Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 1 Assessment driven planning: The development of a strategic plan to address risky drinking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute Technical Assistance to North Carolinas Health & Wellness Trust Funds TUPC.
Advertisements


The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.
1 Our priorities for the next three years Close Critical Service Gaps Increase availability of culturally appropriate services and serve more children.
CONNECTICUT SUICIDE PREVENTION STRATEGY 2013 PLANNING NINA ROVINELLI HELLER PH.D. UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT.
Neighbor to Neighbor Lessons learned from a community- based HIV testing partnership: The HIV Minority Community Health Partnership Presented at American.
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
Community Resources Assessment Training 1-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 1-3.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Northeast Regional Expert Team Education Development Center, Inc. 55 Chapel Street Newton, MA EDC-CAPT CSAP’s Center for the Application.
Welcome back!. Learning Objectives Understand various perspectives as they relate to cultural competence. Explore the various capacities needed for SPF.
Strengthening College Alcohol Abuse Prevention Efforts in Arizona Through a Statewide Tri- University Consortium.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
YOUR GUIDE TO PUTNAM PRIDE: Getting to Know Your Local Drug Free Communities Coalition.
Cancer Education and Cultural Awareness Project (CECAP)
1 Ben George – Poet, Al Zantua & David Little Raven – Drummers.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
California Senior Fall Prevention Coalitions Terri Restelli-Deits, MSW Area Agency on Aging Serving Napa and Solano CA Fall Prevention Summit / December.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Why Summer Learning Matters - to Boston and the Nation Summer Learning: Bridging the Opportunity and Achievement Gap April 3, 2013 Will Miller President,
Steve Delaronde, MSW, MPH University of Connecticut Health Center The Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth July 16, 1999 Identifying Community Resources.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
A Tool to Monitor Local Level SPF SIG Activities
Systems Change 3 Integrated Jobs Strategy Policy Funding Outcome Data Capacity Development Innovation Leadership Values Collaboration Hall et al (2007)
Outcomes of Public Health
BC Injury Prevention Strategy Working Paper for Discussion.
Participatory Evaluation Mary Phillips, BME Former Circles of Care Program Coordinator, Oakland and an Evaluator, Los Angeles, CA.
NEW MEMBER ORIENTATION. Vision: A caring community united for a safer Carolina Mission: To create a campus-community environment that promotes healthy.
Implementation Opening Activity Implementation Considerations Implementation Activity.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
Arizona Institutions of Higher Education (AZIHE) Network Statewide Online AOD Survey Melissa McGee, Ph.D., MPH University of Arizona AZIHE Network, Chairperson.
1 Public Health Accreditation & Quality Improvement AmeriCorps VISTA Orientation September 15, 2014.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Capacity Training New Mexico Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant January 25, 2006 Michelle Fry & Paula Feathers Southwest Center for Applied.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
Strategic Prevention Framework Overview Paula Feathers, MA.
Colorado Prevention Partners SPF-SIG Overview Colorado Prevention Partners.
Asthma Disparities – A Focused Examination of Race and Ethnicity on the Health of Massachusetts Residents Jean Zotter, JD Director, Asthma Prevention and.
California Statewide Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Projects Overview May 20, 2010.
Overview June,  Sub-recipients grant applications will go to ADAMHS/ADAS Boards only.  ADAMHS/ADAS Boards will be expected to identify a primary.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Potential Alcohol Strategies March 20, 2008 Sheila Nesbitt.
Community Health Assessment: Primary Data Collection LHD TA Project – Learning Collaborative 1 Community Health Assessment Second Learning Session Sheena.
Warm-up Question 1 What is your favorite winter activity? If you could travel anywhere this coming weekend, where would you go?
Needs Assessment Presented By Ernest D. Pérez Capacity Building Assistance Trainer BORDER HEALTH FOUNDATION Tucson, Arizona CAPACITY BUILDING ASSISTANCE.
SAMHSA’s Strategic Prevention Framework. Community Prevention Systems Bring the power of individual citizens and institutions together Bring the power.
Step 2. Selecting Strategies that Fit Effective Identify evidence-based strategies that have been shown through research and scientific studies to be.
March 31, 2011 Long-Term Individual & Community Consequences (not an accountability measure) Consumption (Long-term outcomes) Strategies (State required)
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs State Incentive Grant Project Overview Michael Cunningham Deputy Director, Program Services.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Using the Evaluation System to Answer Key Questions About Your Initiative.
Choosing Evidence-Based Approaches (Programs, Policies, Practices) A Comprehensive Framework.
Child Health and School Readiness: The Significance of Health Literacy Laurie Martin, ScD, MPH Human Capital Research Collaborative Conference October.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Maine Learning Community: Day 2 Selecting Strategies and Implementation March 26, 2007 Maine Office of Substance Abuse (OSA) Northeast Center for Application.
The Tobacco Technical Assistance Consortium What is TTAC? What Does It Do?
1 Strategic Prevention Framework Overview Paula Feathers, MA Presented by Marcus Bouligny.
NIKOLE LOBB DOUGHERTY, MA JESSI LAROSE, MPH OCTOBER 2011 H&AC Promising Strategies: Evaluation & Technical Assistance.
Key Leader Orientation 3- Key Leader Orientation 3-1.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
Community Resources Assessment Training 2- Community Resources Assessment Training 2-1 Community Resources Assessment Training 2-1.
The AUC TVET Strategy for Youth Employme nt Windhoek, April 2014 Prudence Ngwenya Department for Human Resources Science & Technology.
Strategic Prevention Framework - Assessment Program Title Here date.
STRATEGIC PLANNING January 12-13, Where are we in the planning process? Needs assessment data collection and prioritization - Consequence - Consumption.
Building Organizational Capacity to Create Community Change
National Prevention Network Conference
The Alliance for Wisconsin Youth: The Role of Prevention Coalitions in Addressing Substance Use Disorders Elysse Chay, Prevention Manager Public Policy.
Presentation transcript:

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 1 Assessment driven planning: The development of a strategic plan to address risky drinking behaviors (underage and binge drinking) in year olds Caren Bacon, MPH Shannon Daily Stokes, MPA David Valentine, PhD. American Public Health Association’s 135 th Annual Meeting

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 2 Background Development of the partnership between the Youth Community Coalition (YC 2 ) and the Institute of Public Policy (IPP) Strategic Prevention Framework-State Incentive Grant

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 3 Assessment Divided into three separate phases –Data assessment: What are the issues regarding risky drinking in our community? –Resource assessment: What resources are available to the Coalition to address these issues within our community? –Readiness assessment: How ready is the community to address the issues of risky drinking behaviors?

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 4 Data Assessment Conducted to develop an understanding of where the problems, as identified by the data, existed within our geographic area concerning risky drinking behaviors among year olds Used “Getting to Outcomes” by the RAND Corporation

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 5 Data Assessment “Getting to Outcomes” - incorporates community planning, implementation, and an evaluation model into one manual. It takes the three processes of planning, implementation and evaluation and converts them into what they define as 10 accountability questions that walk individuals through the processes of planning, implementing, and evaluating a program. Chinman, M., Imm, P., Wandersman, A. (2004) Getting To Outcomes 2004 Promoting Accountability Through Methods and Tools for Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation (TR-101-CDC). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 6 Data Assessment “Getting to Outcomes” Wiseman, S., et al. Getting to Outcomes 10 steps for Achieving Results-Based Accountability. Retrieved October 24, 2007 from

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 7 Data Assessment Divided into two phases: 1) Secondary data collection 2) Focus groups

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 8 Data Assessment 1) Secondary data collection –Collected through the internet or by contacting individuals through phone or (examples of data collected: Missouri Student Survey results, CORE data and results, # of liquor licenses, etc)

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 9 Data Assessment 2) Focus groups –Asked questions related to the risk and protective factors associated with the risky drinking behaviors –A total of nine focus groups were attempted with seven completed (12-15 year olds, year olds, parents of year olds, year old college students and year old non college students )

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 10 Data Assessment Selecting intervening variables –Based upon both the information presented by the data and information presented by the knowledge of Coalition members who are working on these issues or with the target population

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 11 Resource Assessment Conducted to assess the community resources available to address risky drinking behaviors Used “Getting to Outcomes” by the RAND Corporation

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 12 Resource Assessment Divided into two steps: –Resource readily available to coalition YC2 members –Potential sources for resource needs Broader community search

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 13 Readiness Assessment Conducted to identify how ready the community was to address risky drinking behaviors Used “Community Readiness Model” by the Tri-Ethnic Center for Prevention Research at Colorado State University

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 14 Readiness Assessment According to the Community Readiness Model Handbook: ”The Community Readiness Model is a model for community change that integrates a community’s culture, resources, and level of readiness to more effectively address an issue” Insert citation for the CRM handbook

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 15 Readiness Assessment Identification of key informants –Requested a list of potential interviewees or sectors Key informants –Selected a list of individuals who represented a variety of key sectors relevant to the issues within our geographic area (examples business, legal/law enforcement, education, etc) Interviews –Conducted six interviews in person –Scored according to the model using a research specialist and a graduate research assistant

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 16 Strategic Plan Development of strategic plan –Outline provided by funding agency –Collaborative effort by both the coalition coordinator and the evaluator

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 17 Next Steps Implementing the evidence based program and the environmental strategy Developing an evaluation plan for both the evidence based program and the environmental strategy

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 18 Conclusion Built capacity of coalition and evaluation team Participatory evaluation Dual efforts of coalition and evaluation team

Institute of Public Policy University of Missouri-Columbia 19 Contact Information Caren Bacon Institute of Public Policy Harry S Truman School of Public Affairs University of Missouri-Columbia