45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
Advertisements

Using Tune Shifts to Evaluate Electron Cloud Effects on Beam Dynamics at CesrTA Jennifer Chu Mentors: Dr. David Kreinick and Dr. Gerry Dugan 8/11/2011REU.
CESR Synchrotron Radiation Tables - Range of Photon Rates and Beta-averaged Photon Rates - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
Comparison of ECLOUD and POSINST Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts with Emphasis on the Relative Drift and Dipole Contributions Jim Crittenden Cornell.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden & John Sikora Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
ECLOUD Calculations of Field Gradients During Bunch Passage Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
Early Results on a Search for Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD -- Collaboration with Eric Wilkinson -- These slides includes corrections arising from the.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Resolution of ECLOUD Tune Shift Calculation Instability Jim Crittenden.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modelling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD 1) Comparison with CesrTA.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York ECLOUD Simulations for the Tune Shift Measurements of December.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 and January 2009 Measurements - Preparation for PAC2009 FR5RF Paper and Poster - “Effects.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Preliminary Results on the Introduction of the Rediffused SEY Component.
Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update T. Demma, INFN-LNF.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modeling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Comparison of ECLOUD Calculations in Dipole and Quadrupole Fields.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - This presentation limited to resolving drift/dipole weighting question -
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
ElectronsdFud Simulation Work at Cornell Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Space Charge Electric-Field Calculations for Coherent Tune Shift Estimations using the Electron-cloud Modelling Algorithm ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Thanks to Marco for clarifying the drift/dipole weighting - - Thanks to Gerry.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Electron Cloud Simulation Studies for CesrTA Jim Crittenden Cornell.
21 December 2009 ECLOUD Simulations for Measurements of December 2009 / J.A.Crittenden 1/1 ECLOUD Simulations for Measurements of 19/20 December.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York ECLOUD Simulations for the Tune Shift Measurements of December.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Comparison of ECLOUD Calculations in Dipole and Quadrupole Fields.
ECLOUD Simulations for CESR Witness Bunch Tune Shift Measurements Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
CESR Synchrotron Radiation Tables and Electron Cloud Modelling Input Parameters Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York First Results on the Introduction of the Rediffused SEY Component.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York CesrTA Electron Cloud Measurements and Simulations Jim Crittenden.
49th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop October 8 –12, 2010 LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York ECLOUD News 1) Bug in SEY model fixed 2) List of present activities.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Motivation and Overview David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Highlights from the ILCDR08 Workshop (Cornell, 8-11 July 2008) report by S. Calatroni and G. Rumolo, in CLIC Meeting Goals of the workshop:
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
FCC-hh: First simulations of electron cloud build-up L. Mether, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo FCC Design meeting.
Electron cloud beam dynamics G. Dugan, Cornell University CesrTA Advisory Committee 9/11/12.
2nd International Particle Accelerator Conference September 4–9, 2011, San Sebastián, Spain LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle.
RFA Simulations Joe Calvey LEPP, Cornell University 6/25/09.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden & John Sikora Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements
Update to ECLOUD Calculations for the
Electron Cloud R&D at Cornell ILCDR08--7/8/08
Electron Cloud Meeting
Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.
First Look at the New SYNRAD3D Results
Detailed Characterization of Vacuum Chamber Surface Properties Using Measurements of the Time Dependence of Electron Cloud Development Jim Crittenden.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.
Electron Cloud Meeting
First Attempt to Simulate the Shielded Button Measurements with ECLOUD
J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)
All material for this talk may be obtained at
Electron cloud studies at CESR
CTA 09 - Introduction David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for
Recent Advances in Electron Cloud Buildup Measurements and Models at CESR (Part 2) Stephen Poprocki & Jim Crittenden Cornell University Accelerator Physics.
Presentation transcript:

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud Meeting 11 November 2009 I. ECLOUD/POSINST comparison for Feb 2009 tune shift data II. Improvement using  x,y -weighted photon rates III. Sensitivity to vertical beam size IV. Predictions for 4 GeV wiggler-on/wiggler-off lattices

11November 2009 Recent Studies with ECLOUD / J.A.Crittenden 2/8 POSINST simulations with nominal parameters 45 bunch trains, 14 ns spacing, Feb mA=1.6x10 10

11November 2009 Recent Studies with ECLOUD / J.A.Crittenden 3/8 Resolving the remaining discrepancies exhibited in our PAC2009 beam dynamics paper required: Reducing fluctuations due to large individual macroparticle charges Introducing the rediffused SEY component Using the more realistic 2-mm beam offset rather than 5 mm Refining the space charge grid 41x41 --> 81x81 over the 45mm x 25mm vacuum chamber ellipse. I. ECLOUD/POSINST Comparison for the February 2009 Measurements 2.1 GeV e+ 45-bunches, 14 ns spacing 0.4 mA 0.8 mA1.2 mA

11November 2009 Recent Studies with ECLOUD / J.A.Crittenden 4/8 The ECLOUD and POSINST calculations on the previous slide were done with the same input parameters for photon rates, beta functions, SEY parameters and beam sizes. The photon rates were 0.28 (0.57) photons/m/beam particle for the drift (dipole) region averages. The lattice synchrotron radiation tables can provide separate horizontal and vertical beta-averaged rates as well. For this lattice, they turned out to be 0.217/0.220 (0.482/0.482) for the drift (dipole) regions. This correction preferentially affects primary-related phenomena. II. Effect of linear correction for independent horizontal and vertical beta-weighting of synchrotron radiation rates 0.4 mA 0.8 mA1.2 mA With Correction Without Correction

11November 2009 Recent Studies with ECLOUD / J.A.Crittenden 5/8 The modelled vertical tune shifts appear to depend strongly on this parameter, perhaps owing to the varying number of cloud particles in the beam region. The nominal rms vertical beam sizes in our data sets range widely from 30 m (Feb 2009) to 160 m ( April 2007). III. Remarkable Sensitivity to Vertical Beam Size 0.4 mA 0.8 mA1.2 mA  V = 29.7  nominal  V = 40  This example indicates that the tune shift measurements can exclude a vertical beam size larger than 40 m.

11November 2009 Recent Studies with ECLOUD / J.A.Crittenden 6/8 We should consider whether such effects can be produced by other input parameters. The dependence on photon rate appears to decouple in cases where multipacting becomes significant. This sensitivity may present an opportunity to provide useful information to the LET effort. The sensitivity to vertical beam size is asymmetrical, with less sensitivity to smaller beam sizes 0.4 mA 0.8 mA1.2 mA  V = 29.7  nominal  V = 20  The discrimination power of the vertical tune shift data appears to be greater for larger vertical beam sizes.

11November 2009 Recent Studies with ECLOUD / J.A.Crittenden 7/8 IV. Predictions for 4 GeV lattices Wigglers on ( e V = 23 nm) Wigglers off ( e V = 42 nm) 0.4 mA 0.8 mA1.2 mA Wigglers on s H = 843 m s V = 65 m s Z = 13.4 mm The photon rates are about a factor of 2 higher than at 2.1 GeV. The tune shifts are inversely proportional to the beam energy. So the wiggler-off prediction is about what one might have expected. The prediction for the wiggler-on lattice is surprising, especially since the model input parameters are so similar. The culprit turns out to be s V = 88 m --> 65 m. What is the physics? Is it physics? Wigglers off s H = 887 m s V = 88 m s Z = 7.1 mm

11November 2009 Recent Studies with ECLOUD / J.A.Crittenden 8/8 ECLOUD's explanation of the suppressed vertical tune shift in the 4 GeV wiggler-on lattice (e+ beam, 0.8 mA/bunch) 4 GeV Wigglers on ECLOUD finds that the pinch effect suppresses the vertical tune shift at a precise vertical beam size. 4 GeV Wigglers off2.1 GeV Vertical Field Difference (2D averages) All bunches Vertical Field Difference (2D averages) Bunches 42-45