ISR studies on the Drell-Yan for top-pair production Un-ki Yang, Young-kee Kim University of Chicago Top group meeting, April 22, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb -1 Chris Hays 1, Ashutosh Kotwal 2, Ye Li 3, Oliver Stelzer-Chilton 1 1 Oxford University.
Advertisements

 gg→H for different MCs: uncertainties due to jet veto G. Davatz, ETH Zurich.
IMFP Day 4 April 6, 2006 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Rick Field University of Florida (for.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
ISR/FSR Tomonobu Tomura (University of Tsukuba). 2 Introduction ISR/FSR is becoming one of the dominant sources of systematic uncertainties for in-situ.
Ursula Bassler, LPNHE-Paris, RUN II MC workshop 1 Monte Carlo Tuning: The HERA Experience Monte Carlo Models for DIS events Description of inclusive hadronic.
DØ Higgs II Gordon Watts for the collaboration. 2 Gordon Watts (UW Seattle) WIN’ /07/2003 Outline Channels H  WW * H  H ++ H --  +  +  -
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
22. April 2004, New Phenomena MeetingChristian Autermann - Resonant Slepton Production1 Overview R-parity violating Supersymmetry Cross section and Run.
Top Mass Measurements at CDF Erik Brubaker University of Chicago for the CDF Collaboration Moriond EWK Mar 11-18, 2006.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
EW Corrections for CMS Z and Drell-Yan Measurements Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration Working Group on Electroweak precision.
FNAL Academic Lectures – May, –Tevatron -> LHC Physics 3 –Tevatron -> LHC Physics 3.1 QCD - Jets and Di - jets 3.2 Di - Photons 3.3 b Pair Production.
Squarks & Gluinos + Jets: from ttbar to SUSY at the LHC Peter Skands (Fermilab) with T. Plehn (MPI Munich), D. Rainwater (U Rochester), & T. Sjöstrand.
2012 Tel Aviv, October 15, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run 2 
AcerMC and ISR/FSR systematics at ATLAS Liza Mijovic, Borut Kersevan Jozef Stefan Inst. Univ. of Ljubljana ATLAS approach: Generator level studies Parameters.
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
16/04/2004 DIS2004 WGD1 Jet cross sections in D * photoproduction at ZEUS Takanori Kohno (University of Oxford) on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration XII.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Run 2 Monte-Carlo Workshop April 20, 2001 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The Underlying Event in Hard Scattering Processes  The underlying event in a.
1 W/Z Planning Monte Carlo samples 7 TeV – W, Z, top, QCD, EW (tau+DY).. [ Ping and Wayne State ] Trigger – L1 and HLT. Good runs. Lumi segments.
Fermilab MC Workshop April 30, 2003 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF  Study the “underlying event” as defined by.
Study of Direct Photon Pair Production in Hadronic Collisions at √s=14 TeV (Preliminary Results) Sushil Singh Chauhan Department of Physics & Astrophysics.
Experimental aspects of top quark mass measurement Regina Demina University of Rochester 2008 Winter Conference Aspen, CO 01/15/08.
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Validation for PythiaVPhoton10 Jiahang Zhong (Academia Sinica)
Un-ki Yang, HCP Top Mass at the Tevatron Un-ki Yang University of Manchester University of Chicago HCP 2006 at Duke, May 22-26, 2006 On behalf of.
1 Top Mass Measurements, JES, and Systematic at CDF Un-ki Yang The University of Manchester Workshop on Top Physics, LPSC, Oct 18-20, 2007.
Precision Measurements of W and Z Boson Production at the Tevatron Jonathan Hays Northwestern University On Behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations XIII.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
St. Andrews, Scotland August 22, 2011 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage Rick Field University of Florida Outline  Do we need a.
06/30/05 Mathieu Agelou – LowX’05 1 Sensitivity to PDFs at the Tevatron. Mathieu Agelou CEA – Saclay Low x workshop, Sinaia, Romania.
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
January 10, 2005SUSY meeting1 Status of eμ low-p T trilepton analysis M.Rossi,G.Pauletta,M.Giordani Udine University.
Fermilab Energy Scaling Workshop April 28, 2009 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 1 st Workshop on Energy Scaling in Hadron-Hadron Collisions Rick Field.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
ATLAS Higgs Search Strategy and Sources of Systematic Uncertainty Jae Yu For the ATLAS Collaboration 23 June, 2010.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Drell-Yan Spectrum and PDFs Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida Di-lepton Meeting, LPC, FNAL, October 2, 2008.
Heavy Particles & Hard Jets: from ttbar at the Tevatron to SUSY at the LHC Peter Skands (Fermilab) with T. Plehn (Edinburgh & MPI Munich), D. Rainwater.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, July 5, 2012 Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMSPage 1 ICHEP 2012 Rick Field University of Florida Outline of Talk CMS at the LHC CDF Run.
TeV4LHC - Fermilab October 20, 2005 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 TeV4LHC Workshop Rick Field University of Florida CDF Run 2 Talk #1.
Measuring the t-tbar Cross-Section in the Dilepton Channel at CDF* J. Incandela for C. Mills Jan. 17, 2008 DOE Site Visit UC Santa Barbara * PhD Thesis.
Royal Holloway Department of Physics Top quark pair cross section measurements in ATLAS Michele Faucci Giannelli On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
Data Driven study for Same Sign Dileptons July 31 st 2009, “CMS SUSY Leptonic Meeting” 1 Sanjay Padhi.
The Top Quark at CDF Production & Decay Properties
Report from SUSY working group
Proposals for near-future BG determinations from control regions
Early EWK/top measurements at the LHC
Uncertainties on top quark mass due to modeling
The “Underlying Event” CDF-LHC Comparisons
The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 (CDF)
Higgs Vector Boson Fusion Production and Detection at the Tevatron
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics
The “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
The “Underlying Event” CDF-LHC Comparisons
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event”
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Presentation transcript:

ISR studies on the Drell-Yan for top-pair production Un-ki Yang, Young-kee Kim University of Chicago Top group meeting, April 22, 2004

Document: cdf note 6804 Recent talks: –Status reports in top mass meeting: Mar. 17 (2004), Dec. 10 (2003). –Proposals: Nov. 11 (2003) in the 2 nd top mass workshop, Dec. 4 (2003) in MC workshop. Reviewers: –Joey Huston, Mario Martinez-Perez, Eva Halkiadakis Web site – Plots for preblessing: boxed with red color Reference

Why we care about ISR? Initial State Radiations (ISR) gluon plays important roles in many physics measurements.  W mass: more ISRs, higher Pt of W  Top mass: RunII goal 2-3 GeV for  Mtop, but  M=1.3 GeV for in RunI CDF analysis [PRD 63, (2001)] ISR is identified as W daughter or 2 nd bjet.  LHC is a top factory, ttbar+njet is a major background to many EWK processes (crucial for Top-Yukawa coupling, ttH) ISR

How to control ISR in ttbar system?  In Run I: switch ISR on/off using PYTHIA –Good for understanding size of the effect, but we don’t use what we have learned, and no clear one sigma definition  In Run II: systematic approach –ISR is governed by DGALP eq. Q 2,  QCD, splitting functions, PDFs –Use DY data (no FSR): study Pt of the dilepton, njets in the DY for different Q 2 region (~different DY mass region) ++ -- qq -> tt(85%)

Average Pt of the dilepton for the different DY mass region Pt of the dilepton from Herwig (M=30 vs 90 GeV) Average Pt of the dilepton at generator: Ptcut=50 Average Pt of the dilepton has a logarithmic Q 2 dependence ( DGLAP evolution effect )  Measure the slope, this allows us to estimate the size of ISR at M(DY)=2* M t log(M 2 ) (2Mt) 2

ISR jets in ttbar system  Many soft-ISR jets are easily larger than 8 GeV in top pair production, because of very high incoming parton energy Incoming parton E for top pair production

Datasets SUSY dimuon (4.8.4a): reprocessed with High-pt electron/muon: reprocessed datasets  Very important to have pure DY data sample (normalization is not important)  SUSY dilepton (only dimuon): 67 pb-1 (not full)  High-pt electron: 193 pb-1 for CEM18  High-pt muon: 193pb-1 for CMUP18, 175 for CMX18  Analysis tool: UCntuples ( used in T. Maruyama’s analysis) 2Mt Dimuon Dielectron

Analysis cuts 1 st lepton2 nd lepton Hi-pt muon (M>40) Standard CMUP CMX (Pt>20) Standard CMUP CMX CMP (Pt>10*) For Pt>10 EM<1 HAD<3 Low-pt Muon(M<40) Same as hi-pt muon but Pt>10* Same as hi-pt muon Hi-pt electron (M>76) Standard CEM Standard CEM No trilepoton events del Z for two leptons<4cm with opposite charge MET<25

Effect of the QED FSR Willis tuned-Pt(Z) Run I tune M 2 (dimuon) Pt(dimuon) vs M(dimuon)[65-70] M 2 (Z/g) Many QED FSR photons (mainly collinear)  Need to remove them (we don’t care about normalization)  Prediction for collinear photons in Pythia is not well controlled (effect on kinematic acceptance, ISO variable: under study: but not subject of this talk)

Photon cuts ISO chisq Central FSR Central pio Plug pio Plug FSR EM (Et>5) Cut effect: CEM FSR 90% (313/345) CEM pio 17% (50/284)

MC datasets CDF standard setting for top/ewk groups Pythia 6.2 (RunI tune) Pythia 6.2 (Willis’ Zpt tune) Herwig 6.4 Q 2 min (cut-off for space-like evol.) 1.25 (D=1) parp(62) (D=0) K factor for space- like evol. scale 1 (=D) parp(64) 0.21 Kt_sigma (intrinsic parton pt in proton) 2.50 (D=1) parp(91) Kt_max (Kt cut-off)15 (D=5) parp(93) 15 + Rick’s underlying evts tunning Ffor Pythia  Top/EWK Pythia and Herwig MC samples

Willis tuned-Pt(Z) Run I tune Comparison of the Pt(dimuon) at Z mass [76-106] Log scale

Comparison of the Pt (dimuon) at different mass region

Average Pt (dilepton) as function of the dilepton mass 2 M 2 (dilepton) M<40 GeV: SUSY dilepton M>40 GeV: Hi-pt lepton

Corrections for the average Pt (dilepton) Background corrections –very small due to two tight cuts for cental lepton –Mainly DY(  ) contribution Acceptance corrections –Bin by bin correction using Pythia MC (zewk2m,zewk1e) Backgrounds [ DY(  ) ] * 1.2%5.5%< 0.1% Corr due to backgrounds -0.2% -2.5%< 0.01% Corr. due to acceptance *: Other physics backgrounds, WW, top are small but removed by the MET<25 cut

M 2 (dilepton) Evolution of the as function of the dilepton mass 2

M 2 (dilepton) M 2 dependence on the M 2 dependence on the = ( ) + ( )*log (M 2 )

ISR uncertainty ++ -- Q 2 max: K PARP(67) Qmin : PARP(62) Kt 2 = PARP(64)(1-z)Q 2  QCD = PARP (61) Intrinsic Kt: Gaussian Width: PARP(91) Pythia setting ISR Up(*) ISR Down(*) PARP(61) (D=0.192 GeV) PARP(64) (D=1.0) PARP(67) (D=1.0) PARP(91) (D=2.1) *: to see size of variations (not one sigma) ISR uncertainty is only due to uncertainty in shower processing, –PDF uncertainty is not treated as a part of the ISR uncertainty. –Factorization scale uncertainty is not.

Lambda QCD: 100 vs 384 Kt2 K factor: 4.0 vs 0.25 Q2max K factor: 4.0 vs 0.25 Width: 8.0 vs 0.5 ISR variations

ISR variation due to ISR variation due to Intrinsic Kt Though effect of the intrinsic Kt on is big, not much freedom in Kt, because of the constraint from the data. Gaussian Width in Z mass –Data : –Pythia MC : Width: 8.0 vs 0.5

ISR variation due to ISR variation due to  QCD, K factor Lambda QCD: 100 vs 384 GEN Lambda QCD: 100 vs Kt2 K factor: 4.0 Kt2 K factor: 4.0 vs 0.25 GEN Lambda QCD: 100 vs 384

ISR uncertainty Lambda QCD: 100 vs 384 More ISR :  QCD = 384, K = 0.5 Less ISR :  QCD = 100, K = 2.0 Run I: no ISR: K = infinite ISR uncertainty samples (conservative) Ttbar: more ISR, less Issue: Q2max kfactor : PARP(67)=4 from Rick’s tune A for more ISR, but no effect on the DY. So EWK changed another K factor, PARP(64)=0.2 (almost same effect but not good)

Conclusion and plans  We find that both Pythia tuned version and Herwig describe the ISR activities reasonably well over a wide range of the DY mass region.  Average Pt of the dilepton: shows a good logarithmic dependence on M 2 (dilepton) with the slope of the (useful for LHC too).  With this information, we setup the conservative ISR systematic samples for ttbar (ISR more, less)  In future, plan to study Njet wrt M 2 (dilepton)., include dijet data at high Et to cover ttbar production region to check.