Facilitating Negotiated Interaction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THEORY OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Advertisements

Krashen’s “monitor model” The acquisition-learning hypothesis The monitor hypothesis The natural order hypothesis The input hypothesis The affective.
Chapter 4 Key Concepts.
Foregrounding Oral Communication
Authentic Assessment for Early Childhood Education EECERA Annual Conference Prague 31 st August 2007 Avril Sweeney, Ireland.
Language learning and language teaching with young learners: from research to practice Alessandro Benati University of Greenwich
Week 10: Second Language Acquisition
Second language acquisition theories. Popular beliefs (Lightbown & Spada,1993) 1. Languages are learnt mainly through imitation. 2. Parents usually correct.
Theories of Second language Acquisition
Second Language Acquisition Video series with Dr. Frank Tuzi
The Basics of Language Acquisition
L2 Methodologies South Asian Languages. Focus Who is the second language learner? What does s/he bring to class?
Input and Interaction and Second Language Acquisition
Co-construction of pretend play The teacher’s roles and children’s narrative development Dorian de Haan INHOLLAND University.
Education of English Conversation
An Introduction to Principles of Language Learning Alena Macurová.
The 6 Principles of Second language learning (DEECD,2000) Beliefs and Understandings Assessment Principle Responsibility Principle Immersion Principle.
The Nature of Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching
Minimizing Perceptual Mismatches Laura Beech Aubrey Devine Kerry Litwinski Whitney Rantz.
Proficiency Approach in Teaching Chinese
Communication Skills Anyone can hear. It is virtually automatic. Listening is another matter. It takes skill, patience, practice and conscious effort.
Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
Special Methods of Instruction I CIED 5243 Dr. Bowles, Instructor Key Points Chapter One Shrum and Glisan Welcome MAT Cohort.
Colorado State University April 12 th, 2014 Leslie Davis Devon Jancin Moriah Kent Kristen Foster THEORIES OF SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: What are their.
Syllabus Design The second of a series of workshops in second- language acquisition and instruction at the Language Training Center North Carolina State.
Explaining second language learning
1.You will have 5 minutes to write as much as you can remember about your assigned component. Try to include all of the features of that component and.
Theories of Second language Acquisition
Liza Funke EDU 528 INTRODUCTION Our students are technology-oriented Second language acquisition is social in nature MOOs are technological, social language.
CHAPTER 3: Language Development Among Children of Linguistic Diversity Modified by Dr. Laura Taddei Language Development in Early Childhood Education Fourth.
L2 learning context The Sociocultural perspective Miss. Mona AL-Kahtani.
Multimedia CALL: Lessons to Be Learned from Research on Instructed SLA Carol A. Chapelle Presenters: Thorunn April.
Welcome to Unit 5 Seminar: Stages of Languge Acquisition Learning The Language.
Based on theories of British functional sociolinguist Such as: Firth.Halliday,Dell Hymes,Gamperz and Lavob Great Britain & U.S.A.
Activating Intuitive Heuristics
How Languages are Learned and Acquired
Input and Interaction Ellis (1985), interaction, as the discourse jointly constructed by the learner and his interlocutors and input is the result of.
Language Acquisition By: Marissa Persinger Whitney Lewis Jessica Kline.
Dr. Megan J. Scranton Neumann University
Module 8 Teaching English Learners
Input/Output Lindsay Robertson Sarah Wilson Katie Luscombe.
Applied Linguistics Written and Second Language Acquisition.
“Using a Story-Based Approach to Teach Grammar”
TEFL METHODOLOGY I COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING.
Lecture 3: Finding Balance in the Treatment of Grammar Dr. Douglas Fleming Faculty of Education.
11 TOPIC 1: INTRODUCTION TO CONTENT- BASED INSTRUCTION (CBI) IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. DEFINITION DEFINITION  CBI- the integration of a particular.
Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner, Krashen, Chomsky
The Linguistic Environment (Ch. 4)
Welcome MAT Cohort Special Methods of Instruction I Summer 2012 GRAD 210 Dr. Bowles, Instructor.
HOW CHILDREN LEARN THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST LEV VYGOTSKY.
Language Teaching Approaches on twenty century. Grammar-translation The approach was generalized to teaching modern languages. Classes are taught in the.
CLT with Grammar Instruction People learned languages before institutionalized education existed. Natural learning processes always assert themselves over.
1 Taiwan Teachers’ Professional Development Series: Oral & Written Communication in your FL Classroom.
Input, Interaction, and Output Input: (in language learning) language which a learner hears or receives and from which he or she can learn. Enhanced input:
3. Nine-Twentieth-Century Approaches to Language Teaching
Welcome to the flashcards tool for ‘The Study of Language, 5 th edition’, Chapter 14 This is designed as a simple supplementary resource for this textbook,
INTERACTION HYPOTHESIS – M.Long
Working with Young Children who are Learning English as a New Language D.Badamgarav Ts.Bayasgalan N. Khishigdulam MSUE TESOL conference, 2014.
Teaching methodology, Fall, 2015 Teaching Grammar form vs. forms structure.
The Interpersonal Mode
Glottodidattica Lesson 5.
Maximizing Learning Opportunities
RESEARCH PROJECT   INFLUENCE OF THE INPUT AND INTERACTION ON VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN THE TENTH YEAR AT “CIUDAD DE CUENCA” HIGH SCHOOL DURING THE SECOND.
Explaining Second Language Learning
Noticing and Text-Based Chat
Theories of Second language Acquisition
FLA/SLA: Theories Yes or No?.
Teaching All Children: Planning and Assessment
Chapter 15 The natural approach
Sociolinguistics.
Presentation transcript:

Facilitating Negotiated Interaction Happy Valentine’s Day!!! Lauren, Sarah, Erich, and Alison Source: Kumaravadivelu, B. “Facilitating Negotiated Interaction.” Beyond methods: macrostrategies for language teaching. 2003.

Interaction Conversation and meaningful interaction are considered necessary for language acquisition Interaction = more input Three macrofunctions of language: Textual Interpersonal Ideational

Reflect… Think of your study abroad experience when you were the one who needed help understanding and speaking….what did people do to help you? What did you find most helpful? What did not help?

Textual Interaction Interaction as a Textual Activity: use of linguistic and metalinguistic features of language necessary for understanding input Foreigner talk vs. Teacher talk

Comprehensible Input Krashen’s “i + 1” theory Increase comprehensibility by… Using repetitons Use simple conversations…teacher talk Use situational role play to create dialogue Can you think of anything else?

Reflect “Do you agree with Krashen that teachers can give the best possible language lesson just by talking?” Why or why not? (Kumaravadivelu)

Limitations of Interaction as a Textual Activity What limitations can you think of? Very little exchange of information…not really interactional Little active participation from the learner

Interaction as an Interpersonal Activity The use of language to promote communication between participants Involves sociolinguistic features required to establish roles, relationships and responsibilities No longer just about the language

Long’s Interaction Hypothesis Oral interaction necessary to negotiate communication problems promotes L2 comprehension and production What ways can you think of to negotiate meaning? Clarification requests Repetition Comprehension checks

Episode 5.1 NS: Well what do you think about, um, mothers, um, have their baby and they- NNS: uh-huh NS: - leave them in garbage cans. NNS: huh? What do you s- NS: They have…they have their baby? NNS: my mom? NS: No, no. (laughs). Not your (laughs) m– mothers. NNS: uh-huh– mothers—uh-huh. NS: They have their baby? NNS: Uh-huh. NS: And then—they leave it in garbage cans. NNS: Garbage? NS: Garbage cans. Like big garbage cans. Outside of business--. NNS: ahh… NS: You know what I mean? NNS: No, I don’t know. I’d—I understand garbage…..

“Learners who were exposed to linguistically unmodified input with opportunities to negotiate meaning understood it better than learners who were exposed to a linguistically simplified version of the input but offered no opportunity for such negotiation” (Kumaravadivelu). “The communicative and cognitive effort required to negotiate meaning can bring any problematic linguistic features to the learner’s immediate attention- features that might otherwise go unnoticed by the learner” (Kumaravadivelu). What limitations can you think of?

Interaction as an Ideational Activity An expression of the participants’ of the processes, persons, objects, and events of the real or imaginary world in, around, and outside the learning and teaching context. Draws students’ experiences

Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) Distance between actual level of L2 development and the potential development Compare ZPD to Krashen’s i + 1 theory Potential Level Actual Level of Development

Conclusions These three are all connected “Together, these three dimensions provide opportunities for teachers to create a conducive atmosphere in which learners can stretch their linguistic repertoire, sharpen their conversational capacities, and share their individual experiences” (Kumaravadivelu). More than just conversational adjustments. Must include creation of opportunities for learners to share their perspectives on what matters to them!

Now…get into these groups! Lauren’s Group: Laura, Amy, Caitlin, Aubrey, Alex Erich’s Group: Erika, Jessica, Linda, Katie H., Lizzie Sarah’s Group: Lisa, Jade, Kerry, Melissa, Lindsay Alison’s Group: Katie L., Julia, Stefanie, Whitney (15 minutes for this station)

Groups for Learning Centers Group 1- start with Erich Laura, Erika, Lisa, Katie L., Amy, Jessica, Jade Group 2- start with Lauren Julia, Caitlin, Linda, Kerry, Stefanie, Aubrey Group 3- Start with Sarah Alex, Lizzie, Whitney, Lindsay, Katie H., Melissa (15 minutes per station)