In this event 240 eV electron is passing through the MICE Cerenkov detector.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Refraction of Light.
Advertisements

USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
Light interactions.
Q3. Use your answer from Q2 to find the angle of refraction when the angle of incident is; a) 30 o b) 80 o c) 0 o Q4. What happens to the period of the.
DHC 101 Introduction to scintillation detectors. How many PE/MIP should we expect? Scintillation & Fluorescence WSFWSF PMTPEs  (MIP)
Example: Diamond in air What is the critical angle  c for light passing from diamond (n 1 = 2.41) into air (n 2 = 1)? Rearranging.
Interactions of Light With Matter Science: Chapter 3 Mrs. Milliken.
CRAYS and TA telescope calibration ICRR N. Sakurai, M. Fukushima Utah University L. Wiencke.
Waves on a spherical refracting surface. Suppose that light is incident parallel to the optic axis.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
PMT absolute calibration using the Rayleigh scattering in Nitrogen air PMT absolute calibration using the Rayleigh scattering in Nitrogen air ICRR N.Sakurai,
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
CHAPTER 8 (Chapter 11 in text) Characterization of Nanomaterials.
Progress and plans on PID simulation and reconstruction Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university St. Kliment Ohridski.
Interaction of radiation with matter - 3
Progress and plans on PID simulation and analysis Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university St. Kliment Ohridski.
Extraction of optical parameters in SNO+ with an in-situ optical calibration system Dr. Kalpana Singh On behalf of the SNO+ Collaboration CAP Congress.
Physics. PHS 5041 Optics Refraction of Light Refraction always occurs simultaneously with some partial reflection Change in direction is with respect.
Rayleigh and Mie Scattering
The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.
EXL/crystal simulations B. Genolini Simulation of NUSTAR crystals with Litrani Presentation of Litrani: simulation of.
LIGHT REFRACTION OF LIGHT
Refraction. Reflection & Refraction Refraction Air – lower refractive index Water – higher refractive index The Kingfisher When light is passing from.
Sound of Music Learning check! #2. 1. What is the approximate value of the refractive index of glass? A. 1.3 B C D. 133.
Position Sensitive SiPMs for Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters C.Woody BNL January 17, 2012.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Reflection vs. Refraction
PHYS 252 / 2021 PHYS 252 & PHYS 202 Polarization Scattering Absorption.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
1 Fast Timing via Cerenkov Radiation‏ Earle Wilson, Advisor: Hans Wenzel Fermilab CMS/ATLAS Fast Timing Simulation Meeting July 17,
WP2 meeting, Oct 2006, CPPM Claudine Colnard - NIKHEF Claudine Colnard, Ronald Bruijn, Eleonora Presani, Siemen Meester, Paul Kooijman (presented by Maarten.
Geant4: CAD generated volumes & Lightguides SiLab UTFSM November 2009.
Status of Aerogel detector for high pT upgrade at PHENIX Budget from US-J project for next two years : (1) 400 liters of Aerogel (2) 600 photomultiplier.
Experimental set-up for on the bench tests Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE/Photonis Multi-Channel.
Water Tank as the Outer Muon Veto Mingjun Chen
Aerogel counter with a Fresnel lens
work for PID in Novosibirsk E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
Refraction and Snell’s Law Refraction: bending of light at the interface of 2 different materials.
Acousto-Optic Modulators
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
Today’s agenda: Thin Film Interference.
Sound of Music Learning check! #3. 1. Which has the longest wavelength ? A. Blue light B. Red light C. White light D. Green light.
Propagation of Light Through Optical Fiber. Outline of Talk Acceptance angle Numerical aperture Dispersion Attenuation.
Lasers and Optics LO: to be able to calculate the refractive index using the critical angle of a substance.
Science 8: Unit C – Light and Optical Systems Topic 3: Refraction.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
14.1 Bending of light Determining the refractive index of glass In an experiment, a ray of light is directed towards a semi-circular glass block at various.
Electromagnetic Calorimeter for HADES at SIS100 Pavel Tlustý, NPI Řež Motivation Plans Current status Tests Outlook HADES Collaboration Meeting, Sesimbra,
Goal: To understand reflection and refraction Objectives: 1)To understand Reflection off of a simple mirror 2)To learn about Scattering 3)To understand.
Aerogel detector revisited Sokolov Oleksiy, UNAM, progress report, 20 Sept 2006 E int = M – wall reflectivity є – PMT relative area Belle geometry (traditional):
REFRACTION Physics Chapter 18b. Refraction Bending rays of light as it passes from one medium to another Caused by change in speed of wave Amount of refraction.
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
Group refractive index ● Method ● Additional runs ● Wavelength distribution ● Systematics ● Results.
Lesson 9. Objective Explain, qualitatively and quantitatively, how the Compton effect is an example of wave particle duality, applying the laws of mechanics.
PW3 - Refraction.  When light passes from glass into air (an optically less dense medium), it refracts away from the normal.
Total Internal Reflection The Endoscope. You will need… A semicircular block A power pack A ray box A single slit A protractor A ruler A pencil.
31 outline particles, waves, and light
The focusing mirror system
FDIRC MC Studies: PMT Coupling Options
KM2A Electron Detector Optimization
Geant4 Simulation :MCP PET
Particle Identification in LHCb
Interactions of Light With Matter
Deng Ziyan Jan 10-12, 2006 BESIII Collaboration Meeting
Behavior of Light.
Interactions of Light Waves
Ch 3-2 Notes: Interactions of Light w/ Matter
Refraction – Snell’s Law
REVISION REFRACTION.
Today’s agenda: Thin Film Interference.
Presentation transcript:

In this event 240 eV electron is passing through the MICE Cerenkov detector

Definition of the materials in the detector. All numbers have to be carefully checked !!! Some of them are arbitrary Aerogel 1 Density = 0.251*g/cm3 Absorption length = 245.0*mm Refractive Index = 1.08 Rayleigh scattering length is calculated by the formula : Where C = 1e-24 m3

Aerogel 2 Density = g/cm3 Absorption length = mm - the same like in aerogel 1 ?!?! Refractive Index = 1.12 Rayleigh scattering length is calculated by the same formula and is the same like in Aerogel 1 ?!?! Optical glass (the material for the Glass window) Density = 2.6 g/cm3; Refractive Index = 1.4 The used absorption length is shown in the graphics Probably it is not the correct one No Rayleigh scattering in this material

Optical PMT glass (the material for the windows of the PMTs) Density = 2.6 g/cm3; Refractive Index = 1.4 No absorption in this material. No Rayleigh scattering in this material Optical air (only the vessels of the cerenkov detector are filled with this material) Density = 1.29 g/cm3; Refractive Index = 1.0 No absorption in this material. No Rayleigh scattering in this material

Energy and wavelength of the photons which hit the PMTs The time of the hits in the PMTs for Vessel 1 (n=1.08) and Vessel 2 (n=1.12)

Angle of incidence in Vessel 1 (n=1.08) and Vessel 2 (n=1.12) Number of photon hits per PMT in Vessel 1 (n=1.08) and Vessel 2 (n=1.12)

Number of photoelectrons in one digit in Vessel 1 and Vessel 2

The time of the first photoelectron in Vessel 1 and Vessel 2 The time of the photoelectron minus the time of the first

Performance of the shaper – the worst case scenario