1 Alternative Sampling Configurations – new study 20 GeV photons 30 x 5/7 X 0 20 x 5/7 X 0 + 10 x 10/7 X 0 Total absobed energy Dep energy in Si Leakage.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.
Advertisements

Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.
Bill Atwood, Dec GLAST 1 GLAST Energy or Humpty-Dumpty’s Revenge A Statement of the Problem Divide and Conquer strategy Easiest: Leakage (Depth)
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
April 19th, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic showers in the SiW ECAL (with 2008 FNAL data) Philippe Doublet.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
N-1 Plots. 2 N-1 Plots – Lead Photon Mass Cut at 100 GeV applied Lead Photon – More plots in Backup.
P. Gay Energy flow session1 Analytic Energy Flow F. Chandez P. Gay S. Monteil CALICE Coll.
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
1 Calice LCUK Bristol 24/03/09 David Ward WP1 : Test Beam.
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
Design Considerations for a Si/W EM Cal. at a Linear Collider M. Breidenbach, D. Freytag, G. Haller, M. Huffer, J.J Russell Stanford Linear Accelerator.
 Performance Goals -> Motivation  Analog/Digital Comparisons  E-flow Algorithm Development  Readout R&D  Summary Optimization of the Hadron Calorimeter.
About N em cut: 20 GeV neutron N(em)=0 N(em)
NIU Workshop R. Frey1 Reconstruction Issues for Silicon/Tungsten ECal R. Frey U. Oregon NIU Workshop, Nov 8, 2002.
17 May 2007LCWS analysis1 LCWS physics analysis work Paul Dauncey.
Simulation of the DHCAL Prototype Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory American Linear Collider Workshop: Ithaca, NY, July , 2003 Fe absorber Glass.
ICLC Paris R. Frey1 Silicon/Tungsten ECal for SiD – Status and Progress Ray Frey University of Oregon ICLC Paris, April 22, 2004 Overview (brief) Current.
Longitudinal shower profile of the DESY and CERN testbeam data in the electromagnetic calorimeter Valeria Bartsch (UCL) & Nigel Watson (Birmingham)
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, Brian Musgrave, Norman Graf, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
More on Testbeam Analysis FLZ. Stability Checks for TCMT Pedestal stability already shown by Kurt MIP calibration stability Response stability.
SiD Cal R. Frey1 Some EGS Studies… Compare with Geant4  Questions of range/cutoff parameters EM Resolution understood? Moliere radius – readout gap relation.
Evaluation of G4 Releases in CMS (Sub-detector Studies) Software used Electrons in Tracker Photons in the Electromagnetic Calorimeter Pions in the Calorimeter.
David Attié Club ‘ILC Physics Case’ CEA Saclay June 23, 2013 ILD & SiD concepts and R&D.
7/6/2011ECAL Studies1/7 ECAL Studies Jacopo Nardulli.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
Development of Particle Flow Calorimetry José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DPF meeting, Providence, RI August 8 – 13, 2011.
Beam test results of Tile/fiber EM calorimeter and Simulator construction status 2005/03/05 Detector Niigata University ONO Hiroaki contents.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
Tungsten as HCal-material for a LC at multi-TeV energies CALICE AHCAL Meeting, DESY 17 July 2009 Christian Grefe for the Linear Collider Detector Group.
Silicon-Tungsten EM Calorimeter R&D
26 Apr 2009Paul Dauncey1 Digital ECAL: Lecture 1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Update on Mistag in 5GeV Single γ Events Elizabeth Brost, Jim Brau, and Chaowaroj Wanotayaroj SiD PFA Meeting 8/18/
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
Feasibility Study of Forward Calorimeter in ALICE experiment Sanjib Muhuri Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre Kolkata.
Taikan Suehara, Belgrade, 7 Oct page 1 Hybrid ECAL: optimization and related developments Taikan Suehara H. Hirai, H. Sumida, Y. Sudo, T.
PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.
Marcel Stanitzki 1 More results... SiD PFA Meeting M. Stanitzki.
R Frey LCWS071 A Silicon-Tungsten ECal with Integrated Electronics for the ILC -- status Currently optimized for the SiD concept Baseline configuration:
Particle Flow Review Particle Flow for the ILC (Jet) Energy Resolution Goal PFA Confusion Contribution Detector Optimization with PFAs Future Developments.
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
Individual Particle Reconstruction The PFA Approach to Detector Development for the ILC Steve Magill (ANL) Norman Graf, Ron Cassell (SLAC)
Longitudinal shower profile - CERN electron runs Valeria Bartsch University College London.
Silicon/Tungsten ECal for the SD Detector – Status and Progress R. Frey U. Oregon UT Arlington, Jan 10, 2003.
Imaging Hadron Calorimeters for Future Lepton Colliders José Repond Argonne National Laboratory 13 th Vienna Conference on Instrumentation Vienna University.
Status of SiD/Iowa PFA by Usha Mallik The University of Iowa for Ron Cassell, Mat Charles, TJ Kim, Christoph Pahl 1 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas,
Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,
DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.
ECAL Interaction layer PFA Template Track/CalCluster Association Track extrapolation Mip finding Shower interaction point Shower cluster pointing Shower.
Performance of the PHENIX NCC Prototype Michael Merkin Skobeltyn Institute of Nuclear Physics Moscow State University.
Taikan Suehara, Belgrade, 7 Oct page 1 Hybrid ECAL: optimization and related developments Taikan Suehara H. Hirai, H. Sumida, Y. Sudo, T.
Physics performance of a DHCAL with various absorber materials Jan BLAHA CALICE Meeting, 16 – 18 Sep. 2009, Lyon, France.
CALICE scintillator HCAL
A SiW EM Calorimeter for the Silicon Detector
State-of-the-art in Hadronic Calorimetry for the Lepton Collider
Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL
Study of energy shower profile and 1m3 energy resolution Jan Blaha Laboratoire d'Annecy-le-Vieux de Physique des Particules MicroMegas Physics.
Tail-Catcher/Muon Tracker Prototype
A Silicon-Tungsten ECal for the SiD Concept
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Argonne National Laboratory
longitudinal shower profile
LSO: Energy resolution
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Status of CEPC HCAL Optimization Study in Simulation LIU Bing On behalf the CEPC Calorimeter working group.
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements
Some EGS Studies… Compare with Geant4 Questions of range/cutoff
Presentation transcript:

1 Alternative Sampling Configurations – new study 20 GeV photons 30 x 5/7 X 0 20 x 5/7 X x 10/7 X 0 Total absobed energy Dep energy in Si Leakage into HCal

2 Response photons 20 x 5/7 X x 10/7 X 0

3 Longitudinal Profiles 20 GeV photons 30 x 5/7 X 0 20 x 5/7 X x 10/7 X 0

4 higher energy 250 GeV photons 20 x 5/7 X x 10/7 X 0

5 high energy response in pixel 250 GeV photons Max pixel in layer 12 (E dep in MIPs) (124 KeV/MIP for 320  m Si) 5 mm x 5 mm pixels (real prototype hex. pixels have smaller area; factor 0.65) 20 x 5/7 X x 10/7 X 0

6 Weighting the layers 20 GeV photons unweighted weighted 20 x 5/7 X x 10/7 X 0

7 Resolution Comparison photons

resolution photons

SiD Cal R. Frey9 Conclusions on config Containment is much better  How important is the leakage for the HCal ? Resolution is nearly the same ( k / sqrt(E(GeV)) )  20+10: k=0.169  0.002, E  20 GeV or more  30:  0.002, E  10 GeV (0.169 at 20 GeV)  Best weighting: 21-30/1-20 = 2.0 Response for remains linear at higher energy SiD cost is not much different