The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Advertisements

The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Imperial College London, 14 January 2009.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC University M&O Personnel University with major hardware responsibility at CERN Based on > 10 years of US Zeus experience.
RAL Summer School September, 2004 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis High Level Trigger Studies for the.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern SM Higgs Discovery Channels ATLAS High Level Trigger Trigger & Physics Selection Higgs Channels: Physics Performance.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
CMS High Level Trigger Selection Giuseppe Bagliesi INFN-Pisa On behalf of the CMS collaboration EPS-HEP 2003 Aachen, Germany.
A segmented principal component analysis applied to calorimetry information at ATLAS ACAT May 22-27, Zeuthen, Germany H. P. Lima Jr, J. M. de Seixas.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Francesco Devoto Study on Performance of First Level Muon Trigger of ATLAS experiment at LHC.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 High-level Trigger Algorithm Development Ignacio Aracena for the SLAC ATLAS group.
Trigger (& some DAQ basics) tutorial Alessandro Cerri (CERN), Ricardo Goncalo (Royal Holloway)
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Online Measurement of LHC Beam Parameters with the ATLAS High Level Trigger David W. Miller on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 27 May th Real-Time.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.
IOP HEPP 6-8 April 2009Matthew Tamsett, RHUL 1 Determining the ATLAS electron trigger efficiency in BSM channels from Data Matthew Tamsett, RHUL Supervisor:
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway, 14 January 2009.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
Sez. di Lecce Universita` degli Studi del Salento The Muon Trigger in ATLAS Giovanni Siragusa On behalf of the ATLAS Muon Trigger group.
Copyright © 2000 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Title – 1 Distributed Trigger System for the LHC experiments Krzysztof Korcyl ATLAS experiment laboratory H.
1 John Baines Commissioning of the ATLAS High Level Trigger.
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
Summary and feedback on trigger AODs Introduction Overview of trigger data in the AODs Trigger-aware analyses and feedback Outlook Ricardo Gonçalo (RHUL)
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
The ATLAS Trigger: High-Level Trigger Commissioning and Operation During Early Data Taking Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London On behalf.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Commissioning and Performance of the CMS High Level Trigger Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago for the CMS collaboration.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
ATLAS T RIGGER P ERFORMANCE Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration LHC Days at Split, 4-8 October, 2010.
Status of the ATLAS first-level Central Trigger and the Muon Barrel Trigger and First Results from Cosmic-Ray Data David Berge (CERN-PH) for the ATLAS.
7 October 2004Steve Armstrong ATLAS Overview Week Freiburg1 Online Physics Event Selection: The e /  Slice Steve Armstrong Brookhaven National Laboratory.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
TRIGGERING IN THE ATLAS EXPERIMENT Thomas Schörner-Sadenius UHH Teilchenphysik II 4. November 2005.
Trigger Algorithms and Performance Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway ATLAS Overview Week - CERN 10 October 2007.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
The Level-2 calorimeter status SLAC ATLAS Forum May
Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL BNL Analysis Jamboree – Aug. 6, 2007
Commissioning of the ATLAS High Level Trigger
The CMS High-Level Trigger
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Special edition: Farewell for Valerie Halyo
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
Special edition: Farewell for Stephen Bailey
Special edition: Farewell for Eunil Won
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
Presentation transcript:

The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London

2 ATLAS and the LHC

3 2 proton beams of 7 TeV/proton …roughly as much kinetic energy as the french TGV traveling at 200km/h colliding at 25ns interval… 25ns x c = 7.5m … not much longer than this room!

4

5

6

7

8 LHC physics

9 ATLAS is a general-purpose experiment: Many areas of Particle Physics will be investigated here

10 Challenges faced by the ATLAS trigger Much of ATLAS physics means cross sections at least ~10 6 times smaller than total cross section 25ns bunch crossing interval (40 MHz) Offline storing/processing: ~200 Hz – ~5 events per million crossings! In one second at design luminosity: – bunch crossings –~2000 W events –~500 Z events –~10 top events –~0.1 Higgs events? –200 events written out The right 200 events should be written out!

11 The ATLAS trigger

12 Finally…the trigger Collision Rate 40 MHz Level 1 Special Hardware Trigger Level 2 Processor Farm Level 3 Processor Farm Raw Data Storage ~ 75 kHz ~1 kHz ~200 Hz Offline Data Reconstruction GB/sec 40 TB/sec 1-10 GB/sec ~300 MB/sec Selecting interesting events based on progressively more detector information

13 The ATLAS trigger Three trigger levels: Level 1: –Hardware based (FPGA/ASIC) –Coarse granularity detector data –Calorimeter and muons only –2.5  s latency (buffer size) Level 2: –Software based –Only detector sub-regions (Regions of Interest) processed; seeded by level 1 –Full detector granularity in RoIs –Fast tracking and calorimetry –Average execution time ~40 ms –Output rate ~1 kHz Event Filter (EF): –Seeded by level 2 –Full detector granularity –Potential full event access –Offline algorithms –Average execution time ~1 s –Output rate ~200 Hz High-Level Trigger

14 Level 1

15 LVL1 - Muons & Calorimetry Muon Trigger looking for coincidences in muon trigger chambers 3 out of 4 (low-p T ; >6 GeV) and 3 out of 4 + 1/2 (Barrel) or 2/3 (Endcap) (high-p T ; >20 GeV) Muon Trigger looking for coincidences in muon trigger chambers 3 out of 4 (low-p T ; >6 GeV) and 3 out of 4 + 1/2 (Barrel) or 2/3 (Endcap) (high-p T ; >20 GeV) Calorimetry Trigger looking for e/  isolated hadron, jets Various combinations of cluster sums and isolation criteria  E T em,had, E T miss Calorimetry Trigger looking for e/  isolated hadron, jets Various combinations of cluster sums and isolation criteria  E T em,had, E T miss Toroid e/  trigger

16 High Level Trigger

17 Example: level 2 e/  calorimeter reconstruction Full granularity but short time and only rough calibration Reconstruction steps: 1.LAr sample 2; cluster position and size (E in 3x3 cells/E in 7x7 cells) 2.LAr sample 1; look for second maxima in strip couples (most likely from  0 , etc) 3.Total cluster energy measured in all samplings; include calibration 4.Longitudinal isolation (leakage into hadronic calorimeter) Produce a level 2 EM cluster object (note EDM different from offline) 00 

18 match? HLT Selection EMROI L2 calorim. pass? L2 tracking cluster? E.F.calorim. track? E.F.tracking cluster? E.F. pass? Level 2 seeded by Level 1 Fast reconstruction algorithms Reconstruction within RoI Level1 Region of Interest is found and position in EM calorimeter is passed to Level 2 Ev.Filter seeded by Level 2 Offline reconstruction algorithms Refined alignment and calibration Event rejection possible at each step Electromagnetic clusters

19 Example Menu ObjectExample physics coverage ElectronsHiggs (SM, MSSM), new gauge bosons, extra dimensions, SUSY, W, Z, top PhotonsHiggs (SM, MSSM), extra dimensions, SUSY Muons Higgs (SM, MSSM), new gauge bosons, extra dimensions, SUSY, W, top Rare b-decays (B  X, B  J/  X) Tau+missing E T Extended Higgs models (e.g. MSSM), SUSY Jets SUSY, compositeness, resonances Jet+missing E T SUSY, leptoquarks OthersPrescaled, calibration, monitoring

20

21 Level 1 architecture Level 1 uses calorimeter and muon systems only Muon spectrometer: –Dedicated trigger chambers Thin Gap Chambers – TGC Cathode Strip Chambers – CSC Calorimeter: –Trigger towers group calorimeter cells in coarse granularity:  = 0.1  0.1 (EM/Tau);  = 0.2  0.2 (Jets) Identify regions of interest (RoI) and classify them as MU, EM/Tau, Jet Information passed to level 2: –RoI type –E T threshold passed –Multiplicity –Location The response of the level 1 hardware is emulated in Athena.

22

23 Example: level 2 tracking algorithm 1.Form pairs of hits in Pixel and SCT in thin  slices; extrapolate inwards to find Z vtx from a 1D histogram 2.Using Z vtx, make 2D histogram of hits in  -  plane; remove bins with hits in too few layers 3.Do 2D histogram using space point triplets in 1/p T -  plane; Form tracks from bins with hits in >4 layers 4.Use Kalman technique on the space points obtained in previous steps Start from already estimated parameters: Z vtx, 1/p T, ,  Full granularity but short time Algorithms optimised for execution speed, including data access time Produce level 2 tracks Z X YY X  Z  Z