Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Advertisements

Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Assembly Procedure. Outline. Assembly procedure for tagger and vacuum chamber. Support stands. Alignment.
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Mechanical Engineering Design Review BL ARPES Endstation Derek Yegian, Jonathan Denlinger, Keith Franck 4/18/2008.
Short bunches in SPEAR J. Safranek for the SPEAR3 accelerator group November 2, 20101J. Safranek CLS THz Workshop.
EuCARD-HFM ESAC review of the high field dipole design, 20/01/2011, Maria Durante, 1/40 EuCARD-HFM ESAC Review of the high field dipole design Fabrication.
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Jim Stewart (JLAB) Internal Magnet Review May 2009.
Slide HALLD TAGGER MAGNET STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Presented by William Crahen 6/10/09 Pole Plate analysis Vacuum chamber analysis Vacuum chamber tie rods and.
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 Iron Shield Mounting Design Stephanie Yang.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Assembly Procedure. Preassembly of second bottom yokes and poleshoes. a) Install special support. b) Place the second bottom.
Photon Tagging in the Hall D Beamline James McIntyre University of Connecticut 13 May GlueX Graduate Student Workshop Newport News, VA.
TAGGER MAGNET DESIGN Presented by Tim Whitlatch Hall D Tagger Magnet Design Review July 10,
Jim Stewart Tagger Magnet Design Review July 2009.
Magnet rotated by 5.9 degree Distance from entrance point to magnet right bottom corner m.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
Tagging Near the End-Point Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, May 8-10, Current design capabilities.
Manufacturing Assembly Plan P Mechanical Spine Test Platform.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet Design Workshop: Magnet Design and Analysis Charles Spataro, NSLS-II Project NSLS-II is a new 3Gev synchrotron.
AWAKE Electron Spectrometer Design Simon Jolly 4 th September 2012.
Lesson No. 11 Week No. 07 Name of lesson Marking Tools
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
23 July 2012D. Sober1 Some thoughts on Hall D tagger magnet field mapping D. Sober Catholic University of America GlueX Beam/Tagger biweekly meeting 23.
H. Felice - P. Ferracin – D. Cheng 09/11/2013 Update on structure CAD model.
Possible Spectrometer for eA Collider Seigo Kato Faculty of Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata , Japan Presented to the workshop "Rare-Isotope.
Hcal Geometry and Assembly CLIC Meeting - LAPP December 2008, 15th.
Hall C Meeting SHMS Magnets and Support Structure Design and Procurement Status Paul Brindza January 26, 2009.
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
1 COMPTON POLARIMETER PRELIMINARY MAGNET DESIGN 06/03/08 Christopher Vidal, Senior Mechanical Designer Ernie Ihloff, P.E., Engineering Group Leader EE.
Jürgen Florenkowski GSI, Darmstadt Agenda Annual Report Meeting EU construction ( CNI ) contract "DIRAC-PHASE-1" for the FAIR project September 26, 2006.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting. Jefferson Lab. September 9 – 11, Review of Tagger System.
Overview of the GlueX Tagger and Photon Beamline..
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.
GlueX Two Magnet Tagger G. Yang University of Glasgow Part 1, 3 D Tosca analysis. Part 2, Preliminary Drawings. Part 3, Proposed Assembly Procedures (i)
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
SHMS Spectrometer Update Hall C 2008 Users Meeting Paul Brindza January 18, 2008.
SBS Magnet and Infrastructure Status Robin Wines July 2015.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
1.Placement of support base for 70 degree-dipole magnet(D) ・ Support base for 70 degree-dipole magnet(D) should be placed horizontally with a spirit level,
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.
Baby Mind C OIL DESIGN AND ASSEMBLY SCENARIOS Helder Silva Phillipe Benoit Alexey Dudarev Gabriela Rolando Herman ten Kate Etam Messomo Laurent Nicola.
Emulsion Test Beam first results Annarita Buonaura, Valeri Tioukov On behalf of Napoli emulsion group This activity was supported by AIDA2020.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
ROLLING Rolling is a process of reduction of the cross-sectional area or shaping a metal piece through the deformation caused by a pair of metal rolls.
Radiation Shutter Re-Purposing Roy Preece STFC RAL 18 th December 2014.
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
A 3D design model of the apparatus for the Laser Wakefield Acceleration of electrons at ELI-NP S. Balascuta1 , R. Dinca1 1) “Horia Hulubei” National.
Solenoid Yoke Door-Barrel Connection
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
The design schemes of the low field dipole magnets
Present status of the flux return yoke design
EFREMOV INSTITUTE SAINT PETERSBURG RUSSIA
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
CEPC Booster Ring Magnets
Status of QQXF cryostat
Presentation transcript:

Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design

Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.

Design Considerations. The basic tagger parameters are: Main beam energy = 12 GeV. Magnetic field = 1.5 T – 12 GeV radius of curvature = 26.7 m. Momentum range of analysed electrons = 0.6 to 9.0 GeV/c. Intrinsic average focal plane momentum resolution = 0.05%. Decision to use an iron based magnet of reasonable size imposes a limit on the main beam bend angle of around 15 degrees.

Adopted design. Total main beam bend angle = 13.4 degrees. Total length of focal plane (25% to 90% of ) ~ 9 m. The focal plane detector package is divided into two parts. Set of 141 fixed scintillators spanning the full energy range with 0.5 % resolution. Movable microscope of finely segmented counters with 0.1% resolution spanning the coherent peak – tagged photon energies between 8.5 and 9 GeV for GlueX. Magnet configuration of two identical rectangular dipoles in series, in front of which there is a quadrupole to optimise the focal plane vertical focussing – the photon energies of interest to GlueX are analysed in the first magnet. For each: Gap width = 3.0 cm. Pole length = 3.1 m. Weight = 38 tonnes – heaviest single yoke piece ~13 tonnes. Coil power = 30 kW. A straight focal plane with optics which are not inferior to those for a single dipole tagger.

Vacuum chamber design. Since the tagger is broad-band it analyses electron energies from 25% to 90% of which are focussed along a focal plane ~ 9 m in length. The structure of the vacuum chamber should not intercept any of the analysed electrons, and the chamber should extend to within a few cm of the focal plane. The vacuum chamber should also allow the main electron beam to exit cleanly from the spectrometer. A long (~12.5 m) relatively narrow (~0.8 m) chamber with no internal supports is required. The design adopted uses the pole shoes of the dipole magnets as part of the vacuum system. The vacuum chamber fits around the pole shoes. Vacuum seals are made between a lip around each pole shoe and the top or bottom surfaces of the vacuum chamber. Compressed rubber O-rings form the vacuum seals.

The two identical magnets tagger Magnet 1 Magnet 2 Vacuum chamber The vacuum force is around 70 tonnes, so the vacuum chamber needs external support.

The electron entrance angle :5.9 degrees Main beam exit angle: degrees Main beam bending angle 13.4 degrees The angle between the photon exit beam and the focal plane: 9.94 degrees General view of the tagger showing the lay-out of the dipole magnets, focal plane and a selection of electron trajectories.

Length: 3.09 m. Width: 1.09 m. Height:1.41m. Weight: ~38 Tons for one magnet. Conductor area: 135 cm 2. Current density: 144 A/cm 2. Magnetic field: 1.5 T. Pole gap: 3 cm 1 Vertical section through one of the dipole magnets showing pole profile and coil geometry

Vacuum chamber 1 1 Top view Front view Right hand side view looking along output flange Pumping port

Vacuum chamber sections AA` and BB` O-ring Groove Weld Compression pad

Enlarged view of output flange (Electrons pass from back to front in the figure) For compression pad screws Vacuum window compression pad For compression fitting screws Main flange bolt hole Bevelled edge To manufacture the vacuum chamber: a. Weld together complete assembly. b. Skim those parts of the top and bottom surfaces used for the vacuum seals to make them flat and parallel.

Stresses and Deformations. For each magnet: magnetic force between the poles is ~ 150 tonnes, weight ~ 38 tonnes. Vacuum Forces. Total force on chamber~ 70 tonnes. This is supported by: Honeycomb strengthening of ~40 tonnes, 4 vertical struts from manet 2 of ~15 tonnes, 3 vertical struts from magnet 1 of ~ 10 tonnes. Magnet 2 Magnet 1

Magnet deformation calculation with magnetic, vacuum and weight forces. (Maximum deformation in the pole gap is less than 0.21mm which is much smaller than the O-ring compression of ~6mm for the two O-rings. The calculation are based on a solid piece of iron. From measurements on the Mainz tagger the deflections are underestimated by a factor of ~1.5.) 3 point supports

Vacuum chamber deformation analysis – (for complete chamber). 1.Stainless steel – walls 15mm, ribs 20mm*160mm. Boundary condition: gap between pole shoes and vacuum chamber side walls allowed to vary by 0.1 mm.

Mechanical Assembly. Vertical section showing the arrangement for compressing the vacuum O-rings. Rods connected between yoke and vacuum chamber used to apply compression to the O-rings. Rubber O-ring.

Vertical sections showing how O-ring compression is defined. Back of vacuum chamberBottom pole shoe Spacer Compressed O-ring

Brackets O-ring compression along exit face. O-ring compression along the back and side walls of vacuum chamber. Magnetic force and weight of coils.

Sequence of brackets– outwith exit face. Top pole shoe Vacuum chamber Bottom pole shoe Bottom yoke

Sequence of brackets– along an exit face for a top yoke. Top yoke Pole shoe Top surface of vacuum chamber Vertical rods are equispaced.

Top yoke Top coil Bottom coil Top pole shoe Vacuum chamber Exit flange Support arms View with coils added.

Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Assembly Procedure

Outline. Assembly procedure for tagger and vacuum chamber. Alignment.

Adjustable weight supports Movement blocks Strongback support frame.

1, Place bottom yokes on supports and adjust to correct height and orientation. Assembly procedure for tagger and vacuum chamber

2, Fix bottom pole shoes to bottom yokes.

3, a) Attach brackets, for supporting the weights of the lower coils, to the lower pole shoes. b) Fix brackets, which take the O-ring compression rods, to the lower pole shoes.

3. a) Attach brackets, for supporting the weights of the lower coils, to the lower pole shoes. (Section view)

3. b) Fix brackets, which take the O-ring compression rods, to the lower pole shoes. (Section view)

4, a) Place lower coils round lower pole shoes. b) Fix brackets, which counteract magnetic forces on lower coils, to the lower pole shoes. c) Position O-ring on top of lower pole shoes. d) Attach O-ring compression spacer to the top of lower pole shoes. ( The spacer are aluminum strips- 7mm(height) *5 mm*5mm screwed to the pole shoe vacuum seal lip)

4, a) Place lower coils around lower pole shoes. b) Fix brackets, which counteract magnetic forces on lower coils, to the lower pole shoes. c) Position O-ring on top of lower pole shoes. d) Attach O-ring compression spacer to the top of lower pole shoes. ( The spacer are aluminum strips-7mm(height) *5 mm*5mm screwed to the pole shoe vacuum seal lip) (Section view)

5. a) Attach vacuum O-ring compression rods and fittings to lower surface and side walls of vacuum chamber. b) position vacuum chamber around the bottom pole shoes. c) Tighten vacuum O-ring compression rods until O-ring compression is defined by the O-ring compression spacer

(Section view)

6. Place magnet gap spacers on top of lower pole shoes.

7. a) Attach O-ring to upper pole shoes. b) Attach O-ring compression spacer to upper pole shoes. c) Position upper pole shoes on magnet gap spacers.

(Section view)

8. a) Attach O-ring compression rods and fittings to upper surface and side walls of vacuum chamber. b) Fix brackets, which take the O-ring compression rods, to the upper pole shoes. c) Tighten O-ring compression rods until O-ring compression is defined by O-ringcompression spacers. d) Fix brackets, which support weight of upper coils and counteract magnet forces on upper coils, to upper pole shoes. Vacuum test possible.

8. a) Attach O-ring compression rods and fittings to upper surface and side walls of vacuum chamber. b) Fix brackets, which take the O-ring compression rods, to the upper pole shoes. c) Tighten O-ring compression rods until O-ring compression is defined by O-ring compression spacers. (Section view)

Mechanical Assembly. Vertical section showing the arrangement for compressing the vacuum O-rings. * Rods connected between yoke and vacuum chamber used to apply compression to the O-rings. Rubber O-ring.

(Section view) 8. d) Fix brackets, which support weight of upper coils and counteract magnet forces on upper coils, to upper pole shoes.

9. Place upper coils around upper pole shoes.

10. Attach back yokes to bottom yokes.

11. Attach top yokes to back yokes.

12. a) Install the upper and lower vacuum chamber support arms. b) Remove spacers Magnetic field measurement without vacuum. Full vacuum test.

Alignment marks for defining the absolute position of the dipole magnets in the Tagger hall. Red - incoming beam (first magnet) Grey -2 GeV electrons Blue - main beam exit from first magnet, and its extension to the second magnet Green-7 GeV electrons. Magenta- Main beam exit. Alignment

Top view of alignment trajectories showing alignment points on both dipole pole shoes and the floor of tagger building.