Luminosity measurments roadmap for luminosity determinations relative luminosity monitors luminosity from machine parameters luminosity from physics processes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low-x and PDF studies at LHC Sept 2008 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford At the LHC high precision (SM and BSM) cross section predictions require precision Parton.
Advertisements

Low x workshop Helsinki 2007 Joël Feltesse 1 Inclusive F 2 at low x and F L measurement at HERA Joël Feltesse Desy/Hamburg/Saclay On behalf of the H1 and.
LHC/HERA workshop, WG 4 (17. Jan. 2005)
P. 1Mario Deile – DIS 2004 Mario Deile CERN on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration TOTEM: Forward Physics at the LHC.
M.Mevius Open and hidden beauty production in 920 GeV proton –nucleus collisions at HERA-B M.Mevius DESY.
LHC Luminosity Workshop December 9, 2002 Gregory Snow (University of Nebraska) 1 Toward a Measurement and Monitoring of pp Luminosity in the CMS Experiment.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
The ALFA project in ATLAS Antwerpen 25/10/07 Per Grafstrom.
Status of the Roman Pot Project reminder prototyping & testbeam mechanics & infrastructure simulation Hasko Stenzel ATLAS week October 2006.
The ATLAS experiment The ATLAS Detector Physics at the LHC Luminosity determination Hasko Stenzel.
Luminosity measurements and forward physics in ATLAS forward detectors luminosity calibration and monitoring forward physics beyond luminosity Hasko Stenzel.
Machine induced background in ALFA The ALFA detector elastic scattering and luminosity background generation, rejection and subtraction impact on luminosity.
QCD Studies in ATLAS Martin Siebel (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration XIII Lomonosov Conference, Moscow,
M. Gallinaro - "Physics with the CT-PPS project" - LHC Forward - Sep. 23, Michele Gallinaro LIP Lisbon (on behalf of the CMS and TOTEM collaborations)
LHC status and commissioning plans. LHC in 4 slides Lest we forget Progress to date Present schedules Consequent plan for 2008.
Where did all the protons go? Mike Lamont LBOC 20 th January 2015.
Beam profile measurements based on modern vertex detectors and beam-gas interactions Slides from: Colin Barschel - TIPP 2014 third international conference.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Calibration of the ZEUS calorimeter for electrons Alex Tapper Imperial College, London for the ZEUS Collaboration Workshop on Energy Calibration of the.
ATLAS Forward Detector Trigger ATLAS is presently planning to install forward detectors (Roman Pot system) in the LHC tunnel with prime goal to measure.
14/03/2007A. Sbrizzi, HERA-LHC Workshop, DESY 1 Luminosity measurement in ATLAS and CMS A.Sbrizzi - University of Bologna, Italy.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Luminosity Measurement and Monitoring in ATLAS LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop On behalf of ATLAS Collaboration Laura Fabbri Thanks to LUCID people.
Beam Commissioning WG, 10 August Luminosity Scans in the LHC S. White.
May 12, 2009Włodek Guryn1 Physic Program with Tagged Forward Protons at STAR Single Diffraction Dissociation (inclusive SDD cross section, leading  0.
AFP Introduction September 10th 2014 M. Bruschi, INFN Bologna (Italy) 1.
QCD at LHC with ATLAS Theodota Lagouri Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration) EPS July 2003, Aachen, Germany.
The Large Hadron Collider Contents: 1. The machine II. The beam III. The interaction regions IV. First LHC beam [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In.
1 Luminosity measurement at LHC Charged Higgs Workshop Uppsala September 2008 Per Grafstrom CERN.
14 Aug. 2008John Huth Harvard DOE Review Introduction: Harvard ATLAS Group John Huth.
1 Triggering on Diffraction with the CMS Level-1 Trigger Monika Grothe, U Wisconsin HERA-LHC workshop March 2004 Need highest achievable LHC Lumi, L LHC.
P. 1K. Eggert – Early TOTEM Running with the  * =90m Optics Karsten Eggert on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration Politecnico di Bari and Sezione INFN Bari,
30 June 2009EDS '09 Antonio Zoccoli1 ATLAS and the Forward Physics Antonio Zoccoli Università & INFN – Bologna Antonio Zoccoli Università & INFN – Bologna.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
M. Gilchriese LHC Startup Luminosity Planning July 29, 2005.
Backgrounds at FP420 Henri Kowalski DESY 18 th of May 2006.
7/6/20101L. Rossi – IPRD10 - Siena Leonardo Rossi (INFN Genova) on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration IPRD10, Siena, June 7, 2010 ATLAS Status Brief recall.
Backup slides Z 0 Z 0 production Once  s > 2M Z ~ GeV ÞPair production of Z 0 Z 0 via t-channel electron exchange. e+e+ e-e- e Z0Z0 Z0Z0 Other.
Maarten Boonekamp Precision measurements with Atlas 1 Precision measurements (?) with Atlas, at the LHC (emphasis on QCD) Maarten Boonekamp CEA-Saclay.
1 Underlying Event studies & Charged particle multiplicities in inelastic pp events with the ATLAS.
Joint LHC Machine-Experiments Workshop on Very Forward Detectors Summary D. Macina (CERN) Joint LHC Machine-Experiment Worshop on the Luminosity Monitoring.
Kreuth, 2015/10/5-9 Csörgő, T. Evidence for non-exponential pp d/dt at low t and √s = 8 TeV by TOTEM T. Csörgő for the TOTEM Collaboration.
Status of the Experiment RRB - TOTEM 16 April 2013 S.Giani - CERN on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration CERN-RRB
Where do the protons go II? Mike Lamont LBOC 2 nd February 2016 Acknowledgements TOTEM in the first few slides.
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
LHC Wire Scanner Calibration
Antiproton-proton elastic scattering as a day-1 experiment at HESR
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Impact of running with LHCf and early Totem 90 m optics
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Diffraction and Forward Physics in ATLAS: results and perspectives
Emmanuel Tsesmelis TS/LEA 26 January 2007
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Workshop “MC for the LHC” - CERN
Recent Results from TOTEM
QCD at LHC with ATLAS Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK
Intensity Evolution Estimate for LHC
ATLAS Plans for Elastic Cross-Section and Luminosity Measurement
W and Z production: cross section and asymmetries at the LHC
Hard Core Protons soft-physics at hadron colliders
On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration:
Another Immortal Fill….
Presentation transcript:

Luminosity measurments roadmap for luminosity determinations relative luminosity monitors luminosity from machine parameters luminosity from physics processes luminosity from elastic scattering how to access luminosity information

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 2 roadmap for luminosity determinations from machine parameters (2008) ●absolute luminosity at start-up will uniquely come from the machine ●expected precision is 20-30% ●this will improve with special dedicated runs, 10% is feasible from physics processes (2009) ●using γ γ →μμ (not discussed here) ●using W/Z counting: 3-5% can be reached from elastic scattering (>2009) ●with the optical theorem ●with small-angle scattering in the Coulomb region ●3% accuracy is anticipated combinations of all above... from machine parameters (2008) ●absolute luminosity at start-up will uniquely come from the machine ●expected precision is 20-30% ●this will improve with special dedicated runs, 10% is feasible from physics processes (2009) ●using γ γ →μμ (not discussed here) ●using W/Z counting: 3-5% can be reached from elastic scattering (>2009) ●with the optical theorem ●with small-angle scattering in the Coulomb region ●3% accuracy is anticipated combinations of all above...

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 3 relative luminosity monitor: LUCID Cherenkov light is emitted at 3 o and is read-out after 3 reflections on the inner tube walls.

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 4 M. Bruschi – INFN Bologna (ITALY) Off-line On and Off-line

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 5 other luminosity monitors ●MBTS (limited lifetime) ●TILE calorimeter (Monitoring/Minimum Bias path) ●LARG (current in HV lines) ●Beam Condition Monitor  precision of about 1% on relative luminosity is expected ●MBTS (limited lifetime) ●TILE calorimeter (Monitoring/Minimum Bias path) ●LARG (current in HV lines) ●Beam Condition Monitor  precision of about 1% on relative luminosity is expected

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 6 Luminosity from machine parameters Simplest case, beams colliding head-on, Gaussian beam profiles In presence of a crossing angle the luminosity is reduced by In presence of a crossing angle the luminosity is reduced by

Dresden R.Bailey, DESY, December Overall commissioning strategy for protons (est d. 2005) Hardware commissioning Machine checkout Beam commissioning 43 bunch operation 75ns ops 25ns ops I Install Phase II and MKB 25ns ops II Stage A BC No beamBeam D I.Pilot physics run First collisions First collisions 43 bunches, no crossing angle, no squeeze, moderate intensities 43 bunches, no crossing angle, no squeeze, moderate intensities Push performance Push performance Performance limit cm -2 s -1 (event pileup) Performance limit cm -2 s -1 (event pileup) II.75ns operation Establish multi-bunch operation, moderate intensities Establish multi-bunch operation, moderate intensities Relaxed machine parameters (squeeze and crossing angle) Relaxed machine parameters (squeeze and crossing angle) Push squeeze and crossing angle Push squeeze and crossing angle Performance limit cm -2 s -1 (event pileup) Performance limit cm -2 s -1 (event pileup) III.25ns operation I Nominal crossing angle Nominal crossing angle Push squeeze Push squeeze Increase intensity to 50% nominal Increase intensity to 50% nominal Performance limit cm -2 s -1 Performance limit cm -2 s -1 IV.25ns operation II Push towards nominal performance Push towards nominal performance

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 8 Luminosity from beam parameters Adjustment of the orbits to equalize the position differences left/right of the IP, determination of the overlap integral. Tuning based on Beam position monitors with ~ 50 μm resolution. Adjustment of the orbits to equalize the position differences left/right of the IP, determination of the overlap integral. Tuning based on Beam position monitors with ~ 50 μm resolution. Optimize luminosity in separation scans (Van der Meer-method) Optimize luminosity in separation scans (Van der Meer-method) LEP example

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 9 Expected precision from machine parameters Factors entering in the luminosity calculation: ●beam current (intensity) 1-2% ●crossing angle (reduction factor) ●hour glass effect (1% at high lumi, ß*=0.55m) ●bunch-by-bunch variations ●non-gaussian beam shapes ●suppression of tails by scraping A precision of 10% can be reached ●... and can be further reduced with dedicated runs/special studies ●at start-up a precision of 20-30% can be expected ●ultimately a few % level is not unrealistic, ●at the ISR an error of < 1% was achieved! Important: cross calibration of machine- and experiment-based methods! More info: H.Burkhardt and P.Grafstrom, LHC Project Report 1019 Factors entering in the luminosity calculation: ●beam current (intensity) 1-2% ●crossing angle (reduction factor) ●hour glass effect (1% at high lumi, ß*=0.55m) ●bunch-by-bunch variations ●non-gaussian beam shapes ●suppression of tails by scraping A precision of 10% can be reached ●... and can be further reduced with dedicated runs/special studies ●at start-up a precision of 20-30% can be expected ●ultimately a few % level is not unrealistic, ●at the ISR an error of < 1% was achieved! Important: cross calibration of machine- and experiment-based methods! More info: H.Burkhardt and P.Grafstrom, LHC Project Report 1019

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 10 Luminosity from W/Z counting ●large cross section, high rate ●clean experimental signature (leptonic modes) ●precise theoretical calculations ●large cross section, high rate ●clean experimental signature (leptonic modes) ●precise theoretical calculations Recent results on W/Z counting in CSC note: experimental systematic uncertainty dominated by acceptance, is 2-3% (accounts for ISR, kT, UE, EW and PDF uncertainties) Recent results on W/Z counting in CSC note: experimental systematic uncertainty dominated by acceptance, is 2-3% (accounts for ISR, kT, UE, EW and PDF uncertainties) For 1fb -1

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 11 theoretical cross section QCD NNLO calculation for inclusive W/Z production, perturbative uncertainty from scale variations is about 1%. QCD NNLO calculation for inclusive W/Z production, perturbative uncertainty from scale variations is about 1%. However, 2-loop EW corrections are important at large pT, no complete QCD x EW are available! However, 2-loop EW corrections are important at large pT, no complete QCD x EW are available! EW corrections

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 12 theoretical cross section: PDF uncertainty PDF-uncertainty using CTEQ6.6: % using NLO+NLL PDF-uncertainty using CTEQ6.6: % using NLO+NLL New NNLO MRSW2006 compared to MRST2004 (6% change) New NNLO MRSW2006 compared to MRST2004 (6% change) Currently a 3-5% accuracy of luminosity from W/Z seems in reach and will improve in the course of LHC.... Currently a 3-5% accuracy of luminosity from W/Z seems in reach and will improve in the course of LHC....

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel13 elastic scattering with ALFA Absolute Luminosity For ATLAS

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 14 The elastic t-spectrum schematically ALFA simulation

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 15 Luminosity from elastic scattering Our baseline method for the absolute luminosity calibration requires the measurement of elastic scattering in the Coulomb-nuclear interference region down to t ≈6·10 -4 GeV 2 Our baseline method for the absolute luminosity calibration requires the measurement of elastic scattering in the Coulomb-nuclear interference region down to t ≈6·10 -4 GeV 2 This is only possible if ALFA can be operated very close to the beam ≈12σ under optimal beam conditions. Alternatively at larger t the optical theorem can be used: This is only possible if ALFA can be operated very close to the beam ≈12σ under optimal beam conditions. Alternatively at larger t the optical theorem can be used: Requires μrad angle measurements and detector distance to beam ≈1.5 mm! Requires μrad angle measurements and detector distance to beam ≈1.5 mm! Requires measurements of the total rate and extra- polation of elastic rate to 0! Requires measurements of the total rate and extra- polation of elastic rate to 0!

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 16 How to measure the total inelastic rate? From the CSC note on minimum bias: MBTS acceptance SCT+Pixel Systematic uncertainty ≈3% + physics model uncertainties Systematic uncertainty ≈3% + physics model uncertainties

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 17 Single diffraction with forward detectors RP IP 240m RP ZDC 140m LUCID ZDC 140m LUCID ATLAS 17m single diffraction Cross sections[mb]PythiaPhojet Elastic scattering 34.2 (modified) 22.2 (default) 34.5 Single diffraction Double diffraction Minimum bias non-diffractive Total cross section Complement central detector measurement of single diffraction with measurements in the forward region to get the total rate. In addition for the Luminosity there is an uncertainty of the extrapolation of the elastic slope to t=0 ~1% (TOTEM) Complement central detector measurement of single diffraction with measurements in the forward region to get the total rate. In addition for the Luminosity there is an uncertainty of the extrapolation of the elastic slope to t=0 ~1% (TOTEM)

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 18 Elastic scattering in the CNI region t reconstruction: hit pattern for 10 M elastic events simulated with PYTHIA + MADX for the beam transport  special optics  parallel-to-point focusing  high β*

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 19 acceptance Global acceptance = 67% at yd=1.5 mm, including losses in the LHC aperture. Require tracks 2(R)+2(L) RP’s. distance of closest approach to the beam Detectors have to be operated as close as possible to the beam in order to reach the coulomb region! -t=6·10 -4 GeV 2 decoupling of L and σ TOT only via EM amplitude!

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 20 t-resolution The t-resolution is dominated by the divergence of the incoming beams. σ’=0.23 µrad ideal case real world

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 21 L from a fit to the t-spectrum inputfiterror correl ation L % σ tot mb mb0.9%-99% B18 Gev Gev % 57% ρ %89% Simulating 10 M events, running 100 hrs fit range large stat.correlation between L and other parameters

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 22 systematic uncertainties for the luminosity Details are give in the ALFA TDR CERN-LHCC and in ATL-LUM-PUB

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 23 How to get your cross-section? Marjorie Shapiro

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 24 The concept of luminosity blocks Marjorie Shapiro

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 25 How to get the luminosity for your sample Marjorie Shapiro More info: Luminosity Working Group LTF report:

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 26 Conclusion Expected precision of luminosity measurements ●relative monitoring to 1% (LUCID) ●initial absolute calibration from machine parameters 20-30% ●improving with special runs to 10% or better ●W/Z production yield 3-5% calibration, likely to improve with LHC data ●elastic scattering in the CNI region and/or with the optical theorem will yield a 3% accuracy Expected precision of luminosity measurements ●relative monitoring to 1% (LUCID) ●initial absolute calibration from machine parameters 20-30% ●improving with special runs to 10% or better ●W/Z production yield 3-5% calibration, likely to improve with LHC data ●elastic scattering in the CNI region and/or with the optical theorem will yield a 3% accuracy

Dresden R.Bailey, DESY, December Staged commissioning plan for protons Hardware commissioning 450 GeV and 7TeV 2008 Machine checkout Beam commissioning 450 GeV Machine checkout Beam commissioning 7TeV 43 bunch operation Shutdown BC No beamBeam Shutdown Machine checkout Beam Setup 75ns ops25ns ops IShutdown 2009 No beamBeam A

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 28 Forward detectors

Dresden luminosity measurements, H.Stenzel 29 acceptance for t and ξ global acceptance: PYTHIA 45 % PHOJET 40.1 % global acceptance: PYTHIA 45 % PHOJET 40.1 %