SAFETY-BARRIER DIAGRAMS FOR DOCUMENTING SAFETY OF HYDROGEN APPLICATIONS F. Markert and N.J. Duijm Systems Analysis Department, Risø National Laboratory,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Joint Code of Practice Objectives and Summary Presentation
Advertisements

The Department of Energy Enterprise Risk Management Model
Lessons Learned from the Application of Risk Management in the Shipment of LNG.
Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP) and Safety Management System (SMS) in the Context of the Seveso II Directive.
Development of Tools for Risk Assessment and Risk Communication for Hydrogen Applications By Angunn Engebø and Espen Funnemark, DNV ICHS, Pisa 09. September.
Accident Investigation Root Cause Analysis
International Energy Agency Hydrogen Implementing Agreement Proposed Task on Hydrogen Safety.
Safety distances: comparison of the metodologies for their determination – M. Vanuzzo, M. Carcassi ICHS San Francisco, USA - September SAFETY.
Mr. R. R. Diwanji Techniques for Safety Improvements.
Integration of Quality Into Accident Investigation Processes ASQ Columbia Basin Section 614 John Cornelison January 2008.
Understanding the management of risks to health and safety on the premises of a retail business Unit 352.
6/23/2015 Risk-Informed Process and Tools for Permitting Hydrogen Fueling Stations Jeffrey LaChance 1, Andrei Tchouvelev 2, and Jim Ohi 3 1 Sandia National.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO RISK IDENTIFICATION 2.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2.
Tony Gould Quality Risk Management. 2 | PQ Workshop, Abu Dhabi | October 2010 Introduction Risk management is not new – we do it informally all the time.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Annex I: Methods & Tools
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Safety Management System Performance Based on Organizational Factors of “Seveso” sites Papadakis Georgios A., Kokkinos Konstantinos G. & Machaira Paschalia.
Passenger Aircraft Environmental Control System Safety Analysis Presented By: Brian Cranley, Ali Dalal, Chris Hankins, Josh Martin.
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Safety Procedures in the Chemical Industry Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December 2013.
Quality Risk Management Methodology Anthony Cumberlege SAPRAA meeting - Randpark golf club, 20 March 2009.
 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 7 Quality and Innovation in Product and Process Design.
Process Safety Management
Pre Incident Planning and Related Loss Reduction Strategies
BPMN By Hosein Bitaraf Software Engineering. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is a graphical representation for specifying business processes.
1 Introduction to Security Chapter 5 Risk Management: The Foundation of Private Security.
Risk Management - the process of identifying and controlling hazards to protect the force.  It’s five steps represent a logical thought process from.
ISO OPERATIONAL CONTROL
Guidance Notes on the Investigation of Marine Incidents
Emergency Planning Steps 5 steps in emergency planning Step 1: Establish a team Step 2: Analyze capabilities and hazards Step 3: Conduct vulnerability.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS RISK ASSESSMENT Prepared by: Miss Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
ERT 322 SAFETY AND LOSS PREVENTION RISK ASSESSMENT
1 Commissioned by PAMSA and German Technical Co-Operation National Certificate in Paper & Pulp Manufacturing NQF Level 4 Perform visual inspection tests.
LSST Camera CD-3 Review Brookhaven National Laboratory, Brookhaven, NY LSST Safety Council Camera Review Bremerton, WA 2015 LSST Camera Environment,
QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT RASHID MAHMOOD MSc. Analytical Chemistry MS in Total Quality Management Senior Manager Quality Assurance Nabiqasim Group of Industries.
Sandia National Laboratories
2 IMPACT - THE FIRE PERMIT = Hot Work Permit 3 Welcome ! This course is linked to the use of IMPACT, so it is assumed that: You know how to use IMPACT.
Objectives Students will be able to:
SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN TURKISH STATE RAILWAYS (TCDD)
TUGAS K3 DALAM INDUSTRI KIMIA
Application of SIL assessment, Bow-tie and API 14C to ensure a thorough Safety Concept Prepared by: Fabienne Salimi & Tino Vande Capelle 26 January 2011.
WHAT IF ANALYSIS USED TO IDENTIFY HAZARDS HAZARDOUS EVENTS
Human Reliability HUMAN RELIABILITY HUMAN ERROR
Erman Taşkın. Information security aspects of business continuity management Objective: To counteract interruptions to business activities and to protect.
Using HPI Tools in Tank Farm Work Control and Hazard Analysis Process U.S. Department of Energy Enhancing Integrated Safety Management through Event Prevention.
Initiating Event Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country.
Process system and safety laboratory
Overview of the handbook Chapter 5: Levee inspection, assessment and risk attribution.
Fault Tree Analysis for Fatality Prevention Dr. Steven A. Lapp President - Design Sciences, Inc.
A fault tree – Based Bayesian network construction for the failure rate assessment of a complex system 46th ESReDA Seminar May 29-30, 2014, Politecnico.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
Process Safety Management Soft Skills Programme Nexus Alliance Ltd.
Author: Eng. Abdel-Razek Rashwan QHSE Senior Consultant CAE-Egypt Safety in Global.
Yokohama National University
Engineering Safety in Hydrogen-Energy Applications
Bowtie Analysis – An Effective Risk Management
Guide for the application of the CSM design targets (CSM-DT)
HAZOP Study for Kiln Start-up Process of a Cement Production Plant
Quality Risk Management
HSE Case: Risk Based Approach.
Emergency Planning Steps
Sandia National Laboratories
Quantitative Risk Assessment
M. Vanuzzo, M. Carcassi. Università di Pisa
Mikael Olsson Control Engineer
A New Concept for Laboratory Quality Management Systems
Project Risk Management Jiwei Ma
Review and comparison of the modeling approaches and risk analysis methods for complex ship system. Author: Sunil Basnet.
Presentation transcript:

SAFETY-BARRIER DIAGRAMS FOR DOCUMENTING SAFETY OF HYDROGEN APPLICATIONS F. Markert and N.J. Duijm Systems Analysis Department, Risø National Laboratory, Technical University of Denmark, P.O. Box 49, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Background Barrier diagrams serve two main purposes : 1)Evaluation of adequateness of safety measures (part of accident prevention) Are the barrieres reasonable and independent? Are barriers missing? 2) Communication to all stakeholders Illustrating the possible accident scenarios and safety measures taken to prevent them - Safety-barrier diagrams have been popular in Denmark as a risk analysis tool. - Safety-barrier diagrams are also useful for analysisng the new hydrogen technologies

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Definition of a safety barrier A barrier function is a function planned to prevent, control, or mitigate the propagation of a condition or event into an undesired condition or event; A safety barrier is a series of elements that implement a barrier function, each element consisting of a technical system or human action. Level indicator Alarm Operator ButtonPowered valve Signal DetectionDiagnosisAction

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Graphical presentation of a safety barrier Fault tree representation Safety barrier Condition on success is optional

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September BARRIER DIAGRAMS Barriers can be of different types:  Active versus passive barriers  Automatic versus manual barriers Examples of barriers:  An alarm for high level in a tank.  A sprinkler system in a building to prevent fires in developing.  A dike surrounding a tank, designed to contain accidental spillage from the tank.

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September CONSTRUCTION OF BARRIER DIAGRAMS The construction of barrier diagrams consists of 4 steps: 1.Construction of e.g. the event chains When constructing barrier diagrams one must start with ignoring all the existing barriers! The main structure of the barrier diagram is the event chains, which may consist of elements from both the event tree and the fault tree method.

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September STEPS IN CONSTRUCTING BARRIER DIAGRAMS 2.Inclusion of the barriers.

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September STEPS IN CONSTRUCTING BARRIER DIAGRAMS 3. Once the barrier diagram is finished, the level of safety should be evaluated  to determine whether there are sufficient barriers against the undesired events happening  When evaluating the diagram one must consider: The frequency/probability of the initiating events The severity of the end events (consequence assessment) The number, coverage and reliability of barriers in each of the event chains in the diagram 4. (optional) Classification of barriers according to type or evaluated reliability of the barrier..

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Safety-barrier diagrams are simpler than fault trees

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Dependency can be included via the ”Common Element” Common Element indicated: ”Single Operator”

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Barriers may not be bypassed Events/conditions and barriers are unique Paths through diagrams can converge and diverge; divergence can be exclusive (as in an event tree) or simultaneous (or parallel) Important properties of safety-barrier diagrams Exclusive Simultaneous/parallel DivergenceConvergence

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Important properties (continue) Diagrams can be split into connected sub-diagrams; Connected diagrams can be put together into a single diagram that fulfils the above conditions The probability of conditions in a safety-barrier diagram can be derived from the probability of the initial conditions and probabilities of failure on demand of the barriers.

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Comparison with other (graphical) risk analysis methods Barrier diagrams are developed from cause-consequence diagrams Cause-consequence diagrams combine fault trees and event trees Barrier diagrams simplify the presentation of safety systems (”and” gates in fault trees) A ”Bowtie” diagram is a safety-barrier diagram with a single ”Critical Event”

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Example safety-barrier diagram Process flow diagram for a hydrogen refuelling facility with cryogenic delivery

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Safety-barrier diagram for the unloading of a LH2-truck Safety-barrier diagram for the unloading of a liquid hydrogen truck at a refuelling station on the basis of the FMEA study by Venkatesh S., et.al.; Failure modes and effects analysis for hydrogen fueling options. California Energy Commission;2004.

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Barrier diagram evaluation & type classification Barrier Name Barrier Type Description Unloading Inspection Activated Barrier - Procedural (Observation of local conditions not using instruments) On arrival of the truck, the truck is inspected visually for defects by driver or station operator (need to be decided who). The mitigation action what to do in case defects are noted need to be included. Hydrogen sensors Activated Barrier - Warned (Human Action based on passive warning) Hydrogen sensors are located near the unloading facility The sensors themselves do not mitigate the presence of an explosive atmosphere, so a follow up has to be found in terms of alarms, evacuation, close down of unloading operation, close down of potential ignition sources Inspection of hoses Activated Barrier - Procedural (Observation of local conditions not using instruments) Inspection of hoses before unloading/connection

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Barrier diagram evaluation & type classification Inspection of connections Activated Barrier - Procedural (Observation of local conditions not using instruments) Connections are inspected before unloading action is started Supervision during unloading Activated Barrier - Procedural (Observation of local conditions not using instruments) The unloading action is monitored by personnel. Note that the personnel may become disabled by freeze burn - consider additional remote monitoring Deviations of the unloading lead to aborting the unloading action

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Barrier diagram evaluation & type classification Barrier Name Barrier Type Description Personal protection Temporary Passive Barrier - Put in place (and removed) by person Unloading operator and truck driver have donned protective clothing against cryogenic burn ("Nomex suit") Limited accessActivated Barrier - Warned (Human Action based on passive warning) A safety distance around the truck and unloading facility where access is prohibited to third parties and personnel not involved in the unloading action. Venting prior disconnection Activated Barrier - Procedural (Observation of local conditions not using instruments) Unloading hoses need to be vented prior to disconnection Collision prevention Temporary Passive Barrier - Put in place (and removed) by person /Permanent Passive Barrier/Activated Barrier - warned Temporary Passive Barrier The unloading facility can be protected against external impacts such as third party traffic by: a) caution cones, b) concrete poles, and c) impact resistant movable fences/barriers

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Conclusions The methodology of safety-barrier diagrams has been introduced and exemplified by the safety analysis of two sections of a hydrogen refueling station. Safety-barrier diagrams offer a good overview of the safety precautions that are included in the different sections, and the consequences of the failure of these precautions. Safety-barrier diagrams support hazard analysis; they do not support or replace the preceding phase of hazard identification, for which exist a range of more suitable methods, such as FMEA or HAZOP The logic framework used for safety-barrier diagrams and the use of a classification for the different safety barriers forces the analysts to consider the completeness of the barriers (in terms of the detect- diagnose-act sequence) and the role of the safety barrier in the system.

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Conclusions The safety-barrier diagrams allow both quantitative and qualitative assessments to be made. The presentation by means of safety-barrier diagrams is simpler, and thereby easier to understand by non-experts than other graphical methods such as fault trees or event trees. Therefore safety-barrier diagrams are excellent means for documenting system safety and for communication with authorities and other stakeholders.

Paper nd ICHS, San Sebastian 11th-13th September Thank you for your attention