Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June 2007 - 1 Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 4 June 2007 Patrick Ryan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mayukh Das 1Louisiana Tech University For the 2004 D0SAR Workshop Activities with L3 and the Higgs By : Mayukh Das.
Advertisements

B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
PDCMSSW - Luca Perrozzi1 Looking for… Punch throughs… Looking for… Punch throughs…
1 B-tagging meeting overview Li bo Shandong University.
ESTIMATING THE FAKE LEPTON BACKGROUND IN A SEARCH FOR PAIR PRODUCED STOPS AT CMS David Kolchmeyer Advisor: Alberto Graziano.
Summary of Results and Projected Sensitivity The Lonesome Top Quark Aran Garcia-Bellido, University of Washington Single Top Quark Production By observing.
Trigger studies of SM 130 GeV Higgs  in the lepton+hadron channel First pass at estimating trigger efficiency Higgs mass reconstruction Catalin Ciobanu,
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 21 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 21 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
Work SummaryNSF Report, 16 Nov Patrick Ryan, MSU Summary of Work Single Top Single Top trigger Have determined the optimum lepton triggers (mu20i,
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
1 previously, when I calculated event selection efficiencies, I defined efficiencies as the following: efficiency in electron channel = (total number of.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
1 Measuring the Top Quark Cross Section in the Semileptonic Channel Andrea Bangert.
1 W’  tb  lnubb: the first read. 2 introduction sample: W’  tb  lnubb generator: PYTHIA number of events: 5000 will only use events in the good run.
Top Trigger Strategy in ATLASWorkshop on Top Physics, 18 Oct Patrick Ryan, MSU Top Trigger Strategy in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics Grenoble.
1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.
Dimuon Channel ( Z  μμ ) L uminosity ~180 pb -1 (recorded) 2 isolated muons with both having matching central tracks |η μ | 15 GeV 65.0 < M μ 1 μ 2
Progress on B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford May 22 nd, 2007.
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 9 May Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 9 May 2007 Patrick Ryan.
FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.
22. April 2004, New Phenomena MeetingChristian Autermann - Resonant Slepton Production1 Overview R-parity violating Supersymmetry Cross section and Run.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
Analysis Plans for Jets + EtMiss Signatures Pierre Savard ATLAS Toronto Group Meeting January
Lepton efficiency & fake rate Yousuke Kataoka University of Tokyo Content definitions of leptons p2 efficiency and fake rate for SU3 ( ) p3, p4.
1 Top ID in tt → 6-Jet channel Erik Devetak Edinburgh Collaboration Meeting ( )‏
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
28 July 2006 CERN REU Status Report 1 Lindsey Gray, University of Florida RCT Trigger Supervisor and Database Project Status Lindsey Gray Advisors: Dr.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
Slides for EB3. Left Problems from EB2 1. Why muon triggers are not used in e  channel? 2. Add backgrounds estimation for signal search region 3. Add.
5/28/2002UTA group meeting1 An update of top to stop analysis How to estimate W->e cross section? Why the w to e cross section I used is so big? Next Choose.
Fully Hadronic Top Anti-Top Decay (Using TopView) Fully Hadronic Top Anti-Top Decay (Using TopView) Ido Mussche NIPHAD meeting, Februari 9 th :
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Search for a 4 th generation t’ quark in p-p collision at ATLAS -Suyog Shrestha, Iowa State University.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
Wuppertal ttbar strategy meeting 16 August 2012, T. Cornelissen 1 Sebastian, Thijs Status of JetElectron QCD fit in resonance analysis.
1 Reinhard Schwienhorst, MSU Top Group Meeting W' Search in the single top quark channel Reinhard Schwienhorst Michigan State University Top Group Meeting,
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
1 Data taking period E1 Plots E1 - August 5th. Producing the plots Triggers used Plots I.Trigger. II.Luminosity. III.Jets. IV.Leptons. V.MET. What Next?
Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
VHF working meeting, 4 Oct Measurement of associated charm production in W final states at  s=7TeV J. Alcaraz, I. Josa, J. Santaolalla (CIEMAT,
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Estimating the isolated lepton rate in multi-jet events Manuel & Alexander Ivo, Stan, Martijn, Auke, Els et al.
1 Top activities in Milano. 2 Overview Study of W+jets background to semileptonic tt –I. Besana (1 st year PhD student, continuing work of diploma thesis)
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
15/11/11 LHCb Liverpool Meeting
The University of Manchester
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
Monica Dunford April 24th, 2007
Muon Trigger Acceptance Study
Run and Luminosity dependence of p17 NN b-tag
Presentation transcript:

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting 4 June 2007 Patrick Ryan

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Events with No TruthAll Muons Events with no TruthAll Muons trigger L1 MU TopView Ntuples TruthAll tree - all muons Truth tree All muons from W decay Other muons included only if p T > 5 GeV What causes the trigger to fire Muons not originating at vertex Jets interacting with calorimeter In-flight decays Bug in software

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Investigation of Events with No TruthAll Muons Calculate  R between LV1 Trigger and closest jet for 5200 (left) Range between 0 and 0.5 for most events Larger than  R between L1 Muon and reconstructed Muon (0 to 0.1) Smaller than  R between L1 Muon and Jet for entire sample (0 to 3) Most muons within jet radius (0.4) Events pass MU06

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Investigation of Events with No TruthAll Muons Eta of events with 0 TruthAll Muons passing MU06 (right) Compared to reference sample, more events between -1 and 1 Eta-phi of events with 0 TruthAll passing MU06 (left) Events evenly distributed in phi No info gained from this plot Different samples used for each plot (explains different number of events) Events pass MU06

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Investigation of Events with No TruthAll Muons Removal of events with no TruthAll Muons by LV2 Run over 56,250 events (162 have 0 TruthAll Muons & Pass MU06) Isolation cut removes all (hints that events come from jets) Can conclude that missing muons are from jets Muon Track Record in ESD/AOD Contains info about all muons in muon system At this time we believe it’s not necessary to look at this Question for analysis model people Why are these events not in ntuple L1L2Pass L1Pass L2 MU06mu MU06mu06l MU06mu20i1620

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Single Top Muon Efficiencies TopView Version 1212 MuidTauRec 003 ntuples Truth efficiencies No selection cuts Ratio of number of events before and after trigger Reconstructed efficiencies Apply common single top event selection (separate e and  ) At least 1 high-p T  with p T > 20 GeV No secondary lepton with both p T > 10 GeV and <  < N jet ≥ 2 p T 1 > 30 GeV p T 2 > 25 GeV N Jet B-tagged ≥ 1 where b-tagged jet has p T > 35 GeV E T Miss > 25 GeV Ratio before and after trigger calculated after event selection

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Muon Efficiencies 5501 (s-channel) Reconstricted efficiencies range from 80 to 95% MU06, MU08, MU10, and MU11 show very little turn-on behavior MU20 turns on between 10 and 20 GeV Current offline cut of 20 GeV acceptable for this trigger MU40 turns on between 10 and 30 GeV Current offline cut of 20 GeV too low for this trigger

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Muon Efficiencies 5502 (t-channel) Behavior similar to s-channel except at high p T Significant decrease in efficiency for MU20 and MU40

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Muon Efficiencies 5200 (ttbar) Sample Behavior similar to s and t channels

Single Top Trigger Studies Top Trigger Meeting, 6 June Patrick Ryan, MSU Plans Continue Level 2 studies Efficiencies at Event Filter Efficiencies for e, jets, etc.