Science Operations Plan NGAO - Meeting 10 D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 09/17/2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flow-down of Strategic Priorities to Annual and 5-year WMKO Plan Taft Armandroff Hilton Lewis September 18, 2009 Taft Armandroff Hilton Lewis September.
Advertisements

1 Keck LGS AO Planning Workshop: Overview, Requirements & Schedule December 5, 2004.
NGAO Systems Engineering Status Team Meeting #3 (Video) R. Dekany 13 December 2006.
NGAO Construction Project Cost Estimation: Initial Thoughts Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting #12 December 13, 2007.
Science Group: Status, Plans, and Issues Claire Max Liz McGrath August 19, 2008.
NGAO System Design Review Response Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting June 18, 2008.
LGS AO Operations Transition: Introduction to Meeting April 15, 2005.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max, Sean Adkins for NGAO Team SSC Meeting February 20, 2008.
1 NGAO Instrumentation Studies Overview By Sean Adkins November 14, 2006.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. ~ March 20, 2009 February 5, 2009 DRAFT.
Trying to connect WBSs with people and phases Relevant questions to my work: How the realistic NGAO strategies will/should affect the work in progress?
NGAO Control Systems Group Status, Plans & Issues NGAO Team Meeting August 19, 2008 Erik Johansson Jimmy Johnson, Doug Morrison, Ed Wetherell.
Observing Operations Concept Document Elizabeth McGrath NGAO PD Team Meeting #6 March 19, 2009.
Functional Requirements Status and Plans Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory Viswa Velur California Institute of Technology Keck NGAO Team Meeting.
NGAO Report February 18, 2009 Waimea NGAO Report February 18, 2009 Waimea P. Wizinowich for the NGAO Team.
1 Keck NGAO Proposal: Management Overview Presenter: P. Wizinowich SSC Meeting June 21, 2006.
NGAO System Design: AO System (WBS 3.2) & Laser Facility (WBS 3.3) Design Inputs & Outputs Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting #9 August 24, 2007.
Science Operations Update NGAO - Meeting 11 D. Le Mignant, E. McGrath & C. Max W. M. Keck Observatory 11/05/2007.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Keck Precision AO (KPAO) SSC Presentation January.
Build to Cost Directions & Guidelines Peter Wizinowich SSC Meeting November 3, 2008.
The Path to NGAO Core Science Requirements Claire Max and Liz McGrath NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
NGAO Meeting #3 Introduction NGAO Meeting #3 Peter Wizinowich December 13, 2006.
Planning “Science Operations” tasks for the PD phase NGAO PD Phase D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 08/19/2008.
Demonstration of Science Observing Modes AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 D. Le Mignant, A. Bouchez for the Keck AO team.
NGAO Management Update Peter Wizinowich NGAO Meeting #11 November 5, 2007.
Science Operations Replan NGAO - Meeting 6 D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 04/25/2007.
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO System Design Phase Management Report - Replan NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
NGAO interface control documents: Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory Keck NGAO PD phase Meeting #6 March 19, 2007 Videoconference.
Observing efficiency for NGAO 1.Definitions 2.Lessons learned a)Keck LGS AO “efficiency” b)Keck AO brute conclusion 3.Observing efficiency budget 4. Observing.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
NGAO System Design Phase Update Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team (with input from Sean Adkins, Matthew Britton, Ralf.
NGAO discussion: Science Operations NGAO Meeting #4 D. Le Mignant 22 Jan
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.
NGAO operations thoughts D. Le Mignant, E. Johansson, C. Neyman.
NGAO System Design Phase System & Functional Requirements Documents NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
Encouraging “System Level” Thinking Christopher Neyman, Erik Johansson, David Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory Viswa Velur California Institute of Technology.
System Architecture WBS 3.1 Mid-Year Replan Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting #6 April 25-26, 2007 UCSC.
NGAO topical discussion: Observing Efficiency and Uptime Budgets Telecon Meeting 12/7 D. Le Mignant and E. Johansson 7 Dec Attendees; R. Campbell,
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory NGAO Next-Generation Adaptive Optics System NGAO Uptime Budget Keck NGAO Meeting.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Functional Requirements Status and Plans Christopher Neyman & Erik Johansson W. M. Keck Observatory Viswa Velur California Institute of Technology Keck.
NGAO High-Contrast Performance Budget (WBS aka Companion Sensitivity) Initial WFE budget and status report NGAO Team meeting #4, WMKO Kamuela.
NGAO Instrumentation WBS Replan By Sean Adkins April 25, 2007.
Major Management & Systems Engineering Ideas for Reducing Costs Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
NGAO Meeting #5 Introduction NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.
NGAO Instrumentation Preliminary Design Phase Planning September 2008 Sean Adkins.
Functional Requirements for NGAO Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory NGAO Team Meeting #9 August 24, 2007.
Plan to develop system requirements through science cases Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
Trade Study Report: NGAO versus Keck AO Upgrade NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
Trying to connect WBSs with people and phases Relevant questions to my work: How the re 8 -planning will affect the work in progress? Priorities to capture.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
LGS AO Readiness for 05B AOWG meeting February 4, 2004 Keck LGS AO team.
SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies SOFIA SCIENCE UTILIZATION POLICIES Pamela M. Marcum SOFIA Project Scientist SSSC Feb 19, 2010.
Eleventh Lecture Hour 9:30 – 10:20 am, Saturday, September 16 Software Management Disciplines Iterative Process Planning (from Part III, Chapter 10 of.
1 Data simulations / Community challenges Stephan Birkmann / Jeff Valenti.
ADASS the Planning and Scheduling Perspective Roadmap: - How planning and scheduling fits in at ADASS - ADASS planning and scheduling posters and presentations.
Why is the VLT very efficient? Fernando Comerón On behalf of Francesca Primas and Martino Romaniello.
Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Meeting #2 Caltech November 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Astronomy and Observatory Activity May 31st, : :30pm.
WG1 Report Osiris Lander delivery Support and Science activities during Comet approach.
Science Priorities and Implications of Potential Cost Savings Ideas
NGAO System Design Project Plans and Schedule
Observatory Science Operations
Observatory Science Operations
NGAO topical discussion: Observing Efficiency and Uptime Budgets
NGAO Uptime Budget Keck NGAO Meeting #2 Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Presentation transcript:

Science Operations Plan NGAO - Meeting 10 D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 09/17/2007

2 Talking Points Picture from the Replan Meeting Work in the Plan Priorities Risk/challenges

3 Observatory Rqts Science Operations Science Requirements Observing Scenarios Observing Models TS: KAON 476 Observing Efficiency Budget System Design Approach System Engineering Science Operations Performance budget Trade Studies Rationales for Functional and Performance Requirements 3.4: Science Ops Functional Rqts Current LGSAO Operations Assessment Report: KAON 463 Main Drivers & Risk Areas

4 Work in the Plan SCRD –Include/retrofit observing scenarios –“All-in” science simulations for SCRD SRD from the operations perspective –Science ops requirements –Observatory overall requirements FRD for science operations –WBS Science operations plan –WBS 3.4 –WBS 3.2 –WBS 3.5 Observing efficiency performance budget –See Science Ops page

5 Priorities 1.SCRD –Include/retrofit observing scenarios –“All-in” science simulations for SCRD –E.g., Requirements for PSF reconstruction 2.SRD from the operations perspective –Science ops requirements Based on ?? –Observatory overall requirements Based on ?? 3.Observing efficiency performance budget –See Science Ops page –NGS backup science TS? 4.FRD for science operations –WBS Science operations plan –WBS 3.4 –WBS 3.2

6 Risk / challenges Encounter the same difficulties we have experienced so far: –Coordination among WBS, particularly for science operations (AO, laser, Science instrument) –Finding interested and experienced scientists and engineers for reviews/discussion of the documents Validate/discuss the Operations Model. –Observatory Requirements for Operations Planning operation cost control in the long term Data quality, observing efficiency, science data products? Strategic Decisions --- Review and agreed by SSC? Document the main drivers for the Observing Efficiency budget Strategic Planning Document for Keck --> 90% (weather-corrected) Build budget from observing timeline Telescope, AO, instrument overheads versus performance

7 Science Operations Requirements Mission for the science operations be to: maximize the scientific impact of the TAC allocated observing time with the NGAO instruments from 2012 to Top-level goals from the science requirements: 1.Science-grade quality of the raw data (image quality per science requirements, completeness of observations) 2.Science-grade quality of the data products (photometry, astrometry, PSF knowledge, WCS calibrations) 3.Science impact from a given data product (number of publications and citations) Top-level goals from the observatory: 1.More than 80% of the time allocated is spent on collecting science-quality data. 2.The NGAO combined with its science instruments is facility-class instrument. 3.The Observatory is capable of supporting the equivalent of 240 nights/year for NGAO science operations.