1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena 12.0.6 Jet Note 8 Meeting 7 th June 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PFA-Enhanced Dual Readout Crystal Calorimetry Stephen Magill - ANL Hans Wenzel - FNAL Outline : Motivation Detector Parameters Use of a PFA in Dual Readout.
Advertisements

INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
07/16/2002 p. 1 Muon Fake RatesPetra Merkel Muon Fake Rates Concept: determine rate of fake muons due to pion/kaon punch-through (PT) muons out of pion/kaon.
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (with T. Dai, X. Li, A. Wilson, B. Zhou) US-ATLAS.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
PFA on SiDaug05_np Lei Xia ANL-HEP. PFA outline Calibration of calorimeter –Done –Not tuned for clustering algorithm Clustering algorithm –Done: hit density.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Analysis Meeting 12 th June 2007.
1 W’  tb  lnubb: the first read. 2 introduction sample: W’  tb  lnubb generator: PYTHIA number of events: 5000 will only use events in the good run.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
Progress on B-tagging Efficiency Monica Dunford May 22 nd, 2007.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
PFA Development – Definitions and Preparation 0) Generate some events w/G4 in proper format 1)Check Sampling Fractions ECAL, HCAL separately How? Photons,
Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
My work PAST WORKS: 1) (Madrid) Data Analysis in L3, LEP: - Measurement of the Mass, Width and Cross Section of the W boson production at LEP, Study.
Michele Faucci Giannelli TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009 SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter Testbeam results.
1 Shower maximum detector (SMD) is a wire proportional counter – strip readout detector using gas amplification. SMD is used to provide a spatial resolution.
Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.
Optimizing DHCAL single particle energy resolution Lei Xia 1 CALICE Meeting LAPP, Annecy, France September 9 – 11, 2013.
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
Jet Calibration Experience in CDF Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool -CDF calorimeter -Relative Calibrations -Absolute Calibration -Multiple Interactions.
PFA Template Concept Performance Mip Track and Interaction Point ID Cluster Pointing Algorithm Single Particle Tests of PFA Algorithms S. Magill ANL.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
 0  5  Outline Event selection & analysis Background rejection Efficiencies Mass spectrum Comparison data-MC Branching ratio evaluation Systematics.
W/Z Plan For Winter Conferences Tom Diehl Saclay 12/2001.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Barbara Storaci, Wouter Hulsbergen, Nicola Serra, Niels Tuning 1.
1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Dijet Mass and Calibration1 H C A L Z(700) Data and Calibration Dan Green Fermilab June, 2001.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
Photon purity measurement on JF17 Di jet sample using Direct photon working Group ntuple Z.Liang (Academia Sinica,TaiWan) 6/24/20161.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Jet Energy and Resolution at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta YETI meeting, 7/1/2008.
Update on Track Efficiency Fitting using Kshorts 17. May 2010 Till Eifert, Grant Gorfine.
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Elena Bruna Yale University
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Dual Readout Clustering and Jet Finding
Jet Studies 1. Changes in seed finding for cone jets reconstruction
Measurement of the γ,W,Z with ATLAS for the ATLAS Collaboration
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Update of Electron Identification Performance Based on BDTs
Implementation of e-ID based on BDT in Athena EgammaRec
EM Linearity using calibration constants from Geant4
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Argonne National Laboratory
Performance of BDTs for Electron Identification
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
Presentation transcript:

1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Jet Note 8 Meeting 7 th June 2007

Data Looked at mc (with 1mm problem) 400k minbias events: trig1_misal1_csc pythia_minbias.recon.AOD.v k single pions with et=1GeV trig1_misal1_mc singlepart_singlepi_et1.recon.AOD.v k single pions with et=10GeV trig1_misal1_mc singlepart_singlepi_et10.recon.AOD.v Will repeat with 30 micron samples and compare.

3 Athena 11 vs 12 AODs Number of tracks Track Resolution

4 Selection of isolated pions (et=1GeV) Cuts made to remove bias in 11: Based on tracks: Number of tracks in event < 15 ΔR track isolation >0.8 >=1 B Layer Hit Based on clusters Cluster Multiplicity < 4 Energy difference in cones ΔR=1.0 and Δ R=0.4 < 200MeV Energy fraction in cone ΔR=0.2 > 0.7xEnergy in cone ΔR=0.4 Approx. 1 track in 200 survive. (or 1 per 10 events) For version 12: Can make harder cuts since there are more statistics Changes: Removed cut on number of tracks as this was ineffectual ΔR track isolation >1.0 magnitude of energy difference in cones ΔR=1.0 and Δ R=0.4 < 100MeV Approx. same number of tracks surviving E taken as the sum of caloTopoCluster energies (calibrated to EM scale only) in cone. Cone size of ΔR cone =0.4 found to be optimal Track extrapolated to 2 nd layer of EM Calorimeter must match at least one cluster within ΔR match <0.05 Require clusters and tracks in |eta|<2.4

5 Results An improvement to the E/p bias can be made using a smaller cone size of 0.2 By requiring an isolated 0.2 cone get E/p comparable to 0.4 cone for the single sample For Cone 0.2: Sample E/p mean RMS -minimum bias (0.2) -single pion cone 0.4 -single pion cone 0.2 Error: ±0.007 Sample E/p mean RMS -minimum bias -single pion (after cuts) -single pion (before cuts) Error: ±0.007

6 Pions with et=10GeV approx 1/100 events have a track with 8GeV<pt<12GeV ¾ with matching cluster within R < 0.05 ¾ with matching 0.4 Cone Jet within R < 0.2 Cluster based E/p before cuts mean = (cf single pion) RMS = (cf single pion) Jet based E/p before cuts mean = 2.78 (cf 1.11 single pion) RMS = (cf single pion) Track isolation cut kills minimum bias tracks 3k events (out of 400k -> 100 events) More stats & work needed on this

7 Pile-up First look at pile-up sample (from mark) 5.6 events Bias to E/p scales with the sum of energy in the event. Difficult to find events with energy sum similar to single event Method of cuts to find isolated pion probably not possible Will need to use some kind of background subtraction