Outcome Based Education (OBE) & Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Advertisements

What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
© JABEE 2013 Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education Washington Accord And International Engineering Alliance Dr Yasuyuki AOSHIMA Executive.
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
TOWARDS EAC ACCREDITATION
B.Eng (Hons) Electronics majoring in Multimedia
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
F aculty o f NGINEERIN G E Outcome Based Education (OBE) system Getting to know the mapping of Programme Outcomes (POs), Programme Educational Objectives.
College Strategic Plan by
TOWARDS EAC ACCREDITATION IN 2009
Outcome-Based Education (OBE) - Towards EAC Accreditation in 2009
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
A Decade of Experience On Outcome Based Accreditation: Still a Long Way To Go A. Erbil PAYZIN Bülent E. PLATIN Chair, MÜDEK Executive Board Member, MÜDEK.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
OBE Briefing.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
Outcome-Based Approach to Engineering Education B.Eng. (Hons) Electronics majoring in Computer Dr. Ian Chai, Program Coordinator Ling Huo Chong, Assistant.
TVET/BCC TOT 2007 Competency Based Education and Training: Implications for Workforce Antonia Coward PhD.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
ABET Assessing Program Outcomes Amir Rezaei. Outline Context of Assessment Process of Assessment Similarities and differences between classroom and program.
Outcome-based Education – From Curriculum to Classroom practices
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Engineering Branding AU Engineer, Engineer of the World. 1.
The “Fundamentals” of Accreditation Quality Assurance in Educational Programs Lyle D. Feisel Chair, IEEE Com. on Global Accreditation Activities Dean Emeritus.
Highlights from Dr. Robin Dasher-Alston To Periodic Review Report Committee November 24, 2003.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
Technische Universität Berlin 1 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jörg Steinbach Vice-president of the Technische Universität Berlin Past-President of SEFI Accreditation.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
Haphe.eurashe.eu 1 Presenter NameEvent Name HAPHE Survey Results First results – EU Level versus Belgium HEI All Perspectives Prepared by Prof.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
Mutual Recognition of Engineering Educational Programs in the Washington Accord Andrew M. Wo Deputy CEO, Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan (IEET)
Organizational Process The activities conducted by an educational institution or school is called organizational process Which consist of series of steps.
BY: SHAIFALI RACHNA PURI. ACADEMIC RECORD (Marks in qualifying degrees) ACADEMIC RECORD (Marks in Higher Degrees ) ACADEMIC RECORD (Marks in entrance.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
Outcome Based Education (OBE) & Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
CURRICULUM DESIGN Part 2 of 2 PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES PROGRAM OUTCOMES COURSE OUTCOMES.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
College of Computer Science OBE Implementation on Curriculum Revisions
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Assessment and Accreditation
Mechanical Engineering
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION (OBE) Engineering Programmes Accreditation
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION – AN INTRODUCTION
Presentation transcript:

Outcome Based Education (OBE) & Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)

Overview Issues in Higher Education, Teaching & Learning Why Outcome-based Education? What is Washington Accord? Outcome-based Education Implementation of OBE Characteristics of OBE Curricular Operation Models of OBE Programme Objectives Programme Outcomes Learning Outcomes Assessment Issues and Tools Continual Quality Improvement

Issues In Higher Education Accountability towards students – fulfilling requirements of the curriculum Satisfying needs of industry – unemployed graduates Maintaining academic standards – unaccredited programmes Accountable to grant providing organizations – stakeholders Accreditation – outcome based education

Issues In Teaching And Learning Student intake – qualification, quantity Staff – Qualification, competency Teaching process – transparent, control Assessment - outcomes Courses – up to date, relevant Facilities – sufficient, up to date,

Why Outcome-based Education? To fulfill the requirements of EAC*, BEM*, Washington Accord BEM registers graduates and professional engineers Programmes attain standard comparable to global practice, hence accreditation required EAC is the body delegated by BEM requires elements of outcomes in engineering curriculum to ensure CQI culture in the spirit of OBE. It is a natural way of what higher level education should be based on *EAC – Engineering Accreditation Council *BEM – Board of Engineers Malaysia

Accreditation Objective …graduates of accredited programme satisfy minimum requirement for registration with BEM / IEM …ensures CQI is being practiced

What’s Washington Accord? an international accreditation agreement for professional engineering academic degrees, established in 1989, the signatories as of 2007 are Australia, Canada, the Republic of Ireland, Hong Kong, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, the United Kingdom and the United States. recognizes that there is substantial equivalency of programs accredited by those signatories. graduates of accredited programs in any of the signatory countries are recognized by the other signatory countries as having met the academic requirements for entry to the practice of engineering.

What’s Washington Accord? (cont…) The following countries have provisional signatory status and may become member signatories in the future: Germany India Malaysia Russia Sri Lanka

OBE addresses the following key questions: What do you want the students to have or able to do? How can you best help students achieve it? How will you know what they have achieved it? How do you close the loop

OBE addresses the following key questions: (cont...) Who are our stakeholders? What services do we provide? Do constituencies understand our objectives? What services, facilities and policies must be present? How do we measure our results? How do we use these results for CQI? Are we achieving our objectives and improving? Are our constituencies satisfied?

Outcome-based Education Focuses on student learning by: Using learning outcome statements to make explicit what the student is expected to be able to know, understand or do; Providing learning activities which will help the student to reach these outcomes; Assessing the extent to which the student meets these outcomes through the use of explicit assessment criteria.

Outcome-based Education Constituents requirements (Develop objectives) Curriculum, Staff & Facilities Teaching & Learning Graduates with Outcomes Constituents satisfaction (Achieving objectives) Continual Quality Improvement

Implementation of OBE Program Effective Program Educational Objectives. Effective Program Outcomes. Practical Assessment Tools. Effective Assessment Planning. Robust Evaluation Planning. CQI procedures in place

Characteristics of OBE curricula It has program objectives, program outcomes, course outcomes and performance indicators. It is objective and outcome driven, where every stated objective and outcomes can be assessed and evaluated. It is centered around the needs of the students and the stakeholders.

Characteristics of OBE curricula (cont…) Every learning outcome is intentional and therefore the outcomes must be assessed using suitable performance indicators. Program objectives address the graduates attainment within 3-5 years after their graduation. Program outcomes, which consist of abilities to be attained by students before they graduate, are formulated based on the program objectives.

Characteristics of OBE curricula (cont…) Program outcomes address Knowledge (K), Skills (S) and Attitudes (A) to be attained by students. Teaching / Learning method may have to be integrated to include different delivery methods to complement the traditional Lecturing method.

Operation Models for OBE Distribution of K, S, A elements throughout the 4 years Yr. 4 S&A 30% S&A 30% Yr. 3 K 70% K 70% K 70% K 70% Yr. 2 S&A 30% Yr. 1 S&A 30% A B C D A B C D

Mision and Vision Multimedia University Vision Mission To be a premier university that propagates the generation and dissemination of knowledge in cutting edge technologies Mission To deliver quality academic programmes based on state-of- the-art R&D. To attract and nurture quality minds who will contribute towards the global knowledge economy. To inculcate a strong research culture within a dynamic, efficient and effective team of academic and support staff. To be financially self-sustaining via education and the commercialisation of R&D products and services.

Mision and Vision (cont…) Faculty of Engineering & Technology Vision To be a competitive engineering faculty that innovates learning and research as well as supports the production of versatile graduates in facing the challenges of globalisation. Mission To produce competent engineers who will drive and support the K-economy of the country To function as a leading faculty for R&D activities To serve as a catalyst for ideas/resources of ICT

Programme Objectives What the programme is in preparing graduates for their career and professional accomplishments (published) Consistent with institution missions (evidence) Involvement of constituents / stakeholders (evidence)

Programme Outcomes Expected to know and able to perform or attain by the time of graduation (skills, knowledge and behaviour/attitude) Outcomes (a) to (k)

Programme Outcomes a) Ability to acquire and apply fundamental principles of science and engineering. b) Capability to communicate effectively. c) Acquisition of technical competence in specialised areas of engineering discipline d) Ability to identify, formulate and model problems and find engineering solutions based on a system approach. e) Ability to conduct research in chosen fields of engineering. f) Understanding of the importance of sustainability and cost-effectiveness in design and development of engineering solutions. g) Understanding and commitment to professional and ethical responsibilities.

Program Outcomes (cont…) h) Ability to work effectively as an individual, and as a member/leader in a team. i) Ability to be a multi-skilled engineer with good technical knowledge, management, leadership and entrepreneurial skills. j) Awareness of the social, cultural, global and environmental responsibilities as an engineer. k) Capability and enthusiasm for self-improvement through continuous professional development and life-long learning.

Learning Outcomes Outcomes that are expected from a certain subject and these are assessed and evaluated through various measurement tools.

Requirements from the students Active role – must come prepared for each class; contribute by teaching others, actively participating, taking risks, learning from instructor/classmates Ethics – respect, trust and openness Committed to learning – continual improvement

Assessment Tools P: Program C: Course Exit surveys, Exit interviews (P) Alumni surveys and interviews (P) Employer surveys and interviews (P) Job offers, starting salaries (relative to national benchmark) (P) Admission to graduate schools (P) Performance in group and internship assignments (P,C) Assignments, report and tests (P,C) P: Program C: Course

Assessment Tools (cont…) Student surveys, individual and focus group interviews (P,C) Peer-evaluations, self evaluations (P,C) Student portfolios (P,C) Behavioral observation (P,C) Written tests linked to learning objectives (C) Written project reports (C) Oral presentation, live or videotape (C) Research proposals, student-formulated problems (C) Classrooms assessment techniques (C) P: Program C: Course

Continual Quality Improvement Assessment and evaluation processes provide critical information to faculty (lecturers) and administrators on the effectiveness of the design, delivery, and direction of an educational program - CQI Improvements based on feedback from evaluations will close the system loop and the process will continue year after year.