International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April 26-30 2004, Tehran 1 III SIZE FUNCTIONS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Functions Reading: Epp Chp 7.1, 7.2, 7.4
Advertisements

Mathematical Induction
Introduction to Proofs
1 Decomposing Hypergraphs with Hypertrees Raphael Yuster University of Haifa - Oranim.
6.1 Vector Spaces-Basic Properties. Euclidean n-space Just like we have ordered pairs (n=2), and ordered triples (n=3), we also have ordered n-tuples.
Recursive Definitions and Structural Induction
Proofs, Recursion and Analysis of Algorithms Mathematical Structures for Computer Science Chapter 2 Copyright © 2006 W.H. Freeman & Co.MSCS SlidesProofs,
Outline. Theorem For the two processor network, Bit C(Leader) = Bit C(MaxF) = 2[log 2 ((M + 2)/3.5)] and Bit C t (Leader) = Bit C t (MaxF) = 2[log 2 ((M.
3.3 Divisibility Definition If n and d are integers, then n is divisible by d if, and only if, n = dk for some integer k. d | n  There exists an integer.
Section 7.4: Closures of Relations Let R be a relation on a set A. We have talked about 6 properties that a relation on a set may or may not possess: reflexive,
The first of many fun lessons….  We will utilize class time and discussions to determine if a statement is true.
Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 11: Graphs
Comparison Methodologies. Evaluating the matching characteristics Properties of the similarity measure Robustness of the similarity measure – Low variation.
Introduction to Computability Theory
The Growth of Functions
International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 1 II SIZE FUNCTIONS:
International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 1 IV COMPUTING SIZE.
INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES
INTEGRALS Areas and Distances INTEGRALS In this section, we will learn that: We get the same special type of limit in trying to find the area under.
International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 1 I THE NATURAL PSEUDODISTANCE:
Tucker, Applied Combinatorics, Section 1.4, prepared by Patti Bodkin
So far we have learned about:
Visual Recognition Tutorial
1 Foundations of Interval Computation Trong Wu Phone: Department of Computer Science Southern Illinois University Edwardsville.
DAST 2005 Week 4 – Some Helpful Material Randomized Quick Sort & Lower bound & General remarks…
Introduction to Proofs ch. 1.6, pg. 87,93 Muhammad Arief download dari
Discrete Structures Chapter 5: Sequences, Mathematical Induction, and Recursion 5.2 Mathematical Induction I [Mathematical induction is] the standard proof.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
October 1, 2009Theory of Computation Lecture 8: Primitive Recursive Functions IV 1 Primitive Recursive Predicates Theorem 6.1: Let C be a PRC class. If.
12 INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES The Comparison Tests In this section, we will learn: How to find the value of a series by comparing it with a known.
CS Dept, City Univ.1 The Complexity of Connectivity in Wireless Networks Presented by LUO Hongbo.
TR1413: Discrete Mathematics For Computer Science Lecture 1: Mathematical System.
Index FAQ Limits of Sequences of Real Numbers Sequences of Real Numbers Limits through Rigorous Definitions The Squeeze Theorem Using the Squeeze Theorem.
Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 9: Relations
Induction and recursion
Database Systems Normal Forms. Decomposition Suppose we have a relation R[U] with a schema U={A 1,…,A n } – A decomposition of U is a set of schemas.
Introduction to Proofs
Reading and Writing Mathematical Proofs
Mathematical Induction. F(1) = 1; F(n+1) = F(n) + (2n+1) for n≥ F(n) n F(n) =n 2 for all n ≥ 1 Prove it!
The importance of sequences and infinite series in calculus stems from Newton’s idea of representing functions as sums of infinite series.  For instance,
C&O 355 Mathematical Programming Fall 2010 Lecture 4 N. Harvey TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A A.
March 3, 2015Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 5: Mathematical Reasoning 1Arguments Just like a rule of inference, an argument consists of one or more.
Graphing Linear Inequalities in Two Variables Section 6.5 Algebra I.
The Integers. The Division Algorithms A high-school question: Compute 58/17. We can write 58 as 58 = 3 (17) + 7 This forms illustrates the answer: “3.
Chapter 2 Mathematical preliminaries 2.1 Set, Relation and Functions 2.2 Proof Methods 2.3 Logarithms 2.4 Floor and Ceiling Functions 2.5 Factorial and.
Methods of Proof Lecture 3: Sep 9. This Lecture Now we have learnt the basics in logic. We are going to apply the logical rules in proving mathematical.
1 Topic Regions Defined by Inequalities Regions Defined by Inequalities.
Genome Rearrangements Unoriented Blocks. Quick Review Looking at evolutionary change through reversals Find the shortest possible series of reversals.
Linear Inequalities and Linear Programming Chapter 5 Dr.Hayk Melikyan Department of Mathematics and CS
1 The number of orientations having no fixed tournament Noga Alon Raphael Yuster.
1 Decomposition into bipartite graphs with minimum degree 1. Raphael Yuster.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 11 Infinite Sequences and Series.
12 INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES. In general, it is difficult to find the exact sum of a series.  We were able to accomplish this for geometric series.
X y x-y · 4 -y-2x · 5 -3x+y · 6 x+y · 3 Given x, for what values of y is (x,y) feasible? Need: y · 3x+6, y · -x+3, y ¸ -2x-5, and y ¸ x-4 Consider the.
CS 103 Discrete Structures Lecture 13 Induction and Recursion (1)
Inductive Proofs and Inductive Definitions Jim Skon.
Date: 1.2 Functions And Their Properties A relation is any set of ordered pairs. The set of all first components of the ordered pairs is called the domain.
CompSci 102 Discrete Math for Computer Science March 13, 2012 Prof. Rodger Slides modified from Rosen.
Chapter Three SEQUENCES
Introduction to Proofs
Application: Algorithms Lecture 19 Section 3.8 Tue, Feb 20, 2007.
Section 1.7. Definitions A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true using: definitions other theorems axioms (statements which are given as.
Notions & Notations - 1ICOM 4075 (Fall 2010) UPRM Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez Fall 2010 ICOM.
Ch 9.6: Liapunov’s Second Method In Section 9.3 we showed how the stability of a critical point of an almost linear system can usually be determined from.
INFINITE SEQUENCES AND SERIES In general, it is difficult to find the exact sum of a series.  We were able to accomplish this for geometric series and.
11.4 The Comparison Tests In this section, we will learn:
Distinct Distances in the Plane
Enumerating Distances Using Spanners of Bounded Degree
TBF Generall Mathematics - II Lecture – 8 : Linear Inequalities
Chapter 5: Morse functions and function-induced persistence
Presentation transcript:

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 1 III SIZE FUNCTIONS AS A TOOL FOR EVALUATING THE NATURAL PSEUDODISTANCE Patrizio Frosini Vision Mathematics Group University of Bologna - Italy

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 2 Assume that two size pairs (M,  ), (N,  ) are given and H is the set of all homeomorphisms from M to N. We recall the definition of natural pseudodistance between (M,  ) and (N,  ): where  ( f )=max P  M  (P)-  (f (P)) .

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 3 For every size pair (M,  ) we define the size function l (M,  ) : IR x IR  IN  +  : For x<y, l (M,  ) (x,y) is the number of connected components of M   y  that contain at least one point of M   x .

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 4 The lower bound theorem

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 5 Theorem. Assume that l (M,  ) (x 1,y 1 ) > l (N   x 2,y 2 ). Then d((M,  ),(N,  ))  min{x 2 -x 1, y 1 -y 2 }. The previous result allows to get information about the natural pseudodistance by using only the values of two size functions computed at two points. An important link between size functions and the natural pseudistance exists: N.B.: the previous result is useful if (x 1,y 1 ) is on the left of (x 2,y 2 ) and higher than it.

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 6 Sketch of proof: d((M,  ),(N,  )) < min{x 2 -x 1, y 1 -y 2 } We prove the contrapositive statement: by assuming that we show that l (M,  ) (x 1,y 1 )  l (N   x 2,y 2 ).

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 7 The key idea is to prove that if two points P,Q belong to the same component C  M   y  and d((M,  ),(N,  )) < h then we can consider a homeomorphism f:M  N with  ( f )<h and say that the points f(P),f(Q) belong to the connected set f(C)  M   y+h .

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 8 M N  distance from C How to use the lower bound theorem  distance from C’

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 9 Difference function l (M,  ) l (N,  ) superimposition

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 10 Difference function

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 11 d((M,  ),(N,  ))  min{x 2 -x 1, y 1 -y 2 } We get a lower bound

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 12 It’s easy to see that when we try to get better lower bounds, we move the points towards the discontinuity set:

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 13 Since each discontinuity point has at least a coordinate that is a critical value for the measuring function, our best lower bound is either the distance between two critical values or half the distance between two critical values of the measuring function.

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 14 A method for trying to compute the natural pseudodistance: 1)Compute the size functions of the size pairs (M,  ),(N,  ) ; 2)Compute the best lower bound B for the natural pseudodistance by the lower bound theorem; 3)If we are able to find a sequence of homeomorphisms ( f i ) with lim  ( f i )= B then B is the natural pseudodistance. Is it always possible to find such a sequence? NO

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 15 These two size pairs have the same size function (and hence the corresponding lower bound B vanishes), but their natural pseudodistance does not vanish! (Indeed d=1 ) M N  y  y Therefore we CANNOT find a sequence of homeomorphisms ( f i ) with lim  ( f i ) equal to our lower bound.

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 16 Theorem. The natural pseudodistance equals D/k, where k is a positive integer and D is the Euclidean distance between two suitable critical values of the measuring functions. We recall that f or M, N closed smooth manifolds and smooth measuring functions, the following statement holds: Since our lower bound can only equal D or D/2, the computational method that we have seen cannot prove the possible existence of examples with k  1,2.

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 17 Theorem. Call  the matching distance between the size functions l (M,  ) and l (N . Then d((M,  ),(N,  ))  . The previous result allows to get information about the natural pseudodistance by computing the matching distance between the size functions. A greater lower bound exists, involving the matching distance between size functions:

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 18 How to get a lower bound by computing the matching distance between the size functions: d((M,  ),(N,  ))  . 

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 19 The inequality d   assures that a small change of the measuring function induces a small change of the size function. IMPORTANT REMARK Stability of size functions w.r.t. small changes of measuring functions. ( d((M,  ),(M,  )) is small, hence  is small, too!)

International Workshop on Computer Vision - Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, April , Tehran 20 Two lower bound theorems for the natural pseudodistance were given. These theorems give us a method to try to compute the natural pseudodistance by using the size functions, and guarantee the stability of size functions with respect to small changes of the measuring functions. Summary