Magnetic Methods and Results Daniel Boesner Wendy Key Geol 692 May 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can we use total field magnetics to find buried pit houses beneath layers of volcanic ash? Visible pit houses at Bridge River, B.C. (Prentiss et al., 2009)
Advertisements

Geological Interpretation of Geophysical Magnetics  Geomagnetic reference field  Tectonics, sea-floor spreading and age of ocean basin  Near surface.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Magnetic Methods (IV) Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
Edge Detection and Depth Estimates – Application to Pseudogravity and Reduced to Pole Results: Part I Edge detection on an oversampled synthetic anomaly.
Magnetic Field 5.
RESISTIVITY STUDY SPRING 2010 FIELD EXERCISE APPLIED GEOPHYSICS 492/692 Amie Lamb, Katie Ryan, Justin Skord and Nicole Shivers.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Geol 454 Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of.
The use of curvature in potential-field interpretation Exploration Geophysics, 2007, 38, 111–119 Phillips, Hansen, & Blakely Abstract. Potential-field.
UTAM 2004 Travis Crosby. UTAM 2004 Travis Crosby Very Low Frequency EM Surveys for the Purpose of Augmenting for the Purpose of Augmenting Near-Surface.
Anatomy of Anomalies Total Field Magnetics and Ground Penetrating Radar at a Potential Archaeological Site.
South Lake Tahoe: Magnetic Surveying Erica Romero and Caitlin Swale.
Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Techniques  The specification sates that you should be able to:  Describe the geophysical exploration techniques.
INTRODUCTION TO UTM COORDINATES AND MAP DATUMS.
Copyright © 2014 All rights reserved, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador Earth Systems 3209 Unit: 5 Earth’s Resources Reference: Chapters 21; Appendix.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography High resistivity stream channel gravels are delineated by the 250 ohm-meter contour Data acquired with.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Land Magnetometer Training Course
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Techniques  The specification sates that you should be able to:  Describe the geophysical exploration techniques.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Gravity surveys Annie, Sue, Betsy. Regional location Bango Road canal bank V-line canal bank Reno Highway Carson Highway.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 28 Mar 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Mon 31 Mar: Burger (§7.4–7.6) Last Time: Earth’s Main Magnetic Field Earth’s.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Field investigations of abandoned Negro cemeteries using GPR presented by Alison Henning Rice University March 9, 2007.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
An E-W gravity profile across the La Bajada fault Zone in the Rio Grande Rift, North Central New Mexico Rajesh Goteti University of Rochester SAGE 2007.
1) Magnetic total field (T) obtained from airborne survey (see R.J.Blakely, 1995) (ΔT) Total field anomaly (IGRF removal), which satisfy potential theory,
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Basic resistivity models 2 Layer 4 Layer 3 Layer Characteristic Curves.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Measuring the Gravity and Magnetic Anomaly of a Rising Lava Plume Chris Jaeger December 3, 2015.
MAGNETOMETERS IN HYPACK® Data Collection & Data Processing.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
The objective of the CRONUS-Earth Project is to simultaneously address the various uncertainties affecting the production and accumulation of in-situ cosmogenic.
Recall that the proton precession magnetometer makes measurements of the total field, not the vector components of the field. Recall also that the total.
Edge Detection and Depth Estimates – Application to Pseudogravity and Reduced to Pole Results: Part I Edge detection on an oversampled synthetic anomaly.
Underwater archaeology combines fields of study including: Anthropology Chemistry Ethnography Geology History Oceanography.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Characteristic curves and their responses. The method of Characteristic Curves (Two layer case) Summary of steps Set  1 =  a1 Construct the ratios 
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 1 Apr 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 4 Apr: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Magnetics (Measurement, Anomalies)
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 30 Mar 2016
Last Time: Magnetic Methods Intensity of induced magnetization by an external field is (where k is magnetic susceptibility ) Crustal minerals can be diamagnetic.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
Collected three adjacent grids
What is the magnetic potential of a dipole?
Geol 319: Important Dates Friday, Sept 28th – class cancelled
Magnetic Methods (III)
Magnetic Methods (V) Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
Magnetic Methods- continued
Final review sessions - II
Tie up Gravity methods & begin Magnetic methods
Magnetic Methods (II) Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic Methods and Results Daniel Boesner Wendy Key Geol 692 May 2009

Main Points Introduction Introduction Method Background and Theory Method Background and Theory Field Area Field Area Field Methods Field Methods Equipment Equipment Data Collection Data Collection Processing Processing Results Results Conclusions Conclusions

Method Background and Theory Magnetometer utilizes the precession of spinning protons to measure the total magnetic intensity of the Earth’s magnetic field. Magnetometer utilizes the precession of spinning protons to measure the total magnetic intensity of the Earth’s magnetic field. Values vary geographically due to the dipole nature of the Earth’s magnetic field. Values vary geographically due to the dipole nature of the Earth’s magnetic field. Iron-rich minerals and other metals produce localized perturbances in magnetic field values which are detected by the magnetometer. Iron-rich minerals and other metals produce localized perturbances in magnetic field values which are detected by the magnetometer. Simple model of the Earth’s magnetic field Proton procession magnetometer Breiner, S., 1973

Magnetic Contour Map Breiner, S., 1973

Iron-rich materials create perturbances in the magnetic field Effects of depth on anomaly on anomaly Breiner, S., 1973

Field Area Construction of the Truckee and V-Line Canals began in 1903 and 1904 respectively as part of The Newlands Project which used the combined waters of the Truckee and Carson Rivers to irrigate over 400,000 acres of western Nevada desert (Simond, 1996). Construction of the Truckee and V-Line Canals began in 1903 and 1904 respectively as part of The Newlands Project which used the combined waters of the Truckee and Carson Rivers to irrigate over 400,000 acres of western Nevada desert (Simond, 1996).

Field Methods-Equipment Scintrex Envi- Mag proton procession magnetometer Scintrex Envi- Mag proton procession magnetometer Roving and base station magneto- meters employed Roving and base station magneto- meters employed

Field Methods- Data Collection Total field data collected every 0.5 s by the rover and every 2 s by the base station. Total field data collected every 0.5 s by the rover and every 2 s by the base station. Stations were established at specified locations along 5 lines as follows: Stations were established at specified locations along 5 lines as follows: Lines 1 and 3 (Length of the V-line Canal and Truckee Canal): 100 m station intervals Lines 1 and 3 (Length of the V-line Canal and Truckee Canal): 100 m station intervals Lines 2 & 5 (Re-Evaluations): 25 m intervals Lines 2 & 5 (Re-Evaluations): 25 m intervals Line 3 (Abandoned Levee): 50 m intervals Line 3 (Abandoned Levee): 50 m intervals Stations were established to facilitate the collection of GPS locations and to allow for preliminary analysis of total field and noise anomalies in the field. Stations were established to facilitate the collection of GPS locations and to allow for preliminary analysis of total field and noise anomalies in the field.

Field Methods- Data Collection To better differentiate anomalies from observable cultural “contaminants” detailed maps were made locating cultural features. To better differentiate anomalies from observable cultural “contaminants” detailed maps were made locating cultural features. Anomalous areas were identified in the field by plotting total field measurements collected at each station. Anomalous areas were identified in the field by plotting total field measurements collected at each station.

Processing Oasis Montaje by Geosoft was used to evaluate the data. Oasis Montaje by Geosoft was used to evaluate the data. Position data between stations were calculated under the assumption that stations are the end points of a straight line. Position data between stations were calculated under the assumption that stations are the end points of a straight line. Noise values greater than 1 nT were removed in order to eliminate anomalies generated by noise sources. Noise values greater than 1 nT were removed in order to eliminate anomalies generated by noise sources. Data was reduced-to-pole (RTP) using an inclination of 63.5° and a declination of 14.21° (IGRF, NOAA). Data was reduced-to-pole (RTP) using an inclination of 63.5° and a declination of 14.21° (IGRF, NOAA).

Effects of Processing Raw Data Noise >1 nT Removed RTP

Results- V-Line Canal Line 2 Lines 1 and 3 Line 5

Results- Truckee Canal Line 4

Limitations A variety of surface and subsurface interpretations are possible for each recorded anomaly. A variety of surface and subsurface interpretations are possible for each recorded anomaly. Burger et al. (1992) suggest a distance of 20+ m should be maintained to reduce the effects of cultural “contaminants”. Burger et al. (1992) suggest a distance of 20+ m should be maintained to reduce the effects of cultural “contaminants”.

Conclusions Data anomalies may be unreliable due to the volume of cultural “contaminants” particularly along the Truckee Canal. Data anomalies may be unreliable due to the volume of cultural “contaminants” particularly along the Truckee Canal. Total field measurements along the Truckee Canal are more extreme than those along the V- Line Canal. Total field measurements along the Truckee Canal are more extreme than those along the V- Line Canal. Anomalies observed along the V-Line Canal could not be readily attributed to apparent cultural or geologic sources. Anomalies observed along the V-Line Canal could not be readily attributed to apparent cultural or geologic sources.

Questions?

References Burger, R.H., Sheehan, A.F., and Jones, C.H., 1992, Introduction to applied geophysics: Exploring the shallow subsurface: New York, W.W. Norton & Company, 554 p. Simonds, Wm., J., 1996, The Newlands Project: Third Draft: Bureau of Reclamation History Program (Accessed: 26 April, 2009). Breiner, S., 1973, Applications manual for portable magnetometers: Sunnyvale, CA, Geometrics, 58.