AS-2216-067/AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger or Movement of an Academic Department- Resubmission.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
UNLV FACULTY SENATE TENURE & PROMOTION FORUM Oct. 2, 2012 Oct. 2, 2012 Thanks to the Past Chairs: Dr. John Filler Dr. Ceci Maldonado Dr. Nasser Daneshvary.
Carolyn M. Byerly, Ph.D., professor Department of Journalism and Graduate Program in Mass Comm & Media Studies TENURE: BASIC INFO AND ISSUES.
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
Swift Curricular Approvals: What Does it Take? Michigan State University - Office of the Provost – University Curriculum and Catalog Academic Program Submission.
Margaret Crowder, Chair Jennifer Hanley, Vice Chair Heidi Alvarez, Secretary Western Kentucky University Senate.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
WU Research Integrity Policy 2010 Revision Presentation for the Committee on Research Integrity for the School of Medicine December 1, 2010 Attachment.
University Council Shared Leadership for Integrated Planning and Consultative Decision-Making.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger or Movement of an Academic Department- Resubmission.
Institutional Effectiveness at CCC The Journey The Priority  It is always important to know if what you are doing is effective. This is the story of.
Catalog & Program Changes “A meeting to discuss proper submissions to the undergraduate and graduate catalogs.” March 31, 2014 Southern Illinois University.
B. Proposed Revisions to UT HOP 3.16 Threatened Faculty Retrenchment (D )— Janet Staiger (professor, radio- television-film and committee chair).
Curriculum Overview Office of the Registrar University Curriculum and Catalog Rev. 12/12.
UBC Senate: Supporting an integrated approach to enhancing the mental health and wellbeing of students in the academic environment Lindsey Kovacevic Academic.
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RPT Workshop March 28, :30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Intermountain Network Scientific CC (INSCC) Building, room 110.
Completing this module The goal of this module is to prepare you to submit an application for Sabbatical Leave at ACC. At the end of the module, you will.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges The Basis for Faculty Power: Title 5 Regulations and Education Code Mark Lieu, Vice President Jane Patton,
Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit
UCSF HUMAN RESOURCES SERVING THE ACADEMIC AND STAFF COMMUNITY School of Medicine Faculty Council, June 21, 2012.
Faculty Senate RTP Update Issues Brought by FS-RTP Issue: Extend review deadlines to meet increase in quantity of portfolios, academic calendar,
A.A./GEN ED PROGRAM REVIEW Karen Borglum, Ed.D. Assistant Vice President Curriculum and Articulation.
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FACULTY SENATE SHARED GOVERNANCE OVERVIEW.
Call Changes APM c: “Each campus shall develop guidelines and checklists to instruct chairs about their duties and responsibilities in connection.
Primary Functions of Program Directors Leadership Curriculum Management and Coordination Coordinate Program Assessment Marketing, Recruitment and Admissions.
Wrestling with Workload: Valpo’s Faculty Workload Task Force Kraig Olejniczak, Dean, College of Engineering Mike Owens, Assistant Provost for Faculty Affairs.
Ad hoc Committee on Faculty Bylaws Todd Ellis Michelle Hendley Jimmy Johnston Michael Koch Eileen McClafferty John Relethford Renee B. Walker (Chair)
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Interim Provost’s Report Faculty Senate November 11, 2014.
Faculty Governance Jane Dillehay Faculty Chair Jan Hafer AAUP Chair 12 August 2011.
Faculty Senate Meeting November 19, Agenda I.Call to Order and Roll Call - M. Bruening, Secretary II.Proposed Amendment to the Faculty Bylaws (CRR.
1 TERMS OF REFERENCE Assoc.Prof.Dr. Osman YILMAZ April 20, 2004 University Curriculum Committee.
Internal Governing Policy 45 Review of Alleged Capricious Grades Joint Forum of the Council on Academic Affairs and the Council on Graduate Studies.
Academic Affairs (ACAF) Office Conducts Initial Review of Proposal Proposal owner (typically, a college) submits proposal Approval Process for Academic.
Professional Development Plans Colleen Mullery Sr. Associate Vice President, Faculty Affairs & Human Resources.
1 Capital Union Building – Penn State Harrisburg Administration Building – Penn State Schuylkill.
Course Substitutions & Course Waivers Proposed New Policy AGC 1 st Presentation September 08, 2015 Patti Trepkowski and Diane Patrick.
Chapter 6 Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Role of Students in Participatory Governance Richael Young, College of San Mateo Barbara Illowsky, De Anza College.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
AP 4021: Program Discontinuance A Presentation to the Board of Trustees by the Academic Senate Presidents of Moorpark, Oxnard and Ventura Colleges September.
Office of the Provost University Curriculum and Catalog
CURRICULUM-CHANGE APPROVAL PROCESSES
Filing an Academic Grievance
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
Shared Governance in the EMU-AAUP/EMU Master Agreement
TOPS TRAINING.
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Local Senates and Boards
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Student Academic Grievance Policy
RTP For new faculty A brief introduction.
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
Current policy is 14 years old ttp://web. csulb
Current policy is 14 years old ttp://web. csulb
OUHSC Graduate College Program Review Overview and Timeline
Erosion of Senate Authority Over Curriculum?
Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
FA Review and Clarification of Appendix 15A
Faculty Governance at NU
The Role of the Academic Senate President and Effective Leadership
Sabbatical and Difference-in-Pay Leaves Office of Faculty Advancement
Faculty Grievance & Dispute Resolution Office
Presentation transcript:

AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger or Movement of an Academic Department- Resubmission

Recommendations (1975) The faculty Senate recommends that no formal set of procedures should be followed when the formation, merger or dissolution of departments is at issue. The Faculty Senate recommends the following statement shall serve as a policy guideline in these matters: 1.All matters leading to decisions concerning the formation, merger or dissolution of departments shall be handled on an ad hoc basis with adequate consultation with all concerned parties. These include at a minimum the faculty and students of affected departments, the Deans of affected schools, the Academic Deans’ Council, the Faculty Senate, the Deans of Undergraduate and Graduate Studies, the Vice President for Academic Affairs and the President of the University. 2.That the definition of adequate consultation be that all parties concerned be informed and consulted on all actions and considerations with will be admitted as the basis for interim and ultimate decisions, with a summary of all such information and consultation to be in writing, signed and dated. FS /AS Policy on the Formation, Merger & Dissolution of Departments

President Kramer’s Response (1975) I agree with the Faculty Senate recommendation that no formal set of procedures should be followed when the formation, merger or dissolution of departments is considered. I further agree that decisions concerning the formation, merger or dissolution of departments shall be handled on an ad hoc basis with adequate consultation. Adequate consultation shall be demonstrated by a summary of all such information and consultation, in writing, signed, and dated.

President Ortiz’s Response to AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger, or Movement of an Academic Department May 9, 2007 Upon your request, I have considered again the recommendation from the Academic Senate concerning AS /AA – Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger, or Movement of an Academic Department. The decision to form, dissolve, merge, or move an academic department is not to be made in haste, or without sufficient discussion. Consultation with all concerned parties is an essential part of the decision making process. The current policy requires that such consultation take place and be summarized in writing, signed and dated. I ask Academic Affairs to review their archiving procedures to ensure that all documentation is retained as a permanent record of these actions. With the re-affirmation of these principles, I see no need to alter the decision made by Robert Kramer and the Academic Senate in 1975 that no formal set of procedures be followed when the formation, dissolution merger, or movement of an academic department is considered. I do not accept the Senate’s recommended procedural changes.

Summary of AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger, or Movement of an Academic Department – Resubmission The existing policy regarding the formation, merger, or dissolution states that no formal set of procedures should be followed. The Academic Senate recommends that the following statements serve as guidelines for these actions:

Summary of AS /AA Continued… Still Ad Hoc Basis Adequate consultation means that all concerned parties a. Be informed b. Be given a reasonable amount of time to respond c. Record is kept d. Concerned parties receive a response

- Concerned Parties (minimum) Faculty, Staff and Students of Affected Dept. Dean of Affected College Academic Deans’ Council Academic Senate Staff assigned duties for Deans of Undergraduate and Graduate Studies Provost Vice President for Academic Affairs President - Informed of (minimum): a. Reasons for the proposed change(s); b. History c. Anticipated changes to academic programs and timeline d. Impact on RTP matters Summary of AS /AA Continued…

- Records in Academic Affairs with reasonable access - President reports his decision and reasons to concerned parties