Evolved Massive Stars. Wolf-Rayet Stars Classification WNL - weak H, strong He, NIII,IV WN2-9 - He, N III,IV,V earliest types have highest excitation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prof. D.C. Richardson Sections
Advertisements

Chapter 17 Star Stuff.
Life as a Low-mass Star Image: Eagle Nebula in 3 wavebands (Kitt Peak 0.9 m).
Stellar Evolution. The Mass-Luminosity Relation Our goals for learning: How does a star’s mass affect nuclear fusion?
Chapter 17 Star Stuff.
Stellar Evolution. Evolution on the Main Sequence Zero-Age Main Sequence (ZAMS) MS evolution Development of an isothermal core: dT/dr = (3/4ac) (  r/T.
Lecture 26: The Bizarre Stellar Graveyard: White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars.
Stellar Evolution: The Deaths of Stars Chapter Twenty-Two.
Today: How a star changes while on the main sequence What happens when stars run out of hydrogen fuel Second stage of thermonuclear fusion Star clusters.
Susan CartwrightOur Evolving Universe1 The Lives of Stars n From studying nearby stars and stellar clusters l most stars are on the main sequence l stars.
The Fate of Massive Stars Post Main-Sequence Evolution of Massive Stars The Classification of Supernovae Core-Collapse Supernovae Gamma Ray Bursts Cosmic.
Supernova. Explosions Stars may explode cataclysmically. –Large energy release (10 3 – 10 6 L  ) –Short time period (few days) These explosions used.
The role of neutrinos in the evolution and dynamics of neutron stars José A. Pons University of Alicante (SPAIN)  Transparent and opaque regimes.  NS.
1. accretion disk - flat disk of matter spiraling down onto the surface of a star. Often from a companion star.
The origin of the (lighter) elements The Late Stages of Stellar Evolution Supernova of 1604 (Kepler’s)
Astronomy 535 Stellar Structure Evolution. Course Philosophy “Crush them, crush them all!” -Professor John Feldmeier.
Announcements Angel Grades are updated (but still some assignments not graded) More than half the class has a 3.0 or better Reading for next class: Chapter.
Stellar Interiors Astronomy 315 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 10.
The Formation and Structure of Stars
Stellar Structure Section 6: Introduction to Stellar Evolution Lecture 16 – Evolution of core after S-C instability Formation of red giant Evolution up.
Stellar Structure Section 3: Energy Balance Lecture 4 – Energy transport processes Why does radiation dominate? Simple derivation of transport equation.
Late Burning Stages. fuelq(erg g -1 )T/10 9 1H1H5-8e He7e C5e Ne1.1e O5e Si0-3e Ni-8e
Neutron Stars and Black Holes PHYS390: Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 18.
Stellar Structure: TCD 2006: star formation.
Stellar Structure Section 6: Introduction to Stellar Evolution Lecture 17 – AGB evolution: … MS mass > 8 solar masses … explosive nucleosynthesis … MS.
The Sun The Sun in X-rays over several years The Sun is a star: a shining ball of gas powered by nuclear fusion. Luminosity of Sun = 4 x erg/s =
Modelling SN Type II: microphysics From Woosley et al. (2002) Woosley Lectures.
Astronomy 1 – Fall 2014 Lecture 12; November 18, 2014.
Stellar Winds and Mass Loss Brian Baptista. Summary Observations of mass loss Mass loss parameters for different types of stars Winds colliding with the.
Stellar Evolution. The H-R Diagram There are patterns in the HR diagram. Most stars lie on the main sequence, and obey a mass-luminosity relation. (Low.
Chapter 17: Evolution of High-Mass Stars. Massive stars have more hydrogen to start with but they burn it at a prodigious rate The overall reaction is.
How Stars Evolve Pressure and temperature –Normal gases –Degenerate gases The fate of the Sun –Red giant phase –Horizontal branch –Asymptotic branch –Planetary.
Lecture 1 Time Scales, Temperature-density Scalings, Critical Masses.
Section 1: Structure of the Sun
SUPERNOVA NEUTRINOS AT ICARUS
Stellar Structure Temperature, density and pressure decreasing Energy generation via nuclear fusion Energy transport via radiation Energy transport via.
OUR SUN THE CLOSEST STAR. Composition of the Sun The Sun is composed of at least 80 of the elements found on Earth. Sun is mostly composed of 91.2% Hydrogen,
Stellar Evolution Beyond the Main Sequence. On the Main Sequence Hydrostatic Equilibrium Hydrogen to Helium in Core All sizes of stars do this After this,
Prelim Review.
Dec. 6, Review: >8Msun stars become Type II SNe As nuclear burning proceeds to, finally, burning Silicon (Si) into iron (Fe), catastrophe looms.
Composition and Mass Loss. 2 Two of the major items which can affect stellar evolution are Composition: The most important variable is Y – the helium.
Advanced Burning Building the Heavy Elements. Advanced Burning 2  Advanced burning can be (is) very inhomogeneous  The process is very important to.
What temperature would provide a mean kinetic energy of 0.5 MeV? By comparison, the temperature of the surface of the sun  6000 K.
EXAM II Monday Oct 19 th (this coming Monday!) HW5 due Friday midnight.
1. active prominences - solar prominences that change in a matter of hours.
Review: Evolution of Sun As usual, PowerPoint slides available at the web site Dr. Bill Pezzaglia 1.
The Red Giant Branch. L shell drives expansion L shell driven by M core - as |  |, |  T| increase outside contracting core shell narrows, also L core.
The Lives and Deaths of Stars
M.R. Burleigh 2601/Unit 4 DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY LIFECYCLES OF STARS Option 2601.
9. Evolution of Massive Stars: Supernovae. Evolution up to supernovae: the nuclear burning sequence; the iron catastrophe. Supernovae: photodisintigration;
Death of sun-like Massive star death Elemental my dear Watson Novas Neutron Stars Black holes $ 200 $ 200$200 $ 200 $ 200 $400 $ 400$400 $ 400$400.
Selected Topics in Astrophysics
Stellar Spectroscopy and Elemental Abundances Definitions Solar Abundances Relative Abundances Origin of Elements 1.
PHYS 1621 Test 1 Results Course grade is based on number of points including review questions, in-class exercises, tests, extra credit 260+ A B.
The Study of Light The Sun. Objectives 0 Explain how the sun produces energy which is transferred to the Earth by radiation. 0 Explain how incoming solar.
Astronomy 1020-H Stellar Astronomy Spring_2016 Day-32.
Naomi Pequette. 1.Core Hydrogen Burning 2.Shell Hydrogen Burning 3.First Dredge Up 4.The Bump in the Luminosity Function 5.Core Helium Flash 6.Core Helium.
The Sun 1)H-R diagram 2)Solar Structure 3)Nuclear Fusion 4)Solar Neutrinos 5)Solar Wind/Sunspots October 21, 2002.
Chapter 17 Star Stuff.
Ch 12--Life Death of Stars
Supernova.
Some Later Stages of Low- Mass Stars
Contents of the Universe
How Stars Evolve Pressure and temperature The fate of the Sun
The Sun: Our Star.
Low Mass Stars (< 8 MSun) - Outline
Stellar Evolution.
Composition and Mass Loss
Supernova.
Presentation transcript:

Evolved Massive Stars

Wolf-Rayet Stars Classification WNL - weak H, strong He, NIII,IV WN2-9 - He, N III,IV,V earliest types have highest excitation WC4-9 - He, C II,III,IV, O III,IV,V WO1-4 - C III,IV O IV,V,VI WN most common, WO least

Wolf-Rayet Stars log L/L  > 5.5 log T eff > 4.7 (but ill defined - photosphere is at different radii and T eff for different ) ~ M  yr -1 v wind ~ 1-4x10 3 km s -1 ~ 1/2 of kinetic energy in ISM within 3 kpc of sun is from WR winds Wind energy comparable to SN

Wolf-Rayet Stars Have lost H envelope - M > 40 M  or binary with envelope ejection WNL  WN  WC  WO is an evolutionary sequence and a mass sequence Mass loss first exposes CNO burning products - mostly He,N Next partial 3  burning - He, C, some O finally CO rich material Lowest mass stars end as WN, only most massive become WO Surrounded by ionized, low density wind-blown bubble Metallicity dependence for occurrence of WRs –in Galaxy observed min mass for WR ~ 35 M  –in SMC min mass ~ 70 M  –WOs found only in metal-rich systems

Wolf-Rayet Stars High luminosities result in supereddington luminosities in opacity bumps produced by Fe peak elements at ~70,000K and 250,000K Without H envelope these temperatures occur near surface Radiative acceleration out to sonic point of wind Wind driven by continuum opacity instead of line opacity Photosphere lies in optically thick wind

Advanced Burning Stages No observations - these stages are so short that they are completed faster than the thermal adjustment time of the star - the stellar surface doesn’t know what’s happening in the interior Hydrodynamics may render the previous statement untrue For stars >~ 8 M  C ignition occurs before thermal pulse-like double shell burning –limits s-process to producing elements with A < 90 C burning and later (T > 5e8 K) dominated are neutrino cooled - energy carried by, not photons Near minimum mass C ignition is degenerate and often off- center since cooling starting in core - maximum T occurs outside core

Advanced Burning Stages C burning and later (T > 5e8 K) dominated are neutrino cooled - energy carried by, not photons When does cooling take over? –at low T,  energy loss rate  ≈1.1x10 7 T 9 8 erg g -1 s -1 for T 9 < 6 &  < 3x10 5 g cm -3 –   = L/M ~ 3.1x10 4 S  /R erg g -1 s -1 after H burning –set  =   –rates equal for S  /R = 1 at T 9 = 0.62; S  /R = 0.1 at T 9 = 0.46

cooling photons must diffuse, so rate of energy loss   2 T –  ’s must traverse star, interacting with and depositing energy in material –   ~ R 2 N  /c ~  1/3 M 2/3 ’s are ~ free streaming; even in stellar material interaction cross sections are small –cooling is local - ’s don’t interact with star to depositi energy before escaping –since ’s don’t interact, they provide no pressure support Homework: What does this imply about late burning stages?

cooling several paths for neutrino creation plasmon decay - plasma excitation decays into pair photoneutrino process - pair replaces  in  -e - interaction neutrino-nuclear bremsstrahlung -  ’s of breaking radiation replaced by pairs At low T photoneutrino dominates, cooling/g independent of  At higher T e - e + annihilation dominates, suppressed w/ increasing  At high , low T e - degeneracy inhibits pair formation & plasmon rate dominates Overall rate increases w/ T

cooling

The URCA process - generating changes in neutron excess and thereby heating & cooling through mass movements of material undergoing weak interactions rate of emission of energy by escaping neutrinos/mole If A = 0 entropy decreases & there is cooling A = 0 if there is no composition change

cooling If composition is changing for e - capture and  decay w/ energy release Q if affinity is positive, e - capture (ec) is driven to completion & dY Z /dt is negative - generates entropy if affinity is negative,  decay is driven to completion & dY Z /dt is positive - also generates entropy

cooling If conversion is slow, process is reversible and no heat generated If fast, degeneracy energy transferred into ’s inefficient & heat generated depending on rate of cooling, heating or cooling can occur For fluid with mass motions (convection)

cooling affinity will change with T,  as fluid moves, as will S More complications from nuclear excited states De-excitation releases  ’s which heat material In convection or waves  ’s may be deposited in different place from capture or decay - net energy transport where the Urca pair are nuclei c & d and  c &  d are the rates of energy emission as antineutrinos from  decay of c and as neutrinos from e - capture on d, respectively