General introduction: HSC collaboration meeting at Princeton Yasushi Suto Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo (Global Scholar, Dept. of Astrophys.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Timeline and Product Development Aug-Oct 2007Recovery Plan completed and adopted Recovery Plan Adaptive Management Framework developed and adopted.
Advertisements

Kento Aida, Tokyo Institute of Technology Grid Working Group Meeting Aug. 27 th, 2003 Tokyo Institute of Technology Kento Aida.
10 July 2008 Rafael Llavori Head of the Institutional and International Relations Unit Self-assessment of agencies and self- assessment report. An agency.
Planning Office and Academic Registry Planning Office Overview.
Making a Financial Case: The Loughborough Context ILM Level 5
Councillor Egli Ward 9 Knoxdale- Merivale June 5, 2014.
Why an RE Review? Equity Quality. Focus of the RE Review –Aims –Curriculum –Exemplification of good RE practice –Assessment including qualifications.
1 Meeting Agenda Introduction Meeting Purpose Review CEST Mission & Organization Review Working Group Role Review Schedule Assignments Next Meetings Materials.
State Milestones Subsidized Insurance Workgroup High Level Timeline 2011 Jan 2011 Feb 2011 Mar 2011 Apr 2011 May 2011 Jun 2011 Jul 2011 Aug 2011 Sept 2011.
United Nations Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED) Revised documents and procedures for assessing Member States’ implementation efforts.
1 Session # Relay TG Closing Remarks IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE j-09/0005 Date Submitted:
Asia Broadband Backbone Committees August 30, 2002 Shigeki Goto, Kazunori Konishi (APAN-JP)
Informing a data revolution right data, to the right people, at the right time, in the right format The IDR road map Bangkok Regional Workshop July 17-18,2014.
NOAA Science Advisory Board Fire Weather Research Working Group (FWRWG) John T. Snow 2 Oct 07.
Reject Appeal SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG Approve EVALUATION – FALL CONTINUE IMPLEMENTATION & SCHEDULING PLAN REVISION DIVISION MANAGEMENT.
Report from Subaru Advisory Committee The main issues of the current SAC: ・ Extensive (strategic) program of Subaru telescope ・ International collaborations.
Subaru Advisory Committee Report すばる小委員長 吉田道利 SAC Chair: Michitoshi Yoshida 2014/1/21Subaru UM
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Open Data Promotion Consortium Noboru Koshizuka, Chief Researcher, Technical Committee Technical Committee Report of Activities of 2012 and Proposed.
Kento Aida, Tokyo Institute of Technology Grid Committee meeting Aug. 25 th, 2005 Taipei Kento Aida.
1 Linac 2010 Status Sep 12-17, 2010, Tsukuba Hiroyuki Sako Japan Atomic Energy Agency JACoW Steering Committee Kyoto 27 May 2010.
GIAN – Migrations Workshop Madrid, September 2012.
INTERNATIONAL STUDENT CENTER PHOTO CONTEST “4 seasons at the ISC” 1.COME TO THE ISC 2.TAKE PICTURES 3.WIN A PRIZE 4.GO TO (1. ) The.
Why Collaboration?  Better science through collaboration If you want to do a big survey, you need to benefit (or persuade) many scientists. (Democratic.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Future of Science & Technology in Japan -Topics from Tokyo Node- Millennium Project The Planning Committee Meeting July 28 & 29, 2005 Chicago, USA Shinji.
September 8, 2015 Update Housing Committee September 8, 2015 Neighborhood Revitalization Plan for Dallas.
1 Session # Relay TG Opening Remarks and Session Agenda IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE j-07/025.
1 Session # Relay TG Opening Remarks and Session Agenda IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE j-08/010.
Summary of HEP SW workshop Ian Bird MB 15 th April 2014.
Kento Aida, Tokyo Institute of Technology Joint Meeting Grid activities committee and Grid working group Jan. 28 th, 2004 Honolulu.
Project Planning Committee (PPC): Session #68 Closing Report IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE ppc-10/0010.
1 Session # Relay TG Opening Remarks and Session Agenda IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE j-08/016draft.
TAC Subaru UM /01/16 K. Shimasaku (chair)
Introductory Remarks and Meeting Goals
Mike PAC Charge & Agenda ALCW15 Plenaries CERN SPC – September 2014
UN Environment Latin America and the Caribbean Following up to the Decisions of the XX Meeting of the Forum of Ministers October 2017, Bogota, Colombia.
Board and Committee Decision and Discussion to end 2016
Background on the 2016 Study Program Process
Subaru Weak Lensing Survey: Hyper Suprime-Cam
Milestones & Deliverables BENE III period Jan 06 - Jun07
Session # Relay TG Closing Remarks
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Session # Relay TG Opening Remarks and Session Agenda
Japan proposal on schedule
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Overview of WMO Strategic Planning Initiative
2017 Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Revised engagement approach for draft GTAC
Task Force for Measuring Sustainable Development (TFSD)- Project plan
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Proposed Strategic Planning Process for FY 2013/14 thru FY 2015/16
GOMACTech-04 Technical Program Committee Timeline
Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.
Wireless Local Number Portability Timeline - Phase 2
Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.
5QC Update IPSG Meeting Lisbon, 15 November 2007
Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
A Chronology Tribal Transportation Self Governance Program (TTSGP)
Drafting Group: Final Meeting Drafting Group: 1st Meeting
Second Independent Evaluation of UNAIDS
DRAFT ISO 10015:20XX Revision Overview Quality management - Guidelines for competence management and people development ISO/TC176 TG 01.
Document CWG-SFP-2/7-E 4 August 2017 Original: English
Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.
Rev. 2 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY 2002 SERVICE PROVIDER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP.
Wireless Local Number Portability Timeline - Phase 2
Welcome and Introduction Pere Mato (CERN) June 2009
Updating the National Vaccine Plan: A roadmap for the next decade A National, not Federal, Plan December 11, 2009.
Rev. 2 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY 2002 SERVICE PROVIDER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP.
Presentation transcript:

General introduction: HSC collaboration meeting at Princeton Yasushi Suto Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo (Global Scholar, Dept. of Astrophys. Sci., Princeton Univ.) HSC collaboration Nov. 11 & 12, 2009

Proposed agenda: Wed., Nov :00-14:30 Yasushi Suto: HSC organization: advisory council, survey design committee, working group Summary of discussion on Sept. 25 at University of Tokyo Purpose of this meeting 14:30-15:00 discussion 15:00-16:00 current plan of 3 surveys 10 min presentations by chairs of each survey + 10 min discussion 16:00-16:30 coffee 16:30-18:00 discussion led by Masahiro Takada on collaboration policy, etc.

Proposed agenda: Thu., Nov.12 9:00-12:00 parallel session on how to optimize the current survey plan Wide survey (chair: Masahiro Takada) Deep survey (chair: Tomoki Morokuma) Ultra-deep survey (chair: Masami Ouchi) 13:30-15:30 summary of the morning session and discussion 13:30-14:10 Masahiro Takada: wide-survey 14:10-14:50 Tomoki Morokuma: deep survey 14:50-15:30 Masami Ouchi: ultra-deep survey 15:30-16:00 coffee 16:00-18:00 further discussion toward the proposal led by Michael Strauss

Outline of this collaboration meeting Establish the HSC organization advisory council, survey design committee, working group How to proceed Summary of discussion on Sept. 25 at The University of Tokyo Survey designs Collaboration policy Data right

We have to avoid this kind of fight among HSC collaborators

A possible HSC organization proposed on Jan. 19, 2009 at NAOJ HSC Survey Design Committee Working group 1 Working group 2 Working group 3 Working group N …… HSC collaborators PI Advisers H.Karoji S.Miyazaki M.Takada: weak lens K.Shimasaku: high-z objects M.Chiba: Galactic archeology J.Gunn: galaxy evolution M.Strauss: everything scientific D.Spergel, T.Yamada, N.Yasuda, … non-scientific E.Turner, Y.Suto, … N-PAC council

Today’s proposal (for HSC, not for SUMIRE) HSC Survey Design Committee Working group 1 Working group 2 Working group 3 Working group N …… HSC collaborators PI Advisory Council H.Karoji S.Miyazaki M.Chiba, J.Gunn, K.Shimasaku, M.Strauss, M.Takada, K.Umetsu H.Aihara, P.Ho, H.Murayama, D.Spergel, Y.Suto, E.Turner N-PAC council

How to proceed next ? (Jan version) Aug. 2010: deadline of the Subaru strategic program proposal Jun. 2010: HSC proposal 1 st draft completed and circulated among collaborators Mar. 2010: Japan-Princeton-Taiwan HSC Japan ? Dec. 2009: draft of HSC survey circulated among collaborators Nov. 2009: HSC Princeton Mar. 2009: 3rd HSC workshop (in NAOJ or Univ. of Tokyo

How to proceed next ? Dec. 2013: 1 st world-top result from HSC as part of SUMIRE project XXX.2012: start HSC survey Aug. 2011: deadline of the Subaru strategic program proposal XXX. 2011: HSC proposal 1 st draft completed and circulated among collaborators XXX.2010: Japan-Princeton-Taiwan HSC Japan ? Nov. 2009: HSC Princeton

Summary of discussion on Sept. 25 at The University of Tokyo According to the draft of HSC white paper, the number of requested nights of wide, deep and ultra- deep surveys is 600. Somehow we have to reduce it by 50% (?) It is non trivial at al. Possibilities include Cut each of these surveys by a factor of two. Drop one (or even two !) of the survey plans, and adjust the number of nights among the rest of the plans Something in-between the above two, by cutting each of the surveys by a factor depending on the strength of their scientific case. The factors may be adapted after a few years of the survey, depending on its achievements.

Purpose of today ’ s discussion The latest number of requested nights for each survey (wide, deep, and ultra-deep) Presentation by each survey group Agreement on the decision making procedure Discussion today and tomorrow Final decision; who and how ? other collaboration issues

Summary of requested nights Wide 1500 deg nights (w/o weather factor) 1000 deg nights Deep 79 nights (w/o weather factor) Ultra-deep 69 nights (w/o weather factor) Max number of nights: 210 (w/o weather factor) Ratio: ( )/210=307/210=1.46 On average, 210/307=0.68 reduction

Comparison: Nov.11 vs. Nov.12 Wide 1500 deg nights ⇒ 1000 deg nights Deep 79 nights ⇒ 43 nights Ultra-deep 69 nights ⇒ 60 nights Max number of nights: 210 (w/o weather factor) Wide: deep: ultra-deep = 50: 20: 30