NATIONAL CENTER ON EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES University of Minnesota Rachel Quenemoen Cammy Lehr Martha Thurlow.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Advertisements

Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 2 of 8 Background and Legal Context.
Module 1: IEP Overview – A Plan for Guiding Instruction and Service Provision.
Trends in Teacher Evaluation Systems in Public Education CEC’S POSITION ON SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Accommodations Manual Manual available online on the Testing Students with Disabilities Accommodations page at
Making the Grade Grading Practices for Students with Disabilities By Cathy Sartain Industries
A Guide for IEP Teams Including Students with Disabilities in State and District- wide Assessment.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
WyCAS/NCEO1 WyCAS-Alt Implementation Guide A Workshop for Pilot Implementation Sites Jim Ysseldyke, Martha Thurlow, & Sandy Thompson National Center on.
N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Sandy Thompson and Martha Thurlow National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota Effective.
Inclusive assessment and accountability systems: Issues and opportunities for students with disabilities in standards-based reform Rachel F. Quenemoen.
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O What the heck does proficiency mean for students with significant cognitive disabilities? Nancy Arnold,
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
N C E O National Center on Educational Outcomes Linking Curriculum Standards, Assessment, and Instructional Practices Martha L. Thurlow February 11, when.
National Center on Educational Outcomes June, 2004 How do we keep kids from being stuck in our gap? A frame, a series of discussion questions, and some.
Accountability, accommodations and alternate assessment.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Accommodations in Testing: A National Perspective Blue Ribbon Panel Meeting June, 2002.
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion Each Power Point presentation can be viewed as.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Preparing for Success: The Individualized Education Program August 2015 New Teacher Institute 1.
 Special Education is mandated by federal law and we have to do what they say.
ECSE 604: Early Literacy and Augmentative Communication, Summer 2015 Day 2: Part 2.
Martha Thurlow and Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes CEC Preconvention Workshop #4 April 21, 2010.
What does progressing in general curriculum mean?  Assessing student progress?  Progress is what the fed promotes and requires  Progress in the general.
What does progressing in general curriculum mean?  Assessing student progress?  Progress is what the fed promotes and requires  Progress in the general.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Texas Public School Accountability Presented at Midwinter by the Texas Education Agency.
Including Quality Assurance Within The Theory of Action Presented to: CCSSO 2012 National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Transition Assessment Sue Severson, Ed.D. Minnesota State University Moorhead Minneapolis Career Fair March 4, 2005.
Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
Grading Special Education Students Elementary, Middle School, and High School Ages “Research suggests that grading practices vary considerably among.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
Making the Grade Grading Practices for Students with Disabilities By Cathy Sartain Industries
Special Ed CST Lehman College January 12, This is a criterion referenced test that is designed to measure your and skills in relation to an established.
Dr. Timothy Mitchell Rapid City Area Schools 9/21/13.
IUSD Special Education Department October 14, 2015.
Slide 1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) States’ Data-Based Responses to Low Achieving Students on State Assessments Martha L. Thurlow National.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Design Principles for Assessment.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington,
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
State Testing for SPED Students: (Georgia Alternative Assessment vs. Regular State Testing with Accommodations)
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion.
State Graduation Policies for Students with Disabilities
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
State-Defined Alternate Diplomas
American Institutes for Research
Laurene Christensen, Ph.D. Linda Goldstone, M.S.
Accommodations in Testing: A National Perspective
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Is Your Child’s IEP Individualized?
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Presentation transcript:

NATIONAL CENTER ON EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES University of Minnesota Rachel Quenemoen Cammy Lehr Martha Thurlow

ASSESSING EDUCATIONAL RESULTS - TOUGH ISSUES FOR STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES l Understanding standards, assessments, and accountability l Addressing issues related to assessment accommodations, what we know l Facing tougher graduation requirements, and other issues

Accountability Systems for All l Improving America’s Schools Act l Goals 2000 l Revised Individuals with Disabilities Education Act With IDEA 1997, special education is moving to a system with accountability for both services and for student learning

IDEA Accountability Requirements l Performance goals and indicators: goals and standards for students with disabilities “are consistent, to the maximum extent appropriate” to those set for all children l Students with disabilities “are included in general State and district-wide assessment programs, with appropriate accommodations, where necessary”

IDEA Accountability Requirements, cont. l Alternate assessment aligned to general curriculum standards, beginning not later than July 1, 2000 l Reporting to public for ALL students, numbers and performance levels, aggregated and disaggregated l IEP documentation of decisions

Accountability Means... l...a systematic method to assure those inside and outside the educational system that schools are moving in desired directions –Currently there is a shift from: Is the student getting services? –To also: Is the student learning?

Assessment is one Part of Accountability Assessment for instructional planning VS. Assessment for accountability

Accountability System Components l Goals (Content Standards) l Indicators of Success (Performance Standards) l Measures of Performance l Reporting l Consequences

Purposes l To make decisions about student competence l To provide data for making policy decisions l To make comparisons among local education agencies or schools; and l To provide data for criterion- referenced accountability

SYSTEM acCOUNTability l Are ALL students learning to high standards? –Need to pull apart results - are there GROUPS of students failing? What are possible reasons? No opportunity to learn? No accommodations to learn or to show what they’ve learned? No appropriate interventions to ensure learning? Low expectations?

HIGH STANDARDS ALL KIDS acCOUNTability l Everything else is negotiable... Instructional methods, place, structure, schedules, time.. l If groups of students are not achieving high standards, INTERVENE!!!!! l School improvement efforts are key - be sure ALL kids count in school improvement

STUDENT Accountability l AFTER system is held accountable, THEN we hold the student accountable l Appropriate assessment measures l Multiple measures, includes large scale test scores, but also other performance measures as appropriate l Decisions made by team, documented on IEP

Why Is Inclusion in General Accountability System Important? For accurate picture of education To make “fair” comparisons To meet legal requirements (e.g., Title I, Goals 2000) To avoid unintended effects To benefit from reforms To promote higher expectations

“We Treasure What We Measure”

“... the purpose of assessment and accountability is to improve the quality of instruction in schools and school systems, rather than simply to measure and report school effectiveness.” Committee on Title I Testing and Assessment Report, 1999

Participation Issues It is not IF all students participate, it is HOW they will participate.