Slide 1UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 UCSB Rod Production UCSB Rod Production, Jan. 20 2004, presented by Jim Lamb.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Preparation for ATLAS SCT/ID Endcap Completion at CERN Jo Pater Manchester, 4 January 2006.

Advertisements

TEC X5 Setup (1) 1 Front + 1 Back petal, fully equipped (28 modules F.P modules B.P. + AOH + DOHM) Petal assembly IPN-Lyon (F.P.), RWTH-Aachen I.

1 Status of the CMS Pixel project Lorenzo Uplegger RD07 Florence 28 June 2007.

1/8/04Lance Simms Thermal Testing of TOB/TEC Hybrids at UCSB.

14 June 2005C. Campagnari (UCSB)1 Status of Rod Production at UCSB This report covers the last week Reporting for: Dan Callahan Susanne Kyre Stephen Jaditz.

Slide 1L3 Testing Meeting March 7, 2003UCSB Status-Anthony Affolder UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder (for the UCSB module testing group) Current testing.

Thermal Testing of TEC/TOB Hybrids at UCSB 1/20/04 Slide 1 Thermal Testing of TOB/TEC Hybrids at UCSB.

Rods Schedule and Issues J. Incandela University of California Santa Barbara for the TOB Rod Group Tracker Integration Meeting October 27, 2005 Slides.

Slide 1Module Testing Meeting March 7, 2003US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model-Anthony Affolder US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model Anthony Affolder (for.

US Tracker Institutional Leaders Meeting, March 1, 2005 J. Incandela 1 Slides for the US Si Tracker Institutional Group Leaders Meeting J. Incandela March.

Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 4 August 2003 Sam Burke UCSB HEP Group.

Slide 1 Anthony Affolder US Module LT meeting June 17, 2004 UCSB Module LT Testing.

Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 11 August 2003 Sam Burke UCSB HEP Group.

24 May 2005C. Campagnari (UCSB)1 Status of Rod Production at UCSB This report covers the last week Reporting for: Dan Callahan Susanne Kyre Stephen Jaditz.

1 Long Term Module Testing-Anthony AffolderTPO, December 11, 2003 Current Module LT Testing Capability Only Vienna Boxes Available  10 slots at each site.

Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 3 November 2003 Sam Burke Lance Simms.

Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 30 June Sam Burke UCSB HEP Group.

4/25/2006 Puneeth Kalavase, UC, Santa Barbara On behalf of US Tracker Outer Barrel group Construction and Testing of CMS “Rods”

US Module and Rod Production Overview and Plan For the US CMS Tracker Group.

Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 28 July 2003 Sam Burke UCSB HEP Group.

3 May 2005Claudio Campagnari (UCSB)1 Status of Rod Production at UCSB This report covers the last two weeks Reporting for: Dan Callahan Susanne Kyre Stephen.

Anthony AffolderUS CMS Meeting 12/3/2002Proposal of UCSB Short-term Testing Program Assumptions Electrical and optical hybrids not burnt-in prior to arrival.

CMS Tracker Week – Module Test Meeting – July 2003 – Patrick Gartung 1 Long term rod testing software Patrick Gartung University of California, Riverside.

Slide 1 Anthony Affolder US Silicon Meeting, March 9, 2004 Equipment Status ARCS equipment status à Single module and 4 hybrid DAQ equipment status à Vienna.

US Tracker Group Status Sep. 1, 2005 J. Incandela For the US CMS Tracker Group.

1 US Testing Status-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, Dec. 11, 2003 Update of US Testing Status Anthony Affolder On behalf of the US testing group.

Slide 1Rod Production presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)April 9, 2004 Rod Production Rod Production, April , presented by Jim Lamb (UCSB)

US CMS Silicon Electronics Testing – CMS Lehman Review - May 21, Affolder1 US CMS Silicon Electronics Testing US CMS Lehman Review BNL 5/21/03 A.

1 US Testing Update-Anthony AffolderTracker Meeting, Feb 10, 2004 US Module Testing Update Anthony Affolder (On behalf of the US testing group) Update.

28 June 2005C. Campagnari (UCSB)1 Status of Rod Production at UCSB This report covers the last week Reporting for: Dan Callahan Susanne Kyre Stephen Jaditz.

Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 7 July 2003 Sam Burke UCSB HEP Group.

CMS Tracker Week – Module Test Meeting – April 2003 – Patrick Gartung 1 Status of US long term module testing Patrick Gartung University of California,

Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 18 August 2003 Sam Burke UCSB HEP Group.

Slide 1UCSB CMS Weekly Status MeetingCMS 4-Hybrid Test System Sam Burke EE UCSB 4-Hybrid Thermal Test System Status 21 July 2003 Sam Burke UCSB HEP Group.

P.Tipton Tracker Week, Feb,2004 Multi-Rod Burn-In Test-Stands and Transport Paul Tipton University of Rochester for US TOB Collaboration.

Fermilab PMG - Results from module testing - April 9, 2004 – E.Chabalina (UIC) 1 Results from module testing E.Chabalina University of Illinois (Chicago)

Plans to Test HBD Prototype in Run 6 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting March 8, 2006.

17 May 2005Jim Lamb (UCSB)1 Status of Rod Production at UCSB This report covers the last week Reporting for: Dan Callahan Susanne Kyre Stephen Jaditz Puneeth.

Preparations to Install the HBD for Run 6 Craig Woody BNL PHENIX Weekly Meeting January 26, 2006.

Juan Valls - LECC03 Amsterdam 1 Recent System Test Results from the CMS TOB Detector  Introduction  ROD System Test Setup  ROD Electrical and Optical.

J. Valls, CMS L2-L3 Meeting, Sept ROD Production at CERN  ROD Flow During Production  ROD Flow at CERN  ROD Testing Areas  Infrastructure  Equipment.

August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.

Straw Working group Ferrara 4/9/2014. Outline Status and Plans Installation of Chambers 1-3 Chamber 4 Vacuum test SRB Readout, monitoring and software.

ROD assembly and test in US

DAQ Equipment Status 2 fully equipped Vienna boxes at UCSB and FNAL

UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder

Update of US Testing Status

UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder

UCSB Short-term Testing Plan

Results from module testing

UCSB Testing Status Anthony Affolder

Recent TOB Developments

On behalf of the US TOB testing group

First Assembled Rod in US

Module production in Italy

UCSB Short-term Testing Plan

Operations/Failure Analysis

Hybrid & Module Electrical Testing

US Hybrid/Module/Rod Testing Model

US Module Testing Progress Report

Current Module LT Testing Capability

Operations/Failure Analysis

Current Module LT Capability

Operations/Failure Analysis

FNAL module testing summary

Module Failures on Rods

US Module Testing Progress Report

Operations/Failure Analysis

Equipment Status ARCS equipment status DAQ equipment status

Hardware needs (ARCS) Current ARCS capabilities at both sites should be able to keep up with production assuming software changes Automatic I-V curves,

Presentation transcript:

Slide 1UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 UCSB Rod Production UCSB Rod Production, Jan , presented by Jim Lamb

Slide 2UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 What is a rod? Substructure for modular assembly of tracker barrel. 688 rods will be installed into a barrel much like the one in the picture. Half of all rods will be produced here at UCSB. The other half produced at FNAL.

Slide 3UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 What is a rod? Barrel is grouped into 96 control rings, each containing 5-10 rods. Rods use token-ring protocol to communicate with data acquisition electronics. Redundancy architecture allows control ring to operate even in case multiple non-consecutive CCU failure.

Slide 4UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 Rod as it Arrives at UCSB Major components are Command and Control Unit (CCU) and Analog Opto-hybrids (AOH) CCU handles communication between rods, and between rod and readout electronics. AOH converts module’s electrical output to optical signal. Both of these components, as well as electrical connectivity of the whole, are tested at CERN prior to shipping.

Slide 5UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 Rod Assembly First rod assembly took approximately 2 hours. Module placed on bare rod using handling tools developed at UCSB (S. Kyre). Handling tools developed here are used at FNAL and CERN.

Slide 6UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 Rod Assembly Tools

Slide 7UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 Rod Testing Flow Chart Rod burn-in very important. Only cold-test of entire rod substructure. First time every rod component (AOH) is subjected to cold, long- term test.

Slide 8UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 Single Rod Test Stand Used for functionality test after module installation. à Test box provides dry, dark, and electrical isolated environment Also used for cold-test of individual rods (not part of regular production). à Connects to rod burn-in chiller for cooling

Slide 9UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 US Multi-Rod LT Stands Up to 8 rods run for 3 days of thermal cycling (room temp to – 20C and back). (Burn-in box developed and assembled by University of Rochester.) Rods controlled and read-out with software already written for module test. (UCSB helped in that adaptation). Data will be adapted so that initial module test (ARCS) criteria can be applied and module quality re-verified.

Slide 10UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 Status Single rod test stand fully equipped. One complete rod assembled and tested at room temperature. Two more rods to be assembled and tested this week. UCSB rod burn-in box assembled here December 2003 Mechanical-grade rod thermal-cycled to –20C. Lack of power supplies from CERN is only thing keeping us from full capacity in burn-in and single-rod test stands.

Slide 11UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 Rod Testing Results Faults clearly seen in rod using new LT à Only opens on rod so far Laser gain differences add complication to data analysis à Fixed noise cuts will not work due to 50% variation in laser gain à Laser gain is measured by header height, allowing adaptation of cuts. Similar work on optimization of calculation of pulse height & peak time variable needed as in module LT More statistics needed in order to know how best to test rod ARCS Rod LT

Slide 12UCSB Rod Production presented by Jim LambDOE review, January 20, 2004 Further Work Implementation of Rod debugging tests to be determined. (Hopefully worked out when I visit CERN Rod assembly lab next month.) Commissioning of burn-in stand with full capacity. 11 bare rods to arrive in late February, including first SS6 rod and first US DS rod. Design/commission module handling tools for DS rod. Implementation of adapting ARCS testing criteria to long-term Rod testing data.