Agricultural policy objectives Multifunctionality: a new rationale for support? Economics of Food Markets Lecture 5 Alan Matthews

Classes this week Thursday 2 pmThursday 6 pm Oisin HanrahanBananasMatthew FleuryBananas Eoghan O’BriainCottonLaura DugganCotton Ronan HughesRiceKaren DuffyRice

Classes next week Thursday 2 pmThursday 6 pm Reyhana DhanaBeefDeirdre O’BrienBeef Shauna LawlorDairyDeirdre CollinsDairy Richard BissettWheatJonathan Kinghan Wheat

Lectures next week Because of Bank Holiday, changed to Wednesday 1-3 pm, Room AP3.19 Reading and website

The European model of farming Emphasises the non-commodity outputs provided by farming activity –Cultural heritage –Rural development –Landscape –Biodiversity and environment –Food security Does provision of these non-commodity outputs provide a distinct justification for support to farming? Is an example of multifunctionality

Multifunctionality The existence of multiple commodity and non-commodity outputs that are jointly produced, AND The fact that some of these non-commodity outputs exhibit characteristics of externalities or public goods Why multifunctionality matters: –High protection countries argue that maintaining agricultural production is a necessary prerequisite for these non-commodity benefits

The issue of jointness Think about jointness wrt cultural heritage, rural viability via agricultural employment, landscape, environmental quality, food security –Can these non-commodity outputs be provided by the non- agricultural sector? –Are there economies of scope such that agriculture has a competitive advantage in supplying these outputs? –Does jointness imply fixed proportions? –Could there be non-agricultural provision?

The issue of externalities/public goods Non-commodity outputs that constitute positive externalities do not necessarily cause market failure The existence of a positive externality is not necessarily an argument for intervention; how much of the non- commodity output is optimal? –The problem of valuation Not all public goods necessarily imply government provision, e.g. possibility of clubs, voluntary groups The spatial and scale dimensions of non-commodity outputs

Policy implications Agriculture produces negative as well as positive spillovers, yet advocates of multifunctionality do not net out or consider these negative effects Using agricultural support in one country to attain multifunctional benefits lower the benefits from agriculture, including multifunctional benefits, everywhere else Unlikely that blanket measures to encourage agricultural production will ensure just the right outputs of non- commodity benefits in the right places at reasonable cost –Provides an argument for improving targeting and decoupling of policy measures

Reading Evolution of agricultural policy objectives Winters, A., (1990), The so-called non-economic objectives of agricultural support, OECD Economic Studies 13, pp Multifunctionality Cahill, C. and Shobayashi, M., 'The concept of multifunctionality of agriculture: results of OECD research', Proceedings of the Agricultural Economics Society of Ireland. Bohman, M. et al The Use and Abuse of Multifunctionality, US Department of Agriculture Economic Resarch Service. See also the Commission's defence of multifunctionality in the context of the WTO agricultural negotiations. Read the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Multifunctionality: A Pretext for Protection, ABARE Current Issues paper 99.3, Canberra, ABARE, for a critical view.