansen.

1 WS2 Malta Workpackage 3 Sea-bed substrate Leader: Geological Survey of Finland (GTK) Team: Anu Kaskela, Aarno Kotilainen, Ulla Alanen Contact:

Offshore wind farms and marine environment Ideas from UNIFOB.

David Connor, JNCC, UK HELCOM Red List habitat workshop, March 2010, Stockholm.

Habitat Modeling. Goals Predict the locations of as-yet undiscovered refuges in the Great Lakes Develop management protocols to create new unionid habitat.

EMODNET Geology future trends – short term Direct link to the marine layers in the OGE portal Complete layer package (end July 2011) Supply data layers.

Habitat modelling – Methods and examples Gdansk Martin Isæus

ICES | CIEM International Council for the Exploration of the Sea What is ICES and what can ICES provide to the UN Regular Process? Jörn Schmidt.

Mapping European Seabed Habitats, the MESH project as a case study Els Verfaillie & Vera Van Lancker Universiteit Gent, Renard Centre of Marine Geology.

Review of the ecosystem condition account

EMODNET Physical Habitat Portal How to proceed? by MODEG (9 th June 2011) Discussion group: David O’Connor, Joni Kaitaranta, Andy Cameron, Jacques Populus,

Biogeomorphology: interactions between benthos and sediment dynamics University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands Bas.

1 EMODNET pilot biological lot Francisco Hernandez, Simon Claus, Leen Vandepitte.

Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 2010 David Fox Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Marine Resources Program Use of seafloor mapping data in.

26 February 2014 Views to practical support on management of HELCOM biodiversity data by an EU Service contract Hermanni Kaartokallio (SYKE) EEA workshop.

WISE and WISE-Marine Water Information System for Europe and Water Information System for Europe (coming in 2010 with Marine data to a web- site near you)

Natalie Coltman, JNCC, UK Progress meeting: 25 May 2010, Copenhagen.

Contemporary state of bottom communities of the Kara and Barents Seas P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology White Sea Biological Station Moscow State University.

Ur-EMODnet progress meeting EUSeaMap Preparatory Action for development & assessment of a European broad-scale seabed habitat map Brussels, 7 th June 2011.

GULF OF MAINE MAPPING INITIATIVE: A FRAMEWORK FOR REGIONAL FISHERIES RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT Sara Ellis 1, Thomas Noji 2, Susan Snow-Cotter 3, Brian Todd.

Marine Protected Areas in South Africa: from coastal successes to offshore challenges Colin G. Attwood Marine Research Institute University of Cape Town.

How do we work… Samuli Korpinen, Finnish Environment Institute, Marine Research Centre HELCOM BalticBOOST WS on Physical loss and damage to the seafloor.

EU FP7 BENTHIS & EU-HELCOM BalticBOOST

Use of PSA data in biological studies

Developments in Seabed Mapping

Juha-Markku Leppänen Marine Research Centre

Nephrops UWTV surveys in the Skagerrak and Kattegat (FU 3-4)

Monitoring and assessments of biodiversity in the Baltic Sea

Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics

AquaSpace Case Study Basque County, Spain: Issues and Tools

HELCOM MORE 8 meeting outcome

Typology and classification of coastal waters in Estonia

HELCOM Baltic Sea Protected Areas

Sampling Design.

Presentation transcript:

GIS modelling for marine management Poland habitat mapping Oslo Workshop Martin Isæus

What drives the marine mapping in Sweden, Norway and the Baltic? EU National County management Industry – Marine Wind Power BALANCE Off-shore reefs survey Nature reserve survey WPD Finngrunden

The BALANCE project 19 partners & 10 countries 2½ year & € 4,7 mio. Main activities: Collation of marine environmental & anthropogenic data Baltic seafloor mapping Biodiversity assessment Marine spatial planning BSR INTERREG IIIB region from space, Source: SeaWiFS Project, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Centre and ORBIMAGE

The BALANCE approach Collate & analyse available geo- physical and hydrographical information within HELCOM region Define and agree on an unified data format Decide a common platform for data handling, processing and projection of marine landscape map, e.g. ArcGis, WGS84, UTM Define standards for classifying Baltic marine landscapes Validation & confidence scheme Applying an ecosystem-based approach, not the one nation – one approach

Benthic marine landscapes Basic layers: Seabed sediments Photic depth Bottom salinity Secondary layers: Temperature Wave exposure Ice cover Current velocity Bathymetry Word of caution!

Benthic marine landscapes Features 60 benthic landscapes identified Most common is non-photic mud at 7,5 – 11psu covering km 2 or 14,3% of total seabed 8 landscapes cover km 2 or 90,7% of total seabed 40 landscapes cover less than 1% of total seabed area Coverage data for each EEZ as well as entire HELCOM region is available

Linking the physical characterisation to socio-economic exploitation Illustrating the value of (transnational ?) marine landscape mapping Could be linked to implementation of various EU obligations, e.g WFD or pMSD (?) Could be linked to climatic change showing the consequences to marine environment Annual variation in the Cod Reproductive Volume, DIFRES Pelagic marine landscapes – an example

Habitat mapping Norway Denmark Sweden Lituania Estonia Finland

Nephrops in Skagerrak Martin Isæus, AquaBiota Hans C. Nilsson, NIVA Mattias sköld, Swedish board of Fishery

SPI – Sediment Profile Images

Ecological status

Study area Grids from multi-beam survey: Bathymetry (5 m res.) Hardness (4 classes) SPI (22) SPI + fauna (14) SPI + new fauna sample (2) New field data

Predictors importance for the model

Probalitity of Nephrops presence Spearman Corr 0.659

Random SPI + Nephrops burrow shape + Trawling frequency => density plot and population estimate

Kernel density mean yield per cage Radius 5 km, 100m-grid.

Kjell Magnus Norderhaug Martin Isæus Trine Bekkby Frithjof Moy Are Pedersen Spatial predictions of Laminaria hyperborea at the Norwegian Skagerrak coast

Probability of L. hyperborea Monitoring data vs All available data

Off-shore bank survey Natura 2000? Benthic biology Marine geology Hydrography

Nature values?

Utbredning av ”Död mans hand” Alcyonium digitatum

Nature values Fucus (+) Chara (+) Epithytes (-) Filamentous (-) Detritus (-) Sulphuric bacteria (-)

EUNIS in the Baltic

Wind Power FOTO: KNUT STRØM WPD

Bathymetry (multi-beam) Back-scatter Bentic biota Fish Birds Bats Seals

Presence of blue mussel Mytilus and Horse mussel Modiolus

Presence of fish Stensnultra cvROC=0,843 ROC=0,889 cvCOR=0,63 COR=0,682

Abundance of fish Stensnultra cvCOR=0,509 COR=0,619