KAJO – Flexible Blended Learning in Science of Education E-xcellence seminar, Oulu 19.5.2009 Eetu Pikkarainen.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Bringing learning and research together through inquiry-based learning

Advertisements

A Narrative Inquiry of Autonomy Development and ICT Use: The Story of an ELT Colombian Department. By: Jenny Mendieta Department of Applied Language Studies.

Blended learning for CPD

Information Literacy and Inquiry-based learning Pamela McKinney Learning Development and Research Associate (Information Literacy) at CILASS CILASS identifies.

Manuel Benito Gómez Ramón Ovelar Beltrán Virtual Campus of the University of the Pays Basque (UPV/EHU) ITC Master, a partnership project between 9 universities.

BLENDED LEARNING UNIT A Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (Part of the University of Hertfordshire Learning and Teaching Institute) Conclusions.

DAF Project Dialogic Assessment and Feedback Martina A. Doolan & Paul Morris Introduction DAF is part of a.

MODULAR TE Valorisation Conference Dr.-Ing. Juergen Wehling Faculty for Engineering Sciences, Department of Technology (Lectureship) TUD, Prof. Dr.-Ing.

EMERSION Industry Oriented Education Model - QA System Requirements Overview Dave Carroll EMERSION Local Leader for QA, DIT Project Team School of Computing.

Comparing approaches in the development of VLE for two groups of primary teachers through student use. Jay Deeble King Alfred's University College, Winchester.

IVETTE:Implementation of virtual environments in training and in education Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme Mario Barajas University of Barcelona.

KAJO – E-xcellence assessment experiences E-xcellence seminar, Oulu Eetu Pikkarainen.

Visioning and Fostering Quality Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Ontario Council of Ontario Educational Developers: Judy Britnell (Ryerson)

Open Learning Part-time Primary PGCE Aims of the seminar: To present an overview of the course; To begin to explore the concept of open learning; To identify.

Education and Training 2010 Peer Learning Activity, Vilnius 2009 Policy approaches to Practical Classroom Training in ITE.

Telecollaboration in University Foreign Language Education The INTENT conference Facultad de Filosofía y Letras University of León, Spain February.

ICT Driving Licence at the University of Helsinki: Meeting the Needs of Diverse Study Fields Tiina Heino Päivi Helminen 31 March, 2009 Helsinki University.

Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.

SOCRATES PROGRAMME OnLineMath&Sciences Project Results by 31 January 2007 and Planning October 2005 – September 2007.

Design of Blended Learning Activities Design of blended learning activities: Issues and perspectives An ASCILITE workshop By Allison Littlejohn Chair of.

Side 1 Can Computer Supported Collaborative Learning help to fulfil the VirClass goal? Grete Oline Hole, HiB.

ROMANIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ROMANIAN EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM.

University of Latvia Higher Professional Studies Programme Faculty of Biology SECONDARY SCHOOL BIOLOGY AND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHEMISTRY TEACHER SECONDARY.

Dr Fiona J. L. Handley Centre for Learning and Teaching.

UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ OPEN UNIVERSITY University of Excellence in Adult Education Satu Helin 2006 Guidance services at the Open University University.

E-PTLLS Consortium Annual Conference in association with HEA Seminar Series Marta Menor Rodriguez & Karen Veneziale Accrington & Rossendale College.

Advocacy and policy dialogue at national level on development education Seminar for NGDO Platforms of New Member States Budapest, 9-10th March 2006 Rilli.

Connecting Teachers Can there be models of effective practice for teachers with ICT? Chair: Christine Vincent, Becta Presenter: Margaret Cox King’s College.

Developing Strategies to support staff in the delivery of blended / online learning Judith Smith, Department of eLearning 21 April 2005.

Report on present status of the quality assurance system at University of Split Željko Dujić, MD, PhD Vice rector for science and international affaires.

Roles of technology in language learning – a joint institutional perspective Juan Pedro de Basterrechea – Instituto Cervantes Joerg Loeschmann – Goethe-Institut.

Different approaches and experiences at the University of Parma (Italy) Embedding information literacy into subject learning Fabrizia Bevilacqua Monica.

ICT, Integration, Culture and Tolerance Education and Culture Lifelong Learning Programme GRUNDTVIG

Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology EDEN Conference 22 June 2005.

Using virtual collaboration tools for designing innovative education scenarios Gabriel Dima University “Politehnica” of Bucharest, Romania.

Jukka Lerkkanen Guidance services in higher education Jyväskylä University of Applied Sciences, Teacher Education College, Head of Department,

ACADEMIC STUDY CULTURE Katja Kurasto International Relations Coordinator School of Engineering

1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.

SOCRATES PROGRAMME OnLineMath&Sciences Project October 2005 – September 2007.

THE NEED TO TRAIN THE TRAINERS. Who University lecturers /academics Teaching assistants (such as research students who do tutoring etc) Senior academics.

To create an Interactive Learning Template To create new learning content for new courses to be hosted on the Virtual Learning Environment (vle) Learning.

Teaching in teams: lessons from systematic review training NCRM Training the Trainers Event 4 th June 2007 Angela Harden and Karen Bird MRS Node EPPI Centre,

The Scope of Learning Technology Pete Richardson Learning Technologist School of Education Bangor University The Scope of Learning Technology XME 4078:

Results of WP 4: Implementation, experimentation of teacher training actions Open University of Catalonia - From November 4th to December 19th.

Name of Pilot Project: Developing pedagogy through collaboration, action research and reflection. Aim of the Project: to set up a collaborative partnership.

Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology WebCT Executive Seminar EDEN.

Connecting Teachers Can there be models of effective practice and would they threaten innovation and diversity? Chair: Christine Vincent, Becta Presenter:

Teacher Education College of JAMK UAS Harri Keurulainen Head of Department.

Course identity and collaborative provision: opportunities and challenges Dr David Chan (SCOPE, City University, Hong Kong) Dr Gary Taylor (PSP, SHU) and.

Effectiveness and Perceptions of a Peer Teaching Evaluation Program Lorin Sheppard, PhD Mary Kiersma, PhD, PharmD Manchester University College of Pharmacy.

Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.

2007. Faculty of Education ► Staff 300 (incl.100 in Teacher training school) ► 20 professorships ► 80 lecturers ► 9 senior assistants ► 12 assistants.

Oulu University of Applied Sciences – Making Connections Worldwide Oulu Helsinki Arctic Circle.

Company LOGO ATP Connected Learning in an Open World ‘‘Developing new ideas and escaping from the old ones’ - A collaborative E learn course development.

EXPERIENCE OF AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CREDIT TRANSFER SYSTEM: WORKLOAD OF STUDENT AND TEACHER IN THE.

Learning Platform one strand in e-learning Andy Lowe Leader of e-Learning St Paul’s Catholic College.

TEMPUS IV MASTS Master curriculum design workshop in Nis Subject Teacher Education Master Programme at University of Belgrade.

Challenges of Implementing PBL in Higher Learning Institutions in Developing Countries: A Case of SUA, Tanzania Sangeda A., Ndossi D. Sokoine University.

Student and stakeholder participation in QA of education Kirsi Hiltunen.

Finnish Core Curriculum – New Approach to Learning

‘How flipping difficult can it be?’ - an update

Library Training and Services on an Individual Basis

Using Technology in Teaching

Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology EDEN Conference 22 June.

Teaching Tools and Learning Platforms for PhD Teaching

TEM: The twente education model

Developing as a Professional

Design of eLearning applications

Chapter 8 Further Concerns in Developing ICT in Language Learning

Guided teaching practice in Rauman normaalikoulu

Presentation transcript:

KAJO – Flexible Blended Learning in Science of Education E-xcellence seminar, Oulu Eetu Pikkarainen

Background General decline of student amounts in educational open university studies in Finland

Development requirements Old model is of good quality but expensive, inflexible and heavy: Maintaining and bettering of quality level Increase of flexibility Decrease of spending of resources

An Old Aim ”To search and invent such a procedure that the work of student would minimise, but students should still learn more… (Comenius)”

Development goals Develop a total model for teaching and studies in province – and utilise it then in other teaching and studies Clarify the role of the collaborating provincial educational institutes (learning centres). Maintain the correspondence of content and demand level of studies in relation to degree programmes.

The nature of development Tradition respecting, pragmatic, short steps project. The whole area of action: administration, collaboration, marketing, etc. Learning and teaching in the focus.

Operations model of the project Open university is buying the teaching and its development from the department. Phased 3 year project: 1.general studies programme (25 ects) 2.subject studies programme (35 ects) Project group: teachers developing their courses (part time), team work, stake holders

Pedagogical base Theoretical clarity and scope as starting points Theory of pedagogical action (Benner, Kivelä, Siljander) Pedagogical paradox: not teacher centred nor student centred model

Pedagogical relationship and didactical triangle 1) contents 2) teaching 3) studying

Learning methods Contents -> Teaching -> Studying -> Learning Learning requires student’s action, theoretical work: study: interrogation (inquiry) Teaching promotes and directs this action towards the contents

”Building blocks” Curriculum –Materials Teacher –Responsibility –Material –Lectures –Leaning tasks –Assessment Tutor –Leaning tasks –Discussions Student –Tasks, Discussion, –Feedback VLE –Tasks, discussions, links, archive,

Contents Courses  Programmes  Science of education  Pedagogical thinking  Education  Culture

Curriculum Starting from wholes (programmes) – content centred Especially the general studies are the general knowledge basis in all our degree programs of education Core content analyses

Programme model 3. Applying phase2. Content phase1. Orienting phase Introductory course (s) Subject area courses Small research thesis seminars

Teacher Teacher (researcher) is responsible of the whole course, the special learning material and assessment of students learning. Lecture as a traditional core of course. –Partly face to face, partly via ACP (good experiences!) –Partly to material

Tutor Students often have no experience in university studies. Aim: –Local process / group tutors in the institutes –Course-specific content tutors (Important!) Near collaboration with teachers Active interaction with students Mediating between students and teachers Tutor training

Learning material Teachers write material around their lecture notes. Recorded lecture snippets linked to material. Course book: part of university studies.

Learning tasks Aim is to shorten the pedagogical cycle Essays and exams Mid exams Revision tests Peer referencing of essays / theses. Forced attending to discussions. Polls Questions

VLE (Virtual learning environment) 1: Channel of interaction 2: Platform of tasks Discussion and information archive Hopes: integration to , assessment of all kind of tasks, collecting assessments, peer referee functions, etc.

Course structure example Orientation and tuning task (VLE) Learning material Lecture (f2f) Questions from students to teacher (VLE) Lecture (ACP) Mid tasks, discussions Revision task Essay / exam Feedback

QA and feedback system Feedback as general education goal: –Beginning, mid and end questionnaires (webropol) –Course-specific feedback boxes (VLE) –Tutor feedback –Teacher feedback –Collected reports yearly -> planning Quality assessment by E-xcellence tools Process modelling Connection to University QA

Applying Utilising in campus and degree programme. Bigger groups Common material. Similar tasks. Part of lectures to tutoring / discussion Tutoring practice in degree programmes. Unifying of QA and development.

Problems Technological-administrational restrictions (VLE) Student groups (Group support, Social media) Research should be made

Thank you! Comments and questions!?