High energy (20MeV-TeV) photon emission from Gamma-ray Bursts Yi-Zhong Fan (Niels Bohr International Academy, Denmark; Purple Mountain Observatory, China.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Advances in our Understanding of GRB emission mechanism Pawan Kumar Outline † Constraints on radiation mechanisms ♪ High energy emission from GRBs.
Advertisements

 -ray radiation mechanism – Fermi data Gamma-ray bursts in the Fermi Era † Work done with Ramesh Narayan & Rodolfo Barniol-Duran Pawan Kumar Outline †
Klein-Nishina effect on high-energy gamma-ray emission of GRBs Xiang-Yu Wang ( 王祥玉) Nanjing University, China (南京大學) Co-authors: Hao-Ning He (NJU), Zhuo.
Understanding the prompt emission of GRBs after Fermi Tsvi Piran Hebrew University, Jerusalem (E. Nakar, P. Kumar, R. Sari, Y. Fan, Y. Zou, F. Genet, D.
Collaborators: Wong A. Y. L. (HKU), Huang, Y. F. (NJU), Cheng, K. S. (HKU), Lu T. (PMO), Xu M. (NJU), Wang X. (NJU), Deng W. (NJU). Gamma-ray Sky from.
Gamma-Ray Burst models Theory of prompt and afterglow emission Robert Mochkovitch (Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris) 10th Rencontres du Vietnam August.
A two-zone model for the production of prompt neutrinos in gamma-ray bursts Matías M. Reynoso IFIMAR-CONICET, Mar del Plata, Argentina GRACO 2, Buenos.
High-energy photon and particle emission from GRBs/SNe Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China Co-authors: Zhuo Li (Weizmann), Soebur Razzaque (PennState),
Bright broad-band afterglows of gravitational wave bursts from mergers of binary neutron stars Xuefeng Wu Purple Mountain Observatory Chinese Center for.
Modeling the SED and variability of 3C66A in 2003/2004 Presented By Manasvita Joshi Ohio University, Athens, OH ISCRA, Erice, Italy 2006.
Episodic magnetic jets as the central engine of GRBs Feng Yuan With: Bing Zhang.
Yun-Wei YU 俞云伟 June 22, 2010, Hong Kong. Outline  Background  Implications from the shallow decay afterglows of GRBs  A qualitative discussion on magnetar.
Statistical Properties of GRB Polarization
Yizhong Fan (Niels Bohr International Academy, Denmark Purple Mountain Observatory, China) Fan (2009, MNRAS) and Fan & Piran (2008, Phys. Fron. China)
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Tsvi Piran Re’em Sari 2nd EUL Workshop on Gamma-Ray Bursts.
Low-luminosity GRBs and Relativistic shock breakouts Ehud Nakar Tel Aviv University Omer Bromberg Re’em Sari Tsvi Piran GRBs in the Era of Rapid Follow-up.
Gamma-Ray Burst Optical Observations with AST3 Xue-Feng Wu Xue-Feng Wu Chinese Center for Antarctic Astronomy, Chinese Center for Antarctic Astronomy,
Reverse Shocks and Prompt Emission Mark Bandstra Astro
GRB B: Prompt Emission from Internal Forward-Reverse Shocks Yun-Wei Yu 1,2, X. Y. Wang 1, & Z. G. Dai 1 (俞云伟,王祥玉,戴子高) 1 Department of Astronomy,
Very High Energy Transient Extragalactic Sources: GRBs David A. Williams Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics University of California, Santa Cruz.
Spectral Energy Correlations in BATSE long GRB Guido Barbiellini and Francesco Longo University and INFN, Trieste In collaboration with A.Celotti and Z.Bosnjak.
GRBs and Magnetic Fields Shiho Kobayashi (小林史歩) Liverpool John Moores University.
Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) and collisionless shocks Ehud Nakar Krakow Oct. 6, 2008.
GLAST Science LunchDec 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/21 Can emission at higher energies provide insight into the physics of shocks and how the GRB inner.
X-ray/Optical flares in Gamma-Ray Bursts Daming Wei ( Purple Mountain Observatory, China)
Temporal evolution of thermal emission in GRBs Based on works by Asaf Pe’er (STScI) in collaboration with Felix Ryde (Stockholm) & Ralph Wijers (Amsterdam),
Ehud Nakar California Institute of Technology Gamma-Ray Bursts and GLAST GLAST at UCLA May 22.
Outflow Residual Collisions and Optical Flashes Zhuo Li (黎卓) Weizmann Inst, Israel moving to Peking Univ, Beijing Li & Waxman 2008, ApJL.
Gamma-Ray Burst Early Afterglows Bing Zhang Physics Department University of Nevada, Las Vegas Dec. 11, 2005, Chicago, IL.
Modeling GRB B Xuefeng Wu (X. F. Wu, 吴雪峰 ) Penn State University Purple Mountain Observatory 2008 Nanjing GRB Workshop, Nanjing, China, June
Great Debate on GRB Composition: A Case for Poynting Flux Dominated GRB Jets Bing Zhang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
High energy emission from jets – what can we learn? Amir Levinson, Tel Aviv University Levinson 2006 (IJMPA, review)
Radiative transfer and photospheric emission in GRB jets Indrek Vurm (Columbia University) in collaboration with Andrei M. Beloborodov (Columbia University)
Recent Results and the Future of Radio Afterglow Observations Alexander van der Horst Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek University of Amsterdam.
Gamma-Ray Burst Polarization Kenji TOMA (Kyoto U/NAOJ) Collaborators are: Bing Zhang (Nevada U), Taka Sakamoto (NASA), POET team Ryo Yamazaki, Kunihito.
1 Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland (Stern, Poutanen, 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1217; Stern, Poutanen, 2007, MNRAS, submitted, astro- ph/ ) A new.
IceCube non-detection of GRB Neutrinos: Constraints on the fireball properties Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China Collaborators : H. N. He, R. Y.
The Early Time Properties of GRBs : Canonical Afterglow and the Importance of Prolonged Central Engine Activity Andrea Melandri Collaborators : C.G.Mundell,
A numerical study of the afterglow emission from GRB double-sided jets Collaborators Y. F. Huang, S. W. Kong Xin Wang Department of Astronomy, Nanjing.
1 Physics of GRB Prompt emission Asaf Pe’er University of Amsterdam September 2005.
Fermi Observations of Gamma-ray Bursts Masanori Ohno(ISAS/JAXA) on behalf of Fermi LAT/GBM collaborations April 19, Deciphering the Ancient Universe.
The acceleration and radiation in the internal shock of the gamma-ray bursts ~ Smoothing Effect on the High-Energy Cutoff by Multiple Shocks ~ Junichi.
Gamma-Ray Bursts Energy problem and beaming * Mergers versus collapsars GRB host galaxies and locations within galaxy Supernova connection Fireball model.
Gamma-Ray Bursts: Open Questions and Looking Forward Ehud Nakar Tel-Aviv University 2009 Fermi Symposium Nov. 3, 2009.
The peak energy and spectrum from dissipative GRB photospheres Dimitrios Giannios Physics Department, Purdue Liverpool, June 19, 2012.
Modeling the Early Afterglow Modeling the Early Afterglow Swift and GRBs Venice, Italy, June 5-9, 2006 Chuck Dermer US Naval Research Laboratory Armen.
GRB efficiency Revisited & Magnetar behind short GRB
Models of GRB GeV-TeV emission and GLAST/Swift synergy Xiang-Yu Wang Nanjing University, China Co-authors: Peter Meszaros (PennState), Zhuo Li (PKU), Hao-ning.
High Energy Emissions from Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs)
Gamma-ray Bursts and Particle Acceleration Katsuaki Asano (Tokyo Institute of Technology) S.Inoue ( NAOJ ), P.Meszaros ( PSU )
High-energy radiation from gamma-ray bursts Zigao Dai Nanjing University Xiamen, August 2011.
Gamma-Ray Burst Working Group Co-conveners: Abe Falcone, Penn State, David A. Williams, UCSC,
EMISSION OF HIGH ENERGY PHOTONS FROM GRB
(Review) K. Ioka (Osaka U.) 1.Short review of GRBs 2.HE  from GRB 3.HE  from Afterglow 4.Summary.
Moriond 2003Jordan GoodmanMilagro Collaboration VHE GRBs with Milagro The Milagro Detector Why look for VHE GRBs Milagrito Result –GRB a Milagro.
Alessandra Corsi (1,2) Dafne Guetta (3) & Luigi Piro (2) (1)Università di Roma Sapienza (2)INAF/IASF-Roma (3)INAF/OAR-Roma Fermi Symposium 2009, Washington.
Gamma-ray Bursts from Synchrotron Self-Compton Emission Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland Boris Stern AstroSpace Center, Lebedev Phys. Inst., Moscow,
Stochastic wake field particle acceleration in Gamma-Ray Bursts Barbiellini G., Longo F. (1), Omodei N. (2), Giulietti D., Tommassini P. (3), Celotti A.
Radio afterglows of Gamma Ray Bursts Poonam Chandra National Centre for Radio Astrophysics - Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Collaborator: Dale.
The prompt optical emission in the Naked Eye Burst R. Hascoet with F. Daigne & R. Mochkovitch (Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris) Kyoto − Deciphering then.
Gamma-ray bursts Tomasz Bulik CAM K, Warsaw. Outline ● Observations: prompt gamma emission, afterglows ● Theoretical modeling ● Current challenges in.
Theory of prompt and afterglow emission Robert Mochkovitch (IAP) Gamma-Ray Bursts in the Multi-Messenger Era (Paris, June 2014)
Fermi Several Constraints by Fermi Zhuo Li ( 黎卓 ) Department of Astronomy, Peking University Kavli Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics 23 August, Xiamen.
Slow heating, fast cooling in gamma-ray bursts Juri Poutanen University of Oulu, Finland +Boris Stern + Indrek Vurm.
Yizhong Fan (Niels Bohr International Academy, Denmark Purple Mountain Observatory, China)
Observation of Pulsars and Plerions with MAGIC
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Gamma-Ray Bursts Ehud Nakar Caltech APCTP 2007 Feb. 22.
Andrei M. Beloborodov Columbia University
GRBs with GLAST Tsvi Piran Racah Inst. of Jerusalem, Israel
Presentation transcript:

High energy (20MeV-TeV) photon emission from Gamma-ray Bursts Yi-Zhong Fan (Niels Bohr International Academy, Denmark; Purple Mountain Observatory, China ) Collaborators: Tsvi Piran, Ramesh Narayan, Da-Ming Wei, Bing Zhang ( Fan & Piran 2008, arXiv: )

GRB internal-external shock model central photosphere internal external shocks engine (shocks) (reverse) (forward) 1E17cm for ISM 1E6cm 1E9cm 1E12-1E14cm 1E15cm for wind gamma-ray UV/opt/IR/radio gamma-ray X-ray UV/optical IR mm radio (see Piran 1999, 2004; Meszaros 2002; Zhang & Meszaros 2004 for reviews) prompt promptemission afterglow

MeV-GeV observations (EGRET) GRB GRB (Hurley et al. 1994) GRB (Superbowl Burst) The first afterglow detection, but no redshift information afterglow

MeV-GeV observations (EGRET): GRB : Gonzalez et al Quick evolution Almost constant Almost constant Much longer high energy emission

VHE (>50 GeV) Observations Milagrito observation of GRB at energies above ∼ 0.1 TeV ( 3 σ? Atkins et al ) Upper limits from Magic for several Swift bursts (Albert et al., 06) Claims of detection GRAND at 2.7 σ (Poirier et al 03, but see Fragile et al 03 ) Tibet array: 7σ coincidence ? (Amenomori et al 01) ARGO-YBJ array find only upper limits (Di Sciascio, et al., 06) Only upper limits!

The optical depth of universe to VHE gamma-rays (Stecker et al. 2006)z=5 z=3 z=1 z=2 z=0.5 z=0.03 z=0.2 tau~6

Physical processes producing high energy gamma-rays Synchrotron radiation (Syn-Rad) of electrons/protons Inverse Compton processes Pion production Electromagnetic cascade of TeV gamma-rays see Fan & Piran (2008 ) for a review see Fan & Piran (2008 ) for a review

Inverse Compton (IC) processes electronsSeed photonstimescale Synch. Self- Compton (SSC) Shock-acceleratedSynch. radiation of the electrons Simultaneous with Synch. Rad External IC (EIC) Shock-acceleratedIrrelevant to the electrons and along the direction of outflow material Much Longer than that of the seed photons Bulk ComptonMoving with a high bulk Lorentz factor (cold in their comoving frame) Irrelevant to electrons and arbitrary distributed Determined by that of the ejecta carrying the electrons see Fan & Piran (2008 ) for a review see Fan & Piran (2008 ) for a review

One novel feature of EIC The EIC emission lasts much longer than the seed photons because the duration is affected by (1) the spherical curvature of the blast wave (Beloborodov 05) and by (2) the highly anisotropic radiation of the up-scattered photons (Fan & Piran 06) Fan, Piran, Narayan & Wei (2008 ) Fan, Piran, Narayan & Wei (2008 )

High energy photons from Pion production

Electromagnetic cascade of TeV photons TeV source Infrared background Seed photon MCB GeV photons (Nikoshov 1962; Gould & Schreder 1967)

High energy processes in GRBs and afterglows

SSC in GRBs and their afterglows Prompt SSC SSC ForwardShock  e ≈1000  e ≈tens  e ≈ tens  e ≈ Reverse Shock Shock SSC SSC From Piran (2003)

Standard forward shock (Fan et al. 08) SSC Synch Energy electron’s Lorentz Factor SSC energy Duration Prompt (GRB) 100 keV GeVPrompt Prompt (XRF) 10 keV3001 GeVPrompt X-ray flares0.2 keV5000.2GeVShort Reverse Shock 1 eV10010keVShort Forward Shock 10keV-1eV TeV-keVLong (M’esz’aros & Rees 94; Pilla & Leob 98; Pe’er & Waxman 04; Gupta & Zhang 07, 08 Guetta & Granot 03; Wei et al. 06; Wang et al. 06; Fan et al. 08; Galli & Perna 08 Wang et al. 01a,b; Granot & Guetta 03; Pe’er & Waxman 04b;Kobayashi et al. 07 Wang et al. 01a,b; Granot & Guetta 03; Pe’er & Waxman 04b; Kobayashi et al. 07 Dermer et al. 00; Sari & Esin 01; Zhang & M´esz´aros 01; Wei & Fan 07; Galli & Piro 07; Gou & Meszaros 07; Yu et al. 07) Internal shocks (Pe’er & Waxman 04) External shock model: GeV-TeV Standard internal shocks (Pe’er & Waxman 04) Standard forward shock (Fan et al. 08)

IC of very early afterglow IC: RS emission + FS electrons IC: FS emission + RS electrons (Wang et al. 2001a,b; Granot & Guetta 2003; Piran et al. 2004) SSC of FS SSC of RS (Both reverse shock (RS) and forward shock (FS) exist)

IC of very early afterglow The energy of RS electrons to total energy of RS+Fs electrons Importance of RS IC emission timescale Weak RS ~0.1 (Nakar & Piran 04) UnimportantLonger than the prompt emission Relativistic RS~0.5 Important but dominated by EIC Longer than the prompt emission Prompt photon flow The prompt photon flow overlaps RS/FS shock regions and the cooling of RS/FS electrons may be dominated by EIC, and GeV-TeV EIC plateaus are produced ( Beloborodov 05: EIC in RS; Fan, Zhang & Wei 05, ApJ629 : EIC in RS + FS ) (in GRB B: prompt optical photons cool the FS electrons+prompt gamma-rays cool the RS electrons)

Is strong reverse shock popular? Bright optical flashes, predicted in RS model, are detected only in a few bursts (Akerlof et al. 1999; Fox et al. 2003; Li, W. et al. 2003; Boer et al. 2006; Klotz et al. 2006; Roming et al. 2006) Even for these limited detections, the afterglow modeling usually suggests a weakly magnetized RS region (Fan et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2003; Kumar & Panaitescu 2003; Wei et al. 2006; Klotz et al. 2006). A stronger magnetization may account for the non-detection in other events (Fan, Wei & Wang 2004; Zhang & Kobayashi 2005; Giannios et al. 2008). The IC emission of reverse shock is expected to be weak in most cases (cf. Kobayashi et al. 2007)

EIC in early afterglow (Wang et al. 06; Fan & Piran 06; Fan et al. 2008) Fan & Piran (2006 ) Fan & Piran (2006 ) Any central engine afterglow photons

EIC in early afterglow (Fan, Piran, Narayan & Wei 2008)

Bulk Compton in GRBs and their afterglows Shemi (94) and Shaviv & Dar (95a,b) suggested that the ultra-relativistic GRB ejecta was moving into a dense soft photon background and the electrons in the ejecta Compton scattered on the photons and boosted them to MeV-GeV (producing GRB prompt emission) Bulk Compton in GRB internal shocks (Takagi & Kobayashi 05), producing GeV-TeV emission (efficiency ~1E-3) Bulk Compton in GRB afterglows (Panaitescu 08a, b), producing flares, plateaus followed by a sharp drop, some X-ray flattening and GeV emission The late outflow launched by the re-activity of the central engine has to have a Gamma~10 4 and is electron/positron dominated

Electromagnetic cascade of TeV photons In the presence of intergalactic magnetic field (B_IGM), the magnetic deflection angle of the electron/positron at a radius R_IC they lose most of their energy through IC scattering the CMB The time-delay caused by the magnetic deflection is B IGM < G is needed to get detectable GeV emission signatures. It is not clear that whether such a small value is realistic within a radius ~10 Mpc to the GRB host galaxy. (Plaga 95; Cheng & Cheng 96; Dai & Lu 02; Guetta & Granot 03; Wang et al. 04; Razzaque et al. 04; Murase et al. 07; Ichiki et al. 07) z~0.1 and B IGM ~ Gauss (Murase et al. 07)

pion production The collision of relativistic nucleons (Gamma~300) with a dense cloud to produce \pi^0 ( Katz 94; to account for the 18 GeV photon detected in afterglow of GRB ) Pions produced in standard GRB internal shocks ( Waxman & Bahcall 97; Gupta & Zhang 07 ) Neutron rich GRB outflow: inelastic n, p collision produces \pi^0 ( Bahcall & Meszaros 01; Meszaros & Rees 01 ) The neutral beam model ( Dermer & Atoyan 04; >10 18 eV neutrons created in p+\gamma process escaped from internal shocks and were subjected to further photopion processes with photons……; see also Ioka et al. 04 )

Interpretation of the EGRET data

We need to reproduce the spectrum and the nearly constant count rate. The SSC of an X-ray plateau followed by a sharp decline? High energy afterglow of GRB : the SSC component of a slowly decaying X-ray light curve? (Wei & Fan 2007) GRB (Hurley et al. 1994) Afterglow emission 30MeV- 30GeV

The ~0.2 GeV hard component of GRB : the EIC of the RS+FS shocks in wind medium? (Fan & Piran 08 based on Beloborodov 05 + Fan, Zhang & Wei 05) 3. The MeV-GeV emission has a very hard spectrum F v ~v 0 1. The MeV-GeV plateau has a duration about 3 times that of the sub-MeV emission 2.The MeV-GeV emission energy is at least ~3 times that of the sub-MeV emission Prompt emission overlaps FS+RS (Sari & Piran 99; Fan et al. 05): EIC works The timescale favors a process relevant to the very early afterglow (Granot & Guetta 04) Suppose that a significant part of MeV-GeV emission is powered by the RS, the reverse shock has to be relativistic Fan et al. 08

What can GLAST tell us?

Constrain the physical composition of the GRB outflow ( If magnetized, no GeV-TeV excess: Giannios 08 ), the particle acceleration models and the radiation mechanisms Probe the initial Lorentz factor of the GRB ejecta ( Lithwick & Sari 01; Dai & Lu 02; Fan & Wei 04 ) and the radius of the prompt energy dissipation ( Gupta & Zhang 08 ) Test current various modifications of forward shock model that introduced to account for the peculiar Swift X-ray data ( Fan et al. 08 ) Do something with GLAST detections

Is there a canonical high energy afterglow light curve? (Fan, Piran, Narayan & Wei 08) (Fan, Piran, Narayan & Wei 08) ? ? ? Given the small number of high energy photons, these novel features are not expected to be identified as frequently as in X-ray band. But in some extremely bright bursts, like GRBs , and , more than 1000 sub-GeV photons may be collected.

MAGIC-II, HESS-II: ~30 GeV photons from GRBs? z=1

Thank you!

EIC in early afterglow (something to be clarify) The total energy to be emitted into GeV energies is that of the blast wave and does not strongly depend on the brightness of the central engine afterglow (e.g., X-ray flares). The SSC of the early forward shock also peaks at GeV energies. In the absence of EIC, the SSC will convert a significant of blast wave energy into high energy emission. So the EIC can not enhance the GeV detection significantly. After taking into account the SSC of the forward shock before and after the X-ray flare, the detected high energy lightcurve should be a plateau rather than a GeV flare. The SSC of the X-ray flares can be distinguished as sub-GeV (Wei et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2006; Fan et al. 2008)or even GeV-TeV flashes (Galli & Piro 2007; Fan et al. 2008) The SSC of the X-ray flares can be distinguished as sub-GeV (Wei et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2006; Fan et al. 2008)or even GeV-TeV flashes (Galli & Piro 2007; Fan et al. 2008)

Stern & (2004) Stern & Poutanen (2004) Naked-eye GRB B: energetic GeV source (Zou et al. 08)? Syn SSC 2nd IC SSC and 2nd IC in GRBs? SSC and 2nd IC in GRBs?