CMB polarisation results from QUIET

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMB Constraints on Cosmology Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Advertisements

Lecture 2 Temperature anisotropies cont: what we can learn CMB polarisation: what it is and what we can learn.
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT Osamu Tajima (KEK) QUIET collaboration 1.
First results from QUIET Osamu Tajima (KEK) The QUIET Collaboration 1.
Latest Results from WMAP: Three-year Observations Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) Texas Symposium in Melbourne December 15, 2006.
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
Calibration System with Cryogenically-Cooled Loads for QUIET-II Detector M. Hasegawa, O. Tajima, Y. Chinone, M. Hazumi, K. Ishidoshiro, M. Nagai High Energy.
Cleaned Three-Year WMAP CMB Map: Magnitude of the Quadrupole and Alignment of Large Scale Modes Chan-Gyung Park, Changbom Park (KIAS), J. Richard Gott.
Systematic effects in cosmic microwave background polarization and power spectrum estimation SKA 2010 Postgraduate Bursary Conference, Stellenbosch Institute.
Cosmic Microwave Background & Primordial Gravitational Waves Jun-Qing Xia Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, IHEP Planck Member CHEP, PKU, April.
Photo: Keith Vanderlinde Detection of tensor B-mode polarization : Why would we need any more data?
QUaD: A CMB Polarization Experiment … First Year Results, arXiv: v1 Robert B. Friedman The University of Chicago GLCW
K. Ganga – CMB Science and Observations 1 Rencontres du Vietnam /08 The QuaD CMB Polarization Experiment K. Ganga APC.
Suzanne Staggs (Princeton) Rencontres de Blois, 1 June 2011 The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT): Still More Cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background.
Distinguishing Primordial B Modes from Lensing Section 5: F. Finelli, A. Lewis, M. Bucher, A. Balbi, V. Aquaviva, J. Diego, F. Stivoli Abstract:” If the.
Component Separation of Polarized Data Application to PLANCK Jonathan Aumont J-F. Macías-Pérez, M. Tristram, D. Santos
1 ACT  Atacama Cosmology Telescope  Funded by NSF  Will measure CMB fluctuations on small angular scales  Probe the primordial power spectrum and the.
N. Ponthieu Polarization workshop, IAS, Orsay, 09/15/ N. Ponthieu (IAS) The conquest of sky polarization The upper limits era First detections Prospects.
Gary Hinshaw NASA/GSFC From Quantum to Cosmos, Airlie Center VA, July year Results from WMAP with a Glimpse Ahead.
1 On the road to discovery of relic gravitational waves: From cosmic microwave background radiation Wen Zhao Department of Astronomy University of Science.
Thoughts on Ground-based lensing measurements Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford/SLAC KIPAC.
July 13, 2007 Robert Ward, Caltech LIGO-G Z 1 Robert Ward for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Amaldi 7 Sydney, Australia July 2007 A Radiometer.
Simulating the Interferometer In order to simulate the performance of an interferometer, 20 by 20 degree sections were extracted from the simulated CMB.
The CMB and Gravity Waves John Ruhl Case Western Reserve University 3/17/2006, CERCA at St. Thomas.
The CMB and Neutrinos. We can all measure the CMB T CMB = \ K CMB approx 1% of TV noise! 400 photons/cc at 0.28 eV/cc.
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
The Implication of BICEP2 : Alternative Interpretations on its results Seokcheon Lee SNU Seminar Apr. 10 th
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Bill Reach 2009 May 14 Greater IPAC Technology Symposium.
Search for B-modes in CMB Polarization  QUIET and other experiments Osamu Tajima (KEK) The QUIET Collaboration Ultimate High Energy Physics QUIET collaboration.
Constraints on the neutrino mass by future precise CMB polarization and 21cm line observations Yoshihiko Oyama The Graduate University for Advanced Studies.
Probing fundamental physics with CMB B-modes Cora Dvorkin IAS Harvard (Hubble fellow) Status and Future of Inflationary Theory workshop August 2014, KICP.
Wei-Tou Ni Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University [1] W.-T. Ni, (MPLA 25 [2010]
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT. QUIET Project Miami Physics Conference 2009 December 16 Raul Monsalve for the QUIET Collaboration University of Miami QUIET.
The CMB TE Cross Correlation and Primordial Gravitational Waves Nathan Miller CASS Journal Club 11/6/07.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Joint analysis of Archeops and WMAP observations of the CMB G. Patanchon (University of British Columbia) for the Archeops collaboration.
Determination of tensor spectral index in the CMB Wen IHEP
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
B Polarization Measurement of the CMB
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting CMB Polarization Measurements Sarah Church John Fox, Chao-Lin Kuo, Sami Tantawi, Dan Van Winkle KIPAC/Stanford Physics/SLAC.
QUIET Experiment Rencontres de Moriond 2010 March 14 th, 2010 Akito KUSAKA (for QUIET collaboration) University of Chicago, EFI and KICP.
Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford Physics/SLAC
Experimental Cosmology Group Oxford Astrophysics Overview CLOVER is a UK-led experiment to detect the B-mode polarisation of the Cosmic Microwave Background.
The Planck Satellite Hannu Kurki-Suonio University of Helsinki Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Cosmology, Helsinki
Testing the slow roll inflation paradigm with the Big Bang Observer
Adventures in Parameter Estimation Jason Dick University of California, Davis.
3rd International Workshop on Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry NTHU & NTU, Dec 27—31, 2012 Likelihood of the Matter Power Spectrum.
Planck Report on the status of the mission Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA.
Blind Component Separation for Polarized Obseravations of the CMB Jonathan Aumont, Juan-Francisco Macias-Perez Rencontres de Moriond 2006 La.
On the detection of the tensor-to-scalar ratio r using the CMB B-modes
WMAP Cosmology Courtesy of NASA/WMAP Science Team map.gsfc.nasa.gov.
1 Injecting W-band power (from Gunn oscillator) into QUIET receiver module KEK and Fermilab Collaborating at Lab 3 Status of QUIET-II at Fermilab Fritz.
Basics of the Cosmic Microwave Background Eiichiro Komatsu (UT Austin) Lecture at Max Planck Institute August 14, 2007.
CMB, lensing, and non-Gaussianities
150GHz 100GHz 220GHz Galactic Latitude (Deg) A Millimeter Wave Galactic Plane Survey with the BICEP Polarimeter Evan Bierman (U.C. San Diego) and C. Darren.
Investigating dark energy with CMB lensing Viviana Acquaviva, SISSA, Trieste Lensing collaborators in SISSA: C. Baccigalupi, S. Leach, F. Perrotta, F.
BICEP2 Results & Its Implication on inflation models and Cosmology Seokcheon Lee 48 th Workshop on Gravitation & NR May. 16 th
Detecting the CMB Polarization Ziang Yan. How do we know about the universe by studying CMB?
PLANCK TEAM of the DISCOVERY Center. The most mysterious problems.
CMB physics Zong-Kuan Guo 《现代宇宙学》
Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization
Towards the first detection using SPT polarisation
Observational Cosmology Lab University of Wisconsin-Madison
12th Marcel Grossman Meeting,
A Measurement of CMB Polarization with QUaD
Separating E and B types of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky Wen Zhao Based on: WZ and D.Baskaran, Phys.Rev.D (2010) 2019/9/3.
Presentation transcript:

CMB polarisation results from QUIET Ingunn Kathrine Wehus 23rd Rencontres de Blois, 1/6 -11

CMB polarisation We can measure the polarisation of the CMB the same way as for light The Stokes parameters quantify the polarization properties of a light ray I = no filter at all Q = linear polarizer at 0 and 90° U = linear polarizer at -45 and 45 ° V = circular polarizer I is just the temperature Q and U combine to form E- and B-modes No known physical process can generate V-polarised CMB radiation

B-modes and inflation Stokes Q and U can be combined to E-modes and B-modes Density fluctuations at last scattering produce E-modes Gravitational lensing turns E-modes into B-modes at small scales Primordial gravitational waves produce B-modes Inflation predicts primordial gravitational waves B-modes never measured The tensor-to-scalar ratio r parametrizes how much B-modes there are compared to E-modes r gives the energy scale of inflation

QUIET (Q/U Imaging ExperimenT) QUIET is a groundbased experiment for measuring CMB polarisation Constrains B-modes Teaches us about inflation Only B-mode radiometer experiment Different, and possibly better, systematics Unique radiometer on a chip technology Input to case studies for the next generation satellite Phase I (Pilot) 19 Q-band detectors (43 GHz) Aug 08 - May 09 91 W-band detectors (95 GHz) Jun 09 – Dec 10 Phase II (If funded) ~500 detectors in 3 bands (32, 44 and 90 GHz) Measure the E- and B-mode spectra between l = 25 and 2500 detection of lensing at more than 20σ constraining the tensor-to-scalar ratio r down to 0.01

QUIET collaboration

5 countries, 13 institutes, ~30 people QUIET collaboration Manchester Oxford Chicago (KICP) Fermilab Oslo MPIfR-Bonn Stanford (KIPAC) KEK Caltech JPL Columbia Princeton Observational Site Atacama, Chile Miami 5 countries, 13 institutes, ~30 people

The site Located at 5080 m above sea level at the Chajnantor platau in the Atacama desert in Chile One of the driest places on earth.. South pole has 40% lower PWV, but lower temperature results in comparable transmission More of the sky is available than on south pole, and the same patch of sky can be observed from different angles. Good for systematics control Accessible year round, day and night ..but still varying weather Control room Local inhabitants

QUIET Patches

Q-band observing hours Patch 2a 905 Patch 4a 703 Patch 6a 837 Patch 7b 223 All CMB 2668 Patch Gb 311 In total 3458 observation hours (77% cmb, 12% galaxy, 7% calib, 4% cut) Patch Gc 92

Two independent pipelines Pseudo-Cl (PCl) pipeline Computationally less heavy; massive null-testing Easy to simulate systematic errors Maximum-likelihood (ML) pipeline Produces optimally filtered map Power spectrum calculated from exact likelihood Needs the full covariance matrix from the previous step Gives smaller and more accurate error bars

Temperature maps – galactic center QUIET vs WMAP

CMB temperature observations

QUIET vs WMAP – galactic center Stokes Q Stokes U

QUIET vs WMAP – galactic plane Stokes Q Stokes U

QUIET vs WMAP – CMB patch Stokes Q Stokes U

Decomposition into E and B modes

The EE power spectrum

The BB power spectrum

Tensor-to-scalar ratio r ML: r = 0.52+0.97−0.81. PCL: r=0.35+1.06-0.87 (r < 2.2 at 95% confidence) (BICEP: r < 0.72 at 95% confidence)

Future prospects More Q-band papers to follow: Foregrounds, point sources, instrumentation, data analysis W-band analysis now started Optimized pipelines to handle more data Null-testing ongoing

W-band galactic center Stokes Q Stokes U

Future prospects More Q-band papers to follow: Foregrounds, point sources, instrumentation, data analysis W-band analysis now started Optimized pipelines to handle more data Null-testing ongoing Future phase II plans Improved detectors under development at JPL

Phase II power spectra forecasts Current Performance (noise, duty cycle, 1/f) Likely Improvements 0.018r 0.005 10 lensing 35 Courtesy K. Smith

Summary CMB polarisation is a future main source of cosmological data Detecting primordial gravitational waves will teach us about inflation QUIET is among the most sensitive CMB B-mode experiments in the world: Unique radiometer technology Q-band receiver is world leading in published array sensitivity at 69 uK sqrt(s) Excellent location Q-band results show that everything is working Power spectra consistent with LCDM Current constraint on tensor-to-scalar ratio is r = 0.35 ± 1.0 W-band results will be world leading when presented later this year Phase II may possibly detect gravitational waves. Will constrain r below 0.01

First Q-band results: arXiv:1012.3191 See http://quiet.uchicago.edu/ for more information QUIET