Chandra Calibration Status CUC Meeting Oct. 13, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AGN FEEDBACK IN TWO INTERESTING GROUPS F. Gastaldello (IASF-MI, UCI) D. Buote (UCI), P. Humphrey (UCI), W. Mathews (UCSC), F. Brighenti (U. Bologna), P.
Advertisements

Clusters as calibration tools S. Molendi (IASF-MI)
Comparison of XMM-Newton EPIC, Chandra ACIS-S3, ASCA SIS and GIS, and ROSAT PSPC results for G , 1ES , and MS A “Man on the street”
Suzaku XRT Update Kai-Wing Chan, Yoshi Maeda & the XRT Team 3-MAY-2007.
Unresolved X-Ray Sources in Intermediate Redshift Cluster Fields Unresolved X-Ray Sources in Intermediate Redshift Cluster Fields S. Fawcett, A. Hicks,
Imaging Analysis Aneta Siemiginowska Chandra X-ray Center Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal April ACIS Calibration: Recent Updates, Planned Updates, & Future Issues 2.E0102: Joint.
Bruno Altieri EPIC Calibration meeting, Feb. 1-3, 2005 European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 XMM-Newton ESAC Status of XMM-Newton cross-calibration with.
Chandra Calibration Status ACIS 1.Gain correction files for epochs 30, 31 and 32 were released in CALDB (Sept 2007), (Dec. 2007) and
Chandra Calibration Status ACIS 1.Gain corrections for epochs 28 and 29 (Nov – April 2007) were released in CALDB 3.4 on May 16, Gain corrections.
Progress Report Ian Evans (CXCDS) and Jonathan McDowell (SDS) Chandra Users ’ Committee Meeting September 19, 2007.
CUC Oct 2005 Science Data Systems Jonathan McDowell.
Chandra X-ray Center Chandra X-ray Observatory Overview Roger Brissenden Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory CIAO Workshop 23 April 2001.
Chandra Calibration Status ACIS 1.Gain correction files for epochs 33 and 34 were released in CALDB (June 2008) and (Sep. 2008). HETG 1. An.
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay ESAC 04/10/05 Implementation of the MOS spatial/temporal DRM: Does it work ? Zeta Puppis: Checking the line.
Chandra Calibration Status Calibration Updates Since Last CUC Meeting ACIS 1. New tgain files were released for epochs 23 and 24 (May 2005 – Nov 2005)
XMM-Newton/ Chandra Cross Calibration with Clusters of Galaxies CXC Calibration Workshop October L. David, J. Nevalainen, M. Bonamente, D. Jerius,
Chandra Calibration Status  Gain correction files for epochs 35 (Aug. – Oct. 2008) and 36 (Nov Jan.2009) were released in CALDB versions
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay EPIC Calibration Meeting Saclay 24/09/03 Epoch dependant MOS QE and RMF and Cross-calibration with the PN.
Some Chandra Basics. Chandra X-Ray Observatory.
Marcus Kirsch, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Center Page 1 EPIC ESAC Marcus G. F. Kirsch Mallorca, Summary status of the EPIC calibration.
Evaluation of the EPIC flux cross-calibration from 2XMM sources R. Saxton, S. Mateos, A. Read, S. Sembay Mateos et al., 2009, A&A, arXiv
Probing the X-ray Universe: Analysis of faint sources with XMM-Newton G. Hasinger, X. Barcons, J. Bergeron, H. Brunner, A. C. Fabian, A. Finoguenov, H.
XMM-Newton 1SCI-SA Populating the CCF Immediate needs are driven by the requirement to test the SAS over the summer before public release. (A release called.
Vadim Burwitz EPIC Calibration Meeting, October 27, 2006 RX J1856 HZ 43Sirius B Further work on cross-calibration results obtained from observations of.
Chandra Calibration Status Summary 1.The gratings and mirrors are very well calibrated at this time and there are no time-dependent effects as far as we.
Chandra Calibration Status  Recent releases  Current Calibration projects  Cross-Calibration between Chandra and other X-ray telescopes  Revisions.
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay MPE 04/05/06 The Effective Area of EPIC A comparison of MOS1, MOS2 and PN derived fluxes of 17 on-axis AGN.
Chandra Calibration Status Calibration Updates Since Last CUC Meeting ACIS 1. A full set of calibration products for S0, S4 and S5 at T=-120 C, including.
Testing the EPIC hard band calibration S. Molendi (IASF/CNR)
Chandra Calibration Status Calibration Updates Since Last CUC Meeting ACIS 2. New products were released in CALDB on Dec. 15, 2006 to properly handle.
CXC Chandra X-ray Observatory Operations. CXC Overview 1. Mission and Observatory Description 2. Chandra Operations 3. Chandra X-ray Center Architecture.
The EPIC-pn spectral response Frank Haberl EPIC Cal meeting, Tübingen, February 2003 Status of the pn spectral response in SAS5.4.1 Latest developments.
Chandra Calibration Status  Highlights of the IACHEC Meeting  Updates to the LETG/HRC-S calibration  Continuous Clocking (CC) mode calibration.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal Nov ACIS Calibration: Planned Updates & Future Issues 2.ACIS Operations: Controlling the.
An XMM-ESAS Update Steve Snowden NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center EPIC Operations and Calibration Meeting - BGWG Palermo - 11 March 2007.
Chandra Calibration Status  Highlights from the Chandra Calibration Review  New results on the HRMA effective area  Updates to the ACIS contamination.
Chandra X-ray Center Martin Elvis Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Welcome to the 4 th Chandra – CIAO Workshop 20 – 22 May 2002.
Martin Stuhlinger Mallorca, European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 XMM-Newton ESAC Status of XMM-Newton cross-calibration with SASv7.1 CAL Meeting.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky February A Comparison of Spectral Fit Results of E0102 from the Chandra and XMM CCDs Paul Plucinsky.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal October Comparison of RGS Model for 1E to the HETG data 2.BI CCD CTI Correction.
Martin Stuhlinger X-Ray Universe 2005, Sep.26-30, 2005 European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 XMM-Newton ESAC Status of XMM-Newton cross-calibration with.
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay Mallorca 02/02/05 Temporal and spatial variability of the MOS RMF 1.Introduction and brief history of the.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC CAL/OPS Meeting MPE, Germany 04-05/05/06 EPIC BGWG XMM-Newton EPIC BackGround Working Group founded (~1.
Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky EPIC Cal Update on ACIS Calibration 1) Update to the ACIS contamination model 2) Temperature-dependent.
Can people meet from 2:40 to 3:30 on Tuesday, September 5?
The first year result of MAXI/SSC Masashi Kimura, Hiroshi Tsunemi, Hiroki Kitayama (Osaka Univ.) Hiroshi Tomida, Masaru Matsuoka (JAXA) Arata Daikyuji.
Title: Quién le pone el cascabel al gato ? J. F. Albacete Colombo Univ. de Rio Negro, Viedma, ARG & Ettore Flaccomio Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo,
Not Your Advisor's CIAO... - an update on Chandra's CIAO analysis system Jonathan McDowell Doug Burke, Antonella Fruscione, Aneta Sieimiginowska and the.
CUC Oct 2014 CXC Jonathan McDowell. I will report on CIAO (user software) and the standard processing pipeline software, which come into being thanks.
I.Introduction  Recent evidence from Fermi and the VLBA has revealed a strong connection between ɣ -ray emission in AGNs and their parsec-scale radio.
Herman L. Marshall (MIT), Allyn Tennant (MSFC), Catherine E. Grant (MIT), Adam P. Hitchcock (Dept. Chemistry, McMaster U.), Steve O’Dell (MSFC), Paul P.
X-ray Absorption and Scattering by Interstellar Dust: the XMM view Elisa Costantini Max Planck Institute for extraterrestrial Physics (MPE) P. Predehl,
TIPS COS Status: SMOV update III STScI/CU COS Team 17 September 2009.
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
Laboratoire d’Astrophysique Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Switzerland The energy profile of the accretion disk in Q from 3.0 years of.
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
3 May 2007 Suzaku Users mwb MIT/MKI XIS Update Mark Bautz, MIT Kavli Institute XIS-2 Anomaly Contamination.
Status Update on the Monte Carlo Simulation Vlasios Vasileiou April 20-21, 2007 Milagro Collaboration Meeting.
The onboard calibration for the spaced-row charge injection of the Suzaku XIS Hideki Uchiyama, Yoshiaki Hyodo, Hiroya Yamaguchi, Hideyuki Mori, Takeshi.
Instrumental limits to our knowledge in X-ray Astronomy Matteo Guainazzi (ASTRO-H ESA Science Operations Centre) Calibration (as any truly scientific endeavors)
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
Investigation into the strong residuals seen
A.Zanichelli, B.Garilli, M.Scodeggio, D.Rizzo
The Crab Light Curve and Spectra from GBM: An Update
Astronomical Observational Techniques and Instrumentation
Chandra Calibration Status
Temporal &Spatial Dependency of the MOS RMF
Calibration Activities – the MOS perspective
CTI and time dependent gain corrections for ACIS
Presentation transcript:

Chandra Calibration Status CUC Meeting Oct. 13, 2011

Chandra Calibration Status  Calibration updates since the 2010 CUC meeting  Internal Chandra cross-calibration status  Current calibration issues

 ACIS temperature-dependent gain correction software for timed-event (TE) mode data was released in CIAO on Dec. 15,  ACIS cti-correction software for TE data in graded (G) telemetry mode was released in CIAO 4.3  A new contamination model for the ACIS-I was released in CALDB  Time-dependent gain corrections for epochs ( Aug 2010 – July 2011) Recent Calibration Products and Software Releases ACIS

HRC  An update to the HRC-I QE to improve cross-calibration between HRC-I/HRC-S/ACIS-S was released in CALDB  HRC-I gain map for 2010 was released in CALDB  HRC-S rmf (using SAMP) was released in CALDB  A series of time-dependent HRC-S QE maps (one for each year) were released in CALDB (June 30, 2011) Recent Calibration Products or Software Releases

 Updated extraction regions and the clocking angle for dispersed LETG/ACIS-S spectra were released in CALDB  Revised LETG transmission efficiencies for orders m=2-10 were released in CALDB (April 26, 2011) Recent Calibration Products or Software Releases LETG

Internal Chandra Cross-Calibration Calibration products derived from ground-based data. Calibration products derived in-flight data and internal cross-calibration  HRMA effective area  ACIS-S and ACIS-I QE  LETG first order efficiency  MEG first order efficiency for E<1 keV  HEG first order efficiency for E>1 keV  Shape of HRC QE  HRC-I and HRC-S QE  LETG higher order efficiencies  ACIS contamination model  MEG first order efficiency for E>1keV  HEG first order efficiency for E<1keV

Internal Chandra Cross-Calibration Bare ACIS-S/ACIS-I cross-calibration Abell 1795 phabs*apec keV Temperature Abundance Flux 5% 3%

Bare ACIS-S/ACIS-I cross-calibration G phabs*pow  s =1.84   =1.78 Power-law index Flux Column density Filled symbols – full-frame Open symbols – sub-array NH S =3.07 NH I =2.91

Bare HRC-I/HRC-S/ACIS-S cross-calibration G %

Mirror Vignetting and ACIS QE MAP Abell 1795 ACIS-I3 X aim point read-out ACIS-S

Current ACIS Calibration Issues ACIS-I3 X ACIS contamination model Simultaneous two-temperature fit to 13108, and 13113

ACIS contamination model Simultaneous two-temperature fit to and and 13109

ACIS Detector

Spectral fit to the July 2011 LETG/ACIS-S observation of Mkn 421

Time-dependent ACIS QE ACIS-S3

Time-dependent ACIS QE ACIS-I3 Solution – a set of time sorted QEU maps

ACIS-S1 Gain E observations on S1 node 2

ACIS-S1 Gain Near default LETG/ACIS-S configuration E

Feature near the Si-K edge in bright sources Cyg X-2 TE Mode CC Mode

CC-F mode calibration Required products for CC-F mode calibration  Trap maps for CC mode data - done  Gain tables for CC mode data – done  QE tables for CC mode data After Dec – done Before Dec – being worked

Current LETG/HRC-S Calibration Issues Result of current grey correction – broad band flux

HRC-S energy-dependent QE loss

HRC-S Gain throughout the Chandra mission

Stability of the HRC-I QE

Current HETG Calibration Issues Sample of about 30 HETG/ACIS-S AGN observations CALDB CALDB version

Correction to HEG/MEG First Order Transmission Efficiency

LEG/MEG/HEG Cross-Calibration

Current Imaging Issues Dithered SAOTrace simulation of an HRC-I observation of AR Lac

HRC-I intrinsic spatial response Raw Gaussian Gaussian plus Lorentzian

Summary of Present Calibration Activities  Release CC- F mode calibration products  Release MEG/HEG first order transmission correction  Release updated ACIS contamination model  Investigate low energy HRC-S QE losses  Investigate Si-K edge feature in ACIS data of very bright sources  Improve the low energy gain calibration of S1  Incorporate dithered SAOTrace rays and updated HRC-I spatial response into MARX  Revise SAOTrace to produce better agreement between the raytrace simulations and the observed power in the wings of the PSF