SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Biomedical Informatics Research Network’s Governance of their Data Federation Efforts. A case exploring our.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Twelve Cs for Team Building
Advertisements

Educational Teams: Variation at McGill Teaching in a different way Lynn McAlpine McGill University Canada
Bay Area Regional Center California State University, East Bay Biomedical Sciences Oscar Wambuguh (Affiliate Director) Debapriya Sengupta (Affiliate Assistant)
Key Points (Mallory, 1991)  To solve problems by drawing on the talents of variety of individuals.  To foster togetherness in the workplace while.
Institute Engagement in AIAA Event Model January 2013.
1 Chapter 12 Strategic Entrepreneurship PART IV MONITORING AND CREATING ENTREPRENEURIAL OPPORTUNITIES.
SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Alliance for Cellular Signaling (AfCS) “Scaling up” academic science.
SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Biomedical Informatics Research Network.
Michael Marron, Ph.D., Director Division of Biomedical Technology National Center for Research Resources National Institutes of Health Department of Health.
Purchasing And Boundary Spanning IDIS 424 Spring 2004
SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN How are public data contributions rewarded in open genetics databases?
Data Sources & Using VIVO Data Visualizing Scholarship VIVO provides network analysis and visualization tools to maximize the benefits afforded by the.
What do I do if I don’t know the answer? Instructor: Emily Gregor Greenleaf TATP Co-ordinator
How does classroom discussion and questioning affect students’ learning?
Global Software Teams. Sources – Handout Readings  Carmel “Global Software Teams”  Alexander “Virtual Teams Going Global”  Geber “Virtual Teams” 
LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT (34 SLIDES).
Teamwork Chapter 6.
© 2014 The Regents of the University of Michigan. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of.
STRENGTHENING the AFRICA ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION NETWORK An AMCEN initiative A framework to support development planning processes and increase access.
ISCB-SC - Saraswathi.S Saraswathi S PhD Student Iowa State University Ames, Iowa, USA Chairperson: ISCB-SC-RSG.
Mentoring and inquirY using NASA Data on Atmospheric and earth science for Teachers and Amateurs Susan Moore Education Specialist Dr. Lin H. Chambers Project.
Ensuring Food Safety in Europe through Scientific Cooperation and Networking The Role of EFSA Carola Sondermann EFSA Polish Focal Point – Annual Experts.
Sharing Research Data Globally Alan Blatecky National Science Foundation Board on Research Data and Information.
Knowledge of Subject Matter OCPS Alternative Certification Program.
The NIH Roadmap and the Human Microbiome Project Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D. National Human Genome Research Institute April 22, 2007.
Community Board Orientation 6- Community Board Orientation 6-1.
April 13 BEC Meeting BIRN Data Sharing Implementation From the BIRN DSTF Randy L. Gollub, Chair.
Facilitate Scientific Data Sharing by Sharing Informatics Tools and Standards Belinda Seto and James Luo National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.
Session 6: Summary of Discussion A. Institutional Barriers and Potential Solutions 1. Natural environment does not have national or institutional boundaries,
Review of CoP-MfDR Pilot Phase Review of CoP-MfDR Pilot Phase Third International Roundtable on Managing for Development Results Hanoi, Vietnam February.
Management, 6e Schermerhorn Prepared by Cheryl Wyrick California State Polytechnic University Pomona John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
The Biomedical Informatics Research Network Carl Kesselman BIRN Principal Investigator Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering Information Sciences.
Advanced Technologies in Education Virtual Observatory 1 Virtual Observatory: D-Space Project Athens, 14 November 2004 Elena Tavlaki Head of Research Programs.
Clinical Research Informatics at the University of Michigan Daniel Clauw M.D. Professor of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology Assistant Dean for Clinical.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG The Use of Research Funding Databases for Research Assessment Information Systems Presented at the 8th international.
Work Package 6 L2C Kick-off meeting Fontainebleau, March 7th 2006.
Theme 2 Developing MPA networks Particular thanks to: Theme 2 Concurrent Session Rapporteurs, Dan Laffoley, Gilly Llewellyn G E E L O N G A U S T R A L.
The Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) Fostering Community Engagement and Adoption Breakout 9 RDA Sixth Plenary, Paris Mary Vardigan, ICPSR, University.
Teams Thomas P. Holland, Ph.D., Professor Institute for Nonprofit Organizations.
GEO Implementation Boards Considerations and Lessons Learned (Document 8) Max Craglia (EC) Co-chair of the Infrastructure Implementation Board (IIB) On.
Social Structure and Interaction. A social structure is a network of interrelated statuses and roles that guide human behavior. A status is a socially.
Function BIRN The ability to find a subject who may have participated in multiple experiments and had multiple assessments done is a critical component.
Introduction/ Boundaries/ Expected and Unexpected Behavior Beginning Social Communication Middle School: Lesson One.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD / BIRN Coordinating Center NAMIC Group Site PI: Mark H. Ellisman Site Project.
TEAM BUILDING!.  The learner will be able to define team building by the end of this lesson  The learner will be to list a minimum of 6 of the 12 C’s.
Knowledge management knowledge work. Data information and Knowledge Data: set of discrete facts about events Information: data that are processed to be.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
Biomedical Informatics and Health. What is “Biomedical Informatics”?
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
Biomedical Informatics Research Network BIRN as a Shared Infrastructure: An Overview of Policies & Procedures Mark James, Phil Papadopoulos October 9,
How does classroom discussion and questioning affect students’ learning?
© GEO Secretariat Work Plan Management Update GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012.
IEA DSM Programme Task XV: Network-Driven DSM Dr David Crossley Task XV Operating Agent and Managing Director Energy Futures Australia Pty Ltd.
HR and Knowledge Management in Multidisciplinary Team
University of Michigan Media Union
CHAPTER SEVEN THE FOUNDING TEAM.
Ian Bird GDB Meeting CERN 9 September 2003
Steven Newhouse EGI-InSPIRE Project Director, EGI.eu
SYNTHESYS3 Parallel Discussions
Teams and Communication
Designing Curriculum for the Next Generation
Activity one What does Open Data mean to you? (10 mins)
Work Plan Management GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012
Cognitus: A Science Case for HPC in the Nordic Region
Why the Multistakeholder Approach Works
BioMedBridges – Work Packages 2 & 12
What is “Biomedical Informatics”?
MAPPING AFRICA FOR AFRICA INITIATIVE
Project Management Method and PMI ® PMBOK ® Roles
Presentation transcript:

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Biomedical Informatics Research Network’s Governance of their Data Federation Efforts. A case exploring our major themes Judith S. Olson Mary Puetz Airong Luo

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Our Case Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN) – $30M from NIH Three related projects plus an oversight technical group “Learning by doing” Involving 256 Scientists and Support People from 14 institutions in the US – Coordinated development with sharing lessons learned

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Our Case Three related collaboratories involving science that would benefit from sharing data on brain images – Function BIRN – Morphometry BIRN – Mouse BIRN

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Four major findings from this case Scientific and Information Management Technical Social Organizational

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Findings about the Science and Information Management Difficulties in achieving common ground – Have to speak the others’ language when crossing science boundaries Molecular level to morphometry to functional Even maps of the brain differ in terminology Solution: Developing the Rosetta Stone Thesaurus about what regions of the brain might be called – Both a technical and social issue

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Findings about the Science and Information Management Application to settings outside of science – Explicitly seek common ground across disciplines or areas Research and Development Development and Manufacturing Mergers and Acquisitions Lawyers with anybody

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Findings about Technical Issues Difficulties in that distributed sites have different infrastructure Solution: – Standardized “racks” shipped to the locations (“BIRN in a box”) Difficulties in that local databases developed their own format Solution: – Federated as opposed to centralized databases – Resource Manager finds and aggregates relevant data

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Findings about Technical Issues Application to settings outside of science – Help people achieve a common infrastructure “IT in a box” – Federation of databases allows individual databases to grow May be more flexible than centralized resources

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Findings about the Social Issues Difficulties in motivation to share – Credit assignment Solution: – Giving credit and responsibility where they are due Authorship guidelines – Do data contributors get authorship? – No, but the BIRN collective gets credit – You can’t get data out unless your team contributes

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Findings about the Social Issues Difficulties in ownership and sharing – Worry about being “scooped” Solution: – Originator owns for first year – Gives permission to trusted others – Opens to BIRN collective – Opens to public

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Findings about the Social Issues Application to settings outside of science – Create explicit rewards for sharing – Address the issue of ownership Create rollout of ideas to wider audience Allow creator to reap the benefits first this applies to cross industry or supply chain cooperation in particular

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Findings about Organizational Issues Difficulties in knowing what to do – These are massive projects with little precedent Solution: – Share solutions to common problems E.g. Institutional Review Boards – template E.g. Tutorials E.g. Standards (tasks for Functional MRI) – Overall governing body made up of members of each set of contributors

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Findings about Organizational Issues Application to settings outside of science – Be a learning organization – Participate in relative roundtables – Find ways to extend (test?) your learnings to others

SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN How do these relate to settings outside of science? Science and Information Management – Achieving common ground Technical Issues – Help people have the common infrastructure (… in a Box) – Federate instead of centralize Social Issues – Create explicit rewards for contributions – Roll out ownership to prevent scooping – Create balanced Governing Board Organizational Issues – Be a learning organization – Find ways to extend what you are learning to others