ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
Advertisements

Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
CLIC drive beam accelerating (DBA) structure Rolf Wegner.
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
ABSTRACT We report on the suppression of long-range wakefields in the main linacs of the CLIC collider. This structure operates with 2π/3 phase advance.
CLIC Main linac structure and Crab cavity Vasim Khan
R.M. Jones, International Workshop on Linear Colliders, 18 – 22 Oct. 2010, CERN, Geneva 1 Status and Prospects for the CLIC DDS Roger M. Jones Cockcroft.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
July Alexej Grudiev, Improvement of CLIC structure. Possible improvement of the CLIC accelerating structure. From CLIC_G to CLIC_K Alexej.
4th CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), 26 th - 28 th May Alternate Means of Wakefield Suppression in CLIC Main Linac Roger M. Jones, Vasim Khan,
MAIN LINAC DDS DESIGN Vasim Khan Bohr seminar series, HEP group, The University of Manchester.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS Vasim Khan
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, 18 – 22 Oct. 2010, CERN, Switzerland 1 Recent progress on CLIC_DDS Roger M. Jones Cockcroft Institute and The.
Vasim Khan 4th Annual X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting, CERN /36 CLIC_DDS & Test Structure V. Khan, A. D’Elia, R. Jones A.
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS Vasim Khan. 24 cells No interleaving 48cells 2-fold interleaving ∆fmin = 32.5 MHz ∆tmax =30.76 ns ∆s = 9.22 m 24 cells No interleaving.
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /13 CLIC_DDS study
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS DESIGN AND FORTCOMING Vasim Khan & Roger Jones V. Khan LC-ABD 09, Cockcroft Institute /14.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /21 CLIC_DDS_HPA study
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /24 CLIC_DDS study
WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN THE MAIN LINACS OF CLIC Vasim Khan The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and Technology, Daresbury, Warrington, WA4 4AD.
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
DDS limits and perspectives Alessandro D’Elia on behalf of UMAN Collaboration 1.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
Investigation of Wake Fields in Optimized SRF Cavities for the ILC The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and Technology, Daresbury WA4 4AD, UK.
Course B: rf technology Normal conducting rf Part 5: Higher-order-mode damping Walter Wuensch, CERN Sixth International Accelerator School for Linear Colliders.
Structures design R&D program Alessandro D’Elia-UMAN/CI and CERN On behalf of Roger M. Jones 1.
Overview of CLIC main linac accelerating structure design 21/10/2010 A.Grudiev (CERN)
SRF CAVITY GEOMETRY OPTIMIZATION FOR THE ILC WITH MINIMIZED SURFACE E.M. FIELDS AND SUPERIOR BANDWIDTH The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and.
1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Mohsen Dayyani Kelisani Thermionic & RF Gun Simulations.
ABSTRACT The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is currently under development at CERN as a potential multi-TeV e + e – collider. The manufacturing and assembly.
ENGINEERING DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF X-BAND DAMPED DETUNED STRUCTURE V. Soldatov¹, D. Gudkov¹, A. Samoshkin¹, G. Riddone², A. Grudiev², S. Atieh², A.
PBG Structure Experiments, AAC 2008 Photonic Bandgap Accelerator Experiments Roark A. Marsh, Michael A. Shapiro, Richard J. Temkin Massachusetts Institute.
Beam breakup and emittance growth in CLIC drive beam TW buncher Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, IPM.
The CLIC accelerating structure development program Walter Wuensch CARE05 23 November 2005.
CLIC Accelerating Structure R&D Introduction W. Wuensch X-band workshop
WP 9.2 DDS Status, R.M. Jones, 25 th Oct 2010, WebEx Phone-in, Geneva 1 WP 9.2: DDS Status Roger M. Jones Cockcroft Institute and The University of Manchester.
Hybrid designs - directions and potential 1 Alessandro D’Elia, R. M. Jones and V. Khan.
TWO-BEAM, MULTI-MODE, DETUNED ACCSELERATING STRUCTURE S.Kazakov 1,2, S.Kuzikov 3, V.Yakovlev 4 J.L. Hirshfield 1,5, 1 Omega-p,Inc., 199 Whitney Ave., New.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
1 Design and objectives of test accelerating structures Riccardo Zennaro.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Helical Accelerating Structure with Controllable Beam Emittance S.V. Kuzikov 1, A.A. Vikharev 1, J.L. Hirshfield 2,3 1 Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
XB-10, ICFA Mini-Workshop, R.M. Jones, Cockcroft Inst., 30 th Nov-3 rd Dec Wakefields in Linacs Subjected to Detuning and Manifold Coupled Damping.
ELI and other things A. D’Elia 1. C-BAND STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-BUNCH RF LINACS: ELI_NP PROPOSAL Bunch charge 250 pC Number of bunches 40 Bunch distance.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Damped and Detuned Structures for CLIC The University of Manchester The Cockcroft Institute 4/10/2013I.Nesmiyan1 Acknowledgements to colleagues at CERN,
A. D’Elia 1,2,3, T. Higo 4, V. F. Khan, R.M. Jones 1,2, A. Latina 3, I. Nesmiyan 1,2, G. Riddone 3 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of.
Damping intense wake-fields in the main Linacs and PETS structures of the CLIC Linear Collider Vasim Khan: 1 st year PhD Student Supervisor: Dr. Roger.
High Power Crab Cavity Testing Ben Woolley HG2016 Argonne National Lab. 8 th June 2016.
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
Alternate Means of Wakefield Suppression in CLIC Main Linac
RF-kick in the CLIC accelerating structures
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
Vasim Khan & Roger Jones
A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS
Roger M. Jones Cockcroft Institute and The University of Manchester
CLIC_DDS study
Developments on Proposed
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Progress in the design of a damped an
Presentation transcript:

ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised to GHz with a phase advance of 2π/3 per cell [1] for the main accelerating mode. The moderately damped DDS design [2] is being studied as an alternative to the strongly damped WDS design [1]. Both these designs (DDS and WDS) are based on the nominal accelerating phase advance. Here we explore high phase advance ( HPA ) structures in which the group velocity of the rf fields is reduced compared to that of standard (2π/3) structures. The electrical breakdown strongly depends on the fundamental mode group velocity. Hence it is expected that electrical breakdown is less likely to occur in the HPA structures. Here we report on a study of both the fundamental and dipole modes in a DDS_ HPA structure, designed to operate at 5π/6 phase advance per cell. International linear accelerator conference, LINAC’10, Sept 12 – 17, Tsukuba, Japan. ACCELERATIGN MODE RF PROPERTIES OF CLIC_DDS_HPA A HIGH PHASE ADVANCE DAMPED AND DETUNED SRUCTURE FOR THE MAIN LINACS OF CLIC V. F. Khan †*, A. D’Elia †*‡, A. Grudiev ‡, R. M. Jones †*, W. Wuensch ‡ † School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K. * The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and Technology, Daresbury, U.K. ‡ CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS V. Khan acknowledges receipt of funding from the Cockctoft Institute. This research has received funding from the European Commission under FP7 Research Infrastructure grant agreement no MOP002 REFERNCES [1] H. Braun, et. al, CLIC-Note764, [2] R.M. Jones, et. al, PRST-AB, 9, , [3] V.F. Khan, et. al, IPAC10, [4] B. Zotter and K. Bane, CERN ISR-TH/80-25, HIGHER BAND DIPOLE MODES IN HPA STRUCTURE SUPPRESSION OF FIRST DIPOLE BAND COMPONENT OF WAKEFIELD  Our CLIC design aims at an average loaded gradient of ~ 100 MV/m at a pulse length of ~ 270 ns.  Associated high surface e.m. fields cause electrical breakdown.  High group velocity (v g ) and large input power are also known to exacerbate breakdown.  Imperative to reduce the surface fields and v g.  Beam induces higher order modes which disrupt succeeding bunches.  Critical to ensure the resulting wakefield is suppressed to manageable level.  Finally, the overall “wall-plug” to beam efficiency must be optimised.  We have developed a travelling wave structure of 24 cell, with a fundamental mode phase advance of 5π/6 per which we referred to as CLIC_DDS_HPA.  Group velocity of the fundamental mode is reduced.  Optimised overall performance by varying the iris thickness (compared to CLIC_DDS_A[3]).  Superior performance predicted compared to standard structure (in particular there is a reduced input power requirement) RF properties of DDS_HPA for a range of iris thicknesses  We utilise the code “TRANVRS” [4] to rapidly calculate the first six band dipole modes in CLIC_DDS_HPA.  We characterise the smooth geometry by sharp transitions – a requirement of TRANSVRS.  The kick factors for the 5π/6 structure are contrasted with the standard 2π/3 structure (rightmost).  Overall summation of the kick factors is reduced ~ 15% compared to CLIC_DDS_A  Main contribution to the fields is confined by the 1 st, 3 rd and 6 th bands – dominated by the first band.  We focus our study on suppressing the first dipole band.  The Spectral function and circuit model [2] are used to calculate the strongly coupled manifold-dipole modes.  As a preliminary to the spectral function calculation, uniform structure dispersion curves must be obtained (indicated to the right).  Spectral function for a Gaussian distribution with a bandwidth Δf = 3.48 σ, together with Δf = 0.8 σ is illustrated to the right. In addition, the corresponding synchronous frequency and kick factor weighted density functions are shown.  The Fourier transform of the Spectral function enables the wake function to be obtained and this is illustrated in the plots (bottom right).  Provided the Δf = 0.8 σ distribution is used, together with a reduced bunch population (n b = 3 x 10 9 ), the wakefield satisfies the beam dynamics constraints (minimal emittance dilution). Synchronous kick factors Kick ϕ acc Diff. kV/pc/mm/m2π/35π/6% ΣK ΣK ΣK ΣK Dispersion curves DDS_HPA Spectral function (G) DDS_HPA Envelope of wakefield Cell # 1 Cell # 13 Cell # 24 Avoided crossing Light line Beam dynamics constraints * 5π/6 2π/3 ω syn /2π - Δf = 3.48σ - Δf = 0.8σ G 2Kdn/df Cell 1 Cell 24 RF parametersDDS_ADDS_ HPA42 DDS_ HPA32 Iris thickness (In/Out)[mm]4/ /2.8 Bunch population (n b )[10 9 ] Q (In/Out) [10 3 ]5.0/ / 7.0 R’ (In/Out) [MΩ/m]51 / / 102 Group velocity, v g /c (In/Out) [%] 2.07 / / 0.45 P in [MW] Acc. grad (E acc ) (Load./UnL.) [ MV/m] 105 / / / 138 Pulsed temp. rise (ΔT sur ) [ o K]51 48 Surface electric field (E sur ) [MV/m] Modified Poynting vector (S c ) [W/μm 2 ] RF-to-beam efficiency. (η)[%] H-field E-field Cell 1 Cell 24 Surface fields in CLIC_DDS_A[3] CLIC_DDS Tolerable limit on electric field Tolerable limit on ΔT