Decision Making Reviewing and Selecting Solutions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Combining Analysis strands in a Main Gate Submission.
Advertisements

Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
WASH Cluster – Emergency Training S WASH STRATEGY Session 3 Strategic Planning S3 1.
Improving how your organisation supports the use of research evidence to inform policymaking.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Materiality and Risk Chapter 9.
The Essence of Critical Thinking the reasoned identification and evaluation of evidence to guide decision making analysis the form and content of evidence.
What makes a good project?.  A testing ground for concepts presented in the taught programme  An opportunity to demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge.
Group Techniques John A. Cagle California State University, Fresno.
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Project Update Monthly Research Administrators Meeting March 11, 2010.
Decision-Making Understand the main steps involved in rational decision-making Discuss the major reasons for poor decisions, and describe what managers.
Planning and Decision Making
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Chapter 11 Selecting the Best Alternative Design Strategy 11.1.
1 Types of Evaluation Decide on the Purpose: Formative - improve and inform Summative- identify value/effect.
Linear Programming Special Cases Alternate Optimal Solutions No Feasible Solution Unbounded Solutions.
March 20, 2001CSci Clark University1 CSci 250 Software Design & Development Lecture #17 Tuesday, March 20, 2001.
Systems Analysis II Nizar R. Mabroukeh
Feasibility Studies National Heritage Areas. Initiating National Heritage Areas National Heritage Area designations have been initiated in four different.
The New Product and Services Development Process By SK Winning Innovations for Tomorrow (WIT)
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Policy WG NIH policy proposal. Goal: Incorporating global access licensing as one of the additional review criteria Question 1: Should we propose this.
Objective- and Strategic Analysis
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
Objective Provides an overview of the primary issues related to a business/venture idea. It determines if the business venture is feasible or “doable”.
A GENERIC PROCESS FOR REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING Chapter 2 1 These slides are prepared by Enas Naffar to be used in Software requirements course - Philadelphia.
International Business Strategy LON301BUS Implementing and Evaluating Strategy Unit: 8 Knowledgecast: 1.
SCOPE THE PROJECT. Managing Client Expectations Client always seem to expect more than we are prepared to deliver. The expectations gap between client.
Michael Webster (Cameco Corporation) Tamara Yankovich (IAEA, Formerly Saskatchewan Research Council) Martin Klukas (Atomic Energy of Canada Limited) IAEA.
FOUNDATIONS OF DECISION MAKING BSM 12. Planning involves decision-making Analyzing alternatives and choosing the best one.
Management & Development of Complex Projects Course Code MS Project Management Project Life Cycle & PM Process Groups Lecture # 4.
Project Life Cycle – Project Initiation © Ed Green Penn State University All Rights Reserved.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
Objective Students will employ entrepreneurial discovery strategies (Feasibility Study) to generate feasible ideas for business ventures/products.
EVAL 6970: Cost Analysis for Evaluation Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn Nick Saxton Fall 2014.
DESIGNING A PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM. By the time you select techniques you should know The target stakeholders What has to be accomplished with them.
EVALUATION AND SELECTION Chapter 6. Objectives Upon completion of this chapter, you should be able to: Critically understand the process of strategy evaluation.
Investment decision making
Team Exercise. 5/29/2007SE Survival Exercise2 SURVIVAL!
Decision Making Matrix A Closer Look at Preliminary Ideas.
UNIT 7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Monitoring and evaluation is the process of examining progress against institution’s goals or plan.  The term SM &
Chapter 1 1 Managing Sport in the 21st Century Janet B. Parks, Bowling Green State University Jerome Quarterman, Howard University Lucie Thibault, Brock.
Inha University Evaluating Solutions Academic English 2 Instructor Chris Gunn.
Training on Safe Hospitals in Disasters Module 3: Action Planning for “Safe Hospitals”
The Engineering Design Process
Management (Foundation)
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Best Practices Consortium
Unit 23 Employability Skills in HSC Unit 23 Employability Skills in Health and Social Care Aim This unit provides learners with the opportunity to acquire.
Level - 3 Process Areas (CMMI-DEV)
Electrical Engineering
Decision Making A quick and simple system for decision making.
Making Decisions.
Design Analysis.
Feasibility Research Reports
NEPAL ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF COLLEGE Project Appraisal: Group Works
[Project Name] Project Gating Presentation
Objective 3.02: Utilize critical-thinking skills to determine best options/outcomes. Making Decisions.
Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. It is a decision-making process in which the basic.
The Decision Making Model
Solution Selection: What works?
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Project Management Group
X y y = x2 - 3x Solutions of y = x2 - 3x y x –1 5 –2 –3 6 y = x2-3x.
C.2.12 The student will develop a plan to resolve a state or local problem by researching public policy alternatives, identifying appropriate government.
Solution Selection: What works?
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Objective 3.02: Utilize critical-thinking skills to determine best options/outcomes. Making Decisions.
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
PFMEA Summary Process Steps
CCM A3 “P” “D” “C” “A” Date: Title / A3 Theme: Owner: Stakeholders:
Presentation transcript:

Decision Making Reviewing and Selecting Solutions

The Review and Selection Process 2. Set criteria for solutions 3. Consider alternative solutions 4. Evaluate alternatives 5. Select one or more solutions 1. Consider strategies to meet the needs

Step1: Select Solutions to Meet the Needs What is What should be Possible Solutions Step1: Select Srategies to Meet the Needs

Step 2: Set Criteria for Solutions Set criteria (standards) for judging the merits of alternative solution strategies. acceptability feasibilityeffect on causes  Minimum criteria would be:

Feasibility Involves financial & human resources as well as the scope of the solution. Acceptability Relates to stakeholder approval, ethical considerations & appropriateness. Characteristics

Effect on Causes The degree to which the solution will bring about change in the cause one wishes to change.

Step 3 & 4: Evaluate and Select Alternative Solutions Is each potential solution supported by research and evaluation data? Does the solution address criticality of need and the likelihood the solution will address causal factors? Short term solutions sometimes do not address causes.

Step 5: Select Solutions Evaluate each solution against the evaluation criteria. Consider whether each high ranking solution will effect change in the desired direction. From those that are high ranking and effect change, select one or more solutions for each need area.