Stat 418 – Day 3 Maximum Likelihood Estimation (Ch. 1)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topics
Advertisements

Stat 301 – Day 28 Review. Last Time - Handout (a) Make sure you discuss shape, center, and spread, and cite graphical and numerical evidence, in context.
Stat 301 – Day 15 Comparing Groups. Statistical Inference Making statements about the “world” based on observing a sample of data, with an indication.
Stat 217 – Day 21 Cautions/Limitations with Inference Procedures.
Sample size computations Petter Mostad
Stat 512 – Lecture 10 Cautions with Inference Open Applets page and Minitab and see me…
Chapter 17 Comparing Two Proportions
Stat 301 – Day 21 Adjusted Wald Intervals Power. Last Time – Confidence Interval for  When goal is to estimate the value of the population proportion.
Stat Day 16 Observations (Topic 16 and Topic 14)
Stat 301 – Day 14 Review. Previously Instead of sampling from a process  Each trick or treater makes a “random” choice of what item to select; Sarah.
Stat 512 Day 9: Confidence Intervals (Ch 5) Open Stat 512 Java Applets page.
Stat 512 – Lecture 12 Two sample comparisons (Ch. 7) Experiments revisited.
Today Today: Chapter 10 Sections from Chapter 10: Recommended Questions: 10.1, 10.2, 10-8, 10-10, 10.17,
Horng-Chyi HorngStatistics II_Five43 Inference on the Variances of Two Normal Population &5-5 (&9-5)
Stat 321 – Day 22 Confidence intervals cont.. Reminders Exam 2  Average .79 Communication, binomial within binomial  Course avg >.80  Final exam 20-25%
Stat 301 – Day 35 Bootstrapping (4.5) Three handouts…
Today’s Agenda Review of ANOVA Module 9 Review for Exam 2 Please log in with your UMID and your participation will be graded by the number of questions.
Stat 301 – Day 21 Large sample methods. Announcements HW 4  Updated solutions Especially Simpson’s Paradox  Should always show your work and explain.
Stat 301 – Day 22 Relative Risk. Announcements HW 5  Learn by Doing Lab 2-3  Evening Office hours  Friday: 10-11, 12-1.
Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response Systems Statistical Inference: Confidence Intervals.
Stat 217 – Day 20 Comparing Two Proportions The judge asked the statistician if she promised to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
MA 102 Statistical Controversies Monday, April 15, 2002 Today: 95% confidence intervals - exercises General confidence intervals Reading: None new Exercises:
Stat 301 – Day 27 Sign Test. Last Time – Prediction Interval When goal is to predict an individual value in the population (for a quantitative variable)
Population Proportion The fraction of values in a population which have a specific attribute p = Population proportion X = Number of items having the attribute.
Stat 321 – Day 23 Point Estimation (6.1). Last Time Confidence interval for  vs. prediction interval  One-sample t Confidence interval in Minitab Needs.
5-3 Inference on the Means of Two Populations, Variances Unknown
Review for Exam 2 Some important themes from Chapters 6-9 Chap. 6. Significance Tests Chap. 7: Comparing Two Groups Chap. 8: Contingency Tables (Categorical.
The Neymann-Pearson Lemma Suppose that the data x 1, …, x n has joint density function f(x 1, …, x n ;  ) where  is either  1 or  2. Let g(x 1, …,
One Sample  M ean μ, Variance σ 2, Proportion π Two Samples  M eans, Variances, Proportions μ1 vs. μ2 σ12 vs. σ22 π1 vs. π Multiple.
Math 227 Elementary Statistics
The maximum likelihood method Likelihood = probability that an observation is predicted by the specified model Plausible observations and plausible models.
LECTURE 21 THURS, 23 April STA 291 Spring
Confidence Intervals Nancy D. Barker, M.S.. Statistical Inference.
Introduction to Statistical Inference Probability & Statistics April 2014.
June 26, 2008Stat Lecture 151 Two-Sample Inference for Proportions Statistics Lecture 15.
Sampling Distribution ● Tells what values a sample statistic (such as sample proportion) takes and how often it takes those values in repeated sampling.
Section Inference for Experiments Objectives: 1.To understand how randomization differs in surveys and experiments when comparing two populations.
June 25, 2008Stat Lecture 14 - Two Means1 Comparing Means from Two Samples Statistics 111 – Lecture 14 One-Sample Inference for Proportions and.
8-3 Estimation Estimating p in a binomial distribution.
Multinomial Distribution
Maximum Likelihood Estimator of Proportion Let {s 1,s 2,…,s n } be a set of independent outcomes from a Bernoulli experiment with unknown probability.
1October In Chapter 17: 17.1 Data 17.2 Risk Difference 17.3 Hypothesis Test 17.4 Risk Ratio 17.5 Systematic Sources of Error 17.6 Power and Sample.
Warm-up Day of 8.1, 8.2, 9.1 and 9.2 Review. Answer to H.W. Problem E#17 Step 1: The amount of water in the bottles is normally distributed. A graph of.
Statistical Inference Drawing conclusions (“to infer”) about a population based upon data from a sample. Drawing conclusions (“to infer”) about a population.
1 Probability and Statistics Confidence Intervals.
Hypothesis Testing. Statistical Inference – dealing with parameter and model uncertainty  Confidence Intervals (credible intervals)  Hypothesis Tests.
Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 10 Comparing Two Groups Section 10.3 Other Ways of Comparing Means and Comparing Proportions.
USE OF THE t DISTRIBUTION Footnote: Who was “Student”? A pseudonym for William Gosset The t is often thought of as a small-sample technique But, STRICTLY.
 Confidence Intervals  Around a proportion  Significance Tests  Not Every Difference Counts  Difference in Proportions  Difference in Means.
ESTIMATION.
Hypothesis Testing for Proportions
Chapter 4. Inference about Process Quality
Comparing Two Proportions
STAT 312 Chapter 7 - Statistical Intervals Based on a Single Sample
Elementary Statistics
Sampling Distribution of Sample Means Open Minitab
AP STATISTICS REVIEW INFERENCE
HUDM4122 Probability and Statistical Inference
Ch. 8 Estimating with Confidence
Elementary Statistics
YOU HAVE REACHED THE FINAL OBJECTIVE OF THE COURSE
Section 3: Estimating p in a binomial distribution
Analysis of 2x2 contingency tables: Hypothesis tests and confidence intervals Different versions of the Pearson chi squared tests, the Fisher exact test,
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Inference & Hypothesis Testing
Estimating the Value of a Parameter Using Confidence Intervals
9.9 Single Sample: Estimating of a Proportion:
Section 12.2 Comparing Two Proportions
Determining Which Method to use
Confidence Interval.
Interpreting Computer Output
Presentation transcript:

Stat 418 – Day 3 Maximum Likelihood Estimation (Ch. 1)

Last Time Multiple confidence interval procedures for   Main goal: Achieve stated confidence level, e.g., 95% of intervals for all possible random samples capture the value of the parameter  Also nice if narrower

Confidence interval for  Exact binomial Wald interval Score interval (Wilson)  Which values of  would not be rejected… Adjusted Wald (Agresti & Coull, 1998)  Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions, American Statistician, 52:119–126.

Likelihood function =C(407,248)  248 (1-  ) 209

Test of significance? Gives you a point estimate Also allows you to compare to other values  Another value of  will be plausible if the likelihood function at that value isn’t too much smaller

Likelihood ratio test Likelihood Ratio compares the unrestricted maximum likelihood to value under null Pearson is z 2 from “score” test (two-sided)

To Do Finish reading Ch. 1 Investigation 1 HW 1 solutions posted tonight? HW 2 posted this weekend? Final Exam survey (by Monday?)