Evolution at Multiple Loci: Quantitative Genetics
I. Rediscovery of Mendel and Challenges to Natural Selection Do traits that exhibit continuous variation have a genetic basis? If the only traits which have genetic variation are controlled by one or two loci then natural selection not as important as mutation Darwin envisioned evolution to be a continuous process of selection acting on limitless genetic variation, with small changes occurring in any one generation, but large changes occurring over long periods.
Why the normal distribution: Central Limit Theorem
Mendelian genetics can explain quantitative traits Example 1: NILSSON-EHLE: Red and White Kernal Color in Wheat Example 2: East’s work with tobacco
Quantitative traits are influenced by the environment as well as genotype Yarrow plant
1. Fisher’s prediction Mutation Effect Probability of Fixation 2. Kimura’s modification 3. Orr’s modification II. Neo Darwinian Synthesis Theoretical models that support then contend with the Darwinian model
Typical results Corolla Width (mm) F2 BC F1 M. micranthus M. guttatus F1 F2 Fenster & Ritland 1994 Testing the Models:
No filter Filtered image— “bumblevision”
Segregation Of floral types Demonstrate Genetic basis Of trait Differences
Convergent evolution??
Yosemite Sam thinks so
1. Fisher’s prediction Mutation Effect Probability of Fixation 2. Kimura’s modification 3. Orr’s modification Theoretical models that support then contend with the Darwinian model Alleles with a distribution of effect sizes contribute to adaptations
III. Measuring Selection and Response to Selection on Continuous Traits
A. Heritability
Class Data Female Wt Female HT
Male Wt Male Ht
Heritability of Female Wt
Heritability of Female Ht
Heritability of Male Wt
Heritability of Male Ht
Conclusions from class data: Distributions of Wts and Hts are roughly normal Distribution indicates that Wts and Hts are likely controlled by many loci, = many loci are segregating alleles that contribute to wt and ht differences among individuals Heritabilities for Ht >> WT 50% >> 30% Interpretation for other human traits??