FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 WP 1 Economics of European infrastructure funds: methodology Funding SP Dec 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Industrial Economics (Econ3400) Week 3 August 7, 2007 Room 323, Bldg 3 Semester 2, 2007 Instructor: Shino Takayama.
Advertisements

Top 10 Most Common Errors AP Economics
Smarter Travel Programmes– Financial impacts for Transport for London COLIN BUCHANAN
WORKSHOP 3: Building a European funding & financial framework for the TEN-T The role of PPPs & the private sector Enrique Fuentes, Development.
A framework for organising and financing infrastructure provision Jan-Eric Nilsson, VTI.
Task 1.4: Mark-up Rules Saskia van der Loo K.U.Leuven Funding meeting, Leuven, 8-9 dec 2005.
Supply Side policies. Supply side policies aim to… Improve the efficiency of factor markets, to boost productivity and hence the overall capacity of the.
International Conference on Small States and Economic Resilience April 2007 Valetta, Malta Islands and Small States Institute Government intervention.
MOLINO II -model structure- KULeuven and ADPC. Contents MOLINO I: –Overview –list of improvements needed MOLINO II: –Network structure and definitions.
Theoretical Framework REVENUE Stef Proost (KULeuven) Based on work Adpc, CERAS, IWW,TIS and KULeuven.
1 Strategic choice of financing systems in regulated and interconnected industries Anna BassaniniJerome Pouyet Rome & IDEICREST-LEI & CERAS-ENPC
Chapter 13: Taxation and Efficiency Econ 330: Public Finance Dr
Economics – Mr. Graboski 10/3/11 Do Now: If the American economy is in a downward spiral, should the federal government step in with increased spending.
The Cost-effectiveness of pensions giving context to the European debate David Natali Observatoire social européen (OSE) Emerging challenges in the impact.
CHAPTER 7 ANALYSIS OF A TARIFF.
The wider economic benefits of transport Kurt Van Dender 9 March 2011 Infrastruktur som vækstdriver for Danmark.
Market size and tax competition Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano, Tanguy van Ypersele.
Railway Days, , Bucharest, Romania Railways in CEE countries – infrastructure investments Miroslaw Kanclerz Manager CEE.
Dr. Noureen Adnan Academic
Monopoly CHAPTER 12. After studying this chapter you will be able to Explain how monopoly arises and distinguish between single-price monopoly and price-discriminating.
Road charging and vehicle taxation - the EU perspective
A Closed- Economy One-Period Macro-economic Model
Highways: free or toll?. In the past, roads were considered a public good Now it is possible to make people pay: should roads be produced by the private.
Price Caps, Rate of Return Constraints and Universal Service Obligations Author: Pio Baake Presented by: Jared Hayden.
College Education is it worth the cost? By: Amit D. Patel.
TELKOM POST RETIREMENT MEDICAL AID (PRMA) ALTERNATIVE FOR EMPLOYEES
International Trade Countries can consume beyond their own PPF if they trade each specialise in goods with comparative advantage The rate of exchange will.
Financing Urban Public Infrastructure
Copyright © 2004 South-Western Monopoly vs. Competition While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price maker. A firm is considered.
Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Competitive markets (partial eq) Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013.
Transition from Regulatory to Market-Based Systems of Higher Education Maureen McLaughlin World Bank June 6, 2006.
Presentation by Alex Wilks on behalf of Counter Balance 24/2/10.
NOBEL WP Szept Stockholm Game Theory in Inter-domain Routing LÓJA Krisztina - SZIGETI János - CINKLER Tibor BME TMIT Budapest,
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROBLEMS. Current Account Deficit Current Account Deficit= net outflows on current account greater than net inflows. Made up on the.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Improving the Efficiency of the U.S. Highway System Clifford Winston The Brookings Institution.
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS- PUBLIC SECTOR INVESTMENTS Lucky Yona.
Top 10 Most Common Errors AP Economics Overview of Trouble Spots 10. Monopolistic Competition and Economies of Scale 9. A Tax Reduces Allocative.
1 REVENUE Seminar Leuven June 9th 2004 WP2.3 Management of investment funds and theory of incentives Yves Balasko David Meunier Emile Quinet ENPC, CERAS.
REVENUE Final Conference Brussels, 29 November 2005.
Theme 10 – Fiscal Federalism
May 5, Begin Unit 6: 10-15% of AP Macro Exam Open Economy: International Trade and Finance 2.Comparative Advantage Review On Website 3.Unit 6 Lesson.
Why reform transport prices? An overview of European transport infrastructure charging policy and research Chris Nash, Bryan Matthews and Batool Menaz.
Regional Policy Major Projects in Cohesion Policy Major Projects Team, Unit G.1 Smart and Sustainable Growth Competence Centre, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
ECOPLAN 1 Case Study Switzerland: Railway Investment Fund Stefan Suter ECOPLAN, Economic Research and Policy Consultancy REVENUE Final Conference Brussels,
Economics of Congestion Jagadish Guria Presentation to the the 8th Annual New Zealand Transport Summit 25 February 2008.
Properties of Pareto-Efficient Contracts and Regulations for Road Franchising Hai Yang Chair Professor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Monopoly CHAPTER 12. After studying this chapter you will be able to Explain how monopoly arises and distinguish between single-price monopoly and price-discriminating.
REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing November 2005, Brussels Revenue Use and Infrastructure Funds Andreas Kopp OECD/ECMT Transport Research.
The theory of taxation (Stiglitz ch. 17, 18, 19; Gruber ch
Case study Oslo: PT optimisation under different rules for revenue use REVENUE final conference Brussels 29th - 30th November 2005 Jon-Terje Bekken Institute.
Mobilising Aid for Trade: A Global Review
Demand for inputs depends on demand for the outputs that they produce; input demand is thus a derived demand derived demand. Inputs can be complementarysubstitutable.
IFIEC Europe International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers 1 Promotion of Renewable Energies in the EU Member States Consequences on the Price.
Economic Activity and Productivity
EU Infrastructure charging and investment policy Christophe Deblanc DG TREN.
Section IV Trade Creation and Trade Diversion. Trade Creation  The Trade creation effect refers to the increased output by members of a trade block as.
Taxation Frederick University 2009.
International Trade Chapter #4.
Chapter 1 Why Study Money, Banking, and Financial Markets?
13 MONOPOLY. © 2012 Pearson Education A monopoly is a market:  That produces a good or service for which no close substitute exists  In which there.
Investment into smart growth! How we can help!. “…the EU and its Member States should adopt a strategic and integrated approach to innovation whereby.
Inquiry on High-Speed Railways High-Speed Railways – social infrastructure for stronger development and competitiveness SOU 2009:74.
State aid monitoring and control: Sharing of experience
Leader ECA audit findings and possible simplification
Industrial Organization
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
European Innovation Council
Marco Polo – Towards a policy revision
The use of revenues from carbon pricing by Melanie Marten and Kurt Van Dender Global NDC Conference.
Presentation transcript:

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 WP 1 Economics of European infrastructure funds: methodology Funding SP Dec 2005

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Objectives of this WP: Methodology of a European infrastructure fund : –How to spend the money: –Selection of projects –Loan or subsidy –Other conditions (tolling, guarantees,…) – Individual accountability of projects –How to finance the working of the fund –Loans (what type?) –Subsidies (what type?) –How to operate the fund –Decision making on selection of projects –Decision making on total capacity of fund –Political feasibility –Membership issues –Termination rules for the fund Conclude with concrete proposals to study

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Tasks WP1 1.Economics of federal infra funds 1.What has economic theory to contribute? 2.Questions for survey about EU and US experience 2.Survey of experience in EU 3.Survey of experience in US 4.Mark up rules for funding investments 5.Risk taking, financial constraints, multi- government levels, network effects 6.Conclusion: proposals

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Survey of Theory with a Graphical example 1 Consider a bridge or a railway line used by local users and foreign users The bridge requires a lump sum investment X and we will analyse whether a local govt (member country) makes the right investment and pricing decisions Public good economics focuses on two motives for federal aid: –Spillovers (use of the good by foreigners) –Insufficient financial capacity (not relevant for member states)

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Survey of Theory with a Graphical example 2 The bridge requires a lump sum investment X and we will analyse whether a local govt (member country) makes the right investment decisions This is a simplification where we have only the 0/1 decision on investment, not the optimal choice of capacity The bridge or railway will be used by locals and foreigners We analyse the following cases: –No congestion, no pricing of infrastructure use –Congestion, optimal pricing –Congestion, locally optimal pricing –Corridor effects (or complementarity of investments) –Political economy issues Two issues are of interest to us: –Does the local government take the right investment decision: will it make the investment when it is worthwhile? –Will it take the right pricing decision? –How can federal government correct this?

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Economics of infrastructure projects – if unpriced and no congestion price trips MWP local MWP local+foreign Local govt: Total benefit local (blue)> total cost X Instead of Total benefit local + foreign > total cost X Federal intervention: subsidy rate s1 Total benefit local (blue)> total cost (1-s1)

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Economics of infrastructure projects – if unpriced and no congestion Economics of grants: –Mostly Conditional and open –Asymmetric information: Federal government does not know cost of project or precise share of foreign user –Optimise Subsidy contract = working rule of fund

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Economics of infrastructure projects – if unpriced and congestion price trips MWP local MWP local+foreign Local govt: Total benefit local (blue)> total cost X Instead of Total benefit local + foreign > total cost X Federal intervention: subsidy rate s2 Total benefit local (blue)> total cost (1-s2) Average User Cost Loss of surplus due to foreign users

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Economics of infrastructure projects – if priced at SMC and congestion price trips MWP local MWP local+foreign Local govt: Total benefit local + tax revenue > total cost X This means green area extra Instead of Total benefit local + foreign benefit + tax revenue > total cost X So grey area is still missing Federal intervention?: subsidy rate s3 Total benefit local (blue)> total cost (1-s3) Average User Cost SMC Optimal toll

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Economics of infrastructure projects – if priced above SMC and congestion price trips MWP local MWP local+foreign Local govt: Total benefit local + tax revenue > total cost X Compared to SMC pricing, larger chance that project is realised BUT smaller total surplus (mainly for the foreign users) Federal intervention: Pricing contract + investment subsidy ? Average User Cost SMC Local toll

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Economics of infrastructure projects – if priced, congestion and corridor effects In a corridor, infrastructure use by foreigners (transit) in one country will depend on capacity and pricing in the other country De Borger, Proost, Van Dender (2005) and De Borger, Dunkerley,Proost (2005) analysed this issue in more detail

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 TOLLING Corridors– 2 cases Country A Country B Country ACountry B TRANSIT LOCAL TRANSIT LOCAL PARALLEL TOLL COMPETITION SERIAL TOLL COMPETITION TRANSIT

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Relative efficiency of tolls in corridors (Nash equilibrium - illustration) 50% local,50% transit – welfare gain w.r.t no tolling Parallel Network (2 links) Serial Network (2 links) 1st Best100% Competition + toll discrimination 93%-1087% Competition+ uniform toll 89%- 665% Toll on locals only22%37%

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Relative efficiency of tolls (Nash equilibrium - illustration) 50% (90) local, 50% (10) transit – welfare gain w.r.t no tolling Parallel Network (2 links) Serial Network (2 links) 1st Best100% Competition + toll discrimination 93% (99.9%)-1087%(-126%) Competition+ uniform toll 89% (99%)- 665%(+63%) Toll on locals only22% (63%)37% (+89%)

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 Endogeneous investments in serial corridor 2 stage game with 2 countries, –First stage: decide on capacity –Second stage: pricing game (Nash) First results for “roads” (constant returns to scale in capacity extension) and symmetrical countries We start with an equilibrium with no pricing of the use of the road and 50% of roads is used by transit Examine what capacity choices are made in function of pricing regimes –Introducing pricing leads to lower capacity with uniform pricing and a welfare loss !

VariableUnit Nash Equilibrium differentiation Nash Equilibrium uniform Nash Equilibrium local tolls only Local demand (1300 in no toll equil)Trips Transit demand (1300 in no toll equil)Trips Trip volume, country levelTrips Generalised price, localEuro/Trip Generalised price, transitEuro/Trip Capacity (2000 in no toll equilibrium) Inverse capacity Local TollEuro/Trip Transit TollEuro/Trip Local MECEuro/Trip Global MECEuro/Trip Local CSEuro Tax revenue, country levelEuro Cost of capacityEuro Welfare, country levelEuro Transit welfare (CS)Euro Overall welfareEuro Change compared to Non toll equil%

FUNDING - SP -Dec 8+9 POLITICAL ECONOMY of infrastructure projects –if unpriced, no congestion price trips MWP local MWP local+foreign Local govt: lobby for projects that give a local benefit if paid federally Benefit will be larger when use is unpriced or when revenues go to locals